吉林大学学报(地球科学版) ›› 2016, Vol. 46 ›› Issue (2): 348-357.doi: 10.13278/j.cnki.jjuese.201602104

• 地质与资源 • 上一篇    下一篇

南堡凹陷南部沙一段控砂模式

杜庆祥1, 郭少斌1, 曹中宏2, 张晓龙2, 李媛姝2   

  1. 1. 中国地质大学(北京)能源学院, 北京 100083;
    2. 中国石油冀东油田公司勘探开发研究院, 河北唐山 063004
  • 收稿日期:2015-08-08 发布日期:2016-03-26
  • 通讯作者: 郭少斌(1962-),男,教授,博士生导师,主要从事层序地层、储层和油气资源预测与评价(含非常规)工作,E-mail:guosb58@126.com E-mail:guosb58@126.com
  • 作者简介:杜庆祥(1984-),男,博士研究生,主要从事矿产普查与勘探专业学习,E-mail:geoduqingxiang@qq.com
  • 基金资助:

    国家油气重大专项项目(2011ZX05006-006)

Sandbody Development Model of the First Member of Shahejie Formation in Paleogene in Southern Nanpu Sag

Du Qingxiang1, Guo Shaobin1, Cao Zhonghong2, Zhang Xiaolong2, Li Yuanshu2   

  1. 1. School of Energy and Resources, China University of Geosciences, Beijing 100083, China;
    2. Research Institute of Exploration and Development, PetroChina Jidong, Oilfield Company, Tangshan 063004, Hebei, China
  • Received:2015-08-08 Published:2016-03-26
  • Supported by:

    Supported by the National Major Program of Oil and Gas(2011ZX05006-006)

摘要:

南堡凹陷盆地内部构造特征复杂,砂体时空分布差异较大。为了明确砂体分布规律,首先对南部缓坡带构造-沉积背景进行研究和岩心相观察,识别了沙一段辫状河三角洲前缘砂体;进而通过对南部缓坡带层序地层格架的建立、沉积学研究和地震地质解释,发现沙一段砂体同时受到顺源和逆源两种同沉积断裂坡折带类型控制。其中,顺源坡折带控制了断槽物源通道的走向,逆源坡折带改变了水流的流向,阻止了砂体的运移。据此,建立了南堡凹陷南部缓坡带沙一段同沉积断裂的控砂模式,得出沙一段砂体具有"沙垒田凸起供砂,断槽物源通道输砂,逆源坡折带阻砂和同沉积洼槽带聚砂"的发育特点。

关键词: 南堡凹陷, 缓坡带, 沙一段, 断槽, 逆源坡折带, 控砂模式

Abstract:

The structural characteristic of Nanpu sag basin is complex, and the sandbody distribution varies in time and space. In order to determine the sandbody distribution pattern, the analysis of core facies with structural and sedimentary background in gentle slope zone was conducted to identify and interpret the braided delta front sandstone. According to the establishment of the sequence stratigraphy framework, sedimentology, and seismic geological interpretation, the distrution of sandbodies in Nanpu sag was controlled by two kinds of synsedimentary fault slope-break belts, including the source direction fault slope-break belts that controlled the sediment transport channel and the sedimentary enrichment space, and the reverse source fault slope-break belts that changed the flow direction and prevented lateral sediment transport. Thus, the sandbody development model of the First Member of Shahejie Formation in Paleogene in the south area of Nanpu sag is concluded and characterized as "Shaleitian salient providing the sands source, the groove and faulted trough transporting sands, the reversed slope-break zone and convex limiting the space, the distributary channel underwater in the braided delta front controlling the spatial distribution, and the slope-break zone determining the gathering of sands".

Key words: Nanpu sag, gentle slope zone, First Member of Shahejie Formation, faulted trough, reversed slope-break zone, sandbody development model

中图分类号: 

  • P544.4

[1] 林畅松, 潘元林, 肖建新, 等. "构造坡折带":断陷盆地层序分析和油气预测的重要概念[J]. 地球科学:中国地质大学学报, 2000, 25(3):260-266. Lin Changsong, Pan Yuanlin, Xiao Jianxin, et al. Structural Slope-Break Zone:Key Concept for Stratigraphic Sequence Analysis and Petroleum Forecasting in Fault Subsidence Basins[J]. Earth Science:Journal of China University of Geosciences, 2000, 25(3):260-266.

[2] 邓宏文, 王红亮, 王敦则. 古地貌对陆相裂谷盆地层序充填特征的控制:以渤中凹陷西斜坡区下第三系为例[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2001, 22(4):293-296. Deng Hongwen, Wang Hongliang, Wang Dunze. Control of Paleo-Morphology to Stratigraphic Sequence in Continental Rift Basins:Take Lower Tertiary of Western Slope in Bozhong Depression as an Example[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2001, 22(4):293-297.

[3] 董福湘, 刘立, 唐黎明. 十屋断陷盆地古构造坡折带特征及其对沉积体系的控制[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2004, 34(2):222-226. Dong Fuxiang, Liu Li, Tang Liming. The Characteristics of Underformed Structural Slope-Break Zone and Its Influnce on Deposition System in Shiwu Fault Basin[J]. Journal of Jilin University(Earth Science Edition), 2004, 34(2):222-226.

[4] 杜江峰, 刘招君, 董清水, 等. 松辽盆地南部西部斜坡区晚白垩世坳陷盆地坡折带研究[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2005, 35(2):170-176. Du Jiangfeng, Liu Zhaojun, Dong Qingshui, et al. Study on Slope Breaks of the Late Cretaceous Depression Basin Around the Western Slope in the Southern Songliao Basin[J]. Journal of Jilin University(Earth Science Edition), 2005, 35(2):170-176.

[5] 冯有良. 断陷盆地层序格架中岩性地层油气藏分布特征[J]. 石油学报, 2005, 26(4):17-22. Feng Youliang. Distribution of Stratigraphic and Lithologic Reservoirs in Sequence Framework of Rift-Subsidence Basin[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2005, 26(4):17-22.

[6] 谢晓军, 邓宏文. 陆相断陷盆地构造-层序地层研究需注意的几个问题[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2007, 18(6):838-842. Xie Xiaojin, Deng Hongwen. Several Issues Concerning Structure-Sequence Strata Research in Continental Faulted Basin[J]. Natural Gas Geoscience, 2007, 18(6):838-842.

[7] 鲍志东, 赵艳军, 祁利祺, 等. 构造转换带储集体发育的主控因素:以准噶尔盆地腹部侏罗系为例[J]. 岩石学报, 2011, 27(3):867-877. Bao Zhidong, Zhao Yanjun, Qi Liqi, et al. Controlling Factors of Reservoir Development in Structural Transfer Zones:A Case Study of the Inner Junggar Basin in Jurassic[J]. Acta Petrologica Sinica, 2011, 27(3):867-877.

[8] 王家豪, 王华, 肖敦清, 等. 伸展构造体系中传递带的控砂作用:储层预测的新思路[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2008, 29(1):19-25. Wang Jiahao,Wang Hua,Xiao Dunqing, et al. Control of Transfer Zone on Sandbodies in the Extensional Structure System:A New Approach to Reservoirprediction[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2008, 29(1):19-25.

[9] 朱红涛, 杨香华, 周心怀, 等. 基于地震资料的陆相湖盆物源通道特征分析:以渤中凹陷西斜坡东营组为例[J]. 地球科学:中国地质大学学报, 2013, 38(1):121-129. Zhu Hongtao, Yang Xianghua, Zhou Xinhuai, et al. Sediment Transport Pathway Characteristics of Continental Lacustrine Basins Based on 3d Seismic Data:An Example from Dongying Formation of Western Slope of Bozhong Sag[J]. Earth Science:Journal of China University of Geosciences, 2013, 38(1):121-129.

[10] 袁书坤, 王英民, 陈振岩, 等. 逆源坡折带的控砂作用:以陈家洼陷沙三段地层为例[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(3):54-58. Yuan Shukun, Wang Yingmin, Chen Zhenyan, et al. Sand Control Effect of Reversed Slop Break:A Case Study from the Third Member of Shahejie Formation in Chenjia Depression[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2007, 19(3):54-58.

[11] 施辉, 李慧, 刘震. 柴达木盆地西南区古近系新纪系坡折带对岩性油藏的控制作用[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2014, 25(4):516-525. Shi Hui, Li Hui, Liu Zhen. Controlling Lithologic Reservoirs Study About Paleogene-Neogene Slope-Break Belts in Southwestern Qaidam Basin[J]. Natural Gas Geoscience, 2014, 25(4):516-525.

[12] 万锦峰, 鲜本忠, 李振鹏, 等. 南堡凹陷滩海地区不同级别断裂活动及其对沉积的影响[J]. 沉积学报, 2013, 31(6):1059-1069. Wan Jinfeng, Xian Benzhong, Li Zhenpeng, et al. Different Levels of Rift Activity and Its Impact on Deposition in Offshore Area,Nanpu Sag[J]. Acta Sedimentologica Sinica, 2013, 31(6):1059-1069.

[13] 杨晓利, 张自力, 孙明, 等. 同沉积断层控砂模式:以南堡凹陷南部地区Es1段为例[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2014, 35(4):526-533. Yang Xiaoli, Zhang Zili, Sun Ming, et al. Models of Contemporaneous Fault Controlling Sandstone Deposition:A Case Study of Es1 in Southern Nanpu Sag[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2014, 35(4):526-533.

[14] 王华, 姜华, 林正良, 等. 南堡凹陷东营组同沉积构造活动性与沉积格局的配置关系研究[J]. 地球科学与环境学报, 2011, 33(1):70-77. Wang Hua, Jiang Hua, Lin Zhengliang, et al. Relations Between Synsedimentary Tectonic Activity and Sedimentary Framework of Dongying Formation in Nanpu Sag[J]. Journal of Earth Sciences and Environment, 2011, 33(1):70-77.

[15] 鲜本忠, 万锦峰, 董艳蕾, 等. 湖相深水块状砂岩特征、成因及发育模式:以南堡凹陷东营组为例[J]. 岩石学报, 2013, 29(9):3287-3299. Xian Benzhou,Wan Jinfeng,Dong Yanlei, et al. Sedimentary Characteristics,Origin and Model of Lacustrine Deepwater Massive Sandstone:An Example from Dongying Formation in Nanpu Depression[J]. Acta Petrologica Sinica, 2013, 29(9):3287-3299.

[16] 童亨茂, 赵宝银, 曹哲, 等. 渤海湾盆地南堡凹陷断裂系统成因的构造解析[J]. 地质学报, 2013, 87(11):1647-1661. Tong Hengmao, Zhao Baoyin, Cao Zhe, et al. Structural Analysis of Faulting System Origin in the Nanpu Sag, Bohai Bay Basin[J]. Acta Geologica Sinica, 2013, 87(11):1647-1661.

[17] 梁杰, 于福生, 刘国玺, 等. 南堡凹陷分期异向伸展变形叠加特征:来自砂箱物理模拟实验的启示[J]. 现代地质, 2014, 28(1):139-148. Liang Jie, Yu Fusheng, Liu Guoxi, et al. Deformation Superimposition Characteristics Resulting from Stretching Direction Changes in Nanpu Sag:Insight from Physical Modeling[J]. Geoscience, 2014, 28(1):139-148.

[18] 冯有良, 周海民, 李思田, 等. 陆相断陷盆地层序类型与隐蔽油气藏勘探:以南堡凹陷古近系为例[J]. 地球科学:中国地质大学学报, 2004, 29(5):603-608. Feng Youliang, Zhou Haimin, Li Sitian, et al. Sequence Types and Subtle Trap Exploration in Continental Rift Basin:A Case Study of Lower Tertiary of the Nanpu Depression[J]. Earth Science:Journal of China University of Geosciences, 2004, 29(5):603-608.

[19] 郭少斌. 陆相断陷盆地层序地层模式[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2006, 33(5):548-552. Guo Shaobin. Sequence Stratigraphy Pattern of the Terrestrial Rifted Basin[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2006, 33(5):548-552.

[20] 董月霞, 张宁, 周海民, 等. 南堡凹陷油田古近系碎屑重矿物的物源和构造意义[J]. 地质科技情报, 2008, 27(5):7-13. Dong Yuexia, Zhang Ning, Zhou Haimin, et al. Provenances and Tectonic Implications of Paleogene Terrigenous Heavy Minerals in Nanpu Rifted Trough, Eastern Hebei Province[J]. Geological Science and Technology Information, 2008, 27(5):7-13.

[21] 董月霞, 杨赏, 陈蕾, 等. 渤海湾盆地辫状河三角洲沉积与深部储集层特征:以南堡凹陷南部古近系沙一段为例[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2014, 41(4):385-392. Dong Yuexia, Yang Shang, Chen Lei, et al. Braided River Delta Deposition and Deep Reservoir Characteristics in Bohai Bay Basin:A Case Study of Paleogene Sha 1 Member in the South Area of Nanpu Sag[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2014, 41(4):385-392.

[22] 鲜本忠, 万锦峰, 姜在兴, 等. 断陷湖盆洼陷带重力流沉积特征与模式:以南堡凹陷东部东营组为例[J]. 地学前缘, 2012, 19(1):121-135. Xian Benzhong, Wan Jinfeng, Jiang Zaixing, et al. Sedimentary Characteristics and Model of Gravity Flow Deposition in the Depressed Belt of Rift Lacustrine Basin:A Case Study from Dongying Formation in Nanpu Depression[J]. Earth Science Frontiers, 2012, 19(1):121-135.

[23] 邢文军, 翟瑞国, 张国栋, 等. 南堡凹陷砂岩体识别与勘探成效[J]. 石油天然气学报, 2013, 35(2):87-91. Xing Wenjun, Zhai Ruiguo, Zhang Guodong, et al.The Identification of Sandbody and Exploration Effect in Nanpu Sag[J]. Journal of Oil and Gas Technology, 2013, 35(2):87-91.

[24] 徐文会, 邢文军, 高文中, 等. 南堡油田沙一段优势储层预测技术[J]. 特种油气藏, 2014, 21(4):70-72. Xu Wenhui, Xing Wenjun, Gao Wenzhong, et al. Reservoir Forecasting Technology of Es1 in Nanpu Rifted Trough[J]. Special Oil & Gas Reservoirs, 2014, 21(4):70-72.

[1] 胡欣蕾, 吕延防, 孙永河, 孙同文. 泥岩盖层内断层垂向封闭能力综合定量评价:以南堡凹陷5号构造东二段泥岩盖层为例[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2018, 48(3): 705-718.
[2] 李志明, 张隽, 鲍云杰, 曹婷婷, 徐二社, 芮晓庆, 陈红宇, 杨琦, 张庆珍. 沾化凹陷渤南洼陷沙一段湖相富有机质烃源岩岩石学与孔隙结构特征:以罗63井和义21井取心段为例[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2018, 48(1): 39-52.
[3] 夏景生, 王志坤, 王海荣, 薛林, 王恺, 刘成权. 渤海湾盆地南堡凹陷西斜坡中深层“混合型河口坝”成因及沉积学意义[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2017, 47(6): 1642-1653.
[4] 孙思敏, 季汉成, 刘晓, 赵忠新, 陈亮. 断陷盆地边界断层分段的层序地层响应特征——以南堡凹陷西南庄断层上盘陡坡带东营组为例[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2017, 47(2): 382-392.
[5] 吕延防, 韦丹宁, 孙永河, 胡明, 刘哲, 孙同文, 王海学, 许辰璐. 南堡凹陷断层对中、上部含油组合油气成藏的控制作用[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2015, 45(4): 971-982.
[6] 王建伟, 宋国奇,宋书君,赵密福,高侠. 东营凹陷南斜坡孔店组原油地球化学特征及其来源[J]. J4, 2008, 38(1): 56-0062.
[7] 刘士林,刘蕴华,林 舸,周 叶,龚发雄,张德圣. 南堡凹陷新近系馆陶组砂岩地球化学、构造背景和物源探讨[J]. J4, 2007, 37(3): 475-0483.
[8] 郭洪金,李勇,钟建华,王海侨. 山东东辛油田古近系沙河街组一段碳酸盐岩储集特征[J]. J4, 2006, 36(03): 351-357.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!