Er:YAG激光活化冲洗技术对根管内氢氧化钙清除效果和根尖封闭性能的影响

doi:10.13481/j.1671-587X.20220224

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 目的

探讨2种Er∶YAG激光活化冲洗技术对根管内氢氧化钙［Ca（OH）₂］清除效果和根尖封闭性能的影响，阐明该技术在根管冲洗过程中的临床应用价值。

方法

80颗离体单根管前磨牙截冠后预备至35#，Ca（OH）₂糊剂充填根管。所有样本根据不同冲洗技术随机分为4组（n=20），分别为超声荡洗组、光子诱导光声流（PIPS）组、冲击波增强发射光声流（SWEEPS）组和阴性对照组。各组随机选择10个样本纵剖，采用扫描电子显微镜（SEM）观察并评分。各组剩余样本进行根管充填，染料渗透实验。比较不同冲洗技术对残留Ca（OH）₂的清除效果，并分析各组染料渗透长度。

结果

3个实验组均无法完全去除根管内残留Ca（OH）₂，与冠1/3和根中1/3比较，根尖1/3残留Ca（OH）₂评分明显升高（P<0.05）；在冠1/3，与超声荡洗组比较，PIPS组和SWEEPS组残留Ca（OH）₂评分降低（P<0.05）；而在根中1/3，与超声荡洗组比较，SWEEPS组残留Ca（OH）₂评分降低（P<0.05）；在根尖1/3，3组残留Ca（OH）₂评分比较差异无统计学意义（P>0.05）；PIPS组和SWEEPS组在冠1/3、根中1/3和根尖1/3 残留Ca（OH）₂评分比较差异无统计学意义（P>0.05）。各组之间的染料渗透长度比较差异无统计学意义（P>0.05）。

结论

PIPS和SWEEPS技术对Ca（OH）₂的清除能力相当。与超声荡洗比较，2种Er∶YAG激光活化冲洗技术对根管中上部的Ca（OH）₂清除效果较好，且应用3种冲洗技术后，根管内残留的Ca（OH）₂短期内对根管充填材料的根尖封闭性能无明显影响。

关键词: 氢氧化钙, 掺铒钇铝石榴石激光, 超声荡洗, 根管冲洗

Abstract: Objective

To explore the effects of two Er： YAG laser activation irrigation techniques on the removal of calcium hydroxide［Ca（OH）₂］ in the root canals and the apical sealing ability， and to clarify the clinical application value of this technique in root canal irrigation.

Methods

A total of 80 isolated single Ca（OH）₂ premolars were prepared to 35# after crown cut， and the root canals were filled with hydroxide paste. According to different irrigation techniques， all samples were randomly divided into 4 groups （n=20）：ultrasonically activated irrigation group， photon initiated photoacoustic streaming（PIPS） group， shock wave enhanced emission photoacoustic streaming（SWEEPS） group， and negative control group. First， 10 samples of each group were randomly selected for longitudinal sections， then they were observed with scanning electron microscepe（SEM） and scored. Secondly， the remaining samples of each group were subjected to root canal filling and dye penetration experiments. The effects of different irrigation techniques on the removal Ca（OH）₂ were compared， and the dye penetration lengthes in various groups were analyzed.

Results

The three experimental groups were unable to completely remove Ca（OH）₂ in the root canal； compared with cervical third and middle third， the residual Ca（OH）₂ score in the apical third was significantly increased （P<0.05）.Compared with ultrasonically activated irrigation group， the residual Ca（OH）₂ scores in PIPS group and SWEEPS group were increased in the cervical third（P<0.05）. While in the middle third， compared with ultrasonically activated irrigation group，the residual Ca（OH）₂ score in_{SWEEPS group was increased （P<0.05）. The apical third did not show significant differences among experimental groups（P>0.05）. There were no significant differences between PIPS and SWEEPS in the residual Ca（OH）₂ scores in the cervical， middle and apical thirds（P>0.05）. There was no significant difference in the dye penetration length among various groups （P>0.05）.}

Conclusion

PIPS and SWEEPS techniques have the similar ability to remove Ca（OH）₂， and compared with ultrasonically actirated irrigation， the removal effects of Ca（OH）₂ in the middle and upper part of the root canal are better， and after the three irrigation techniques are applied， the residual Ca（OH）₂ hardly affect the apical sealing ability of the root canal filling material in the short term.

Key words: Calcium hydroxide, Er∶YAG laser, Ultrasonically activated irrigation, Root canal irrigation

中图分类号:

R781.3

马昂,王颖艺,孙梦瑶,焦珊,孟秀萍,王成坤. Er:YAG激光活化冲洗技术对根管内氢氧化钙清除效果和根尖封闭性能的影响[J]. 吉林大学学报(医学版), 2022, 48(2): 462-469.

Ang MA,Yingyi WANG,Mengyao SUN,Shan JIAO,Xiuping MENG,Chengkun WANG. Effect of Er:YAG laser activation irrigation technique on removal effect of calcium hydroxide in root canals and apical sealing ability[J]. Journal of Jilin University(Medicine Edition), 2022, 48(2): 462-469.

图/表 3

参考文献 27

1	UZUNOGLU-ÖZYÜREK E， ERDOĞAN Ö， TÜRKER S A. Effect of calcium hydroxide dressing on the dentinal tubule penetration of 2 different root canal sealers： a confocal laser scanning microscopic study［J］. J Endod， 2018， 44（6）： 1018-1023.
2	CRUZ A T G， GRECCA F S， PIASECKI L， et al. Influence of the calcium hydroxide intracanal dressing on dentinal tubule penetration of two root canal sealers［J］. Eur Endod J， 2017， 2（1）： 1-6.
3	AMIN S A W， SEYAM R S， EL-SAMMAN M A. The effect of prior calcium hydroxide intracanal placement on the bond strength of two calcium silicate–based and an epoxy resin–based endodontic sealer［J］. J Endod， 2012， 38（5）： 696-699.
4	BARBIZAM J V B， TROPE M， TEIXEIRA É C N， et al. Effect of calcium hydroxide intracanal dressing on the bond strength of a resin-based endodontic sealer［J］. Braz Dent J， 2008， 19（3）： 224-227.
5	KUGA M C， TANOMARU-FILHO M， FARIA G，et al.Calcium hydroxide intracanal dressing removal with different rotary instruments and irrigating solutions： a scanning electron microscopy study［J］. Braz Dent J， 2010， 21（4）： 310-314.
6	CHAWLA A， KUMAR V. Evaluating the efficacy of different techniques and irrigation solutions for removal of calcium hydroxide from the root canal system： A scanning electron microscope study［J］. J Conserv Dent， 2018， 21（4）： 394-400.
7	RÖDIG T， VOGEL S， ZAPF A， et al. Efficacy of different irrigants in the removal of calcium hydroxide from root canals［J］. Int Endod J， 2010，43（6）： 519-527.
8	DIVITO E， PETERS O A， OLIVI G. Effectiveness of the erbium： YAG laser and new design radial and stripped tips in removing the smear layer after root canal instrumentation［J］.Lasers Med Sci，2012，27（2）： 273-280.
9	林欣欣.采用铒激光荡洗技术清理根管玷污层的体外研究［D］.北京：北京协和医学院，2019.
10	ARSLAN H， CAPAR I D， SAYGILI G， et al. Effect of photon‐initiated photoacoustic streaming on removal of apically placed dentinal debris［J］. Int Endod J， 2014， 47（11）： 1072-1077.
11	LUKAČ N， GREGORČIČ P， JEZERŠEK M. Optodynamic phenomena during laser-activated irrigation within root canals［J］. Int J Thermophys， 2016， 37（7）： 1-8.
12	LI D， JIANG S， YIN X， et al. Efficacy of needle， ultrasonic， and endoactivator irrigation and photon-induced photoacoustic streaming in removing calcium hydroxide from the main canal and isthmus： An in vitro micro-computed tomography and scanning electron microscopy study［J］. Photomed Laser Surg， 2015， 33（6）： 330-337.
13	LUKAČ N， JEZERŠEK M. Amplification of pressure waves in laser-assisted endodontics with synchronized delivery of Er：YAG laser pulses［J］. Lasers Med Sci， 2018， 33（4）：823-833.
14	LLOYD A， NAVARRETE G， MARCHESAN M A， et al. Removal of calcium hydroxide from Weine type Ⅱ systems using photon-induced photoacoustic streaming， passive ultrasonic， and needle irrigation： a microcomputed tomography study［J］. J Appl Oral Sci， 2016， 24（6）： 543-548.
15	GU L， KIM J R， LING J， et al. Review of contemporary irrigant agitation techniques and devices［J］. J Endod， 2009， 35（6）： 791-804.
16	MALKI M， VERHAAGEN B， JIANG L M， et al. Irrigant flow beyond the insertion depth of an ultrasonically oscillating file in straight and curved root canals： visualization and cleaning efficacy［J］. J Endod， 2012， 38（5）： 657-661.
17	JIANG L M， VERHAAGEN B， VERSLUIS M， et al. Evaluation of a sonic device designed to activate irrigant in the root canal［J］. J Endod， 2010， 36（1）： 143-146.
18	MEIRE M A， POELMAN D， DE MOOR R J. Optical properties of root canal irrigants in the 300-3，000-nm wavelength region［J］. Lasers Med Sci， 2014， 29（5）： 1557-1562.
19	BLANKEN J， DE MOOR R J G， MEIRE M， et al. Laser induced explosive vapor and cavitation resulting in effective irrigation of the root canal. Part 1： a visualization study［J］. Lasers Surg Med， 2009， 41（7）： 514-519.
20	URBAN K， DONNERMEYER D， SCHÄFER E，et al. Canal cleanliness using different irrigation activation systems： a SEM evaluation［J］. Clin Oral Investig， 2017， 21（9）： 2681-2687.
21	ARICIOĞLU B， ÇIKMAN A Ş， BABACAN M. The comparison of cleaning efficacy and apical extrusion of advanced irrigation activation methods with a novel Er∶YAG laser modality： sweeps［J］. Lasers Dent Sci， 2021， 5（1）： 43-52.
22	YANG Q， LIU M， ZHU L， et al. Comparison of needle， ultrasonic， and laser irrigation for the removal of calcium hydroxide from mandibular molar root canals［J］. Photobiomodul Photomed Laser Surg， 2021， 39（5）： 349-354.
23	HOSHIHARA Y， WATANABE S， KOUNO A，et al. Effect of tip insertion depth and irradiation parameters on the efficacy of cleaning calcium hydroxide from simulated lateral canals using Er∶YAG laser-or ultrasonic-activated irrigation［J］.J Dent Sci，2021，16（2）： 654-660.
24	JEZERŠEK M， LUKAČ N， LUKAČ M， et al. Measurement of pressures generated in root canal during Er∶YAG laser-activated irrigation［J］. Photobiomodul Photomed Laser Surg， 2020， 38（10）： 625-631.
25	AL-OMARI W M， PALAMARA J E. The effect of Nd∶YAG and Er，Cr∶YSGG lasers on the microhardness of human dentin［J］. Lasers Med Sci， 2013， 28（1）： 151-156.
26	PAQUÉ F， SIRTES G. Apical sealing ability of Resilon/Epiphany versus gutta-percha/AH Plus： immediate and 16-months leakage［J］. Int Endod J， 2007， 40（9）： 722-729.
27	DUARTE M A H， ORDINOLA-ZAPATA R， BERNARDES R A， et al. Influence of calcium hydroxide association on the physical properties of AH Plus［J］. J Endod， 2010， 36（6）： 1048-1051.

Group	Residual Ca(OH)₂score
Group	Cervical third	Middle third	Apical third	Total
Ultrasonically activated irrigation	3.00±0.67	3.30±0.82	4.30±0.82^*△	3.53±0.94
PIPS	2.00±0.67^#	2.70±0.82	4.30±0.82^*△	3.00±1.23
SWEEPS	2.10±0.74^#	2.30±0.82^#	3.80±0.79^*△	2.73±1.03
Negative control	1.00±0.00	1.00±0.00	1.00±0.00	1.00±0.00

[1]	秦娇娇, 马昂, 王静, 吴庆翠, 李怡然, 朱亚平, 焦珊, 王成坤. 不同功率的Er：YAG激光对白榴石玻璃陶瓷与树脂粘接面粘接强度的影响[J]. 吉林大学学报(医学版), 2020, 46(05): 942-947.
[2]	赵竹兰, 仲杨, 黄玉, 许立硕, 刘晨光, 张莉, 马宁. 五倍子穿心莲内酯提取液治疗牙周牙髓联合病变的临床疗效评价[J]. 吉林大学学报(医学版), 2020, 46(04): 839-843.
[3]	朱亚平, 王成坤, 吴庆翠, 李怡然, 马昂, 秦娇娇, 焦珊, 王静. 脱敏剂和激光脱敏对牙本质表面形态、硬度和成分的影响[J]. 吉林大学学报(医学版), 2020, 46(01): 121-126.
[4]	车鸿泽, 车彦海, 金权, 许立硕, 马宁, 张莉. 五倍子提取液在慢性根尖周炎患者根管治疗中应用的效果评价[J]. 吉林大学学报(医学版), 2018, 44(01): 162-165.