Journal of Jilin University(Earth Science Edition) ›› 2022, Vol. 52 ›› Issue (3): 866-878.doi: 10.13278/j.cnki.jjuese.20200287

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Prediction Model of Sulfur Element in Magmatic Sulfide Deposits Based on Support Vector Machine Algorithm

Li Mengmeng1,2,Liu Jingdang1,2,Liang Tianyi2,Tan Liang3,Wang Gang2,Zhu Xi2   

  1. 1. Mining Institute,Liaoning Technical University,Fuxin 123000,Liaoning,China

    2. Liaoning Chemical Geology Exploration Institute Co.,Ltd.,Jinzhou 121000,Liaoning,China

    3. CCTEG Shenyang Engineering Company,Shenyang 110015,China

  • Online:2022-05-26 Published:2024-01-03
  • Supported by:
    Supported by the Project of Central Geological Exploration Fund (2011D3-09-2)

Abstract:

Sulfur plays an important role in the formation of magmatic sulfide deposits. Based on the drill core data of the Voisey’s Bay nickel-copper sulfide deposit in Labrador, Canada, the correlation between nickel and copper mass fraction and sulfur mass fraction was analyzed by support vector machine (support vector machine, SVM) and kernel function based on radial basis function (radial basis function, RBF), and the prediction model of sulfur was established based on     sulfur mass fraction. In the prediction model, nickel and copper mass fractions are used as independent variables, sulfur mass fraction is used as the dependent variable, the predicted value of sulfur mass fraction is calculated by SVM to fit the original value. According to the calculation results of the fitting curve, the sulfur evolution can be divided into three stages: In the sulfur saturation stage, the mass fraction of sulfur element is 3.12×10-6-20.80×10-6, the variance is less than 1.44×10-7, the fractal dimension is 0.35, λ>0, and the stage is chaotic; In the mineralization stage, the mass fraction of sulfur element is 6.60×10-7-17.80×10-7, the variance is less than 1.37×10-9, the fractal dimension is 0.60, λ>0, and the stage is chaotic; In the sulfur loss stage, the sulfur mass fraction is 2.00×10-8-38.0.×10-8, the variance is less than 1.56×10-10, the fractal dimension is 0.94, λ=0, and the stage is stable. The results show that the mass fraction of nickel, copper and sulfur in the immiscible sulfur-saturated magma is not linearly or simply nonlinearly correlated, but staged nonlinearly.


Key words: magmatic sulfide deposit, sulfur saturation, support vector machine, nonlinear, magmatic mixing, prediction model

CLC Number: 

  • P612
[1] Yan Baizhong, Li Yao, Qin Guangxiong, Yu Kaining, Wu Yunxia , Wang Yanan. Prediction of Dry-Hot Rock Targets with Multivariate Information in Guide Basin Based on Remote Sensing Technology [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Earth Science Edition), 2023, 53(4): 1288-1300.
[2] Zhang Yuting, Sun Fengyue, Li Yujin, Ye Lina, Liu Jinlong, Su Rong . Zircon U-Pb Geochronology, Geochemistry and Hf Isotopic Composition of the Middle Jurassic Granodiorite in South Jilin Province [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Earth Science Edition), 2022, 52(5): 1675-1687.
[3] Xu Zhengyu , Fu Nengyi, Zhou Jie, Fu Zhihong. Comparison of Nonlinear Optimization Inversion Algorithms of Transient Electromagnetic Method [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Earth Science Edition), 2022, 52(3): 744-753.
[4] Wu Meng, Qin Yunhu, Wang Xiaoqing, Yang Liu, Zhu Shifei, Zhang Zhen, Mao Lixin, Zhang Jing, Li Guozhang. Log Response of Coal Quality and Its Prediction Model in Renjiazhuang Coal Mine#br# [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Earth Science Edition), 2022, 52(2): 633-643.
[5] Yin Chao, Zhou Aihong, Yuan Ying, Wang Shuaiwei. Prediction of Consolidation Coefficient Based on Neighborhood Rough Set and Support Vector Machine [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Earth Science Edition), 2019, 49(3): 746-754.
[6] Lin Jian, Zhang Qifei, Long Wanxue, Zhang Hongwei. Multi-Model Fusion Method for Landslide Early Warning Based on Early Warning Membership Function [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Earth Science Edition), 2019, 49(2): 477-484.
[7] Zhang Yanjun, Zhang Tong, Yin Renchao, Zheng Jie, Liu Tong, Xie Yangyang. Geothermal Anomaly Areas Exploration and Ground Temperature Prediction Based on 2-Meter Temperature Survey [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Earth Science Edition), 2017, 47(1): 189-196.
[8] Zhang Yanjun, Yu Hai, Li Jianming, Yu Ziwang, Zhang jianing. Prediction Models of Deep Hydrothemal Geothermal Potential Areas Based on GIS: A Case Study of Western Anatolia, Turkey [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Earth Science Edition), 2016, 46(3): 855-864.
[9] Dai Ronghuo,Zhang Fanchang,Liu Hanqing,Li Cancan. Non-Linear Pre-Stack Seismic AVA Inversion Based on Bayesian Theory Using Successive Iteration Method [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Earth Science Edition), 2014, 44(6): 2026-2033.
[10] Chen Guangjun,Sun Fengyue,Li Bile,Wang Guan,Qian Ye,Xu Qinglin,Liu Guocai. Geochemistry and Petrogenesis of Gouli Mafic Enclaves and Their Host Rocks in Eastern Kunlun [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Earth Science Edition), 2014, 44(3): 892-904.
[11] Peng Yi, He Yuliang, Zeng Tao, Zhong Jiangwen, Xu Guoli, Su Xiaoyan,Chen Jun, Peng Songmin, Li Zhen. Regional Metallogenic and Synthetic Information Prediction Models of Mo Deposits in Henan Province, China [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Earth Science Edition), 2013, 43(4): 1262-1275.
[12] Cai Yuqi,Xu Hao,Guo Qingyin,Zhu Pengfei,Wang Yuanzhi,Xie Yingchun. Metallogenic Prognosis and Prospecting Orientation of Granite Type Uranium Deposit in Taoshan Area,Jiangxi Province, China [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Earth Science Edition), 2013, 43(4): 1283-1291.
[13] Zhang Yanqing, Yang Qingli, Gao Xiangyu. Analysis of Base Isolated Structure with Composite Friction Damping System [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Earth Science Edition), 2013, 43(3): 908-913.
[14] Zhuang Jianqi,Peng Jianbing, Zhang Liyong. Risk Assessment and Prediction of the Shallow Landslide at Different Precipitation in Loess Plateau [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Earth Science Edition), 2013, 43(3): 867-876.
[15] Shu Long-cang, Jing Yan-dong, Huang Xiu-dong, Yu Zhong-bo, Wang Zhen-long. On the Development of Improved Empirical Formulas for Calculating the Phreatic Water Evaporation for Bare Land [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Earth Science Edition), 2012, 42(6): 1859-1865.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!