吉林大学学报(地球科学版) ›› 2016, Vol. 46 ›› Issue (1): 11-22.doi: 10.13278/j.cnki.jjuese.201601102

• 地质与资源 • 上一篇    下一篇

松辽盆地白垩系营城组火山岩孔缝单元类型和特征

修立君1,2, 邵明礼2, 唐华风3, 董常春2, 高有峰3   

  1. 1. 中国地质大学地球物理与空间信息学院, 武汉 430074;
    2. 吉林油田公司勘探开发研究院, 吉林松原 138000;
    3. 吉林大学地球科学学院, 长春 130061
  • 收稿日期:2015-04-09 出版日期:2016-01-26 发布日期:2016-01-26
  • 通讯作者: 唐华风(1979),男,教授,博士,主要从事火山岩储层地质和地球物理研究,E-mail:tanghfhc@jlu.edu.cn E-mail:tanghfhc@jlu.edu.cn
  • 作者简介:修立君(1963),男,高级工程师,博士研究生,主要从事石油地质综合研究,E-mail:xiulj@petrochina.com.cn
  • 基金资助:

    国家自然科学青年基金项目(41002038);国家重点基础研究发展计划(973计划)(2012CB822002)

Types and Characteristics of Volcanic Reservoir Pore-Fracture Units of Cretaceous Yingcheng Formation in Songliao Basin, NE China

Xiu Lijun1,2, Shao Mingli2, Tang Huafeng3, Dong Changchun2, Gao Youfeng3   

  1. 1. Institute of Geophysics & Geomatics, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan 430074, China;
    2. Research Institute of Exploration and Development, Jilin Oilfield Company, Songyuan 138000, Jilin, China;
    3. College of Earth Sciences, Jilin University, Changchun 130061, China
  • Received:2015-04-09 Online:2016-01-26 Published:2016-01-26
  • Supported by:

    Supported by National Natural Science Foundation-Youth Foundation(41002038)and National Key Basic Research Program of China (2012CB822002)

摘要:

目前火山岩储层评价的主要依据是储集空间类型和孔渗参数,但储集空间类型与物性参数之间的关系尚不明确。为此,依据松辽盆地全取心井(营一D1井和营三D1井)开展营城组火山岩孔缝单元类型研究及其与孔渗参数关系的分析,取得如下主要认识。首先,研究区火山岩主要发育5种原生孔隙、3种次生孔隙、3种原生裂缝和3种次生裂缝;根据发育过程、分布排列特征的相似性,把储集空间归并为7种孔隙类和2种裂缝类;将上述孔隙类与裂缝类划分为7种组合类型,即7型孔缝单元,分别为①型离散气孔类-次生裂缝类组合型、②型定向气孔类-脱玻化类-次生裂缝类组合型、③型离散粒间孔类-溶蚀孔类组合型、④型离散粒间孔类-溶蚀孔类-原生裂缝类组合型、⑤型离散粒间孔类-溶蚀孔类-次生裂缝类组合型、⑥型定向粒间孔类-溶蚀孔类-次生裂缝类组合型和⑦型裂缝类组合型。其次,对比按孔隙单元拟合孔渗关系与按整体拟合孔渗关系的函数斜率,7型孔缝单元可划分为3组,即,略低于总体拟合函数(A组)的①型和②型孔缝单元,略高于总体拟合函数(B组)的③型、④型、⑤型和⑥型孔缝单元,远远高于总体拟合函数(C组)的⑦型孔缝单元。第三,除②型单元和⑦型单元之外的其他5型单元的储层物性较好;各型孔缝单元的孔喉分选系数随孔喉半径均值增大而增大,储层非均质性变强;多数孔缝单元具有复杂的岩性-岩相组合;孔缝单元分布与火山机构类型和相带关系密切。第四,依据孔缝单元的孔渗条件和孔渗相关拟合函数可知,应该依据孔缝单元进行储层评价分析,即使赋存于相同岩性的①型、②型单元也需要分别对待。

关键词: 松辽盆地, 营城组, 火山岩, 孔缝单元, 储集空间

Abstract:

To evaluate volcanic reservoirs, only the parameters of porosity and permeability are now focused; while the void space, which is the controlling factor to influence the porosity and permeability, is ignored. It hampers the research of volcanic reservoirs. Types of pore-fracture units and their porosity and permeability are analyzed based on the cores of Yingcheng Formation in Early Cretaceous of well Y1D1 and well Y3D1 in Songliao basin. The main results are followings:1)There are five kinds of primary pores,three kinds of secondary pores,three kinds of primary fractures, and three kinds of secondary fractures. The most pores and fractures have been reformed by compaction and dissolution. According to the formation process and distribution pattern, the reservoir spaces are assembled to seven kinds of pore-groups and two kinds of fracture-groups. On the basis of combined characteristics of pore groups and fracture groups, the volcanic reservoirs are divided into seven types of pore-fracture units as below:unit ① assembling of scatter vesicles group (SVG) and secondary fracture group (SFG), unit ② assembling of directional vesicles group (DV), devitrification pore group (DPG) and SFG, unit ③ assembling of scatter intergranular pores group (SIPG) and emposieu group(EG), unit ④ assembling of SIPG, EG, and primary fracture group(PFG), unit ⑤ assembling of SIPG, EG, and SFG, unit ⑥ assembling of directional intergranular pores group (DIPG), EG, and SFG, and unit ⑦ assembling of PFG and SFG. 2)The porosity and permeability of the pore-fracture units have high value except unit ② and unit ⑦. There are three groups of slope of correlation function of pore-fracture units between porosity and permeability comparing to that of the total samples. Group A includes unit ① and ②, whose slope is smaller than the total's; Group B includes unit ③,④,⑤ and ⑥, whose slope is bigger than the total's; Group C is unit ⑦, whose slope is much bigger than the total's. 3) The pore throat sorting coefficient of pore-fracture units are positive correlation with pore throat average radius; this means that the heterogeneity of reservoir becomes stronger. Most pore-fracture units consist of complex lithology and lithofacies. The distribution characteristics of pore-fracture units are correlated to the types and facies belts of volcanic edifices. Based on the above, for reservoir evaluation, the pore-fracture units have also to be considered in addition to their parameters of porosity, permeability, and correlation function; although the units ① and unit ② bear in lava, they have distinct characteristics in porosity and permeability, and it is necessary to treat them individually.

Key words: Songliao basin, Yingcheng Formation, volcanic rocks, pore-fracture units, void space

中图分类号: 

  • P618.18

[1] Sruogal P,Rubinstein N.Processes Controlling Porosity and Permeability in Volcanic Reservoirs from the Austral and Neuquén Basins, Argentina[J]. AAPG Bulletin, 2007, 91(1):115-129.

[2] 罗静兰,曲志浩,孙卫,等.风化店火山岩岩相、储集性与油气的关系[J].石油学报,1996,17(1):32-39. Luo Jinglan, Qu Zhihao, Sun Wei, et al.The Relationships Between Lithofacies, Reservoir Lithology and Oil & Gas of Volcanic Rocks in Fenghuadian Area[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 1996,17(1):32-39.

[3] Levin L E. Volcanogenic and Volcaniclastic Reservoir Rocks in Mesozoic-Cenozoic Island Arcs:Examples from the Caucasus and the NW Pacific[J]. Journal of Petroleum Geology, 1995, 18(3):267-288.

[4] 李伟,何生,谭开俊,等.准噶尔盆地西北缘火山岩储层特征及成岩演化特征[J].天然气地球科学,2010,21(6):909-916. Li Wei, He Sheng, Tan Kaijun, et al. Characteristics of Reservoir and Diagenetic Evolution of Volcanic Rocks in Northwestern Junggar Basin[J]. Natural Gas Geosciences,2010,21(6):909-916.

[5] 侯连华,王京红,邹才能,等.火山岩风化体储层控制因素研究:以三塘湖盆地石炭系卡拉岗组为例[J].地质学报,2011,85(4):557-568. Hou Lianhua, Wang Jinghong, Zou Caineng, et al. Controlling Factors of Weathering Volcanic Reservoir:An Example from the Carboniferous Kalagang Formation in Santanghu Basin[J].Acta Geologica Sinica, 2011,85(4):557-568.

[6] 秦启荣,苏培东,吴明军,等. 准噶尔盆地西北缘九区火山岩储层裂缝预测[J]. 天然气工业, 2008, 28(5):24-27. Qin Qirong, Su Peidong, Wu Mingjun, et al. Fracture Identification in Igneous Rock Reservoirs of the Ninth Block at the Northwest Margin of the Junggar Basin[J]. Nature Gas Industry, 2008, 28(5):24-27.

[7] 赵海玲,刘振文,李剑,等.火成岩油气储层的岩石学特征及研究方向[J].石油与天然气地质,2004,25(6):609-612. Zhao Hailing, Liu Zhenwen, Li Jian, et al. Petrologic Characteristics of Igneous Rock Reservoirs and Their Research Orientation[J]. Oil and Gas Geology, 2004,25(6):609-612.

[8] 刘万洙,王璞珺,门广田,等.松辽盆地北部深层火山岩储层特征[J].石油与天然气地质,2003,24(1):28-31. Liu Wanzhu, Wang Pujun, Men Guangtian, et al. Characteristics of Deep Volcanic Reservoirs in the Northern Songliao Basin[J]. Oil and Gas Geology, 2003, 24(1):28-31.

[9] 吴颜雄,王璞珺,吴艳辉,等.火山岩储层储集空间的构成:以松辽盆地为例[J].天然气工业, 2011,31(4):28-33. Wu Yanxiong, Wang Pujun, Wu Yanhui, et al. Components of Volcanic Reservoir Space:A Case Study from the Songliao Basin[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2011,31(4):28-33.

[10] Gu L X, Ren Z W, Wu C Z, et al. Hydrocarbon Reservoirs in a Trachyte Porphyry Intrusion in the Eastern Depression of the Liaohe Basin, Northeast China[J]. AAPG Bulletin, 2002,86(10):1821-1832.

[11] Wu C Z, Gu L X, Zhang Z Z, et al. Formation Mechanisms of Hydrocarbon Reservoirs Associated with Volcanic and Subvolcanic Intrusive Rocks:Examples in Mesozoic-Cenozoic Basins of Eastern China[J]. AAPG Bulletin, 2006, 90(1):137-147.

[12] 闫林,周雪峰,高涛, 等. 徐深气田兴城开发区火山岩储层次生溶蚀孔隙研究[J]. 天然气工业, 2007, 27(8):16-19. Yan Lin,Zhou Xuefeng,Gao Tao,et al. The Secon-dary Dissolution Pores in Volcanic Reservoirs of Xingcheng Development Area in Xushen Gas Field[J]. Nature Gas Industry, 2007, 27(8):16-19.

[13] 高有峰,刘万洙,纪学雁,等.松辽盆地营城组火山岩成岩作用类型、特征及其对储层物性的影响[J].吉林大学学报(地球科学版),2007,37(6):1251-1258. Gao Youfeng, Liu Wanzhu, Ji Xueyan, et al. Diagenesis Types and Features of Volcanic Rocks and Its Impact on Porosity and Permeability in Yingcheng Formation, Songliao Basin[J]. Journal of Jilin University (Earth Science Edition),2007,37(6):1251-1258.

[14] 唐华风,庞彦明,边伟华,等.松辽盆地白垩系营城组火山机构储层定量分析[J].石油学报,2008,29(6):841-845. Tang Huafeng, Pang Yanming, Bian Weihua, et al. Reservoirs Quantitative Analysis of Volcanic Edifice of Yingcheng Formation in Songliao Basin, Early Cretaceous, NE China[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2008,29(6):841-845.

[15] 罗静兰,邵红梅,杨艳芳,等.松辽盆地深层火山岩储层的埋藏-烃类充注:成岩时空演化过程[J]. 地学前缘,2013,20(5):175-187. Luo Jinglan, Shao Hongmei, Yang Yanfang, et al. Temporal and Spatial Evolution of Burial-Hydrocarbon Filling:Diagenetic Process of Deep Volcanic Reservoir in Songliao Basin[J]. Earth Science Frontiers, 2013,20(5):175-187.

[16] 于文修,陆建林,张庆龙, 等.长岭断陷火山岩储层内碳酸盐矿物碳氧同位素组成及其成因[J]. 矿物岩石地球化学通报, 2012,31(1):82-87. Yu Wenxiu, Lu Jianlin, Zhang Qinglong, et al. Carbon and Oxygen Isotopic Compositions and Genesis of Carbonate Minerals in Volcanic Reservoir from the Changling Rift[J]. Bulletin of Mineralogy, Petrology and Geochemistry, 2012,31(1):82-87.

[17] 王璞珺,迟元林,刘万洙,等.松辽盆地火山岩相:类型、特征和储层意义[J].吉林大学学报(地球科学版),2003,33(4):449-456. Wang Pujun, Chi Yuanlin, Liu Wanzhu, et al. Volcanic Facies of the Songliao Basin:Classification, Characteristics and Reservoir Significance[J]. Journal of Jilin University (Earth Science Edition), 2003, 33(4):449-456.

[18] 唐华风,白冰, 边伟华,等. 松辽盆地营城组火山机构地层结构定量模型[J]. 石油学报,2012, 33(4):541-550. Tang Huafeng, Bai Bing, Bian Weihua, et al. Quantitative Models of Strata Texture Within Volcanic Edifices of Yingcheng Formation in Songliao Basin, NE China[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2012,33(4):541-550.

[19] 唐华风,边伟华,王璞珺,等.松辽盆地下白垩统营城组火山岩喷发旋回特征[J]. 天然气工业,2010,30(3):35-39. Tang Huafeng, Bian Weihua, Wang Pujun, et al.Characteristics of Volcanic Eruption Cycles of the Yingcheng Formation in the Songliao Basin[J]. Natural Gas Industry,2010,30(3):35-39.

[20] 谭开俊,张帆,潘建国,等.火山岩优质储层定量预测技术及应用[J].天然气地球科学,2012,23(1):175-180. Tan Kaijun, Zhang Fan, Pan Jianguo, et al. Quangtitative Prediction Technology of High Quality Volcanic Reservoir and Its Application[J]. Natural Gas Geoscience, 2012,23(1):175-180.

[21] 唐华风,孙海波,高有峰,等.火山地层界面类型、特征及其储层意义[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2013, 43(5):1320-1329. Tang Huafeng, Sun Haibo, Gao Youfeng, et al. Boundary Types and Characteristics of Volcanostratigraphy and Its Signification of Reservoirs[J]. Journal of Jilin University (Earth Science Edition), 2013, 43(5):1320-1329.

[22] 陈庆春,朱东亚,胡文瑄,等.试论火山岩储层的类型及其成因特征[J].地质论评,2003,49(3):286-281. Cheng Qingchun, Zhu Dongya, Hu Wenxuan, et al. Classification and Characteristics of Oil and Gas Reservoir Beds of Volcanic Rocks[J]. Geological Review, 2003, 49(3):286-291.

[23] 唐华风,徐正顺,吴艳辉,等.松辽盆地营城组火山岩储层流动单元特征和控制因素[J].岩石学报, 2010,26(1):55-62. Tang Huafeng, Xu Zhengshun, Wu Yanhui, et al. Charactertics and Controlling Factors of Volcanic Reservoir Flow Units of Yingcheng Formation in the Songliao Basin[J]. Acta Petrologica Sinica, 2010, 26(1):55-62.

[24] 唐华风,徐正顺,王璞珺,等.松辽盆地白垩系营城组埋藏火山机构岩相定量模型及储层流动单元特征[J].吉林大学学报(地球科学版),2007,37(6):1074-1082. Tang Huafeng, Xu Zhenshun, Wang Pujun, et al. Facies Quantitive Model and Characteristics of Reservoirs Flow Unit of Buried Volcanic Edifice of Yingcheng Formation in Songliao Basin, Cretaceous, NE China[J]. Journal of Jilin University (Earth Science Edition), 2007,37(6):1074-1082.

[25] 周学民,舒萍,王国军,等.升平深层火山岩气藏描述[J]. 石油学报,2006,27(S):57-61. Zhou Xuemin, Shu Ping, Wang Guojun, et al. Description of Deep Volcanic Gas Reservoir in Shenping Area[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica,2006,27(S):57-61.

[26] 庞彦明,毕晓明,邵锐,等.火山岩气藏早期开发特征及其控制因素[J].石油学报,2009,30(6):882-886. Pang Yanming, Bi Xiaoming, Shao Rui, et al. Early-Stage Development Characteristics of Volcanic Gas Reservoirs and Its Controlling Factors[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2009,30(6):882-886.

[27] 吴颜雄,王璞珺,曲立才,等.营城组一段及下段岩性岩相和储层物性的精细刻画:基于标准剖面营一D1井全取心钻孔资料[J].吉林大学学报(地球科学版),2007,37(6):1192-1202. Wu Yanxiong, Wang Pujun, Qu Licai, et al. Detailed Description of Lithology, Lithofacies and Porosity and Permeability of the First and the Lower Member of Yingcheng Formation:Based on the Latest Data of Ying-1D1 Well Cores in Standard Section[J]. Journal of Jilin University (Earth Science Edition), 2007, 37(6):1192-1202.

[28] 闵飞琼,王璞珺,于世泉,等.营城组三段及二段岩性岩相和储层物性的精细刻画:基于标准剖面营三D1井全取心钻孔资料[J].吉林大学学报(地球科学版),2007, 37(6):1203-1206. Min Feiqiong, Wang Pujun, Yu Shiquan, et al. Meticulous Depiction of Lithology, Lithofacies and Reservoir Porosity and Permeability in the Third & Second Member of Yingcheng Formation:Based on Whole Coring Ying-3 D1 Well Drilled in the Standard Section[J]. Journal of Jilin University (Earth Science Edition), 2007, 37(6):1203-1206.

[29] 罗静兰,侯连华,蒋宜勤,等.陆东地区火成岩形成时代与构造背景及火山岩储层成因[J]. 石油学报,2012, 33(3):351-360. Luo Jinglan, Hou Lianhua, Jiang Yiqin, et al. Chronology and Tectonic Settings of Igneous Rocks and Origin of Volcanic Reservoirs in Ludong Area,Eastern Junggar Basin[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2012, 33(3):351-360.

[30] 王光付.溶洞型碳酸盐岩油藏高效开发实践:以塔河油田11区为例[J].石油与天然气地质,2008,29(5):703-708. Wang Guangfu. Efficient Development of Vuggy Carbonate Reservoirs:An Example from the Block 11 of Tahe Oilfieid[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2008,29(5):703-708.

[31] 陈志海,黄广涛,刘常红,等.烃类流体分布与缝洞储层流动单元的划分[J].石油学报,2007,28(1):92-97. Chen Zhihai, Huang Guangtao, Liu Changhong, et al. Distribution of Hydrocarbon Fluid and Division of Flow Units in Fracture-Cave Reservoir[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2007, 28(1):92-97.

[1] 唐华风, 张亚东, 邹明倬, 陆国超, 户景松, 张津铭, 卞海越. 渤海湾盆地莱州湾凹陷K油田中生界火山岩储层定量评价[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2026, 56(3): 739-753.
[2] 任宪军, 石云倩. 松辽盆地南部下白垩统火石岭组钙碱性火山岩地球化学特征及成因[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2026, 56(3): 818-834.
[3] 孙文博, 苟军, 王世成, 王常东, 王广婷, 孙家兴, 张铎, 田丽, 孙德有. 大兴安岭南部白音沙那盆地中生代火山岩年代学及岩石成因[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2026, 56(3): 852-874.
[4] 张恩威, 孟庆涛, 唐佰强, 胡菲, 党微.  基于机器学习的TOC测井预测方法:以松辽盆地南部青山口组一段为例[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2026, 56(3): 1062-1075.
[5] 李新琦, 霍飞宇, 赵志平, 崔普媛, 李祺. 渤中凹陷中生界火山岩规模性裂缝储层特征及成因#br#[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2026, 56(2): 483-496.
[6] 黄玉龙, 张皓, 郭强, 陈昌.

低阻玄武岩的矿物学特征及其油气地质意义——以辽河坳陷古近系为例 [J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2026, 56(2): 511-521.

[7] 冯波, 谢一平, 田海龙, 封官宏, 杨金钢. 基于GIS-MCDA的松辽盆地南部中央坳陷区咸水层CO2地质封存适宜性评价[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2025, 55(6): 1981-2000.
[8] 季金礁, 边伟华, 唐华风, 李元哲, 王璞珺. 松辽盆地莺山断陷营城组凝灰熔岩微观孔隙特征[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2025, 55(4): 1051-1060.
[9] 吴燕清, 杨志亮, 王常东, 郝晓飞, 姜山, 林天发, 于兵, 董小宇, 张强, 周舰, 王天奇, 王一鸣.

内蒙古乌兰哈达—楚鲁达板地区铀矿化特征及找矿方向 [J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2025, 55(4): 1103-1119.

[10] 朱建峰, 张美华, 冷庆磊, 刘玉虎, 栾颖. 松辽盆地查干花次凹火山岩构造裂缝及应力场[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2025, 55(3): 745-757.
[11] 王常东, 郝晓飞, 杨东光, 宁君, 翁海蛟, 严兆彬, 张韶华, 武飞. 松辽盆地南部新生代辉绿岩及其与砂岩型铀成矿的关系[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2025, 55(3): 775-788.
[12] 仝立华, 单玄龙, 张家强, 李锋, 石磊, 李耀华, 徐银波, 刘衍彤.

松辽盆地西部斜坡带中南部大岗地区上白垩统油砂含油性特征 [J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2025, 55(2): 363-374.

[13] 高波, 潘哲君, 刘连杰, 李玲玲, 洪淑新, 潘会芳, 张波. 松辽盆地徐家围子断陷沙河子组砂砾岩储层有效性综合评价[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2025, 55(1): 31-45.
[14] 张熠, 刘萍, 周翔. 松辽盆地王府地区泉四段常规、非常规油气有序分布及成藏主控因素[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2025, 55(1): 46-56.
[15] 任梦怡, 范洪军, 陆国超, 柏佳伟, 唐华风. 渤海莱州湾凹陷南斜坡中生界火山岩储层特征和控制因素[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2025, 55(1): 15-30.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 尤敏鑫,刘建民. 同位素地球化学在峨眉山大火成岩省研究中的应用现状与进展[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2014, 44(4): 1231 -1243 .
[2] 杨春梅, 李洪奇,陆大卫,张方礼,高 原,邵英超. 不同驱替方式下岩石电阻率与饱和度的关系[J]. J4, 2005, 35(05): 667 -671 .
[3] 祝洪臣,张炯飞,权 恒. 大兴安岭中生代两期成岩成矿作用的元素、同位素特征及其形成环境[J]. J4, 2005, 35(04): 436 -0442 .
[4] 朱建伟, 赵刚, 刘博, 郭巍, 成俊. 油页岩测井识别技术及应用[J]. J4, 2012, 42(2): 289 -295 .
[5] 陈力,梁海安,张文娟,荣帆. 模糊数学方法在城市工程地质环境区划中的应用--以抚顺市城区为例[J]. J4, 2008, 38(5): 837 -0840 .
[6] 高桂梅,苏 克,王文颖,甘树才,刘招君. 吉林省桦甸油页岩中稀土元素和微量元素的研究[J]. J4, 2006, 36(6): 974 -0979 .
[7] 吴孔运,蒋忠诚,叶 晔. 不同植物群落对灰岩试块溶蚀速率的影响[J]. J4, 2007, 37(5): 967 -0971 .
[8] 周彦章,迟宝明,刘中培. 山东夏甸金矿床充水机理构造控制模式[J]. J4, 2008, 38(2): 255 -0260 .
[9] 张渊,刘连登,孙景贵,陈国华,张洪喜,闫复传,杨开春. 胶东西北部黄埠岭金矿床两期次叠加成矿[J]. J4, 2008, 38(1): 21 -0026 .
[10] 鲁程鹏, 束龙仓, 苑利波, 张蓉蓉, 黄币娟, 王彬彬. 基于示踪试验求解岩溶含水层水文地质参数[J]. J4, 2009, 39(4): 717 -721 .