J4 ›› 2012, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (4): 948-960.

• 地质与资源 • 上一篇    下一篇

桦甸盆地桦甸组油页岩段地球化学特征及地质意义

孙平昌1,2|刘招君1,2,3|李宝毅1,2|柳蓉1,2,3|孟庆涛1,2,3|周人杰4|姚树青1,2|徐银波1,2   

  1. 1.吉林大学地球科学学院|长春130061;
    2.吉林大学油页岩与共生能源矿产成矿及勘查开发重点实验室|长春130061;
    3.东北亚生物演化与环境教育部重点实验室|长春130026;
    4.多伦多大学地质系|加拿大 多伦多M5S 3B1
  • 收稿日期:2011-11-20 出版日期:2012-07-26 发布日期:2012-07-26
  • 通讯作者: 刘招君(1951-),男,教授,博士生导师,主要从事沉积学、层序地层学、石油地质学及油页岩成矿理论研究 E-mail:liuzj@jlu.edu.cn
  • 作者简介:孙平昌(1985-)|男|博士研究生|主要从事油页岩沉积学、油页岩成矿理论研究|E-mail:sunpingchang711@126.com
  • 基金资助:

    国家自然科学基金项目(40972076);吉林大学科学前沿与交叉学科创新项目(200903035);高等学校博士学科点专项科研基金项目(20110061120066;20110061110050)

Geochemical Characteristics and Their Geological Implications of Oil Shale Member of Huadian Formation, Huadian Basin

Sun Ping-chang1,2, Liu Zhao-jun1,2,3, Li Bao-yi1,2, Liu Rong1,2,3, Meng Qing-tao1,2,3, Zhou Ren-jie4, Yao Shu-qing1,2, Xu Yin-bo1,2   

  1. 1.College of Earth Sciences, Jilin University, Changchun130061, China;
    2.KeyLaboratory for Oil Shale and Coexistent Minerals Mineralization &|Exploration and Exploitation|Jilin University, Changchun130061, China;
    3.Key Lab for Evolution of Past Life and Environment in Northeast Asia, Ministry of Education, Changchun130026,China;
    4.Department of Geology, University of Toronto|Toronto, M5S 3B1|Canada
  • Received:2011-11-20 Online:2012-07-26 Published:2012-07-26

摘要:

桦甸盆地位于敦密断裂带之上,是我国著名的古近纪含油页岩断陷盆地。其中桦甸组油页岩段发育厚层的泥岩沉积。长期以来对该段油页岩特征研究较多,但对其物源区特征和构造背景研究甚少。对油页岩段厚层泥岩进行系统的地球化学分析结果表明:泥岩中w(SiO2)整体较低,K2O/Na2O值较高(大于1),w(MgO+Fe2OT3)为3.91%~11.66%,Al2O3/(Na2O+K2O)为3.77~6.29,表明泥岩中含有一定的铁镁质组分和较多的稳定组分。微量元素PAAS标准化分配曲线显示不同样品之间元素富集、亏损趋势不一致,同时稀土元素标准化曲线呈现出稀土含量变化较大、轻稀土富集和明显Eu负异常,表明油页岩段沉积时期存在多个物源。泥岩风化蚀变指数为74~82,Th/U值多集中在4.65~6.07,表明泥岩源区经历了相对中等的风化作用。Th/Sc和Zr/Sc值表明泥岩基本受源岩成分控制。由源岩和构造背景判别图解,并结合前人研究资料得知:桦甸盆地油页岩段母岩主要来自于海西期和燕山期花岗岩以及少量的燕山期中酸性喷发岩;源岩形成于大陆边缘造山带,为大陆岛弧火山岩系。

关键词: 油页岩, 地球化学, 物源区, 构造背景, 古近纪, 桦甸盆地

Abstract:

Huadian basin, which is located within Dunhua-Mishan fault zone, is well known as a Paleogene oil shale-bearing fault-basin in China. Previous studies mostly focus on the sedimentary characteristics of oil shale, but there was little concern on provenance features and tectonic settings. The geochemical analysis based on the mudstone samples from the Oil Shale Member of Huadian Formation shows that the SiO2 content is respectively low, The K2O/Na2O ratio is relatively high(>1). The parameter of (MgO+Fe2OT3) ranges from 3.91% to 11.66% and the Al2O3/(Na2O+K2O)ratio ranges from 3.77% to 6.29%, all of which demonstrate that the mudstones contain a certain amount of femic constituents and a considerable quantity of stable components. The PAAS-standardized distribution curves of trace elements show variable enrichment and depletion trends among different samples, significant variations in the REE contents, enrichment in light REE and negative anomalies of Eu. These features suggest that the material sources of the Oil Shale Member came from several provenances. The mudstone weathering and alteration indexes range from 74 to 82 and the Th/U ratio mainly ranges from 4.65 to 6.07, both of which suggest that provenances had underwent moderate weathering processes. The Th/Sc and Zr/Sc ratios illustrate that these mudstones were mainly controlled by source rocks. On the basis of source rocks, discrimination diagrams of the tectonic setting and previous research material, we conclude that the provenances of the Oil Shale Member of Huadian Formation in Huadian Basin were mainly Hercynian and Yanshanian granites, and also involve some andesitic to rhyolitic effusive rocks. Source rocks were formed in the continental margin orogenic belt and belonged to continental island arc volcanic series.

Key words: oil shale, geochemistry, provenance, tectonic setting, Paleogene, Huadian basin

中图分类号: 

  • P618.12
[1] 张强, 丁清峰, 宋凯, 程龙. 东昆仑洪水河铁矿区狼牙山组千枚岩碎屑锆石U-Pb年龄、Hf同位素及其地质意义[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2018, 48(4): 1085-1104.
[2] 郭春涛, 李如一, 陈树民. 塔里木盆地古城地区鹰山组白云岩稀土元素地球化学特征及成因[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2018, 48(4): 1121-1134.
[3] 日比娅, 孙友宏, 韩婧, 郭明义. 3种无机盐催化热解油页岩[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2018, 48(4): 1043-1049.
[4] 崔亚川, 于介江, 杨万志, 张元厚, 崔策, 于介禄. 东天山觉罗塔格带黄山地区角闪辉长岩岩体的年代学、地球化学特征及岩石成因[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2018, 48(4): 1105-1120.
[5] 赵希林, 姜杨, 邢光福, 于胜尧, 彭银彪, 黄文成, 王存智, 靳国栋. 陈蔡早古生代俯冲增生杂岩对华夏与扬子地块拼合过程的指示意义[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2018, 48(4): 1135-1153.
[6] 王朝阳, 孟恩, 李壮, 李艳广, 靳梦琪. 吉东南新太古代晚期片麻岩类的时代、成因及其对早期地壳形成演化的制约[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2018, 48(3): 587-625.
[7] 尹业长, 郝立波, 赵玉岩, 石厚礼, 田午, 张豫华, 陆继龙. 冀东高家店和蛇盘兔花岗岩体:年代学、地球化学及地质意义[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2018, 48(2): 574-586.
[8] 齐天骄, 薛春纪, 许碧霞. 新疆昭苏布合塔铜(金)矿化区花岗质岩石锆石U-Pb年龄、地球化学特征及其成因[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2018, 48(1): 132-144.
[9] 孙凡婷, 刘晨, 邱殿明, 鲁倩, 贺云鹏, 张铭杰. 大兴安岭东坡小奎勒河中基性侵入岩成因及地球动力学意义:锆石U-Pb年代学、元素和Hf同位素地球化学证据[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2018, 48(1): 145-164.
[10] 张超, 崔芳华, 张照录, 耿瑞, 宋明春. 鲁西金岭地区含矿闪长岩体成因:来自锆石U-Pb年代学和地球化学证据[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2017, 47(6): 1732-1745.
[11] 施珂, 张达玉, 丁宁, 王德恩, 陈雪锋. 皖南逍遥岩体的年代学、地球化学特征及其成因分析[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2017, 47(6): 1746-1762.
[12] 谭洪旗, 刘玉平. 滇东南猛洞岩群斜长角闪岩成因及其构造意义[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2017, 47(6): 1763-1783.
[13] 陈治军, 任来义, 贺永红, 刘护创, 宋健. 银额盆地哈日凹陷银根组优质烃源岩地球化学特征及其形成环境[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2017, 47(5): 1352-1364.
[14] 王师捷, 徐仲元, 董晓杰, 杜洋, 崔维龙, 王阳. 华北板块北缘中段二叠纪的构造属性:来自火山岩锆石U-Pb年代学与地球化学的制约[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2017, 47(5): 1442-1457.
[15] 许中杰, 蓝艺植, 程日辉, 李双林. 句容地区下奥陶统仑山组海平面变化的碳酸盐岩地球化学记录[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2017, 47(5): 1458-1470.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!