吉林大学学报(地球科学版)

• 地质工程与环境工程 • 上一篇    下一篇

马卡山不同植被群落下非饱和带大孔隙流路径示踪试验

张家明,徐则民   

  1. 昆明理工大学建筑工程学院, 昆明650500
  • 收稿日期:2013-02-20 出版日期:2013-11-26 发布日期:2013-11-26
  • 作者简介:张家明(1984-),男,讲师,博士,主要从事植被发育斜坡土体非饱和渗流研究,E-mail:zjm_engeo@163.com
  • 基金资助:

    国家自然科学基金-云南联合基金重点项目(U1033601);国家自然科学基金项目(40572159,40772189)

A Dye Tracer Experiment to Study Macropore Flow Paths in Unsaturated Zone Under Different Vegetation Communities in Maka Mountain, China

Zhang Jiaming, Xu Zemin   

  1. Faculty of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Kunming University of Science and Technology, Kunming650500,China
  • Received:2013-02-20 Online:2013-11-26 Published:2013-11-26

摘要:

为辨识在天然降雨条件下,植被发育斜坡非饱和带中具有优先流效应的大孔隙流路径,不包括死端大孔隙,分析两种植被群落下非饱和带大孔隙流路径分布模式差异及植被根系、有机质含量、土壤颗粒尺寸分布对大孔隙流路径分布模式的影响;选择亚甲基蓝作为染色示踪剂,结合降雨入渗模拟试验,在马卡山草本植被群落斜坡和木本植被群落斜坡开展染色示踪渗透试验。基于垂直开挖剖面采用图像处理技术获得大孔隙流路径分布模式图像。采用非参数检验分析大孔隙流路径差异。采用差方分析、回归分析法分析根系质量分数、有机质含量和颗粒尺寸分布对大孔隙流路径分布模式的影响。结果显示:木本植被群落斜坡大孔隙流路径分布模式更复杂,尺度更大;根系显著影响大孔隙流路径数量、尺度和分布特征,尤其是垂直向下和顺坡向下的根系,当根系尺寸增大时,其对大孔隙流路径影响更显著;有机质有利于团聚体间大孔隙的形成;黏粒、粉粒和砂粒对大孔隙流路径形成没有积极功效,但砾粒有利于大孔隙路径形成,尤其是在表土层;根-土界面和砾-土界面也是重要的大孔隙流路径。研究表明,可以通过根系分布形态、规模,有机质含量和砾粒含量综合评价植被发育斜坡大孔隙流路径分布模式。

关键词: 滑坡, 大孔隙, 根系, 有机质, 颗粒尺寸分布

Abstract:

The objectives of this study is to distinguish the macropore flow paths that have preferential flow effect in natural rainfall conditions in unsaturated zone of well vegetated slopes, not including dead-end macropores, and to analyse the differences of distribution patterns of macropore flow paths between two different vegetation communities and to investigate the influence of root systems, organic matter, particle size distribution on the distribution patterns of macropore flow paths. Methylene blue was chosen as the dye tracer. Dye tracer infiltration experiment and rainfall infiltration simulation experiments were performed together in herbaceous community slopes and in woody plant community slopes in Maka Mountain, China. The distribution patterns of macropore flow paths were obtained based on vertical sections excavated through each experimental plot by image processing technology. The differences of macropore flow paths were analysed using nonparametric test. The analysis of variance and regression analysis methods were used to analyse the effects of the mass density of root, the organic matter content and particle size distribution on the distribution patterns of macropore flow paths. Results show that: 1)the distribution patterns of macropore flow paths in woody plant community slopes were more complex and larger than in herbaceous community slopes;2)root systems had significant effects on the quantity, the scale and the distribution patterns of macropore flow paths, especially, those which had developed vertically or in a downslope direction,as the root size increased, the effects were more significant;3)the organic matter was favorable for the formation of the inter-aggregate pore;4)Clay, silt and sand didn’t produce positive effects on the evolution of macropore flow paths and gravel was favorable for the formation of macropore flow paths, especially in the topsoils; 5)root-soil interface and gravel-soil interface were important macropore flow paths. Our results indicate that the distribution patterns of macropore flow paths could be synthetically evaluated through the root systems morphology and scale, the organic matter content, the gravel content in well vegetated slopes. Further work is needed to estimate the risk of macropore flow paths to the stability of well vegetated slopes.

Key words: landslides, macropores, root systems, organic matter, particle size distribution

中图分类号: 

  • P641.136
[1] 赵金童, 牛瑞卿, 姚琦, 武雪玲. 雷达数据辅助下的滑坡易发性评价[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2018, 48(4): 1182-1191.
[2] 张凤君, 刘哲华, 苏小四, 吕聪, 刘佳露. 土壤类型及组分对热活化过硫酸盐氧化降解土壤中挥发性氯代烃的影响[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2018, 48(4): 1212-1220.
[3] 李志明, 张隽, 鲍云杰, 曹婷婷, 徐二社, 芮晓庆, 陈红宇, 杨琦, 张庆珍. 沾化凹陷渤南洼陷沙一段湖相富有机质烃源岩岩石学与孔隙结构特征:以罗63井和义21井取心段为例[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2018, 48(1): 39-52.
[4] 谭福林, 胡新丽, 张玉明, 何春灿, 章涵. 考虑渐进破坏过程的滑坡推力计算方法[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2018, 48(1): 193-202.
[5] 付建康, 罗刚, 胡卸文. 滑坡堰塞坝越顶溢流破坏的物理模型实验[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2018, 48(1): 203-212.
[6] 李鹏, 苏生瑞, 马驰, 黄璜, 徐继维. 堆积层-基岩接触面滑坡的形成机理——以祖师庙滑坡为例[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2017, 47(5): 1471-1479.
[7] 王孔伟, 常德龙, 李春波, 胡安龙, 魏东. 再论“滑坡群”——以三峡库区为例[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2017, 47(5): 1491-1501.
[8] 秦胜伍, 马中骏, 刘绪, 李广杰, 彭帅英, 陈骏骏, 翟健健. 基于简化Newmark模型的长白山天池火山诱发崩塌滑坡危险性评价[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2017, 47(3): 826-838.
[9] 徐则民, 梅雪峰, 王礼荣, 张有为, 曾强, 郭丽丽. 滑坡预警中的降水时空变异性——以云南头寨沟为例[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2017, 47(1): 154-162.
[10] 安玉科, 吴玮江, 张文, 姚青青, 宋建, 张宏宏. 抗滑桩裂纹控制荷载结构设计法及工程应用[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2017, 47(1): 171-178.
[11] 钱文见, 尚岳全, 杜丽丽, 朱森俊. 充气位置及压力对边坡截排水效果的影响[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2016, 46(2): 536-542.
[12] 彭令, 徐素宁, 彭军还. 多源遥感数据支持下区域滑坡灾害风险评价[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2016, 46(1): 175-186.
[13] 王萌, 姜元俊, 黄栋, 李倩倩. 基于小流域的地震扰动区降雨型滑坡泥石流危险性评价方法[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2015, 45(6): 1781-1788.
[14] 郭小花, 卢玉东, 李小林, 孙政, 李重阳, 张蓉. 黄河上游德恒隆-锁子滑坡堵塞黄河事件[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2015, 45(6): 1789-1797.
[15] 蒋秀姿, 文宝萍, 蒋树, 冯传煌, 赵成, 李瑞冬. 甘肃舟曲锁儿头滑坡活动的主控因素分析[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2015, 45(6): 1798-1807.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!