吉林大学学报(医学版) ›› 2017, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (02): 386-390.doi: 10.13481/j.1671-587x.20170234

• 临床医学 • 上一篇    下一篇

A型肉毒素联合疗法治疗瘢痕疙瘩临床疗效和不良反应评价

周明伟1, 王连有2, 姜日花1, 朱明姬1, 陈凤1   

  1. 1. 吉林大学中日联谊医院皮肤科, 吉林 长春 130033;
    2. 吉林大学中日联谊医院病理科, 吉林 长春 130033
  • 收稿日期:2016-12-23 出版日期:2017-03-28 发布日期:2017-03-31
  • 通讯作者: 朱明姬,教授,硕士研究生导师(Tel:0431-84995523,E-mail:zhumingji33@163.com);陈凤,主治医师(Tel:0431-84995523,E-mail:chenfengdoctor@163.com) E-mail:zhumingji33@163.com;chenfengdoctor@163.com
  • 作者简介:周明伟(1983-),女,吉林省长春市人,主治医师,在读医学博士,主要从事瘢痕及皮肤肿瘤诊治方面的研究。
  • 基金资助:
    吉林省科技厅科研基金资助课题(20150101166JC,20140414032GH,20170414056GH)

Evaluation on efficacy and adverse reactions of combined therapy with botulinum toxin type A in treatment of keloid

ZHOU Mingwei1, WANG Lianyou2, JIANG Rihua1, ZHU Mingji1, CHEN Feng1   

  1. 1. Department of Dermatology, China-Japan Union Hospital, Jilin University, Changchun 130033, China;
    2. Department of Pathology, China-Japan Union Hospital, Jilin University, Changchun 130033, China
  • Received:2016-12-23 Online:2017-03-28 Published:2017-03-31

摘要: 目的:比较A型肉毒素联合得宝松局部注射及透明质酸外用与单纯得宝松局部注射及透明质酸外用对瘢痕疙瘩的疗效及不良反应。方法:选取瘢痕疙瘩患者58例,分为A型肉毒素联合得宝松(复方倍他米松注射液)局部注射及透明质酸外用组(联合治疗组)28例和单纯得宝松局部注射及透明质酸外用组(对照组)30例。2组患者均局部注射得宝松,每4 周1次,连续3 次,每日外用透明质酸。联合治疗组患者在第1次得宝松注射后皮损周边注射1次A型肉毒素。收集入组病例每次治疗前后参数数据、不良反应观察指标和每次治疗前后临床照片,并进行对比分析。结果:与对照组比较,3次治疗后联合治疗组患者皮损外观改善更好。对照组患者在治疗1个月时痛痒感的视觉模拟评分(VAS)下降,但在2和3个月时又逐渐上升;联合治疗组患者在治疗3个月内VAS 值逐渐下降,与对照组比较在2和3个月时VAS值差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。治疗3个月内,联合治疗组患者皮损厚度逐渐下降,而对照组降低幅度不明显;治疗3个月时,联合治疗组患者疗效明显优于对照组(P<0.05)。对照组患者痛痒症状及皮损厚度在每次注射2周后出现反跳,而联合治疗组无反跳。对照组患者不良反应发生率为 26.7%,联合治疗组患者不良反应发生率为 25.0%,2组各项不良反应发生率比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论:A型肉毒素联合得宝松局部注射及透明质酸外用治疗瘢痕疙瘩与单纯得宝松局部注射及透明质酸外用相比疗效更好,不良反应发生率无明显差异,值得临床上推广应用。

关键词: 疼痛测定, 瘢痕疙瘩, A型肉毒素, 倍他米松

Abstract: Objective: To compare the efficacy and adverse reactions between intralesional betamethasone injection combined with botulinum toxin type A and topical hyaluronic acid and simple intralesional betamethasone injection and topical hyaluronic acid in treatment of keloid. Methods: A total of 58 patients with keloid were divided into two groups:intralesional betamethasone injection combined with botulinum toxin type A and topical hyaluronic acid group (combined group, n=28) and intralesional betamethasone injection combined with topical hyaluronic acid group (control group, n=30). In both two groups, the intralesional betamethasone injection was given once every 4 weeks for 3 times totally, and topical hyaluronic acid was applied every day. In combined group, an injection of botulinum toxin type A was given around the lesion after the first intralesional injection of betamethasone. The parameters for therapeutic efficacy and adverse reactions of the patients in two groups were recorded, and the clinical pictures were taken before and after each treatment, and they were analyzed and compared. Results: After 3 treatments, compared with control group, the lesion appearance in combined group was improved. In control group, the VAS value was reduced at 1 month, but was increased gradually at 2 and 3 months. In combined group, the VAS value was reduced gradually in 3 months. There was a significant difference in VAS value at 2 and 3 months between two groups (P<0.05). In combined group, the thickness of keloids were reduced gradually in 3 months, while the reduction was not obvious in control group (P<0.05). The recurrence of pain, itching and lesion height were observed 2 weeks after each treatment in control group, but there was no recurrence in combined group. The incidence rate of adverse reactions was 26.7% in control group, which had no significant difference compared with combined group(25.0%) (P>0.05). Conclusion: Compared with control group, the combined group shows better efficiency in the treatment of keloid and there is no increase of adverse reactions. The therapy is worthy of clinical application.

Key words: keloid, botulinum toxin type A, betamethasone, pain measurement

中图分类号: 

  • R622