乍得南部Bongor盆地下白垩统碎屑岩储层成岩作用及其对物性的影响

doi:10.13278/j.cnki.jjuese.20200134

吉林大学学报(地球科学版) ›› 2021, Vol. 51 ›› Issue (6): 1689-1699.doi: 10.13278/j.cnki.jjuese.20200134

乍得南部Bongor盆地下白垩统碎屑岩储层成岩作用及其对物性的影响

陶永富¹, 李达¹, 黄长兵², 廖鸿辉¹, 张华琴¹, 寻升¹, 李翀¹, 吴伟³

1. 中国石油玉门油田分公司勘探开发研究院, 甘肃酒泉 735000;
2. 西南科技大学环境与资源学院, 四川绵阳 621000;
3. 中国石油集团测井有限公司地质研究院, 西安 710000

收稿日期:2020-06-03 出版日期:2021-11-26 发布日期:2021-11-24
通讯作者: 黄长兵(1986-),男,高级工程师,博士,主要从事石油地质相关方向的研究,E-mail:182384895@qq.com E-mail:182384895@qq.com
作者简介:陶永富(1989-),男,工程师,主要从事油藏工程方面的研究,E-mail:ymtaoyf@petrochina.com.cn
基金资助:
中国石油天然气股份有限公司科技专项（2018D-0704）

Diagenesis of Lower Cretaceous Clastic Reservoir and Its Influence on Physical Properties in Bongor Basin, Southern Chad

Tao Yongfu¹, Li Da¹, Huang Changbing², Liao Honghui¹, Zhang Huaqin¹, Xun Sheng¹, Li Chong¹, Wu Wei³

1. Research Institute of Exploration and Development, PetroChina Yumen Oilfield Company, Jiuquan 735000, Gansu, China;
2. School of Environment and Resources, Southwest University of Science and Technology, Mianyang 621000, Sichuan, China;
3. Geological Research Institute of CNPC Logging Co., Ltd., Xi'an 710000, China

Received:2020-06-03 Online:2021-11-26 Published:2021-11-24
Supported by:
Supported by the Science and Technology Project of CNPC (2018D-0704)

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 综合利用铸体薄片、X射线衍射、阴极发光、扫描电镜、物性分析及镜质体反射率和包裹体温度等资料，结合岩心观察法，对Bongor盆地下白垩统碎屑岩储层基本特征及成岩作用进行了研究。依据胶结物的体积分数及形态、黏土矿物组分的分布、岩石结构镜下特征及孔隙演化、有机质热演化等证据划分了岩石成岩阶段，并分析了成岩作用对物性的影响。结果显示：该区储层岩石类型以长石砂岩为主，胶结物以碳酸盐和黏土矿物为主；溶孔-粒间孔组合型储集性最好，粒间孔-溶孔组合型次之；成岩作用是控制储层物性的主要因素，成岩作用主要包括压实作用、胶结作用、交代作用和溶蚀作用；压实作用和胶结作用是破坏性成岩作用，二者分别使原始孔隙度损失54.93%和31.30%，岩石颗粒中长石、碳酸盐胶结物等易溶物质发育，溶蚀作用是主要建设性成岩作用；目的层成岩阶段以中成岩A期为主，成岩作用弱-中等。

关键词: 储层特征, 成岩作用, 碎屑岩, Bongor盆地, 下白垩统, 乍得南部

Abstract: Based on the data of cast thin section, X-ray diffraction, cathodoluminescence, scanning electron microscope, physical property analysis, vitrinite reflectivity and wrapping temperature, combined with core observation method, the basic characteristics and diagenesis of Lower Cretaceous clastic reservoir in Bongor basin are studied. According to the volume fraction and morphology of cement, the distribution of clay mineral components, microscopic characteristics of rock structure, pore evolution and thermal evolution of organic matter, the rock diagenetic stages are divided, and the influence of diagenesis on physical properties is analyzed. The results show that:The reservoir rock type in this area is mainly feldspathic sandstone, and the cement is mainly carbonate and clay minerals; Dissolved pore intergranular pore combination has the best reservoir performance, followed by intergranular pore dissolved pore combination; Diagenesis mainly includes compaction, cementation, metasomatism and dissolution; The diagenetic stage of the target layer is mainly middle diagenetic stage A, and the diagenesis is weak to medium; Diagenesis is the main factor controlling reservoir physical properties. Compaction and cementation are destructive diagenesis, which make the original porosity lose 54.93% and 31.30% respectively; In the rock particles, feldspar, carbonate cement and other soluble substances are developed, with strong dissolution, which is the main constructive diagenesis.

Key words: reservoir characteristics, diagenesis, clastic rock, Bongor basin, Lower Cretaceous, southern Chad

中图分类号:

TE112.23

陶永富, 李达, 黄长兵, 廖鸿辉, 张华琴, 寻升, 李翀, 吴伟. 乍得南部Bongor盆地下白垩统碎屑岩储层成岩作用及其对物性的影响[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2021, 51(6): 1689-1699.

Tao Yongfu, Li Da, Huang Changbing, Liao Honghui, Zhang Huaqin, Xun Sheng, Li Chong, Wu Wei. Diagenesis of Lower Cretaceous Clastic Reservoir and Its Influence on Physical Properties in Bongor Basin, Southern Chad[J]. Journal of Jilin University(Earth Science Edition), 2021, 51(6): 1689-1699.

参考文献

[1] Marchand A M E, Smalley P C, Haseldine R S, et al. Evidence for Reduced Quartz-Cementation Rates in Oil-Filled Sandstones[J]. Geology, 2001,29(10):915-918.
[2] Wolela A M, Gierlowski-Kordesch E H. Diagenetic History of Fluvial and Lacustrine Sandstones of the Hartford Basin(Triassic-Jurassic), Newark Super-group, USA[J]. Sedimentary Geology, 2007, 197(1/2):99-126.
[3] 窦立荣,肖坤叶,胡勇,等.乍得Bongor盆地石油地质特征及成藏模式[J].石油学报,2011,32(3):379-386. Dou Lirong, Xiao Kunye, Hu Yong, et al. Petroleum Geological Characteristics and Accumulation Model of Bongor Basin in Chad[J]. Journal of Petroleum,2011,32(3):379-386.
[4] 文志刚,李威,窦立荣,等.Bongor盆地Baobab地区潜山油气成藏期次[J].石油学报,2018,39(8):869-875. Wen Zhigang, Li Wei, Dou Lirong, et al. Oil and Gas Accumulation Stage of Buried Hill in Baobab Area of Bongor Basin[J]. Journal of Petroleum,2018,39(8):869-875.
[5] 张辰.乍得H区Bongor盆地Great Baobab油田储层特性研究[D].大庆:东北石油大学,2018. Zhang Chen. Reservoir Characteristics Research of Great Baobab Oilfield in Bongor Basin,Block H,Chad[D]. Daqing:Northeast Petroleum University,2018.
[6] Folk R L. Petrology of Sedimentary Rocks[M]. Texas:Hemphill Publishing Company,1974:184.
[7] 李文强,郭兴伟,王艳忠,等. 基于海陆对比建立苏北-南黄海盆地晚二叠世-早三叠世地层格架[J].吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2020, 50(1):18-30. Li Wenqiang,Guo Xingwei, Wang Yanzhong, et al. Establishment of Stratigraphic Framework of Late Permian to Early Triassic in Northern Jiangsu and South Yellow Sea Basin Based on Land-Sea Comparison[J]. Journal of Jilin University (Earth Science Edition), 2020, 50(1):18-30.
[8] 纪友亮.高邮凹陷古近系阜宁组一段沉积特征对储层成岩作用及物性的影响[J].地质学报,2014,88(7):1299-1310. Ji Youliang. Influence of Sedimentary Characteristics of the First Member of Funing Formation of Paleogene on Diagenesis and Physical Properties of Reservoir in Gaoyou Depression[J]. Journal of Geology,2014,88(7):1299-1310.
[9] 惠学智, 许有为, 吕娜娜, 等. 鄂尔多斯盆地华庆地区长8段成岩主控因素及其对储层的影响[J]. 世界地质, 2019, 38(4):1012-1020. Hui Xuezhi, Xu Youwei, Lü Nana, et al. Major Controlling Factors of Diagenesis and Their Influences on Chang-8 Section Reservoir, Huaqing Area, Ordos Basin[J]. Global Geology, 2019, 38(4):1012-1020.
[10] 冷庆磊, 黄玉龙, 冉波, 等. 火山碎屑岩储层溶蚀孔隙发育特征与控制因素:以松辽盆地南部陆家堡凹陷下白垩统为例[J]. 世界地质, 2020, 39(2):368-378. Leng Qinglei, Huang Yulong, Ran Bo, et al. Characteristics and Controlling Factors of Dissolution Pores in Pyroclastic Rock Reservoirs:A Case Study of Lower Cretaceous of Lujiapu Sag, Southern Songliao Basin[J]. Global Geology, 2020, 39(2):368-378.
[11] 和钟铧,王启智,王强.大兴安岭索伦地区哲斯组碎屑岩地球化学特征和锆石U-Pb年龄对沉积物源属性约束[J].吉林大学学报(地球科学版),2020,50(2):405-424. He Zhonghua, Wang Qizhi, Wang Qiang. Geochemistry and Zircon U-Pb Ages of Clastic Rocks of Zhesi Formation in Suolun Region, Great Xing'an Range:Constraints on Origins of Sediment Provenance[J]. Journal of Jilin University (Earth Science Edition), 2020, 50(2):405-424.
[12] 姚泾利,李咪,王怀厂,等.鄂尔多斯盆地东部绥德-吴堡地区山23气层砂岩成岩相类型与控因[J].河南理工大学学报(自然科学版),2020(3):45-55. Yao Jingli,Li Mi,Wang Huaichang,et al.Diagenetic Facies Types and Controlling Factors of Sandstone in Shan 23 Gas Reservoir in Suide Wubao Area,Eastern Ordos Basin[J].Journal of Henan University of Technology(Natural Science Edition),2020(3):45-55.
[13] 孙海涛,钟大康,李勇,等.超深低孔特低渗砂岩储层的孔隙成因及控制因素:以库车坳陷克深地区巴什基奇克组为例[J].吉林大学学报(地球科学版),2018,48(3):109-120. Sun Haitao, Zhong Dakang, Li Yong, et al. Pore Genesis and Controlling Factors of Ultra Deep, Low Porosity and Ultra-Low Permeability Sandstone Reservoir:Taking Bashiqiqiki Formation in Keshen Area of Kuqa Depression as an Example[J]. Journal of Jilin University(Geoscience Edition),2018, 48(3):109-120.
[14] 郭艳琴,余芳,李洋,等.鄂尔多斯盆地华庆地区长9储层成岩作用与有利成岩相[J].西北大学学报(自然科学版),2016,46(4):558-564. Guo Yanqin, Yu Fang, Li Yang, et al. Diagenesis and Favorable Diagenetic Facies of Chang 9 Reservoir in Huaqing Area, Ordos Basin[J]. Journal of Northwest University (Natural Science Edition), 2016,46(4):558-564.
[15] 司马立强,黄丹,韩世峰,等.鄂尔多斯盆地靖边气田南部古风化壳岩溶诸层有效性评价[J].天然气工业,2015,35(4):7-15. Sima Liqiang, Huang Dan, Han Shifeng, et al. Effectiveness Evaluation of Paleoweathering Crust Karst Layers in the South of Jingbian Gas Field,Ordos Basin[J]. Natural Gas Industry,2015,35(4):7-15.
[16] Houseknecht D W.Assessing the Relative Importance of Compaction Processes and Cementation to Reduction of Porosity in Sandstones[J]. AAPG Bulletin,1987,71(3):633-642.

相关文章 15

[1]	郭颖, 杨波, 韩自军, 李果营, 吴庆勋, 叶涛. 深层碎屑岩自生矿物成因机理及其对储层物性的影响——以渤海歧南断阶带侏罗系为例[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2021, 51(4): 973-990.
[2]	田兴旺, 罗冰, 孙奕婷, 刘冉, 李亚, 陈延贵, 周春林, 汪华, 李亚丁, 王尉, 王云龙, 杨岱林. 二叠系火山碎屑岩气藏天然气地球化学特征及气源分析——以四川盆地成都—简阳地区永探1井为例[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2021, 51(2): 325-335.
[3]	张大智, 初丽兰, 周翔, 王晓莲, 李鑫. 松辽盆地北部徐家围子断陷沙河子组致密气储层成岩作用与成岩相特征[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2021, 51(1): 22-34.
[4]	柳蓉, 闫旭, 刘招君, 张坤, 武昕普, 赵康安. 银额盆地下白垩统巴音戈壁组含油页岩岩系孢粉化石特征及地质意义[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2020, 50(2): 341-355.
[5]	宋宇, 刘招君, Achim Bechtel, 徐银波, 孟庆涛, 孙平昌, 朱凯. 老黑山盆地下白垩统穆棱组油页岩与煤含油率控制因素[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2020, 50(2): 378-391.
[6]	蒙启安, 李军辉, 李跃, 邹越. 海拉尔—塔木察格盆地中部富油凹陷高含凝灰质碎屑岩储层成因及油气勘探意义[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2020, 50(2): 569-578.
[7]	王福平, 李刚, 高元宏, 段隆臣, 刘海声. 钻井液性能对火山碎屑岩崩解性的影响——以青海阿克楚克塞矿区火山碎屑岩为例[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2019, 49(4): 1093-1099.
[8]	单祥, 郭华军, 郭旭光, 邹志文, 李亚哲, 王力宝. 低渗透储层孔隙结构影响因素及其定量评价——以准噶尔盆地金龙2地区二叠系上乌尔禾组二段为例[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2019, 49(3): 637-649.
[9]	林敉若, 操应长, 葸克来, 王健, 陈洪, 吴俊军. 阜康凹陷东部斜坡带二叠系储层特征及控制因素[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2018, 48(4): 991-1007.
[10]	孙海涛, 钟大康, 李勇, 毛亚昆, 杨宪彰. 超深低孔特低渗砂岩储层的孔隙成因及控制因素——以库车坳陷克深地区巴什基奇克组为例[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2018, 48(3): 693-704.
[11]	刘鑫金, 冯阵东, 李聪, 周艳, 王亚明. 近源湖盆砂砾岩储层次生溶孔成因探讨——以查干凹陷祥6井区为例[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2017, 47(2): 393-404.
[12]	贾珍臻, 林承焰, 任丽华, 董春梅, 宫宝. 苏德尔特油田低渗透凝灰质砂岩成岩作用及储层质量差异性演化[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2016, 46(6): 1624-1636.
[13]	陈波, 王子天, 康莉, 张顺存, 史基安. 准噶尔盆地玛北地区三叠系百口泉组储层成岩作用及孔隙演化[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2016, 46(1): 23-35.
[14]	朱志军, 郭福生, 刘腾, 刘远超. 云南兰坪盆地古近系细碎屑岩地球化学特征及其地质意义[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2015, 45(6): 1631-1641.
[15]	徐波, 唐铁柱, 李辰. 鄂尔多斯盆地中东部马五段碳酸盐岩气藏富气主控因素—以陕200井区为例[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2015, 45(5): 1299-1309.

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed

乍得南部Bongor盆地下白垩统碎屑岩储层成岩作用及其对物性的影响

Diagenesis of Lower Cretaceous Clastic Reservoir and Its Influence on Physical Properties in Bongor Basin, Southern Chad

PDF (PC)

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 10