吉林大学学报(地球科学版) ›› 2018, Vol. 48 ›› Issue (1): 39-52.doi: 10.13278/j.cnki.jjuese.20160278

• 地质与资源 • 上一篇    下一篇

沾化凹陷渤南洼陷沙一段湖相富有机质烃源岩岩石学与孔隙结构特征:以罗63井和义21井取心段为例

李志明1,2,3,4, 张隽1,2,3,4, 鲍云杰1,2,3,4, 曹婷婷1,2,3,4, 徐二社1,2,3,4, 芮晓庆1,2,3,4, 陈红宇1,2,3,4, 杨琦1,2,3,4, 张庆珍1,2,3,4   

  1. 1. 中国石化石油勘探开发研究院无锡石油地质研究所, 江苏 无锡 214126;
    2. 页岩油气富集机理与有效开发国家重点实验室, 江苏 无锡 214126;
    3. 国家能源页岩油研发中心, 江苏 无锡 214126;
    4. 中国石化油气成藏重点实验室, 江苏 无锡 214126
  • 收稿日期:2016-12-26 出版日期:2018-01-26 发布日期:2018-01-26
  • 作者简介:李志明(1968-),男,研究员,主要从事油气地球化学、油气地质综合评价研究,E-mail:lizm.syky@sinopec.com
  • 基金资助:
    国家重点基础研究发展计划(“973”计划)项目(2014CB239101);中国石油化工股份有限公司科技开发部项目(P12012,P14157)

Characteristics of Petrology and Pore Configuration of Lacustrine Source Rock Rich in Organic Matter from the First Member of Shahejie Formation in Bonan Sag, Zhanhua Depression: A Case Study on Well Luo 63 and Yi 21 Cored Interval

Li Zhiming1,2,3,4, Zhang Jun1,2,3,4, Bao Yunjie1,2,3,4, Cao Tingting1,2,3,4, Xu Ershe1,2,3,4, Rui Xiaoqing1,2,3,4, Chen Hongyu1,2,3,4, Yang Qi1,2,3,4, Zhang Qingzhen1,2,3,4   

  1. 1. Wuxi Research Institute of Petroleum Geology, RIPEP, SINOPEC, Wuxi 214126, Jiangsu, China;
    2. State Key Laboratory of Shale Oil and Gas Enrichment Mechanisms and Effective Development, Wuxi 214126, Jiangsu, China;
    3. State Energy Center for Shale Oil Research and Development, Wuxi 214126, Jiangsu, China;
    4. Key Laboratory of Petroleum Accumulation Mechanisms, SINOPEC, Wuxi 214126, Jiangsu, China
  • Received:2016-12-26 Online:2018-01-26 Published:2018-01-26
  • Supported by:
    Supported by National Key Basic Research Program("973" Program) of China (2014CB239101)and Projects of Science and Technology Development Section, SINOPEC(P12012, P14157)

摘要: 以沾化凹陷渤南洼陷罗63井和义21井沙一段取心段为例,依据研究样品的热解、全岩与黏土矿物X射线衍射、有机岩石学、孔隙度、氩离子抛光+扫描电镜以及微孔隙结构等分析结果,开展了沙一段湖相富有机质烃源岩岩石学与孔隙结构特征研究,结果表明:罗63井和义21井沙一段取心段富有机质烃源岩主要由碳酸盐矿物、黏土矿物和石英组成,另含少量长石、黄铁矿和石膏,其中黏土矿物主要由伊/蒙混层、伊利石组成,由取心段顶部至底部,碳酸盐矿物质量分数明显增高,而黏土矿物和石英则显著降低,呈现由钙质或灰质泥岩至演变为泥质灰岩的特征,岩石构造类型包括层状、纹层状和块状3类;罗63井和义21井沙一段取心段富有机质烃源岩平均孔隙度分别为2.09%和4.43%,具纹层状构造的烃源岩具有相对高的孔隙度;主要发育矿物基质孔隙(即粒间孔隙和粒内孔隙)和裂缝型孔隙两大类,而有机质孔隙不发育,孔隙半径从十几微米至几纳米的孔隙均有分布,以发育孔径50 nm以上的宏孔为主。

关键词: 矿物组成, 孔隙结构, 富有机质烃源岩, 罗63井, 义21井, 沙一段, 渤南洼陷

Abstract: The paper focuses on the petrology and pore configuration of lacustrine source rock rich in organic matter, on the basis of the analysis of whole rock and clay mineral X-ray diffraction, organic petrology, maturity, porosity, argon ion polishing+SEM, and MP, through a case study of the First Member of Shahejie Formation from Well Luo 63 and Yi 21 cored interval in Bonan sag, Zhanhua depression. The results show that the source rock rich in organic matter is mainly composed of carbonate minerals, clay minerals and quartz, with a little feldspar, pyrite and gypsum, and the clay minerals are consisted of mixed layer of illite/smectite, and illite. From the top to the bottom of the cored interval, the contents of carbonate minerals increase, the clay minerals and quartz decrease, and the lithologic character changes from the calcareous mudstone to the argillaceous limestone. The source rocks are layered, or laminar and block like. The average porosity of the source rocks from the Well Yi 21 and Luo 63 is 2.09% and 4.43% respectively, and the porosity of the source rock with laminar structure is relatively high. The pore types of the source rock rich in organic matter are dominated by mineral matrix pores (inter-particleand intra-particle) and fracture pores with no organic-matter pores. The pore radius is from several nanometers to several micrometers, dominated by macro-pore with its pore diameter larger than 50 nanometers.

Key words: mineral component, pore configuration, source rock rich in organic matters, Well Luo 63, Well Yi 21, First Member of Shahejie Formation, Bonan sag

中图分类号: 

  • P618.13
[1] 张善文,王永诗,张林晔,等. 济阳坳陷渤南洼陷页岩油气形成条件研究[J]. 中国工程科学,2012, 14(6): 49-55. Zhang Shanwen, Wang Yongshi, Zhang Linye, et al. Formation Conditions of Shale Oil and Gas in Bonan Sub-Sag, Jiyang Depression[J]. China Engineering Sciences, 2012, 14(6): 49-55.
[2] 侯读杰,张善文,肖建新,等. 陆相断陷湖盆优质烃源岩形成机制与成藏贡献-以济阳坳陷为例[M]. 北京:地质出版社,2008:134-138. Hou Dujie, Zhang Shanwen, Xiao Jianxin, et al. The Forming Mechanism and Contribution to Reservoirs of High Grade Source Rocks in Continental Fault Depression with Lacustrine Sedimentation: A Case Study of Jiyang Depression[M]. Beijing: Geological Publishing House, 2008: 134-138.
[3] 侯读杰,张善文,肖建新,等. 济阳坳陷优质烃源岩特征与隐蔽油气藏的关系分析[J]. 地学前缘,2008,15(2):137-146. Hou Dujie, Zhang Shanwen, Xiao Jianxin, et al. The Excellent Source Rocks and Accumulation of Stratigraphic and Lithologic Traps in the Jiyang Depression, Bohai Bay Basin, China[J]. Earth Science Frontiers, 2008, 15(2): 137-146.
[4] 王永诗,李政,巩建强,等. 济阳坳陷页岩油气评价方法: 以沾化凹陷罗家地区为例[J]. 石油学报,2013,34(1):83-91. Wang Yongshi, Li Zheng, Gong Jianqiang, et al. Discussion on an Evaluation Method of Shale Oil and Gas in Jiyang Depression: A Case Study on Luojia Area in Zhanhua Sag[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2013, 34(1):83-91.
[5] 朱德顺,王勇,朱德燕,等. 渤南洼陷沙一段夹层型页岩油界定标准及富集主控因素[J]. 油气地质与采收率,2015,22(5):15-20. Zhu Deshun, Wang Yong, Zhu Deyan, et al. Analysis on Recognition Criteria and Enrichment Factors of Interlayer Shale Oil of Es1 in Bonan Sub-Sag[J]. Petroleum Geology and Recovery Efficiency, 2015, 22(5):15-20.
[6] 朱光有,金强,郭长春,等. 渤海湾盆地东营沾化凹陷油气聚集的差异性及控制因素[J]. 石油实验地质,2003,25(4):353-356. Zhu Guangyou, Jin Qiang, Guo Changchun, et al. Differences of Hydrocarbon Accumulations in the Dongying and the Zhanhua Depressions of the Bohaiwan Basin and Their Control Factors[J]. Petroleum Geoloogy & Experiment, 2003,25(4):353-356.
[7] 罗胜元. 沾化凹陷渤南洼陷超压系统与油气成藏研究[D]. 武汉:中国地质大学,2014: 20-42. Luo Shengyuan. Study on the Overpressure Characteristic and Hydrocarbon Accumulation in Bonan Depression, Zhanhua Sub-Basin[D]. Wuhan: China University of Geosciences, 2014: 20-42.
[8] 宋国奇,刘华,蒋有录,等. 沾化凹陷渤南洼陷沙河街组原油成因类型及分布特征[J]. 石油实验地质,2014,36(1):33-38,45. Song Guoqi, Liu Hua, Jiang Youlu, et al. Genetic Types and Distribution Characteristics of Crude Oils from Shahejie Formation in Bonan Sub-Sag, Jiyang Depression[J]. Petroleum Geology & Experiment, 2014, 36(1): 33-38, 45.
[9] 刘华, 蒋有录,谷国翠,等. 沾化凹陷渤南洼陷古近系压力特征及成因机制[J]. 中国石油大学学报(自然科学版),2013,37(4):46-51. Liu Hua, Jiang Youlu, Gu Guocui, et al. Pressure Characteristics and Formation Mechanisms of Paleogene in Bonan Sag, Zhanhua Depression[J]. Journal of China University of Petroleum, 2013, 37(4):46-51.
[10] 戴俊生,陆克政,漆家福,等. 渤海湾盆地早第三纪构造样式的演化[J]. 石油学报,1998,19(4):16-20. Dai Junsheng, Lu Kezheng, Qi Jiafu, et al. The Evolution of the Paleogene Structural Styles in Bohai Gulf Basin[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 1998, 19(4):16-20.
[11] 张凡芹,王伟锋,戴俊生. 沾化凹陷断层活动性及其对层序发育的控制作用[J]. 石油与天然气地质,2003,24(3):253-258. Zhang Fanqin, Wang Weifeng, Dai Junsheng. Fault Activities and Their Controls on the Development Lithologic Sequences in Zhanhua Sag[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2003,24(3):253-258.
[12] 刘培,蒋有录,刘华,等. 渤海湾盆地沾化凹陷断层活动与新近系油气成藏关系[J]. 天然气地球科学,2013,24(3):541-547. Liu Pei, Jiang Youlu, Liu Hua, et al. The Relationship Between Fault-Activity and Hydrocarbon Accumulation of Neogene in Zhanhua Depression, Bohai Bay Basin[J]. Natural Gas Geoscience, 2013, 24(3):541-547.
[13] 周心怀,牛成民,藤长宇. 环渤中地区新构造运动期断裂活动与油气成藏关系[J]. 石油与天然气地质,2009,30(4):469-482. Zhou Xinhuai, Niu Chengmin, Teng Changyu. Relationship Between Faulting and Hydrocarbon Pooling During the Neotectonic Movement Around the Central Bohai Bay[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2009, 30(4): 469-482.
[14] 池英柳,杨池银,周建生. 渤海湾盆地新生代断裂活动与含油气系统形成[J]. 勘探家,2000, 5(3):41-48. Chi Yingliu, Yang Chiyin, Zhou Jiansheng. Cenozoic Faulting and Its Influence on the Formation of Petroleum Systems in Bohai Bay Basin[J]. Petroleum Explorationist, 2000, 5(3): 41-48.
[15] 罗文生,张善文,王永诗,等. 渤南洼陷古近系-新近系断层活动与油气成藏[J]. 油气地质与采收率,2007,14(3):34-37. Luo Wensheng, Zhang Shanwen, Wang Yongshi, et al. Fault Activity and Hydrocarbon Accumulation in Tertiary of Bonan Sub-Sag[J]. Petroleum Geology and Recovery Efficiency, 2007, 14(3): 34-37.
[16] 王志刚. 沾化凹陷裂缝型泥质岩油藏研究[J]. 石油勘探与开发,2003,30(1):41-43. Wang Zhigang. A Study of Shale-Fractured Reservoirs in Zhanhua Sag[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2003,30(1):41-43.
[17] 徐福刚,李琦,康仁华,等. 沾化凹陷泥岩裂缝油气藏研究[J]. 矿物岩石,2003,23(1):74-76. Xu Fugang, Li Qi, Kang Renhua, et al.The Characteristics of Fractured Shale Reservoir in Zhanhua Depression[J]. Journal of Mineral and Petrology, 2003,23(1):74-76.
[18] 智凤琴,李琦,樊德华,等. 沾化凹陷泥岩裂缝油气藏油气运移聚集研究[J].油气地质与采收率,2004,11(5):27-29. Zhi Fengqin, Li Qi, Fan Dehua, et al. Study on Migration and Accumulation of Oil and Gas in Fractured Shale Reservoir in Zhanhua Sag[J]. Petroleum Geology and Recovery Efficiency, 2004,11(5):27-29.
[19] 刘魁元,孙喜新,李琦,等. 沾化凹陷泥质岩储层中裂缝类型及其成因研究[J]. 石油大学学报(自然科学版),2004, 28(4):12-15. Liu Kuiyuan, Sun Xixin, Li Qi, et al. Fracture Pattern and Genesis of Mudstone Reservoir in Zhanhua Depression[J]. Journal of China University of Petroleum(Edition of Natural Sciences), 2004, 28(4): 12-15.
[20] 张美珍,李志明,秦建中,等. 东营凹陷有效烃源岩成熟度评价[J]. 西安石油大学学报(自然科学版),2008,23(3):12-16. Zhang Meizhen, Li Zhiming, Qin Jianzhong, et al. Assessment of the Thermal Maturity of the Effective Hydrocarbon Source Rocks in Dongying Depression[J]. Journal of Xi'an Shiyou University (Natural Science Edition), 2008, 23(3):12-16.
[21] 李志明,秦建中,徐旭辉,等. 镜质体反射率抑制与烃源岩质量关系: 以渤海湾盆地东营凹陷烃源岩为例[J]. 石油实验地质,2008,30(3):276-280. Li Zhiming, Qin Jianzhong, Xu Xuhui, et al. The Relationship Between Vitrinite Reflectance Suppression and Source Rock Quality: A Case Study on Source Rocks from the Dongying Sag, Bohai Bay Basin[J]. Petroleum Geology & Experiment, 2008, 30(3):276-280.
[22] 李志明,张隽,余晓露,等. 南襄盆地泌阳凹陷烃源岩成熟度厘定及其意义[J]. 石油实验地质,2013,35(1):76-80. Li Zhiming, Zhang Jun, Yu Xiaolu, et al. Determination of Maturity for Source Rocks in Biyang Sag of Nanxiang Basin and Its Significance[J]. Petroleum Geology & Experiment, 2013, 35(1):76-80.
[23] Wilkiins R W T, Wilmshurst J R, Russell N J, et al. Fluorescence Alteration and the Suppression of Vitrinite Reflectance[J]. Organic Geochemistry, 1992, 18:629-640.
[24] Wilkiins R W T, Wilmshurst J R, Hladky G, et al. Should Fluorescence Alteration Replace Vitrinite Reflectance as a Major Tool for Thermal Maturity Determination in Oil Exploration?[J]. Organic Geochemistry, 1995, 22:191-209.
[25] 赵澄林. 沉积学原理[M]. 北京:石油工业出版社,2001: 75. Zhao Chenglin. Principles of Sedimentology[M]. Beijing: Petroleum Industry Press, 2001: 75.
[26] 王冠民,熊周海,张婕. 岩性差异对泥页岩可压裂性的影响分析[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版),2016,46(4):1080-1089. Wang Guanmin, Xiong Zhouhai, Zhang Jie. The Impact of Lithology Differences to Shale Fracturing[J]. Journal of Jilin University (Earth Science Edition), 2016, 46(4): 1080-1089.
[27] 崔景伟,邹才能,朱如凯,等. 页岩孔隙研究新进展[J]. 地球科学进展,2012,27(2):1319-1325. Cui Jingwei, Zou Caineng, Zhu Rukai, et al. New Advances in Shale Porosity Research[J]. Advances in Earth Science, 2012, 27(2): 1319-1325.
[28] Loucks R G, Reed R M, Ruppel S C, et al. Spectrum of Pore Types and Networks in Mudrocks and a Descriptive Classification for Matrix-Related Mudrock Pores[J]. AAPG, 2012, 96(6):1071-1098.
[29] 李志明,芮晓庆,黎茂稳,等. 北美典型混合页岩油气系统特征和启示[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版),2015,45(4):1060-1072. Li Zhiming, Rui Xiaoqing, Li Maowen, et al. Characteristics of Typical Hybrid Shale-Oil System in North American and Its Implications[J]. Journal of Jilin University (Earth Science Edition), 2015, 45(4): 1060-1072.
[1] 林敉若, 操应长, 葸克来, 王健, 陈洪, 吴俊军. 阜康凹陷东部斜坡带二叠系储层特征及控制因素[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2018, 48(4): 991-1007.
[2] 赵谦平, 张丽霞, 尹锦涛, 俞雨溪, 姜呈馥, 王晖, 高潮. 含粉砂质层页岩储层孔隙结构和物性特征:以张家滩陆相页岩为例[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2018, 48(4): 1018-1029.
[3] 冯小龙, 敖卫华, 唐玄. 陆相页岩气储层孔隙发育特征及其主控因素分析:以鄂尔多斯盆地长7段为例[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2018, 48(3): 678-692.
[4] 林承焰, 王杨, 杨山, 任丽华, 由春梅, 吴松涛, 吴玉其, 张依旻. 基于CT的数字岩心三维建模[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2018, 48(1): 307-317.
[5] 白永强, 刘美, 杨春梅, 姜振学. 基于AFM表征的页岩孔隙特征及其与解析气量关系[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2016, 46(5): 1332-1341.
[6] 杜庆祥, 郭少斌, 曹中宏, 张晓龙, 李媛姝. 南堡凹陷南部沙一段控砂模式[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2016, 46(2): 348-357.
[7] 李易霖, 张云峰, 丛琳, 谢舟, 闫明, 田肖雄. X-CT扫描成像技术在致密砂岩微观孔隙结构表征中的应用——以大安油田扶余油层为例[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2016, 46(2): 379-387.
[8] 郑香伟, 吴健, 何胜林, 胡向阳, 梁玉楠. 基于流动单元的砂砾岩储层渗透率测井精细评价[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2016, 46(1): 286-294.
[9] 罗胜元, 何生, 金秋月, 杨睿之, 张君立. 渤南洼陷超压系统划分及结构特征[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2015, 45(1): 37-51.
[10] 宋延杰,姜艳娇,宋杨,张依妮. 古龙南地区低阻油层胶结指数和饱和度指数影响因素实验[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2014, 44(2): 704-714.
[11] 刘立, 王力娟, 杨永智, 于志超. 松辽盆地南部HX井上白垩统青山口组黑色泥岩的矿物组成与自生微晶石英成因[J]. J4, 2012, 42(5): 1358-1365.
[12] 魏虎, 孙卫, 晏宁平, 刘舵. 靖边气田富水区扩大原因及控水措施[J]. J4, 2010, 40(5): 1014-1019.
[13] 薛军民, 解伟, 王震, 张林. 川口油田长6储层成岩作用[J]. J4, 2009, 39(6): 1007-1012.
[14] 宋广寿,高 辉,高静乐,孙 卫,任国富,齐 银,路 勇,田育红. 西峰油田长8储层微观孔隙结构非均质性与渗流机理实验[J]. J4, 2009, 39(1): 53-0059.
[15] 初凤友,胡大千,姚杰. 中太平洋YJB海山富钴结核矿物组成与元素地球化学[J]. J4, 2007, 37(1): 8-0014.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!