长7段,夹层型页岩油,储层特征,分类评价,志靖—安塞地区,鄂尔多斯盆地


," /> 长7段,夹层型页岩油,储层特征,分类评价,志靖—安塞地区,鄂尔多斯盆地


,"/> <span>鄂尔多斯盆地志靖—安塞地区长7段夹层型页岩油储层特征及分类评价</span>

吉林大学学报(地球科学版) ›› 2026, Vol. 56 ›› Issue (2): 453-468.doi: 10.13278/j.cnki.jjuese.20240089

• 地质与资源 • 上一篇    下一篇

鄂尔多斯盆地志靖—安塞地区长7段夹层型页岩油储层特征及分类评价

王健1,张媛瑗1,吴楠1,徐清海1,崔子岳2,刘显凤1,付清萌1   

  1. 1.长江大学地球科学学院,武汉430100

    2.中国石油长庆油田分公司,西安710018

  • 出版日期:2026-03-26 发布日期:2026-04-15
  • 基金资助:

    国家自然科学基金项目(42172179)


Reservoir Characteristics and Classification Evaluation of Interlayered Type Shale Oil in Chang 7 Member of Zhijing-Ansai Area, Ordos Basin

Wang Jian 1, Zhang Yuanyuan1, Wu Nan1, Xu Qinghai1, Cui Ziyue2, Liu Xianfeng1, Fu Qingmeng1   

  1. 1. College of Geosciences,Yangtze University,Wuhan 430100,China

    2. Changqing Oilfield Company,PetroChina,Xi’an 710018,China

     

  • Online:2026-03-26 Published:2026-04-15
  • Supported by:
    Supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (42172179)

摘要:

志靖—安塞地区是鄂尔多斯盆地长7段夹层型页岩油的重要产区,其储层致密且物性较差,目前尚缺乏针对性的储层分类评价标准。本文以志靖—安塞地区长7段储层为研究对象,结合岩矿分析、物性测试、电镜观察、压汞实验、氮气吸附等手段,对储层的岩石学特征、物性特征和孔喉结构进行分析,并制定分类评价标准。结果表明:1)储层矿物成分以斜长石为主,岩石类型主要为长石砂岩和岩屑长石砂岩,孔隙度为2.0%~17.0%,渗透率为0.001×10-3~1.486×10-3  μm2,总体较为致密;2)储层有利成岩相为长石溶蚀、绿泥石薄膜胶结和自生黏土矿物溶蚀成岩相;3)孔隙类型主要为原生孔隙、次生孔隙和微裂缝3类,储层孔喉结构分为4类;4)结合孔渗数据和排驱压力,将孔隙度2%、渗透率0.01×10-3  μm2作为研究区有效储层物性下限。最终结合储层特征及孔喉分类标准建立研究区长7段夹层型页岩油储层分类评价标准,并将储层分为4类,其中Ⅰ类和Ⅱ类为有利储层。

关键词: 长7段')">

长7段, 夹层型页岩油, 储层特征, 分类评价, 志靖—安塞地区,
')">鄂尔多斯盆地


Abstract:

The Zhijing-Ansai area is an important producing area of interlayered type shale oil in Chang 7 Member in Ordos basin. The sandstone reservoir is tight and poor in physical property, and there is still no specific reservoir classification and evaluation standards. In this study, lithological analysis, physical property testing, scanning electron microscopy, mercury injection experiment, nitrogen adsorption and other methods were used to analyze the petrological characteristics, physical characteristics and pore structure of Chang 7 sandstone reservoirs in Zhijing-Ansai area, and to establish classification and evaluation criteria. The results show that: 1) The mineral composition is mainly plagioclase. The rock types are mainly arkose and lithic feldspar sandstone. The porosity is 2%-17%, the permeability is 0.001×10-3-1.486×10-3  μm2, and the sandstone reservoir is tight. 2) Favorable reservoir diagenetic facies are feldspar dissolution diagenetic facies, chlorite film cementation diagenetic facies and authigenic clay mineral dissolution diagenetic facies. 3) The main pore types are primary pores, secondary pores, and microcracks. Reservoir pore throat structures can be classified into four categories. 4) Combined with the physical property and displacement pressure, the porosity of 2% and permeability of 0.01×10-3  μm2 are taken as the lower limits of effective reservoir properties in the study area. Ultimately, integrating reservoir characteristics and pore-throat classification criteria, a classification and evaluation standard for interbedded shale oil reservoirs in the Chang 7 Member of the study area was established, and the reservoirs were categorized into four types, with type I and type II identified as favorable reservoirs.

Key words:  , Chang 7 Member,  , interlayered shale oil,  , reservoir characteristics, classification evaluation, Zhijing-Ansai area, Ordos basin

中图分类号: 

  • P618.13
[1] 谢兵, 徐昉昊, 范彩伟, 满勇, 江凡, 徐国盛, 张喜淳, 李安然. 北部湾盆地涠西南凹陷灰岩潜山储层岩溶识别及发育模式[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2024, 54(6): 2029-2046.
[2] 刘宗宾, 程奇, 吕坐彬, 房娜, 王双龙.

渤海海域锦州南油田太古宇变质岩潜山储层特征及其发育模式 [J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2022, 52(3): 829-839.

[3] 史江涛, 郝君明, 王小雷. 塔河地区奥陶系鹰山组储层特征及其主控因素[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2022, 52(2): 348-362.
[4] 迟唤昭1, 赵玉婷2, 刘 财3, 王 桐4, 胡 佳4, 杨松杉4. 松辽盆地德惠断陷营城组凝灰岩储层地质特征[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2022, 52(1): 55-.
[5] 陶永富, 李达, 黄长兵, 廖鸿辉, 张华琴, 寻升, 李翀, 吴伟. 乍得南部Bongor盆地下白垩统碎屑岩储层成岩作用及其对物性的影响[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2021, 51(6): 1689-1699.
[6] 李永刚. 松南气田火山岩致密储层分类及有利目标潜力评价[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2017, 47(2): 344-354.
[7] 蒙启安, 刘立, 曲希玉, 汪成辞, 王小琴. 贝尔凹陷与塔南凹陷下白垩统铜钵庙组-南屯组油气储层特征及孔隙度控制作用[J]. J4, 2010, 40(6): 1232-1240.
[8] 郝琦,刘震,查明,李春霞. 辽河茨榆坨潜山太古界裂缝型储层特征及其控制因素[J]. J4, 2006, 36(03): 384-390.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 程立人,张予杰,张以春. 西藏申扎地区奥陶纪鹦鹉螺化石[J]. J4, 2005, 35(03): 273 -0282 .
[2] 李 秉 成. 陕西富平全新世古气候的初步研究[J]. J4, 2005, 35(03): 291 -0295 .
[3] 和钟铧,杨德明,王天武,郑常青. 冈底斯带巴嘎区二云母花岗岩SHRIMP锆石U-Pb定年[J]. J4, 2005, 35(03): 302 -0307 .
[4] 陈 力,佴 磊,王秀范,李 金. 绥中某电力设备站场区地震危险性分析[J]. J4, 2005, 35(05): 641 -645 .
[5] 纪宏金,孙丰月,陈满,胡大千,时艳香,潘向清. 胶东地区裸露含金构造的地球化学评价[J]. J4, 2005, 35(03): 308 -0312 .
[6] 初凤友,孙国胜,李晓敏,马维林,赵宏樵. 中太平洋海山富钴结壳生长习性及控制因素[J]. J4, 2005, 35(03): 320 -0325 .
[7] 李斌,孟自芳,李相博,卢红选,郑民. 泌阳凹陷下第三系构造特征与沉积体系[J]. J4, 2005, 35(03): 332 -0339 .
[8] 李涛, 吴胜军,蔡述明,薛怀平,YASUNORI Nakayama. 涨渡湖通江前后调蓄能力模拟分析[J]. J4, 2005, 35(03): 351 -0355 .
[9] 旷理雄,郭建华,梅廉夫,童小兰,杨丽. 从油气勘探的角度论博格达山的隆升[J]. J4, 2005, 35(03): 346 -0350 .
[10] 章光新,邓伟,何岩,RAMSIS Salama. 水文响应单元法在盐渍化风险评价中的应用[J]. J4, 2005, 35(03): 356 -0360 .