J4 ›› 2012, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (2): 526-535.

• 地球探测与信息技术 • 上一篇    下一篇

青藏高原羌塘盆地晚三叠世古地磁数据及其构造意义

宋春彦1,2|王剑2|付修根2|冯兴雷2|陈明2|何利2   

  1. 1.中国地质科学院研究生部|北京100037;2.成都地质矿产研究所|成都610081
  • 收稿日期:2011-07-14 出版日期:2012-03-26 发布日期:2012-03-26
  • 作者简介:宋春彦(1981-)|男|博士研究生|主要从事地层、构造和油气相关研究工作|Tel:028-83221030|E-mail:331377185@qq.com
  • 基金资助:

    国家自然科学基金项目(40972087);国家油气专项(选区\[2009\]01)

Late Triassic Paleomagnetic Data from the Qiangtang Terrane of Tibetan Plateau and Their Tectonic Significances

Song Chun-yan1,2, Wang Jian2, Fu Xiu-gen2, Feng Xing-lei2, Chen Ming2, He Li2   

  1. 1.Graduate Department, Chinese Academy of Geological Sciences, Beijing100037, China;
    2.Chengdu Institute of Geology and Mineral Resources, Chengdu610081, China
  • Received:2011-07-14 Online:2012-03-26 Published:2012-03-26

摘要:

羌塘盆地作为青藏高原主要的地体之一,其中生代的地质演化对于研究古特提斯洋关闭和冈瓦纳大陆解体都具有重要的指示意义。为查明羌塘盆地中生代的演化过程,在南、北羌塘坳陷上三叠统扎拉组和土门格拉组地层中共采集200余件砂岩样品进行古地磁对比研究。热退磁实验显示,大部分样品均含有两个磁组分,并揭示出一组高温特征剩磁分量,在95%置信度下通过正倒转检验和正褶皱检验,说明这组高温分量很可能代表岩石形成时的原生剩磁。南、北羌塘坳陷中样品的平均特征剩磁方向分别为D/I=28°/45.5°(a95=3.6°)和D/I=35.3°/46.5°(a95=4.0°);其相近的古地磁极和古纬度表明,南、北羌塘在晚三叠世已经属于一个统一的地块,并且具有北纬27°的古纬度。再结合前人研究成果发现,羌塘盆地晚古生代位于南半球中纬度地区,晚二叠世时已靠近赤道,并逐渐从冈瓦纳大陆北缘裂解开来向北漂移。羌塘盆地与塔里木地块在晚三叠世实现了碰撞拼合;中白垩世时,又与拉萨地块完成了板块碰撞。至此,羌塘盆地与周缘各地块基本上完成了碰撞拼合。

关键词: 青藏高原, 羌塘盆地, 三叠纪, 古地磁, 构造

Abstract:

The Qiangtang terrane is located in the central part of the Tibetan Plateau, where the Mesozoic geological evolution has great significance for revealing the closure of Paleotethyan ocean and the disintegration of Gondwanaland. In order to find out the Mesozoic evolution of the Qiangtang terrane, more than 200 paleomagnetic samples were collected from the Upper Trassic Tumengela Formation and Zala Formation both in the north and in the south Qiangtang. Most samples contained two components of magnetization in thermal demagnetization experiments. The most stable high-unblocking temperature components were isolated and passed positive reversal tests at the 95% confidence level, which suggested that these high-temperature components could be regarded as primary characteristic remanent magnetization. The mean characteristic magnetization directions of the samples from north Qiangtang and south Qiangtang were D/I=28°/45.5° (a95=3.6°) and D/I=35.3°/46.5° (a95=4.0°), respectively.Nearly similar paleomagnetic polar and palaeolatitude, obtained from the north Qiangtang and the south Qiangtang, indicated that they had already belonged to one plate in the Late Triassic. The Late Triassic paleolatitude of Qiantang terrane was 27° in the Northern Hemisphere. Combined with previously reported paleomagnetic results, the paleomagnetic polar wandering paths were obtained. According to the paleomagnetic polar wandering paths, the Qiangtang terrane was located in the Southern Hemisphere during the Late Paleozoic and very close to the Equator in Late Permian. It drifted fast northward from the northeast Gondwanaland from the Late Paleozoic to the Mesozoic. The Qiangtang-Tarim plate collision finished at the end of the Triassic, and the Qiangtang-Lhasa collision might finish in the Middle Cretaceous. By then, all suture movements between Qiangtang terrane and other blocks had finished.

Key words: Tibetan Plateau, Qiangtang terrane, Triassic, paleomagnetic, tectonics

中图分类号: 

  • P631.2
[1] 牟敦山, 付广, 陈雪晴. 南堡1号构造馆三段断盖配置油气渗漏部位及其控藏作用[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2018, 48(4): 1008-1017.
[2] 宋明春, 李杰, 李世勇, 丁正江, 谭现锋, 张照录, 王世进. 鲁东晚中生代热隆-伸展构造及其动力学背景[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2018, 48(4): 941-964.
[3] 刘明忱, 孙建国, 韩复兴, 孙章庆, 孙辉, 刘志强. 基于自适应加权广义逆矢量方向滤波估计地震同相轴倾角[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2018, 48(3): 881-889.
[4] 姚刚, 董向欣, 李丽丽, 马国庆, 孟令顺. 东海陆架盆地构造划分的高精度重磁解释技术[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2018, 48(2): 517-524.
[5] 李昂, 鞠林波, 张丽艳. 塔里木盆地古城低凸起古-中生界构造演化特征与油气成藏关系[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2018, 48(2): 545-555.
[6] 尹业长, 郝立波, 赵玉岩, 石厚礼, 田午, 张豫华, 陆继龙. 冀东高家店和蛇盘兔花岗岩体:年代学、地球化学及地质意义[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2018, 48(2): 574-586.
[7] 朱晓颖, 杨海, 匡星涛, 彭巍巍, 张洪瑞. 新疆东昆仑-阿尔金地区航磁反映的断裂构造特征[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2018, 48(2): 461-473.
[8] 孟恩, 王朝阳, 刘超辉, 施建荣, 李艳广. 辽东半岛东南部南辽河群变质火山岩的时代、成因及其对区域构造演化的制约[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2017, 47(6): 1589-1619.
[9] 展铭望, 付广, 仇翠莹, 杨在增. 一种新的断裂破坏泥岩盖层程度的综合研究方法[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2017, 47(6): 1687-1694.
[10] 阮大为, 李顺达, 毕亚强, 刘兴宇, 陈旭虎, 王兴源, 王可勇. 内蒙古阿尔哈达铅锌矿床构造控矿规律及深部成矿预测[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2017, 47(6): 1705-1716.
[11] 谭洪旗, 刘玉平. 滇东南猛洞岩群斜长角闪岩成因及其构造意义[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2017, 47(6): 1763-1783.
[12] 王孔伟, 常德龙, 李春波, 胡安龙, 魏东. 再论“滑坡群”——以三峡库区为例[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2017, 47(5): 1491-1501.
[13] 韩朋, 翟云峰, 栗粲圪, 张运, 杨会会, 靳春胜. 末次间冰期以来洛川黄土天然剩磁记录的可靠性[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2017, 47(3): 793-806.
[14] 张博为, 付广, 张居和, 胡明, 刘峻桥, 王浩然. 油源断裂转换带裂缝发育及其对油气控制作用——以冀中坳陷文安斜坡议论堡地区沙二段为例[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2017, 47(2): 370-381.
[15] 安纯志, 杨振宇, 仝亚博, 李晨皓, 王恒, 高亮, 韩志锐, 徐颖超. 印支地块思茅地区始新统磁倾角偏低现象及其构造意义[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2017, 47(2): 511-525.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!