吉林大学学报(地球科学版) ›› 2016, Vol. 46 ›› Issue (3): 639-650.doi: 10.13278/j.cnki.jjuese.201603102
王建君1, 李浩武1, 胡湘瑜1, 王青1, 汪斌2, 杨仓3
Wang Jianjun1, Li Haowu1, Hu Xiangyu1, Wang Qing1, Wang Bin2, Yang Cang3
摘要:
基于对Ucayali盆地油气成藏要素的系统解剖,预测盆地内除已发现的逆冲背斜/断背斜外,还可能发育伸展断块、潜山、生物礁、地层尖灭、河道砂及逆冲断层下盘构造等多种圈闭类型,自西向东前展式推覆的逆冲背斜/断背斜为最主要的圈闭类型。前陆运动前盆地构造圈闭发育程度低,现今原油聚集多属前陆运动后二次调整成藏,淡水侵入使浅部油藏普遍遭受轻度降解。由于Shira隆起的分隔作用,西部次盆现今生成的烃类很难运移至东部圈闭中。而东部次盆烃源岩埋深小,Ene组展布面积有限,Ambo群趋于生气,在生油窗内生成的液态烃类相对有限,加之圈闭不断生长,圈闭充满度较低。同时,活动性断层对烃类侧向运移不利,其东侧的背斜圈闭往往无法得到有效充注,形成大规模原油聚集的潜力较小。南部和西部次盆成藏条件配置好,逆冲褶皱发育,圈闭可得到烃类持续充注,主要以天然气为主;南部次盆逆冲断层下盘构造圈闭为重要潜在勘探目标;Ene次盆勘探程度低,烃源岩品质好,仍有发现大型构造圈闭的潜力。
中图分类号:
| [1] Mathalone J M P, Montoya R M. Petroleum Geology of the Sub-Andean Basins of Peru[C]//Tankard A J, Suarez S, Welsink H J. Petroleum Basins of South America. Tulsa:AAPG Memoir 62,1995:423-444.[2] Krabbenhoft A, Bialas J, Kopp H, et al. Crustal Struc-ture of the Peruvian Continental Margin from Wideangle Seismic Studies[J]. Geophysical Journal International, 2004, 159(2):749-764.[3] IHS Company. IHS Basin Monitor:22217-Ucayali Basin[R].Geneva:IHS Company,2009:1-26.[4] Clift P D, Hartley A J. Slow Rate of Subduction Erosion and Coastal Underplating Along the Andean Margin of Chile and Peru[J]. Geology, 2007, 35(1):503-506.[5] Zelasco L D N. Tectonic Evolution of the Contaya Arch Ucayali Basin, Peru[D]. Texas:Texas A & M University, 2010:1-57.[6] Alvarez J O S. Structural and Stratigeraphic Evolution of Shira Mountains,Central Ucayali Basin, Peru[D]. Texas:Texas A & M University, 2007:1-116.[7] Bump A, Kennan L, Fallon J. Structural History of the Andean Foreland, Peru, and Its Relation to Subduction Zone Dynamics[R]. Texas:AAPG Annual Convention, Search and Discovery Article 30060, 2008:20-23.[8] Decou A, Von Eynatten H, Mamani M, et al. Cenozoic Forearc Basin Sediments in Southern Peru (15°-18°S) Stratigraphic and Heavy Mineral Constraints for Eocene to Miocene Evolution of the Central Andes[J]. Sedimentary Geology, 2011, 237(1):55-72.[9] Dumont J F, Fournier M. Geodynamic Environment of Quaternary Morphostructures of the Subandean Foreland Basins of Peru and Bolivia-Characteristics and Study Methods[J]. Quaternary Internatioal, 1994, 21:129-142.[10] Boekhout F,Spikings R,Sempere T, et al. Mesozoic Arc Magmatism Along the Southern Peruvian Margin During Gondwana Breakup and Dispersal[J]. Lithos, 2012(146/147):48-64.[11] Tankard Enterprises Limited.Tectonic Framework of Basin Evolution in Peru[R].Lima:Tankard Enterprises Ltd, 2002:1-45.[12] Bolanos R L, Wine G D. Hydrocarbon Potential of the Ucayali Basin, Peru[R]. Barcelona:AAPG International Conference, Search and Discovery Article 90017, 2003:1.[13] Higley D K. The Putumayo-Oriente-Maranon Province of Colombia, Ecuador, and Peru:Mesozoic, Cenozoic and Paleozoic Petroleum Systems[R]. Denver:USGS Digital Series 63, 2000:1-40.[14] Torres M A, Porta R, Brisson I. Applications and Deve-lopments of Sequence Stratigraphy in Latin America:Synthesis of Exploration and Development Experiences in the Sub-Andean Basins[R]. Buenos Aires:Proceedings SPE Latin American and Caribbean Petroleum Engineering Conference, SPE Paper No 69446, 2001:14.[15] 张申, 田世存, 郭建宇,等秘鲁乌卡亚利盆地油气勘探潜力分析[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2012, 23(2):268-278. Zhang Shen, Tian Shicun, Guo Jianyu, et al. Evaluation of Petroleum Potential in Ucayali Basin, Peru[J].Natural Gas Geoscience, 2012, 23(2):268-278.[16] C & C Reservoir. Field Evaluation Report-Cashiriari and San Martin Fields, Ucayali Basin, Peru[R]. Houston:C & C Reservoir, 2005:1-42.[17] C & C Reservoir.Field Evaluation Report-Aguaytia Field,Ucayali Basin, Peru[R]. Houston:C & C Reservoir, 2009:1-32.[18] 王青, 王建君, 汪平, 等. 秘鲁Ucayali盆地油气地质特征及勘探潜力分析[J]. 石油实验地质, 2012, 34(3):296-302. Wang Qing, Wang Jianjun, Wang Ping, et al. Petroleum Geology and Exploration Potential of Ucayali Basin, Peru[J]. Petroleum Geology & Experiment. 2012, 34(3):296-302.[19] Perupetro. Promotion Tour-Peruvian Sub-Andean Basins-Ucayali Basin[R]. Lima:Perupetro,2005:1-32.[20] Gandhi A, Torres-Verdín C, Voss B, et al. Correction of Invasion Effects on Well Logs in Camisea Gas Reservoirs, Peru, with the Construction of Static and Dynamic Multilayer Petrophysical Models[J]. AAPG Bulletin, 2013, 97(3):379-412.[21] Gandhi A, Torres-Verdín C, Voss B. Construction of Reliable Static and Dynamic Multi-Layer Petrophysical Models in Camisea Gas Reservoirs, Peru[C]//51st Annual Logging Symposium. Perth:SPWLA, 2010:1-16. |
| [1] | 王伟明, 胡美硕, 焦立新, 杨斌, 苗长盛, 孙宏亮, 周志超, 曲希玉, . 三塘湖盆地下石炭统新层系石油地质条件及勘探潜力 [J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2025, 55(5): 1401-1419. |
| [2] | 黄志, 叶涛, 肖述光, 李飞, 高文博, 戴建芳. 渤海湾盆地沙垒田西北斜坡带碳酸盐岩潜山储层形成与油气成藏[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2024, 54(6): 1815-1828. |
| [3] | 韩国猛, 陈冬霞, 马建英, 王梓颐, 董晓伟, 高思航, 邹磊落, 王娜. 黄骅坳陷歧北斜坡油气成藏机制与成藏模式[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2021, 51(6): 1636-1653. |
| [4] | 袁红旗, 魏鸣禄, 于英华. 油源断裂油气成藏期优势通道输导能力综合评判方法及其应用[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2021, 51(3): 694-703. |
| [5] | 肖国林, 蔡来星, 郭兴伟, 董贺平, 庞玉茂. 北黄海盆地东部坳陷勘探突破对我国近海残留“黑色侏罗系”油气勘探的启示[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2019, 49(1): 115-130. |
| [6] | 李昂, 鞠林波, 张丽艳. 塔里木盆地古城低凸起古-中生界构造演化特征与油气成藏关系[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2018, 48(2): 545-555. |
| [7] | 张焕旭, 陈世加, 路俊刚, 刘超威, 陈娟, 李勇, 徐坤. “膨胀力”作用下致密砂岩储层石油运聚特征[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2017, 47(5): 1341-1351. |
| [8] | 付金华,郭少斌,刘新社,王义刚. 鄂尔多斯盆地上古生界山西组页岩气成藏条件及勘探潜力[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2013, 43(2): 382-389. |
| [9] | 王伟明,邓海,卢双舫,徐建军,王贵磊,陈国辉. 断陷盆地单层暗色泥岩厚度与优质烃源岩的关系及其对成藏的控制——以海拉尔盆地为例[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2012, 42(6): 1610-1616. |
| [10] | 李军辉. 海拉尔盆地呼和湖凹陷下白垩统层序构成样式及油气成藏模式[J]. J4, 2012, 42(4): 961-969. |
| [11] | 刘洛夫, 尚晓庆, 孟江辉, 陈治军, 宁松华, 王萍, 李燕. 滨里海盆地东南部S区块下二叠统空谷阶盐岩特征及其对盐上层系油气成藏的影响[J]. J4, 2012, 42(2): 304-311. |
| [12] | 马中振, 谢寅符, 耿长波, 张凡芹. 巴西坎波斯(Campos)盆地石油地质特征与勘探有利区分析[J]. J4, 2011, 41(5): 1389-1396. |
| [13] | 庄新兵, 邹华耀, 李楠, 魏刚, 孙和风. 秦南地区天然气成因与油气勘探潜力分析[J]. J4, 2011, 41(3): 680-688. |
| [14] | 刘洛夫, 孟江辉, 王维斌, 靳军, 吴琳, 赵彦德, 王萍, 支东明. 准噶尔盆地西北缘车排子凸起上、下层系原油的地球化学特征差异及其意义[J]. J4, 2011, 41(2): 377-390. |
| [15] | 卢双舫, 胡慧婷, 刘海英, 邵明礼, 王立武, 张世广, 黄文彪, 仲维维, 吴高平. 英台断陷深层的气源条件及勘探潜力[J]. J4, 2010, 40(4): 912-920. |
|