J4 ›› 2011, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (3): 647-656.

• 地质与资源 • 上一篇    下一篇

松辽盆地北部西斜坡姚家组SⅡ+Ⅲ砂组物源分析及沉积微相

胡晓兰1|樊太亮1|张晓龙2|何辉3|王进财3|方芹1|邹拓4   

  1. 1.中国地质大学能源学院/海相储层演化与油气富集机理教育部重点实验室|北京100083;
    2.冀东油田公司研究院|河北 唐山063004;
    3.中国石油勘探开发研究院|北京100083;
    4.中国石油大港油田勘探开发研究院|天津300280
  • 收稿日期:2010-06-09 出版日期:2011-05-26 发布日期:2011-05-26
  • 通讯作者: 樊太亮(1961-),男,河南信阳人,教授,博士生导师,主要从事层序地层与油藏描述的教学与研究工作,Tel:010-82321559 E-mail:fantl@cugb.edu.cn
  • 作者简介:胡晓兰(1985-)|女|湖北黄石人|博士研究生|主要从事层序地层及隐蔽油气藏勘探与开发的研究|E-mail:bbb-lll@163.com
  • 基金资助:

    国家“973”计划项目(2005CB422103)

Sedimentary Micro-Facies Research and Provenance Analysis of the SⅡ+Ⅲ Sand Groups of Yaojia Formation in the West Slope of Northern Songliao Basin

HU Xiao-lan1, FAN Tai-liang1, ZHANG Xiao-long1, HE Hui3, WANG Jin-cai3, FANG Qin1, ZOU Tuo4   

  1. 1.School of Energy Resources/Key Laboratory of Marine Reservoir Evolution and Hydrocarbon Accumulation Mechanism, Ministry of Education,China University of Geosciences, Beijing100083, China;
    2.Research Institute of Jidong Oilfield Company|Tangshan063004, Hebei,China;
    3.Petro China Exploration and Development Research Institute, Beijing100083, China;
    4.Exploration and Development Research Institute| Dagang Oilfield|CNPC|Tianjin300280, China
  • Received:2010-06-09 Online:2011-05-26 Published:2011-05-26

摘要:

已有研究表明,松辽盆地西斜坡姚家组沉积初期古湖盆大面积暴露地表,形成的姚一段区域性假整合面成为后期油气向西运移的通道,因此,研究姚家组上部地层沉积特征及其控制因素对油气的勘探开发意义重大。通过重矿物分布和小层砂岩百分含量分析,揭示了松辽盆地西斜坡地区姚家组SⅡ+Ⅲ砂组沉积时期受齐齐哈尔和英台双向物源控制。根据古构造层、古地貌形态、水体能量的控制因素分析,结合研究区49口岩心井资料和202口钻测井资料,阐明了西斜坡地区姚家组SⅡ+Ⅲ砂组主要发育水下分流河道、水下分流间湾、远砂坝、河口坝、砂坪、泥坪和混合坪7种微相类型,并总结出SⅡ+Ⅲ4、SⅡ+Ⅲ3、SⅡ+Ⅲ2、SⅡ+Ⅲ14个小层沉积微相平面展布特征及变化规律。研究区姚家组SⅡ+Ⅲ砂组在南北向物源控制下发育的7种微相中,水下分流河道和河口坝为最有利的砂体储集类型;湖水冲刷环境下形成的砂坪和混合坪很可能成为后期湖区勘探的潜在目标。

关键词: 姚家组, SⅡ+Ⅲ砂组, 物源分析, 沉积微相, 松辽盆地北部西斜坡, 油气

Abstract:

Study shows that the surface area of the ancient lake of the west slope at northern Songliao basin is largely exposed during the initial deposit period of Yaojia Formation, and a regional unconformity surface as the channel of westward migration for oil and gas is formed later. Therefore, it is significant to study the deposition system of upper part of Yaojia Formation and its controlling factors on the oil and gas exploration and development. According to the analysis on the distribution of heavy minerals and the percentage of sandstone in each small layer, it is revealed that the SⅡ+Ⅲ sand groups deposition of Yaojia Formation in the west slope of northern Songliao basin is controlled by the two-way provenance of Qiqihar and Yingtai; after analyzing the controlling factors of paleo-topography layer, palaeogeomorphic and water energy environment, combining with the study on the core data of 49 wells and the drilling logging data of 202 wells in the study area, the fact can be clarified that seven major micro-facies types in the SⅡ+Ⅲ sand groups deposition of Yaojia Formation in the west slope area are developed, which includes underwater distributary channel, under water interdistributary bay, distal bar, mouth bar, sand flat, mud flat and sand-mud mixed flat; and the sedimentary micro-facies plane distribution feature and their changing law of the SⅡ+Ⅲ4, SⅡ+Ⅲ3, SⅡ+Ⅲ2 and SⅡ+Ⅲ1 four small layers are summarized. After studying the micro-facies under control of the south and north two-way provenance, it is proven that the underwater distributary channel and mouth bar are the favorite reservoir sandstones, and the sand flat and sand-mud mixed flat micro-facies formed at the environment of water erosion are likely to be the potential targets for exploration in the latter part of lakes area.

Key words: Yaojia Formation, the SⅡ+Ⅲ sand groups, provenance analysis, sedimentary micro-facies, the west slope of northern Songliao basin, petroleum gas

中图分类号: 

  • P618.13
[1] 牟敦山, 付广, 陈雪晴. 南堡1号构造馆三段断盖配置油气渗漏部位及其控藏作用[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2018, 48(4): 1008-1017.
[2] 陈爱民. 澳大利亚Bonaparte盆地WA-406-P区块油气成藏条件及控制因素[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2018, 48(4): 965-980.
[3] 李文强, 郭巍, 孙守亮, 杨绪海, 刘帅, 侯筱煜. 塔里木盆地巴楚—麦盖提地区古生界油气藏成藏期次[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2018, 48(3): 640-651.
[4] 舒晴, 朱晓颖, 高维, 李瑞, 尹航. 三塘湖盆地航磁异常特征及油气远景预测[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2018, 48(2): 451-460.
[5] 姚刚, 董向欣, 李丽丽, 马国庆, 孟令顺. 东海陆架盆地构造划分的高精度重磁解释技术[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2018, 48(2): 517-524.
[6] 李昂, 鞠林波, 张丽艳. 塔里木盆地古城低凸起古-中生界构造演化特征与油气成藏关系[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2018, 48(2): 545-555.
[7] 杨德相, 付广, 孙同文, 李熹微, 姜海燕, 刘滨莹. 油源断裂优势通道输导油气能力综合评价方法及其应用[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2017, 47(6): 1678-1686.
[8] 马德龙, 何登发, 魏东涛, 王彦君, 魏彩茹. 准噶尔盆地南缘古牧地背斜多期构造变形特征[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2017, 47(6): 1695-1704.
[9] 张焕旭, 陈世加, 路俊刚, 刘超威, 陈娟, 李勇, 徐坤. “膨胀力”作用下致密砂岩储层石油运聚特征[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2017, 47(5): 1341-1351.
[10] 张博为, 付广, 张居和, 胡明, 刘峻桥, 王浩然. 油源断裂转换带裂缝发育及其对油气控制作用——以冀中坳陷文安斜坡议论堡地区沙二段为例[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2017, 47(2): 370-381.
[11] 李博南, 刘财, 郭智奇. 基于等效介质模型和频变AVO反演的裂缝储层参数估算方法[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2017, 47(1): 234-244.
[12] 陈冬霞, 庞雄奇, 杨克明, 祝渭平, 严青霞. 川西坳陷深层叠复连续型致密砂岩气藏成因及形成过程[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2016, 46(6): 1611-1623.
[13] 刘峻桥, 吕延防, 付广, 孙同文, 李佳兴. 正断层输导油气运移模式及其对油气分布的控制作用[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2016, 46(6): 1672-1683.
[14] 姜贵璞. 陆相断陷盆地油气空间互补分布成因及分布范围的确定方法[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2016, 46(6): 1649-1659.
[15] 刘财, 杨宝俊, 冯晅, 单玄龙, 田有, 刘洋, 鹿琪, 刘才华, 杨冬, 王世煜. 论油气资源的多元勘探[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2016, 46(4): 1208-1220.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!