三塘湖盆地航磁异常特征及油气远景预测

doi:10.13278/j.cnki.jjuese.20170263

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 三塘湖盆地是我国西部典型的火山岩油气盆地。本文基于1：5万高精度航磁资料，结合区域地质、区域重力、地面踏勘和物性资料，对三塘湖盆地进行了航磁综合解释；详细分析了磁场和重力场特征及其与区域构造的对应关系，圈定了盆地火山岩分布范围，采用欧拉反褶积方法计算了磁性体埋深，初步揭示了盆地磁性基底起伏情况；结合盆地火山岩油气成藏模式，开展了航磁油气远景预测。结果表明，三塘湖盆地中央坳陷内有隐伏火山岩存在的次级凹陷中心具有寻找火山岩油藏的良好前景：汉水泉凹陷区中的2个次级凹陷中心、条湖凹陷区北段次级凹陷中心应作为油气勘探重点区域；石头梅凸起和岔哈泉凸起区可作为重要油气勘探方向；方方梁凸起及其以南区域可作为下一步油气勘探工作的预研区。研究结果可为盆地油气资源后续勘探开发提供指导。

关键词: 三塘湖盆地, 航磁, 火山岩, 磁性体埋深, 油气远景预测

Abstract: Santanghu basin is a typical volcanic oil and gas basin in the west of China. Based on the high precision aeromagnetic data, integrated interpretation was completed, combining with the regional geology, Bouguer gravity, field reconnaissance,and magnetic susceptibility information. Firstly, the magnetic and gravity characteristics of Santanghu basin, as well as the relationship with the structure division were described in detail; and then, the volcanics distribution range was delineated, and the magnetic basement relief was revealed with the depths of the magnetic body calculated by the Euler deconvolution method; finally, the oil-gas-bearing prospecting was conducted based on the aeromagnetic data, together with the volcanic reservoir features and hydrocarbon accumulation pattern. The sub-sags with concealed volcanics distribution in the center of Santanghu basin depression are favorable for oil reservation. Two sub-sags in Hanshuiquan and one sub-sag in northern Tiaohu are key region for oil gas exploration. Shitoumei and Chahaquan uplifts are important regions, and Fangfangliang uplift and the southern area may be the pre-study regions. The exploration direction and prospective areas presented in the paper can provide reference for the oil and gas exploration in the future.

Key words: Santanghu basin, airborne magnetometry, volcanics, depth of the magnetic body, oil-gas-bearing prospecting

中图分类号:

P631.2

舒晴, 朱晓颖, 高维, 李瑞, 尹航. 三塘湖盆地航磁异常特征及油气远景预测[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2018, 48(2): 451-460.

Shu Qing, Zhu Xiaoying, Gao Wei, Li Rui, Yin Hang. Aeromagnetic Anomaly Characteristics and Oil-Gas-Bearing Prospecting of Santanghu Basin[J]. Journal of Jilin University(Earth Science Edition), 2018, 48(2): 451-460.

参考文献

[1] 刘艳,刘崇瑞. 三塘湖盆地构造样式浅析[J]. 中国石油和化工标准与质量,2013,33(7):137. Liu Yan, Liu Chongrui. Brief Analysis of Structure Styles of Santanghu Basin[J]. China Petroleum and Chemical Standard and Quality, 2013, 33(7):137.
[2] 高岗,梁浩,沈霞,等. 三塘湖盆地二叠系火成岩分布及其对烃源岩热演化的影响[J]. 石油实验地质,2009,31(5):462-465. Gao Gang, Liang Hao, Shen Xia,et al. Permian Igneous Rock Distribution and Its Influence to the Thermal Evolution of Source Rock in Santanghu Basin[J]. Petroleum Geology & Experiment, 2009, 31(5):462-465.
[3] 孙自明,熊保贤,李永林,等. 三塘湖盆地构造特征与有利勘探方向[J]. 石油实验地质,2001, 23(1):23-26. Sun Ziming, Xiong Baoxian, Li Yonglin,et al. Structural Characteristics and Favorable Belt for Hydrocarbon Exploration in Santanghu Basin[J]. Petroleum Geology & Experiment, 2001, 23(1):23-26.
[4] 栗维民. 三塘湖盆地形成及演化[J]. 吐哈油气,1999,4(4):8-11. Li Weimin. The Form and Evolution of Santanghu Basin[J]. Tuha Oil & Gas, 1999, 4(4):8-11.
[5] 张枝焕,关强. 新疆三塘湖盆地二叠系油源分析[J]. 石油实验地质,1998,20(2):174-181. Zhang Zhihuan, Guan Qiang. The Permian Source Rock Analysis in the Santanghu Basin of Xinjiang[J].Experimental Petroleum Geology, 1998, 20(2):174-181.
[6] 李溪滨. 三塘湖盆地石油地质特征与勘探建议[J]. 新疆石油地质,1994,15(2):110-115. Li Xibin. Petroleum Geologic Characteristics and Suggestions for Future Prospecting in Santanghu Basin[J]. Xinjiang Petroleum Geology, 1994, 15(2):110-115.
[7] 张恺. 新疆三塘湖盆地板块构造演化特征及其含油气远景评价[J]. 新疆石油地质,1993,14(1):1-13. Zhang Kai. The Characteristics of Plate Tectonic Evolution and the Evaluation of Hydrocarbon Prospect of Santanghu Basin, Xinjiang[J]. Xinjiang Petroleum Geology, 1993, 14(1):1-13.
[8] 伍新和,王成善,伊海生,等. 新疆三塘湖盆地烃源岩特征[J]. 成都理工大学学报(自然科学版),2004, 31(5):511-516. Wu Xinhe, Wang Chengshan, Yi Haisheng, et al. Characteristics of Hydrocarbon Source Rock in the Santanghu Basin of Xinjiang, China[J]. Journal of Chengdu University of Technology (Science & Technology Edition), 2004, 31(5):511-516.
[9] 俞仁连,杨树生,赵立群. 新疆三塘湖盆地构造演化及油气勘查方向[J]. 新疆地质,1996,14(2):111-119. Yu Renlian, Yang Shusheng, Zhao Liqun. Tectonic Evolution and Oil-Gas Exploration Target in Santanghu Basin of Xinjiang[J]. Xinjiang Geology, 1996, 14(2):111-119.
[10] 朱伯生,冯建新,胡斌,等. 对三塘湖盆地基底的认识[J]. 新疆石油地质,1997,18(3):197-200. Zhu Bosheng, Feng Jianxin, Hu Bin, et al. An Understanding of the Basement of Santanghu Basin[J]. Xinjiang Petroleum Geology, 1997, 18(3):197-200.
[11] 鲁海鸥. 三塘湖盆地构造特征研究[D].西安:西安石油大学,2012. Lu Haiou. The Study of Structure in Santanghu Basin[D]. Xi'an:Xi'an Shiyou University, 2012.
[12] 赵泽辉,郭召杰,张臣,等. 新疆东部三塘湖盆地构造演化及其石油地质意义[J]. 北京大学学报(自然科学版),2003, 39(2):219-228. Zhao Zehui, Guo Zhaojie, Zhang Chen, et al.Tectonic Evolution of the Santanghu Basin, East Xinjiang and Its Implication for the Hydrocarbon Accumulation[J]. Acta Scientiarum Naturalium Universitatis Pekinensis, 2003, 39(2):219-228.
[13] 肖常序,汤耀庆,冯益民,等. 新疆北部及其邻区大地构造[M]. 北京:地质出版社,1992. Xiao Changxu, Tang Yaoqing, Feng Yimin, et al. Tectonic Evolution of the Northern Xinjiang and Its Adjacent Regions[M]. Beijing:Geological Publishing House, 1992.
[14] 刘学锋,刘绍平,刘成鑫,等. 三塘湖盆地构造演化与原型盆地类型[J]. 西南石油学院学报,2002, 24(4):13-16. Liu Xuefeng, Liu Shaoping, Liu Chengxin, et al. Tectonic Evolution and Prototype Basins of Santanghu Basin[J]. Journal of Southwest Petroleum Institute, 2002, 24(4):13-16.
[15] 柳成志,孙玉凯,于海山,等. 三塘湖盆地石炭系火山岩油气储层特征及碱性成岩作用[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版),2010,40(6):1221-1231. Liu Chengzhi, Sun Yukai, Yu Haishan, et al. Study on Characteristic of Carboniferous Volcanic Oil and Gas Reservoirs and Alkaline Diagenesis in the Santanghu Basin, NW China[J]. Journal of Jilin University (Earth Science Edition), 2010, 40(6):1221-1231.
[16] 郑曼,吴晓智,李建忠,等. 三塘湖盆地火山岩油藏特征与成藏过程分析[J]. 地质科学,2013,48(4):1246-1257. Zheng Man, Wu Xiaozhi, Li Jianzhong, et al. Characteristics of Volcanic Reservoir and Process of Petroleum Entrapment in Santanghu Basin[J]. Chinese Journal of Geology, 2013, 48(4):1246-1257.
[17] 柳顺彬,马小平,周继兵,等. 新疆三塘湖盆地赋煤构造单元划分与构造特征[J]. 地质论评,2017,63(增刊1):271-272. Liu Shunbin, Ma Xiaoping, Zhou Jibing, et al. Xinjiang Santanghu Basin Coal Division of Tectonic Units and Tectonic Characteristics[J]. Geology Review, 2017, 63(Sup.1):271-272.
[18] 吴斌,贺强,李万军. 新疆三塘湖盆地中生代含煤地层沉积演化及聚煤规律[J]. 科技信息,2010(12):754. Wu Bin, He Qiang, Li Wanjun.Sedimentary Evolution and Coal Accumulation Patterns of the Mesozoic Coal Bearing Strata in Santanghu Basin, Xinjiang[J]. Science & Technology Information, 2010(12):754.
[19] 胡斌,关强,朱伯生,等. 三塘湖盆地构造及形变特征[J]. 新疆石油地质,1999,20(5):374-378. Hu Bin, Guan Qiang, Zhu Bosheng, et al. Structure and Deformation Characteristics in Santanghu Basin[J]. Xinjiang Petroleum Geology, 1999, 20(5):374-378.

相关文章 15

[1]	朱晓颖, 杨海, 匡星涛, 彭巍巍, 张洪瑞. 新疆东昆仑-阿尔金地区航磁反映的断裂构造特征[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2018, 48(2): 461-473.
[2]	潘保芝, 刘文斌, 张丽华, 郭宇航, 阿茹罕. 一种提高储层裂缝识别准确度的方法[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2018, 48(1): 298-306.
[3]	刘宗利, 王祝文, 刘菁华, 赵淑琴, 欧伟明. 辽河东部凹陷火山岩相测井响应特征及储集意义[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2018, 48(1): 285-297.
[4]	孟恩, 王朝阳, 刘超辉, 施建荣, 李艳广. 辽东半岛东南部南辽河群变质火山岩的时代、成因及其对区域构造演化的制约[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2017, 47(6): 1589-1619.
[5]	王师捷, 徐仲元, 董晓杰, 杜洋, 崔维龙, 王阳. 华北板块北缘中段二叠纪的构造属性:来自火山岩锆石U-Pb年代学与地球化学的制约[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2017, 47(5): 1442-1457.
[6]	刘晨, 孙景贵, 邱殿明, 古阿雷, 韩吉龙, 孙凡婷, 杨梅, 冯洋洋. 大兴安岭北段东坡小莫尔可地区中生代火山岩成因及其地质意义：元素、Hf同位素地球化学与锆石U-Pb同位素定年[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2017, 47(4): 1138-1158.
[7]	李永刚. 松南气田火山岩致密储层分类及有利目标潜力评价[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2017, 47(2): 344-354.
[8]	张兴洲, 刘洋, 曾振, 张宏涛, 崔维龙. 大兴安岭北部±130 Ma火山岩的地质意义[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2017, 47(1): 1-13.
[9]	曲长胜, 邱隆伟, 李文涛, 师政, 王巍. 渤海湾盆地潍北凹陷孔三段中基性火山岩储层特征及控制因素[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2016, 46(5): 1284-1296.
[10]	张海洪, 许文良, 王枫, 曹花花. 吉林中部小蜂蜜顶子组火山岩的形成时代及其地质意义:锆石U-Pb年代学和Hf同位素组成证据[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2016, 46(5): 1418-1429.
[11]	王璞珺, 缴洋洋, 杨凯凯, 张增宝, 边伟华. 准噶尔盆地火山岩分类研究与应用[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2016, 46(4): 1056-1070.
[12]	尹志刚, 王文材, 张跃龙, 王阳, 韩宇, 曹忠强, 郑贝. 伊勒呼里山中生代火山岩:锆石U-Pb年代学及其对岩浆事件的制约[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2016, 46(3): 766-780.
[13]	陈斌, 李壮, 王家林, 张璐, 鄢雪龙. 辽东半岛~2.2 Ga岩浆事件及其地质意义[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2016, 46(2): 303-320.
[14]	修立君, 邵明礼, 唐华风, 董常春, 高有峰. 松辽盆地白垩系营城组火山岩孔缝单元类型和特征[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2016, 46(1): 11-22.
[15]	田陟贤, 李永军, 田猛, 杨高学, 向坤鹏, 佟丽莉. 西准噶尔恰达地区哈尔加乌组火山岩锆石U-Pb年代学、地球化学及地质意义[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2016, 46(1): 135-145.

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed