临床诊断与集团筛查前列腺癌的病理学特征比较

doi:日本JICA项目资助课题(科技部第59号);中国

临床诊断与集团筛查前列腺癌的病理学特征比较

苏学今¹，张维萍²，刘喜春³，赵雪俭³

（1.吉林大学基础医学院　病理生物学教育部重点实验室，吉林长春 130021; 2. 一汽集总医院病理科，吉林长春 130011；3. 吉林大学基础医学院病理生理学教研室，吉林长春130021）

收稿日期:2007-12-24 修回日期:1900-01-01 出版日期:2008-09-28 发布日期:2008-09-28
通讯作者: 赵雪俭

Comparison of pathological features of prostate cancer between mass screening patients and clinical patients

SU Xue-jin¹, ZHANG Wei-ping², LIU Xi-chun³,ZHAO Xue-jian¹

(1.Department of Pathology,School of Basic Medical Sciences, Jilin University, Changchun 130021,China; 2. Department of Pathology,Hospital of China FAW Group Corporation, Changchun 130011,China；3.Department of Pathophysiology, School of Basic Medical Sciences，Jilin University，Changchun 130021，China)

Received:2007-12-24 Revised:1900-01-01 Online:2008-09-28 Published:2008-09-28
Contact: ZHAO Xue-jian

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 目的：通过对临床诊断与集团筛查前列腺癌的病理学特征的比较，探讨人群筛查前列腺癌的必要性。方法：107例前列腺癌组织，其中51例为临床病理标本，56例为经前列腺特异抗原（PSA）筛查后发现的病理标本。其中7 例前列腺上皮内瘤 ( PIN) 均来自集团筛查的标本。应用Gleason分级与评分标准进行病理学分析。结果：① 筛查组前列腺癌的Gleason 分级明显低于临床组（χ² =48.22, P<0.001）。② 筛查组前列腺癌的Gleason 评分明显低于临床组（χ² =24.55, P<0.001）。③ 筛查组前列腺癌的分化程度明显高于临床组（χ² =22.46, P<0.001）。④最典型的PIN仅见于集团筛查因PSA含量进行性增高接受活检穿刺患者标本中。结论：人群筛查病例中病理组织学变化以中期的中分化癌为多见，而临床病例中则以晚期的低分化癌为主，PSA集团检查有益于前列腺癌的早期发现。

关键词: Gleason分级, 前列腺特异性抗原

Abstract: To investigate the role of the mass screening by comparing the pathological features of prostate cancer between mass screening patients and clinical patients. Methods 107 cases of prostate cancer(including 51 patients from clinical diagnosis and 56 patients from mass screening) and 7 cases of prostate intraepithelial neoplasia(PIN, from mass screening) were analyzed using the Gleason’s grade system. Results ① Gleason’s grade of prostate cancer in mass screening group was lower than that in clinical diagnosis group(χ² =48.22, P<0.001); ② Gleason’s scores of prostate cancer in mass screening group were lower than those in clinical diagnosis group(χ² =24.55, P<0.001); ③ Differentiated degrees of prostate cancer in mass screening group were higher than those in clinical diagnosis group(χ² =22.46, P<0.001); ④ The typical PIN was found only in mass screening group. Conclusion In mass screening group the moderately differentiated carcinoma is the most common type of prostate cancer, but in clinical diagnosis group the poorly differentiated carcinoma is most. General investigation for prostate cancer is benefit to find caner of early stage.

Key words: Gleason’s grade, prostate-specific antigen

中图分类号:

R737.25

苏学今，张维萍，刘喜春，赵雪俭. 临床诊断与集团筛查前列腺癌的病理学特征比较[J]. J4, 2008, 34(5): 879-882.

SU Xue-jin, ZHANG Wei-ping, LIU Xi-chun,ZHAO Xue-jian. Comparison of pathological features of prostate cancer between mass screening patients and clinical patients[J]. J4, 2008, 34(5): 879-882.

[1]	邹冬辉，张家颖，路英丽，郭焱,王忠山. 重组人前列腺特异性抗原纯化与活性鉴定[J]. J4, 2008, 34(1): 1-5.
[2]	毛建华，张灵，计国义，潘玉琢，高洪文，王伟华，孔祥波，赵丹，李扬，赵雪俭. 前列腺癌患者外周血单个核细胞PSA mRNA表达[J]. J4, 2006, 32(3): 470-472.