J4 ›› 2009, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (3): 353-360.

    Next Articles

The Burial History of the Southern Songliao Basin

GUO Wei1, YU Wen-xiang2, LIU Zhao-jun1, MA Lin1   

  1. 1.College of Earth Sciences| Jilin University|Changchun 130026|China;2.Bureau of the Land and Resources of Changchun,Changchun 130026|China
  • Received:2008-09-27 Online:2009-05-26 Published:2009-05-26
  • Contact: GUO Wei E-mail:guoweijldx@163.com

Abstract:

The analysis of basin subsidence history and buried history are important part of hydrocarbon appraisement.According to the well logging data of south Songliao basin,on the basis of formation denude, the authors evolved the research on deposition rate, subsidence rate and buried history. The simulation of deposition rate and the subsidence rate indicate that the deposition rate and the subsidence rate of the Shahezi Formation,the Yingcheng Formation is the rapidest, the Quantou Formation,the Mingshui Formation is high,and the Denglouku Formation,the Qingsankou Formation,the Yaojia Formation,the Sifangtai Formation is low;the finding of the buried history make known the significance that fast deposition,fast subsidence and fast burial  from the Shahezi Formation to the Yingceng Formation.The strata is denuded in the Late Yingcheng  Formation, stratigraphic break and denudation present increasingly tendency from west to east; the significance of buried history is the more fast deposition,subsidence and interment. From the Denglouku Formation to the Mingshui Formation, the subsidence stay entire from the Yaojia Formation,the strata from upper the Nenjiang Formation to the Mingshui Formation denudation acutely. The strata basically absent in the southeast uplift of the basin from The NengjiangⅢ Formation to the Mingshui Formation.From the Paleogene to the Neogene,the overall significient present that strata uplift slowly,then fall slowly, deposition slowly, bury slowly.

Key words: the southern Songliao basin, buried history, denudation, deposition rate, subsidence rate

CLC Number: 

  • P618.13

\[1\]石广仁.油气盆地数值模拟方法\[M\].北京:石油工业出版社,1999.

[2\]闫宝珍,朱炎铭,赵洪,等.盆地埋藏史恢复的计算机模型建立\[J\].天然气工业,2006,26(1):37-39.

[3\]叶加仁,陆明德.盆地地史模拟评述\[J\].地质科技情报,1995,14(2):45-51.

[4\]褚庆忠.冀中孙虎地区含油气系统埋藏史研究\[J\].地球学报,2000, 21(3):306-312.
[5\]刘光祥,钱一雄,潘文蕃.库车中、新生代前陆盆地沉降沉积分析\[J\].石油地质实验,2000,22(4):313-318. 
[6\]刘景颜,林畅松,喻岳钰,等.用声波测井资料计算剥蚀量的方法改进\[J\].石油实验地质,2000,22(4):302-306.

[7\]方石,张志强,刘招君,等.松辽盆地新生代热演化及地层定年\[J\].吉林大学学报:地球科学版,2007, 37(5):923-928.
[8\]王永春.松辽盆地南部岩性油藏的形成和分布\[M\].北京:石油工业出版社,2001.

[1] GUO Wei, LIU Zhao-Jun, LIU Qun, MA Lin, DING Hong-ru, SUN Shou-liang. Research on the Hydrocarbon Accumulation Dynamics of Gaotaizi Reservoir in the Southern Songliao Basin [J]. J4, 2010, 40(3): 482-490.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!