桩核冠、髓腔固位冠和嵌体冠修复低矮磨牙残冠后产生的生物力学效应比较及其临床意义

doi:10.13481/j.1671-587x.20200426

吉林大学学报(医学版) ›› 2020, Vol. 46 ›› Issue (04): 828-833.doi: 10.13481/j.1671-587x.20200426

• 临床研究 • 上一篇

桩核冠、髓腔固位冠和嵌体冠修复低矮磨牙残冠后产生的生物力学效应比较及其临床意义

李韦萱¹, 金巨楼¹, 赵楚翘², 刘定坤¹, 邹俊东¹, 王明霞¹, 刘志辉¹

1. 吉林大学口腔医院修复科, 吉林长春 130021;
2. 江苏省苏州口腔医院综合治疗科, 江苏苏州 215000

收稿日期:2020-03-11 发布日期:2020-08-20
通讯作者: 刘志辉,副教授,博士研究生导师(Tel:0431-88796018,E-mail:liuzhihui1975@sina.com) E-mail:liuzhihui1975@sina.com
作者简介:李韦萱(1994-),女,黑龙江省鸡西市人,在读医学硕士,主要从事口腔生物力学方面的研究。
基金资助:
吉林省科技厅重点科技研发项目资助课题（20180201056YY）；吉林省科技厅科技发展计划项目资助课题（20190304032YY）

Comparison of biomechanical effects of repairing lower molar residual crowns among post-core crown, endocrown and inlaycrown and their clinical significances

LI Weixuan¹, JIN Julou¹, ZHAO Chuqiao², LIU Dingkun¹, ZOU Jundong¹, WANG Mingxia¹, LIU Zhihui¹

1. Department of Prosthodontics, Stomatology Hospital, Jilin University, Changchun 130021, China;
2. Department of Comprehensive Treatment, Suzhou Stomatology Hospital, Jiangsu Province, Suzhou 215000, China

Received:2020-03-11 Published:2020-08-20

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 目的：应用有限元分析对比桩核冠、髓腔固位冠和嵌体冠修复低矮磨牙残冠后的应力分布情况及固位效果，探讨低矮磨牙残冠的优选修复方案。方法：选择志愿者健康、完整的左侧下颌第一磨牙作为实验样本，应用锥形束CT（CBCT）扫描获得其影像学数据。利用Mimics、Geomagic和CATIA等逆向工程软件建立完整的下颌第一磨牙有限元模型。在此基础上构建3组低矮磨牙残冠模型（剩余临床牙冠的高度分别为1、2和3mm），并建立桩核冠、髓腔固位冠和嵌体冠3组修复体分别修复上述3组残冠的有限元模型，共9个实验组。在Abaqus软件中对模型施加垂直向及斜向静态载荷模拟咀嚼时牙齿受力，施加强制性旋转位移载荷模拟修复体旋转脱位。观察各组模型牙本质的von Mise应力峰值和分布云图，以及各组修复体为抵抗旋转脱位所产生的非轴向固位力和脱位时粘接剂的破坏情况。结果：von Mises应力峰值，垂直载荷下，嵌体冠 > 髓腔固位冠 > 桩核冠；斜向载荷下，髓腔固位冠 > 嵌体冠 > 桩核冠。应力分布云图，桩核冠的根尖1/3处、髓腔固位冠髓室底部和嵌体冠牙颈部及根部应力集中现象明显。非轴向固位力，1mm残冠组，桩核冠 > 嵌体冠 > 髓腔固位冠；2和3mm残冠组，嵌体冠 > 桩核冠 > 髓腔固位冠。刚度退化云图，旋转脱位时粘接剂开裂的面积由大到小依次为嵌体冠>髓腔固位冠>桩核冠。结论：从保护牙体组织及维持修复体长期稳定性的角度分析，桩核冠是修复低矮磨牙残冠较为理想的修复方式。

关键词: 桩核冠, 髓腔固位冠, 嵌体冠, 有限元, 生物力学分析

Abstract: Objective: To compare the stress distribution and retention effects of lower molar residual crowns restored by post-core crown, endocrown and inlaycrown using the finite element analysis, and to explore the optimized repair plan of lower molar residual crowns. Methods: The healthy and integral left mandibular first molar of volunteer was selected as the experimental sample. Their imaging data was collected by cone beam CT (CBCT) scanning. Then the complete finite element model of the mandibular first molar was reconstructed by reverse engineering software such as Mimics, Geomagic and CATIA. On this base, three groups of models of lower molar residual crowns with the clinical crown heights of 1, 2, and 3mm were constructed. Meanwhile, the finite element models of post-core crown, endocrown, and inlaycrown were established to repair the three groups of residual crowns mentioned above; there were nine experimental groups. In the Abaqus software, the vertical and oblique static loads were applied on the models to simulate the forces produced during chewing, and the forced rotational displacement load was applied on the models to simulate the dislocation of restorations. Then the stress peak and stress distribution cloud map of von Mises in dentin of the models in various groups, as well as the force generated by restorations to resist dislocation and the damage of adhesive during dislocating were all observed. Results: The von Mises stress peak results were inlaycrown > endocrown > post-core crown in vertical load and endocrown > inlaycrown > post-core crown in oblique load. According to the stress distribution cloud map, the root apical 1/3 of post-core crown, the pulp floor of endocrown and the dental cervix and root of inlaycrown was found obviously in the stress concentration. The non-axial retention force results were post-core crown > inlaycrown > endocrown in the 1 mm residual crown group, and inlaycrown > post-core crown > endocrown in the 2 and 3 mm residual crown groups. According to stiffness degradation contours of resin adhesive layer, the cracked areas of adhesive during dislocation was inlaycrown > endocrown > post-core crown. Conclusion: From the perspectives of protecting dental tissue and maintaining the stability of restorations, the post-core crown is an ideal restoration for repairing the lower molar residual crowns.

Key words: post-core crown, endocrown, inlaycrown, finite element analysis, biomechanical analysis

中图分类号:

R783.3

李韦萱, 金巨楼, 赵楚翘, 刘定坤, 邹俊东, 王明霞, 刘志辉. 桩核冠、髓腔固位冠和嵌体冠修复低矮磨牙残冠后产生的生物力学效应比较及其临床意义[J]. 吉林大学学报(医学版), 2020, 46(04): 828-833.

LI Weixuan, JIN Julou, ZHAO Chuqiao, LIU Dingkun, ZOU Jundong, WANG Mingxia, LIU Zhihui. Comparison of biomechanical effects of repairing lower molar residual crowns among post-core crown, endocrown and inlaycrown and their clinical significances[J]. Journal of Jilin University(Medicine Edition), 2020, 46(04): 828-833.

参考文献

[1] SHARMA A, RAHUL G R, PODUVAL S T, et al. Short clinical crowns (SCC)-treatment considerations and techniques[J]. J Clin Exp Dent, 2012, 4(4):e230-e236.
[2] 葛艳, 张保卫. 全冠修复固位力的影响因素[J]. 国外医学(口腔医学分册), 2004, 31(1):69-71.
[3] 李萍, 周威, 顾斌,等. 三种固位方式烤瓷冠修复年轻下颌无髓磨牙残冠的临床效果研究[J]. 口腔颌面修复学杂志, 2012, 13(4):211-214.
[4] VAGROPOULOU G I, KLIFOPOULOU G L, VLAHOU S G, et al. Complications and survival rates of inlays and onlays vs complete coverage restorations:a systematic review and analysis of studies[J]. J Oral Rehabil, 2018, 45(11):903-920.
[5] MAMOUN J. Post and core build-ups in crown and bridge abutments:Bio-mechanical advantages and disadvantages[J].J Adv Prosthodont, 2017, 9(3):232-237.
[6] 陈智, 陈瑞甜. 髓腔固位冠[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2018, 34(1):1-5.
[7] WAKABAYASHI N, ONA M, SUZUKI T, et al. Nonlinear finite element analyses:advances and challenges in dental applications[J]. J Dent, 2008, 36(7):463-471.
[8] 王惠芸. 我国人牙的测量和统计[J]. 中华口腔科杂志, 1959, 7(3):149-155.
[9] 赵楚翘, 徐一驰, 刘定坤, 等.髓腔固位冠及桩核冠修复下颌第一磨牙大面积缺损的生物力学分析[J].口腔医学研究,2018,34(5):513-517.
[10] 张国庆,王卫国,朱慧勇. 下颌第一磨牙根管治疗后不同修复方案的生物力学分析[J]. 实用口腔医学杂志,2018,34(4):497-501.
[11] HA S R. Biomechanical three-dimensional finite element analysis of monolithic zirconia crown with different cement type[J]. J Adv Prosthodont, 2015, 7(6):475-483.
[12] D'SOUZA K M, ARAS M A. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of the stress distribution pattern in a mandibular first molar tooth restored with five different restorative materials[J]. J Indian Prosthodont Soc, 2017, 17(1):53-60.
[13] WU W C, WANG D M, LIN Y C, et al. Hydrogen bonds of a novel resin cement contribute to high adhesion strength to human dentin[J]. Dent Mater, 2016, 32(1):114-124.
[14] BENZEGGAGH M L, KENANE M. Measurement of mixed-mode delamination fracture toughness of unidirectional glass/epoxy composites with mixed-mode bending apparatus[J]. Compos Sci Technol, 1996, 56(4):439-449.
[15] REE M, SCHWARTZ R S. The endo-restorative interface:current concepts[J]. Dent Clin North Am, 2010, 54(2):345-374.
[16] 包旭东. 椅旁计算机辅助设计与辅助制作嵌体冠粘接修复大面积缺损根管治疗牙的利与弊[J]. 中华口腔医学杂志, 2018, 53(4):221-225.
[17] LEONG E W, CHOON TAN K B, NICHOLLS J I, et al. The effect of preparation height and luting agent on the resistance form of cemented cast crowns under load fatigue[J]. J Prosthet Dent, 2009, 102(3):155-164.
[18] BOWLEY J F, ICHIM I P, KIESER J A, et al. FEA evaluation of the resistance form of a premolar crown[J]. J Prosthodont, 2013, 22(4):304-312.
[19] 杨丽媛. 不同辅助固位形对低矮磨牙全冠修复体非轴向固位力和边缘适合性影响的体外实验研究[D]. 济南:山东大学, 2015.
[20] WEED R M, BAEZ R J. A method for determining adequate resistance form of complete cast crown preparations[J]. J Prosthet Dent, 1984, 52(3):330-334.
[21] BOWLEY J F, LEE P, LAI W T. Axial wall angulation for rotational resistance in a theoretical-maxillary premolar model[J]. Clin Exp Dent Res, 2019, 5(6):638-647.

桩核冠、髓腔固位冠和嵌体冠修复低矮磨牙残冠后产生的生物力学效应比较及其临床意义

Comparison of biomechanical effects of repairing lower molar residual crowns among post-core crown, endocrown and inlaycrown and their clinical significances

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

赞

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 0

[1]	王志坚, 李彦旭, 韩青, 尚晓峰, 王金成. 髋关节置换术中2种不同髋关节假体的有限元分析:应力集中和位移变化比较[J]. 吉林大学学报(医学版), 2019, 45(02): 347-352.
[2]	柳辛墨, 章亚东, 聂振国, 贾海港, 顾东强, 丁云鹏, 陈磊. 聚己内酯半月板支架应力-应变特性的有限元分析[J]. 吉林大学学报(医学版), 2019, 45(02): 389-394.
[3]	贾一凡, 胡敏. “2×4”矫治系统中前倾弯弓丝弯折位置变化对其力学行为影响的三维有限元分析[J]. 吉林大学学报(医学版), 2018, 44(06): 1249-1255.
[4]	王宇, 穆尚强, 梅继文, 孙爽. 可膨胀椎间融合器治疗腰椎间盘轻度退变的有限元分析[J]. 吉林大学学报(医学版), 2016, 42(03): 565-569.
[5]	陈庆生, 陈笑风, 单晔杰, 丁熙, 王慧明. 松质骨和皮质骨厚度对种植体周围应力分布的影响[J]. 吉林大学学报(医学版), 2016, 42(02): 204-209.
[6]	. 上颌All-on-4修复种植体在不同牙弓形态中应力分布的三维有限元分析[J]. 吉林大学学报(医学版), 2014, 40(06): 1182-1186.
[7]	高翔，柴健，王忠厚，周振平，王晓薇. 自然牙根和种植体联合支持的磁性附着体覆盖义齿应力分析[J]. 吉林大学学报(医学版), 2014, 40(04): 790-794.
[8]	何立辉，高尚，高贝，陈一夫，刘志辉 . 三维有限元法分析分裂桩冠与分裂桩核冠修复下颌第一磨牙残根的应力分布特点[J]. 吉林大学学报(医学版), 2013, 39(1): 113-116.
[9]	董树君, 周延民, 刘玉艳, 陈英新, 王战鑫, 柳淑杰. 上颌后牙区倾斜种植固定桥的力学分析[J]. J4, 2010, 36(5): 957-961.
[10]	王芳, 胡敏, 李洪, 郭克峰. 种植体支抗辅助快速扩大上颌的三维有限元分析[J]. J4, 2010, 36(4): 745-748.
[11]	王伟, 王晓峰, 李慧, 张天夫. 牙槽骨吸收对冠外附着体义齿基牙及牙周组织应力分布的影响[J]. J4, 2010, 36(3): 554-557.
[12]	丁旭，孙新华，郭克峰，李洪 . Tip-Edge plus差动直丝弓矫治器三维有限元力学模型的建立[J]. J4, 2008, 34(5): 907-909.
[13]	王伟，张天夫，刘英，秦绪喜. 两种义齿修复下颌单侧游离端缺失基牙及缺牙区牙槽嵴应力分布的比较[J]. J4, 2008, 34(3): 458-461.
[14]	康振中，胡敏，吴洪，刘磊. 多用唇弓作用下左下颌中切牙和第一磨牙牙周组织应力分布的三维有限元分析[J]. J4, 2008, 34(3): 474-476.
[15]	仪虹，施磊，牛玉梅. 根管预备锥度的变化对根管壁应力影响的三维有限元分析[J]. J4, 2007, 33(6): 1107-1109.