吉林大学学报(地球科学版) ›› 2025, Vol. 55 ›› Issue (1): 209-222.doi: 10.13278/j.cnki.jjuese.20240261

• 地质工程与环境工程 • 上一篇    下一篇

基于无人机多姿态贴近摄影测量的高陡边坡快速航线规划及应用

安志磊,王凤艳,王明常,吴翔,张成要,杜佳涛,马润泽   

  1. 吉林大学地球探测科学与技术学院,长春 130026
  • 收稿日期:2024-10-12 出版日期:2025-01-26 发布日期:2025-02-07
  • 通讯作者: 王凤艳(1970-),女,教授,博士生导师,主要从事岩体结构参数精细解译与岩体质量评价以及相机标定方面的研究,E-mail: wangfy@jlu.edu.cn
  • 作者简介:安志磊(2000-),男,硕士研究生,主要从事贴近摄影测量航线规划方面的研究,E-mail:842144986@qq.com
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金项目(42077242,42171407)

Rapid Flight Path Planning and Application of High and Steep Slopes Based on UAV Multi-Pose Nap-of-the-Object Photogrammetry

An Zhilei, Wang Fengyan, Wang Mingchang,Wu Xiang,Zhang Chengyao,Du Jiatao,Ma Runze   

  1. College of GeoExploration Science and Technology, Jilin University, Changchun 130026, China
  • Received:2024-10-12 Online:2025-01-26 Published:2025-02-07
  • Supported by:
    the National Natural Science Foundation of China (42077242,42171407)

摘要: 针对复杂空间展布的高陡岩质边坡,传统测量方法在效率、精度等方面还有待提高。为了快速准确地获取岩体结构参数以评价岩质边坡稳定性,提出了无人机多姿态贴近摄影测量方法。首先通过现场关键点测量快速建立边坡概化模型,结合所建立的航线规划和姿态控制模型,快速规划航线和摄影姿态;然后采用在遥控器端安装软件的方法代替PC端,实现实时实地、免粗飞、快速多姿态贴近摄影测量航线规划的毫米分辨率高陡边坡高质量影像快速采集;最后通过吉林省长春市净月区某高陡边坡的多姿态贴近摄影测量实验,从模型精度、纹理清晰度、产状解译精度等方面验证该方法的可行性和可靠性。结果表明:多姿态贴近摄影测量所建模型在x、y、z方向上的精度分别为0.018、0.016和0.033 m;模型产状解译的倾向和倾角精度分别为3.1°和2.6°;与普通贴近摄影测量结果对比,多姿态贴近摄影测量所建模型纹理细节得到了很大提升,表面拉花现象大幅减少。模型影像的感知对比度质量指数(PCQI)较大,自然图像质量评价(NIQE)值较低。PCQI和NIQE两种指标结果都表明左右偏斜45°、上下偏斜30°的模型影像质量优于其他偏斜角度对照组。多姿态贴近摄影测量优于普通贴近摄影测量,能较好地减少摄影死角和减弱纹理拉花现象,模型影像质量大幅提升。

关键词: 无人机, 贴近摄影测量, 多姿态, 高陡边坡, 航线规划

Abstract: For complex spatial distributed high and steep rock slopes, traditional surveying methods still face challenges in efficiency and accuracy. To obtain rock mass structural parameters quickly and accurately for evaluating the stability of rock slopes, a multi-attitude close-range photogrammetry method using unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) is proposed. Firstly, the conceptual slope model was established rapidly by measuring key points on site, and the flight route planning and attitude control model were combined to quickly plan the flight routes and camera orientations. Then, by implementing software on the remote controller instead of a PC, the method achieves real-time, on-site, coarse-flight-free, rapid multi-attitude close-range photogrammetry with high-quality image acquisition of high and steep slopes at millimeter resolution. Finally, the method is validated through a multi-attitude close-range photogrammetry experiment on a high and steep slope in Jingyue district, Changchun City, Jilin Province. The feasibility and reliability of the method are assessed based on model accuracy, texture clarity, and orientation interpretation accuracy. The results show that the accuracy of the model in x, y and z directions is 0.018, 0.016, and 0.033 m, respectively. The accuracy of dip direction and dip angle interpretation is 3.1° and 2.6°, respectively. Compared with conventional close-range photogrammetry, the multi-attitude close-range photogrammetry significantly enhances texture details and greatly reduces surface distortion effects. The Chinese PCQI (perceived clarity quality index) values are higher, while the NIQE (natural image quality evaluator) values are lower, indicating better image quality. The result of PCQI and NIQE metrics both showed that the image captured with 45° lateral tilt and 30° vertical tilt provide higher quality than those from other tilt angles. Multi-attitude close-range photogrammetry outperforms conventional close-range photogrammetry, effectively reducing dead angles and mitigating texture distortion, thereby substantially improving model image quality. The model was verified to be reliable by  point accuracy, distance, and orientation interpretation accuracy assessments. The rock mass structural parameters, such as trace lines, orientations, dominant joint sets, and RQD (rock quality designation), interpreted by this method provide reliable foundational data for slope stability evaluation.

Key words: drone, nap-of-the-object photogrammetry, multi-pose, steep slope, flight path planning

中图分类号: 

  • P23
[1] 戴均豪, 薛林福, 李忠潭, 桑学佳, 马建雄. 无人机遥感技术在甘肃北山地区地质填图中的应用[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2021, 51(6): 1908-1920.
[2] 乔中坤, 马国庆, 于平, 周文纳, 张志厚, 焦健, 周帅, 孟兆海, 唐水亮. 基于欧拉反褶积法的无人机航磁找矿应用[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2021, 51(2): 552-560.
[3] 王凤艳, 赵明宇, 王明常, 张旭晴, 周凯. 无人机摄影测量在矿山地质环境调查中的应用[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2020, 50(3): 866-874.
[4] 王吉亮, 施炎, 周炳强, 杨静, 郝文忠, 廖立兵, 康双双. 逐层开挖工程整体三维影像模型构建方法[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2018, 48(5): 1589-1595.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 程立人,张予杰,张以春. 西藏申扎地区奥陶纪鹦鹉螺化石[J]. J4, 2005, 35(03): 273 -0282 .
[2] 李 秉 成. 陕西富平全新世古气候的初步研究[J]. J4, 2005, 35(03): 291 -0295 .
[3] 和钟铧,杨德明,王天武,郑常青. 冈底斯带巴嘎区二云母花岗岩SHRIMP锆石U-Pb定年[J]. J4, 2005, 35(03): 302 -0307 .
[4] 陈 力,佴 磊,王秀范,李 金. 绥中某电力设备站场区地震危险性分析[J]. J4, 2005, 35(05): 641 -645 .
[5] 纪宏金,孙丰月,陈满,胡大千,时艳香,潘向清. 胶东地区裸露含金构造的地球化学评价[J]. J4, 2005, 35(03): 308 -0312 .
[6] 初凤友,孙国胜,李晓敏,马维林,赵宏樵. 中太平洋海山富钴结壳生长习性及控制因素[J]. J4, 2005, 35(03): 320 -0325 .
[7] 李斌,孟自芳,李相博,卢红选,郑民. 泌阳凹陷下第三系构造特征与沉积体系[J]. J4, 2005, 35(03): 332 -0339 .
[8] 李涛, 吴胜军,蔡述明,薛怀平,YASUNORI Nakayama. 涨渡湖通江前后调蓄能力模拟分析[J]. J4, 2005, 35(03): 351 -0355 .
[9] 旷理雄,郭建华,梅廉夫,童小兰,杨丽. 从油气勘探的角度论博格达山的隆升[J]. J4, 2005, 35(03): 346 -0350 .
[10] 章光新,邓伟,何岩,RAMSIS Salama. 水文响应单元法在盐渍化风险评价中的应用[J]. J4, 2005, 35(03): 356 -0360 .