基于AFM表征的页岩孔隙特征及其与解析气量关系

doi:10.13278/j.cnki.jjuese.201605106

吉林大学学报(地球科学版) ›› 2016, Vol. 46 ›› Issue (5): 1332-1341.doi: 10.13278/j.cnki.jjuese.201605106

基于AFM表征的页岩孔隙特征及其与解析气量关系

白永强^1,2, 刘美², 杨春梅², 姜振学¹

1. 中国石油大学(北京) 非常规天然气研究院, 北京 102249;
2. 东北石油大学电子科学学院/黑龙江省高校校企共建测试计量技术及仪器仪表工程研发中心, 黑龙江大庆 163318

收稿日期:2015-12-12 出版日期:2016-09-26 发布日期:2016-09-26
作者简介:白永强(1974-),男,在站博士后,主要从事介观表征研究,E-mail:yqbai2012@163.com
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金项目（51274068，41472112）；中国博士后基金项目（2014M560163）；教育部提高油气采收率重点实验室基金（2014）

AFM Based Pore Characterization of Shales and Its Relation to the Analytical Gas

Bai Yongqiang^1,2, Liu Mei², Yang Chunmei², Jiang Zhenxue¹

1. Unconventional Gas Research Institute, China University of Petroleum, Beijing 102249, China;
2. College of Electronic Science, Northeast Petroleum University/The University-Enterprise R & D Center of Measuring and Testing Technology & Instrument and Meter Engineering in Heilongjiang Province, Daqing 163318, Heilongjiang, China

Received:2015-12-12 Online:2016-09-26 Published:2016-09-26
Supported by:
Supported by National natural Science Foundation of China (51274068,41472112); Chinese Postdoctoral Science Foundation (2014M560163) and Key Laboratory of Enhance Oil and Gas Recovery of Educational Ministry Foundation (2014)

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

页岩储层的孔隙结构影响着页岩气的储集特性。为了较为真实地反映样品表面孔隙三维结构，著者选用原子力显微镜研究页岩微-纳米孔隙特征。以重庆市涪陵地区焦页1井（JY1）和渝参4井（YC4）典型样品为研究对象，用原子力显微镜表征岩样的微观结构，获取岩样的三维形貌图，分析岩样的孔隙分布特征和储集空间特征，构建代表岩样孔隙特征的参数。分别比较相同井号不同井段之间的特征参数差异和不同井号之间的特征参数差异，从而定量描述岩样的形貌特征。结合样品提取现场解析气量数据，建立JY1、YC4样品的解析气量与特征参数之间的关系。结果表明：JY1样品的储集空间密集，孔隙占的空间相对多，其微观结构更有利于气体的吸附和储集；结合两口井取心现场解析页岩气量分析发现，JY1、YC4样品的空间起伏度FDI与现场解析气量均呈现正相关关系。

关键词: 页岩, 孔隙结构, 解析气量, 原子力显微镜, 特征参数

Abstract:

The pore structure of shale reservoirs has a very significant impact on shale gas reservoir. An atomic force microscope (AFM) has unique advantage in characterization of micro-nanoscale structure, and can reflect three-dimensional structure of the surface of a sample. For the study of the relationship between micro-nanometer pore characterization of shales and the amount of field analytical gas extracted from core, we choose typical samples of Jiaoye 1 well (JY1) and Yucan 4 well (YC4) from Fuling of Chongqing as research objects. We get the micro-structure characterization of the rock samples by atomic force microscope, by obtaining three-dimensional topographies of the samples, and by analyzing the features of pore distribution and reservoir space of the samples. We then build parameters that represent internal characteristics of rock samples. Having compared the differences of the characteristic parameters from different well sections in the same well, and the differences of characteristic parameters from different wells respectively, we describe the morphology features of the rock samples quantitatively. Combined with the data of field analytical gas, we build the relationship between the amount of field analytical gas and characteristic parameters of JY1 and YC4 samples, respectively. The results show that relative to the YC4 samples, JY1 samples show more intensive reservoir spacesis, and higher porosity, and more beneficial to the storage of gas. The results also show that there is a positive correlation between the fluctuation degree of interspace and the amount of the field analytical gas of JY1 and YC4 samples. Our results may have significance for the quantitative evaluation of the relation between exploitable volume and the micro-pore structure of shale gas.

Key words: shale, structure of the pores, analytical gas, atomic force microscope, characteristic parameters

中图分类号:

TE132.3

白永强, 刘美, 杨春梅, 姜振学. 基于AFM表征的页岩孔隙特征及其与解析气量关系[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2016, 46(5): 1332-1341.

Bai Yongqiang, Liu Mei, Yang Chunmei, Jiang Zhenxue. AFM Based Pore Characterization of Shales and Its Relation to the Analytical Gas[J]. Journal of Jilin University(Earth Science Edition), 2016, 46(5): 1332-1341.

参考文献

[1] 董大忠,邹才能,杨桦,等.中国页岩气勘探开发进展与发展前景[J].石油学报,2012,33(1):107-114. Dong Dazhong, Zou Caineng, Yang Hua, et al. Progress and Prospects of Shale Gas Exploration and Development in China[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinic, 2012, 33(1):107-114.

[2] 邹才能,董大忠,王社教,等.中国页岩气形成机理、地质特征及资源潜力[J].石油勘探与开发,2010,37(6):641-653. Zou Caineng, Dong Dazhong, Wang Shejiao, et al. Geological Characteristics, Formation Mechanism and Resource Potential of Shale Gas in China[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2010, 37(6):641-653.

[3] 董大忠,邹才能,李建忠,等.页岩气资源潜力与勘探开发前景[J].地质通报,2011,30(2):324-336. Dong Dazhong, Zou Caineng, Li Jianzhong, et al. Resource Potential, Exploration and Development Prospect of Shale Gas in the Whole World[J]. Geological Bulletin of China, 2011, 30(2):324-336.

[4] 李新景,胡素云,程克明.北美裂缝性页岩气勘探开发的启示[J].石油勘探与开发,2007,34(4):392-400. Li Xinjing, Hu Suyun, Cheng Keming. Suggestions from the Development of Fractured Shale Gas in North America[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2007, 34(4):392-400.

[5] 张金川,边瑞康,荆铁亚,等.页岩气理论研究的基础意义[J].地质通报,2011,30(2):318-323. Zhang Jinchuan, Bian Ruikang, Jing Tieya, et al. Fundamental Significance of Gas Shale Theoretical Research[J]. Geological Bulletin of China, 2011, 30(2):318-323.

[6] 张志英,杨盛波.页岩气吸附解吸规律研究[J].实验力学,2012,27(4):492-497. Zhang Zhiying, Yang Shengbo. On the Adsorption and Desorption Trend of Shale Gas[J]. Journal of Experimental Mechanics, 2012, 27(4):492-497.

[7] Ambrose R J,Hartman R C,Diaz-Campos M,et al.New Pore-Scale Considerations for Shale Gas in Place Calculations[J]. SPE 131772,2010:1-17.

[8] 陈尚斌,朱炎铭,王红岩,等.川南龙马溪组页岩气储层纳米孔隙结构特征及其成藏意义[J].煤炭学报,2012,37(3):438-444. Chen Shangbin, Zhu Yanming, Wang Hongyan, et al. Structure Characteristics and Accumulation Significance of Nanopores in Longmaxi Shale Gas Reservoir in the Southern Sichuan Basin[J]. Journal of China Coal Society, 2012, 37(3):438-444.

[9] 张雪芬,陆现彩,张林晔,等.页岩气的赋存形式研究及其石油地质意义[J].地球科学进展,2010,25(6):597-603. Zhang Xuefen, Lu Xiancai, Zhan Linye, et al. Occurrences of Shale Gas and Their Petroleum Geological Significance[J]. Advances in Earth Sciences, 2010, 25(6):597-603.

[10] 赵佩,李贤庆,田兴旺,等.川南地区龙马溪组页岩气储层微孔隙结构特征[J].天然气地球科学,2014,25(6):947-956. Zhao Pei, Li Xianqing, Tian Xingwang, et al. Study on Micropore Structure Characteristics of Longmaxi Formation Shale Gas Reservoirs in the Southern Sichuan Basin[J]. Natural Gas Geoscience, 2014, 25(6):947-956.

[11] 胡爱军,潘一山,唐巨鹏,等.型煤的甲烷吸附以及NMR试验研究[J].洁净煤技术,2007,13(3):37-40. Hu Aijun, Pan Yishan, Tang Jupeng, et al. Experiment Research of Adsorption and NMR on the Noulding Coal[J]. Clean Coal Technology, 2007, 13(3):37-40.

[12] Raut U, Famá M, Teolis B D, et al. Characterization of Porosity in Vapor-Deposite Damorphous Solid Water from Methane Adsorption[J]. The Journal of Chemical Physics, 2007, 127:1-6.

[13] 钟玲文,张慧,员争荣,等.煤的比表面积、孔体积及其对煤吸附能力的影响[J].煤田地质与勘探,2002,30(3):26-28. Zhong Lingwen, Zhang Hui, Yuan Zhengrong, et al. Influence of Specific Pore Area and Pore Volume of Coal on Adsorption Capacity[J]. Coal Geology & Exploration, 2002, 30(3):26-28.

[14] 许满贯,马正恒,陈甲,等.煤对甲烷吸附性能影响因素的实验研究[J].矿业工程研究,2009,24(2):51-54. Xu Manguan, Ma Zhengheng, Chen Jia, et al. Experimental Study on Influencing Factors of Adsorption Properties of Methane on Coal[J]. Mineral Engineering Research, 2009, 24(2):51-54.

[15] Loucks R G. Revisiting the Importance Secondary Disso-lution Pores in Tertiary Sandstones Along the Texas Gulf Coast[J]. Gulf Coast Association of Geological Societies Transactions, 2005, 55:447-455.

[16] Yao Suping, Jiao Kun, Zhang Ke, et al. An Atomic Force Microscopy Study of Coal Nanopore Structure[J]. Chinese Science Bulletin, 2011, 56(25):2706-2712.

[17] 蒋裕强,陈林,蒋婵,等.致密储层孔隙结构表征技术及发展趋势[J].地质科技情报,2014,33(3):63-70. Jiang Yuqiang, Chen lin, Jiang Chan, et al. Characterization Techniques and Trends of the Pore Structure of Tight Reservoirs[J]. Geological Science and Technology Information, 2014, 33(3):63-70.

[18] 田华,张水昌,柳少波,等.压汞法和气体吸附法研究富有机质页岩孔隙特征[J].石油学报,2012,33(3):419-427. Tian Hua, Zhang Shuichang, Liu Shaobo, et al. Determination of Organic-Rich Shale Pore Features by Mercury Injection and Gas Adsorption Methods[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinic, 2012, 33(3):419-427.

[19] 邹才能,杨智,陶士振,等.纳米油气与源储共生型油气聚集[J].石油勘探与开发,2012,39(1):13-26. Zou Caineng, Yang Zhi, Tao Shizhen, et al. Nano-Hydrocarbon and the Accumulation in Coexisting Source and Reservoir[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2012, 39(1):13-26.

[20] 杨华,李士祥,刘显阳.鄂尔多斯盆地致密油、页岩油特征及资源潜力[J].石油学报,2013,34(1):1-11. Yang Hua, Li Shixiang, Liu Xianyang. Characteristics and Resource Prospects of Tight Oil and Shale Oil in Ordos Basin[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinic, 2013, 34(1):1-11.

[21] 梁超,姜在兴,杨镱婷,等.四川盆地五峰组-龙马溪组页岩岩相及储集空间特征[J].石油勘探与开发,2012,39(6):691-698. Liang Chao, Jiang Zaixing, Yang Yiting, et al. Characteristics of Shale Lithofacies and Reservoir Space of the Wufeng-Longmaxi Formation, Sichuan Basin[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2012, 39(6):691-698.

[22] Atul K V,Bodhisatwa H,Suresh K S,et al.Methane Sorption Dynamics and Hydrocarbon Generation of Shale Samples from West Bokaro and Raniganj Basins[J].Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering, 2014, 21:1138-1147.

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

603

HTML			PDF

Just accepted	Online first	Issue	Just accepted	Online first	Issue
0	0	0	0	0	603

From	Others	local

Times	127	476
Rate	21%	79%

Abstract

509

Just accepted	Online first	Issue

0	0	509

From	Others	local

Times	490	19
Rate	96%	4%

Cited

Web of Science	Crossref	ScienceDirect	Search for Citations in Google Scholar >>


This page requires you have already subscribed to WoS.

Shared

Discussed

基于AFM表征的页岩孔隙特征及其与解析气量关系

AFM Based Pore Characterization of Shales and Its Relation to the Analytical Gas

PDF (PC)

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 0

[1]	林敉若, 操应长, 葸克来, 王健, 陈洪, 吴俊军. 阜康凹陷东部斜坡带二叠系储层特征及控制因素[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2018, 48(4): 991-1007.
[2]	赵谦平, 张丽霞, 尹锦涛, 俞雨溪, 姜呈馥, 王晖, 高潮. 含粉砂质层页岩储层孔隙结构和物性特征:以张家滩陆相页岩为例[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2018, 48(4): 1018-1029.
[3]	日比娅, 孙友宏, 韩婧, 郭明义. 3种无机盐催化热解油页岩[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2018, 48(4): 1043-1049.
[4]	邓馨卉, 刘财, 郭智奇, 刘喜武, 刘宇巍. 济阳坳陷罗家地区各向异性页岩储层全波场地震响应模拟及分析[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2018, 48(4): 1231-1243.
[5]	张冰, 郭智奇, 徐聪, 刘财, 刘喜武, 刘宇巍. 基于岩石物理模型的页岩储层裂缝属性及各向异性参数反演[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2018, 48(4): 1244-1252.
[6]	冯小龙, 敖卫华, 唐玄. 陆相页岩气储层孔隙发育特征及其主控因素分析:以鄂尔多斯盆地长7段为例[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2018, 48(3): 678-692.
[7]	李志明, 张隽, 鲍云杰, 曹婷婷, 徐二社, 芮晓庆, 陈红宇, 杨琦, 张庆珍. 沾化凹陷渤南洼陷沙一段湖相富有机质烃源岩岩石学与孔隙结构特征:以罗63井和义21井取心段为例[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2018, 48(1): 39-52.
[8]	刘忠宝, 杜伟, 高波, 胡宗全, 张钰莹, 吴靖, 冯动军. 层序格架中富有机质页岩发育模式及差异分布:以上扬子下寒武统为例[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2018, 48(1): 1-14.
[9]	林承焰, 王杨, 杨山, 任丽华, 由春梅, 吴松涛, 吴玉其, 张依旻. 基于CT的数字岩心三维建模[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2018, 48(1): 307-317.
[10]	徐宏杰, 胡宝林, 郑建斌, 刘会虎, 张文永, 郑凯歌. 淮南煤田煤系页岩气储集空间特征及其岩相控制作用[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2017, 47(2): 418-430.
[11]	马中良, 郑伦举, 赵中熙. 不同边界条件对油页岩原位转化开采的影响及启示[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2017, 47(2): 431-441.
[12]	逄硕, 刘财, 郭智奇, 刘喜武, 霍志周, 刘宇巍. 基于岩石物理模型的页岩孔隙结构反演及横波速度预测[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2017, 47(2): 606-615.
[13]	王冠民, 熊周海, 张婕. 岩性差异对泥页岩可压裂性的影响分析[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2016, 46(4): 1080-1089.
[14]	刘招君, 孙平昌, 柳蓉, 孟庆涛, 胡菲. 敦密断裂带盆地群油页岩特征及成矿差异分析[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2016, 46(4): 1090-1099.
[15]	杜佰伟, 谢尚克, 董宇, 彭清华, 郑博. 伦坡拉盆地渐新统丁青湖组油页岩特征及其地质意义[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2016, 46(3): 671-680.