西太平洋岛弧-弧后盆地热液活动及成矿作用

doi:10.13278/j.cnki.jjuese.201604112

吉林大学学报(地球科学版) ›› 2016, Vol. 46 ›› Issue (4): 1124-1138.doi: 10.13278/j.cnki.jjuese.201604112

西太平洋岛弧-弧后盆地热液活动及成矿作用

石学法^1,2, 李兵¹, 鄢全树^1,2, 叶俊¹

1. 海洋沉积与环境地质国家海洋局重点实验室, 国家海洋局第一海洋研究所, 山东青岛 266061;
2. 青岛海洋科学与技术国家实验室海洋地质过程与环境功能实验室, 山东青岛 266061

收稿日期:2016-04-21 出版日期:2016-07-26 发布日期:2016-07-26
作者简介:石学法(1965),男,研究员,博士,主要从事海洋沉积与海底成矿作用研究,Tel:0532-88967491,E-mail:xfshi@fio.org.cn
基金资助:
国际海底区域资源研究开发"十二五"课题（DY125-12-R-05）；山东省泰山学者工程（2015-11）

Hydrothermal Activities and Mineralization in the Arc and Back-Arc Basin Systems, Western Pacific

Shi Xuefa^1,2, Li Bing¹, Yan Quanshu^1,2, Ye Jun¹

1. Key Laboratory of Marine Sedimentology and Environmental Geology, First Institute of Oceanography, State Oceanic Administration, Qingdao 266061, Shandong, China;
2. Laboratory for Marine Geology, Qingdao National Laboratory for Marine Science and Technology, Qingdao 266061, Shandong, China

Received:2016-04-21 Online:2016-07-26 Published:2016-07-26
Supported by:
Supported by COMRA Research Program (DY125-12-R-05) and Taishan Scholar Program of Shandong Province(2015-11)

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

岛弧-弧后盆地是海底热液硫化物发育的重要环境。本文总结了近几十年对西太平洋地区岛弧-弧后盆地热液活动调查及研究的成果，阐述了岛弧-弧后盆地热液活动的分布规律、构造环境、热液喷口水深和流体温度变化关系、相分离过程以及热液硫化物的金属元素组成特征，分析了成矿元素富集规律和控矿因素。研究认为，随着岛弧-弧后盆地热液喷口所处水深的增加，其最高喷口流体温度也相应增加，这与相分离过程有关；岛弧-弧后盆地热液硫化物与洋中脊硫化物不同，以Fe-Zn-Pb型硫化物为主，显著富集Zn、Pb、Au、Ag等金属元素；热液成矿作用主要受到岛弧及弧后扩张处的岩浆作用、相分离、基岩、弧后扩张速率、沉积物盖层等5类因素的制约。

关键词: 西太平洋, 岛弧-弧后盆地, 热液活动, 硫化物, 相分离, 控矿因素

Abstract:

Island arc and back-arc basin systems are the important seafloor environments for the development of hydrothermal sulfide resources. In this study, we reviewed the results of international investigations and numerous studies on the hydrothermal activities and the accompanying sulfide mineralization processes in the arc and back-arc basin systems over the past few decades. We summarized geographical distributions, tectonic environments, water depths, vent fluid temperatures and phase separation process for the hydrothermal activities, and the sulfide types, element accumulation characteristics, ore body scales and the main ore-forming control factors for the hydrothermal sulfides in the systems. We suggested that, the variation trendy for the water depth of vents in the systems is the same as that for maximum vent fluid temperatures, and both of them are related to the phase separation process. Hydrothermal sulfides are mainly dominated by Fe-Zn-Pb type, and significantly enriched in the metal elements such as Zn, Pb, Au, Ag, etc. Hydrothermal mineralization is mainly controlled by the following five factors, island arc and back-arc magmatism, phase separation, basement rock, back-arc spreading rate and sediment.

Key words: Western Pacific, island arc and back-arc basin system, hydrothermal activity, sulfide, phase separation, ore controlling factors, western pacific

中图分类号:

石学法, 李兵, 鄢全树, 叶俊. 西太平洋岛弧-弧后盆地热液活动及成矿作用[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2016, 46(4): 1124-1138.

Shi Xuefa, Li Bing, Yan Quanshu, Ye Jun. Hydrothermal Activities and Mineralization in the Arc and Back-Arc Basin Systems, Western Pacific[J]. Journal of Jilin University(Earth Science Edition), 2016, 46(4): 1124-1138.

参考文献

[1] Monecke T, Petersen S, Hannington M D. Constraints on Water Depth of Massive Sulfide Formation: Evidence from Modern Seafloor Hydrothermal Systems in Arc-Related Settings[J]. Economic Geology, 2014, 109(8): 2079-2101.

[2] Hannington M, Jamieson J, Monecke T, et al. The Abundance of Seafloor Massive Sulfide Deposits[J]. Geology, 2011, 39:1155-1158.

[3] Hoagland P, Beaulieu S, Tivey M A, et al. Deep-Sea Mining of Seafloor Massive Sulfides[J]. Marine Policy, 2010, 34(3): 728-732.

[4] Kim J, Son S K, Son J W, et al. Venting Sites Along the Fonualei and Northeast Lau Spreading Centers and Evidence of Hydrothermal Activity at an Off-Axis Caldera in the Northeastern Lau Basin[J]. Geochemical Journal, 2009, 43(1): 1-13.

[5] Fouquet Y, Charlou J, Stackelberg U V, et al. Metallogenesis in Back-Arc Environments: The Lau Basin Example[J]. Economic Geology (Plus the Bulletin of the Society of Economic Geologists), 1993, 88(8): 2154-2181.

[6] Lisitsyn P, Malahoff A, Bogdanov Y A, et al. Hydrothermal Formations in the Northern Part of the Lau Basin, Pacific Ocean[J]. International Geology Review, 1992, 34(8): 828-847.

[7] Verati C, Lancelot J, Fouquet Y. Pb Isotope Study of Mineralizations at Oceanic Hydrothermal Vent Fields and Heterogeneities in the North Fiji Back-Arc Basin (SW Pacific)[J]. Comptes Rendus De l Academie Des Sciences Serie Ⅱ, 1994, 319(8): 921-928.

[8] Yukihiro N, Jun-Ichiro I, Takayoshi K, et al. Hydrothermal Plumes Along the North Fiji Basin Spreading Axis[J]. Nature, 1989, 342(6250): 667-670.

[9] Halbach P, Hansmann W, Köppel V, et al. Whole-Rock and Sulfide Lead-Isotope Data from the Hydrothermal JADE Field in the Okinawa Back-Arc Trough[J]. Mineralium Deposita, 1997, 32(1): 70-78.

[10] Kimura M, Uyeda S, Kato Y, et al. Active Hydrothermal Mounds in the Okinawa Trough Back-Arc Basin, Japan[J]. Tectonophysics, 1988, 145(3): 319-324.

[11] Scott S D, Binns R A. Hydrothermal Processes and Contrasting Styles of Mineralization in the Western Woodlark and Eastern Manus Basins of the Western Pacific[J]. Geological Society London Special Publications, 1995, 87(1): 191-205.

[12] Both R, Crook K, Taylor B, et al. Hydrothermal Chimneys and Associated Fauna in the Manus Back-Arc Basin, Papua New Guinea[J]. Eos, Transactions American Geophysical Union, 1986, 67(21): 489-490.

[13] Horibe Y, Kim K R, Craig H. Hydrothermal Methane Plumes in the Mariana Back-Arc Spreading Center[J]. Nature, 1986, 324(6093): 131-133.

[14] Baker E T, German C R. On the Global Distribution of Hydrothermal Vent Fields[C]// German C R, Lin J, Parson L M. Mid-Ocean Ridges: Hydrothermal Interactions Between the Lithosphere and Oceans:Geophysical Monograph Series 148.Washington, DC: American Geophysical Union, 2004: 245-266.

[15] Beaulieu S E, Baker E T, German C R. Where Are the Undiscovered Hydrothermal Vents on Oceanic Spreading Ridges? [J].Deep Sea Research Part II: Topical Studies in Oceanography, 2015, 121: 202-212.

[16] Halbach P Nakamura, Ko-ichi Wahsner M, et al. Probable Modern Analogue of Kuroko-Type Massive Sulphide Deposits in the Okinawa Trough Back-Arc Basin[J]. Nature, 1989, 338:496-499.

[17] Iizasa K, Fiske R S, Ishizuka O, et al. A Kuroko-Type Polymetallic Sulfide Deposit in a Submarine Silicic Caldera[J]. Science, 1999, 283(5404):975-977.

[18] 侯增谦. 现代与古代海底热水成矿作用[M]. 北京:地质出版社, 2003. Hou Zengqian. Modern and Ancient Submarine Hydrothermal Mineralization[M]. Beijing:Geological Publishing House,2003.

[19] Horibe Y, Kim K R, Craig H. Hydrothermal Methane Plumes in the Mariana Back-Arc Spreading Center[J]. Nature, 1986, 324(6093):131-133.

[20] Sakai H, Gamo T, Kim E-S, et al. Venting of Carbon Dioxide-Rich Fluid and Hydrate Formation in Mid-Okinawa Trough Back-Arc Basin[J]. Science, 1990,248(4959):1093-1096.

[21] Fouquet Y, Stackelberg U, Von Charlou J, et al. Hydrothermal Activity and Metallogenesis in the Lau Back-Arc Basin[J]. Nature, 1991, 349(6312): 778-781.

[22] 吴世迎.世界海底热液硫化物资源[M]. 北京:海洋出版社, 2000. Wu Shiying. Global Submarine Hydrothermal Sulfide Resources[M]. Beijing: Ocean Press, 2000.

[23] 吴世迎.马里亚纳海槽海底热液烟囱物研究[M]. 北京:海洋出版社, 1995. Wu Shiying. Study of Hydrothermal Chimneys in the Mariana Trough[M] . Beijing: Ocean Press, 1995.

[24] 曾志刚. 海底热液地质学[M]. 北京:科学出版社,2011. Zeng Zhigang. Submarine Hydrothermal Geology[M]. Beijing: Science Press, 2011.

[25] Beaulieu, Stace E. InterRidge Vents Database[DB/OL]. https://www.interridge. org /zh-hans/IRvents_database, 2015.

[26] Koschinsky A, Garbe-Schönberg D, Sander S, et al. Hydrothermal Venting at Pressure-Temperature Conditions Above the Critical Point of Seawater, 5°S on the Mid-Atlantic Ridge[J]. Geology, 2008, 36(8): 615-618.

[27] Foustoukos D I , Seyfried W E. Fluid Phase Separation Processes in Submarine Hydrothermal Systems[J]. Reviews in Mineralogy and Geochemistry, 2007, 65(1):213-239.

[28] Bischoff J L, Rosenbauer R J. Liquid-Vapor Relations in the Critical Region of the System NaCl-H₂O from 380 to 415℃: A Refined Determination of the Critical Point and Two-Phase Boundary of Seawater[J]. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, 1988, 52(8): 2121-2126.

[29] Ellis A J, Golding R M. The Solubility of Carbon Dioxide Above 100°C in Water and in Sodium Chloride Solutions[J]. American Journal of Science, 1963, 261:47-60.

[30] Hannington M D, Ronde C, Petersen S. Seafloor Tectonics and Submarine Hydrothermal Systems[J]. Economic Geology, 2005,100 : 111-141.

[31] Fouquet Y, Cambon P, Etoubleau J, et al. Geodiversity of Hydrothermal Processes Along the Mid-Atlantic Ridge and Ultramafic-Hosted Mineralization: A New Type of Oceanic Cu-Zn-Co-Au Volcanogenic Massive Sulfide Deposit[C]// Peter A Rona, Colin W Devey, Jérôme Dyment, et al. Geophysical Monograph Series 188.Washington, DC: American Geophysical Union , 2010: 321-367.

[32] Hannington M D, Alan G, Herzig P M, et al. Comparation of the TAG Mound and Stockwork Complex with Cyprus-Type[J]. Proceedings of the Ocean Drilling Program: Scientific Results, 1998, 158: 389-415.

[33] Petersen S, Herzig P M, Hannington M D, et al. Submarine Vein-Type Gold Mineralization Near Lihir Island, New Ireland Fore-Arc, Papua New Guinea[J]. Economic Geology, 2002, 97: 1795-1813.

[34] Yang K, Scott S D. Possible Contribution of a Metal-Rich Magmatic Fluid to a Sea-Floor Hydrothermal System[J]. Nature, 1996, 383(6599): 420-423.

[35] Susan E Humphris, Robert A Zierenberg, Lauren S Mullineaux, et al. Subseafloor Processes in Mid-Ocean Ridge Hydrothermal Systems[C]//Alt J C. Seafloor Hydrothermal Systems: Physical, Chemical, Biological, and Geological Interactions:Geophysical Monograph Series 91.Washington, D C: American Geophysical Union, 1995: 85-114.

[36] 曾志刚, 蒋富清, 翟世奎,等. 冲绳海槽Jade热液活动区块状硫化物的铅同位素组成及其地质意义[J]. 地球化学, 2000, 29(3): 239-245. Zeng Zhigang, Jiang Fuqing, Zhai Shikui, et al. Lead Isotopic Compositions of Massive Sulfides from the Jade Hydrothermal Filed in the Okinawa Trough and Its Geological Implications[J]. Geochimica,2000, 29(3): 239-245.

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed

西太平洋岛弧-弧后盆地热液活动及成矿作用

Hydrothermal Activities and Mineralization in the Arc and Back-Arc Basin Systems, Western Pacific

PDF (PC)

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 10

[1]	龙刚, 沈金松, 苏朝阳, 冉尚. 电各向异性海底多金属硫化矿地层时域电磁响应模拟与特征分析[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2025, 55(1): 274-288.
[2]	曾志刚. 海底热液硫化物中金属、非金属和稀有气体同位素组成的关系及其地质意义[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2024, 54(1): 1-19.
[3]	李良, 孙丰月, 李世金, 李碧乐, 钱烨, 王超, 赵拓飞, 禹禄, 王冠, 霍亮, 王力, 张雅静, 王琳琳, 李浩然, 闫佳铭, 李予晋, 张得鑫, 杨延乾, 王维. 东昆仑成矿带岩浆铜镍硫化物矿床成矿地质条件与成矿规律[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2022, 52(5): 1461-1496.
[4]	洪梅, 张凯, 刘娜, 杨亚冬, 王若凡, 焦昕倩, . 苜蓿基生物炭催化硫化物还原处理顺-二氯乙烯[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2022, 52(4): 1275-.
[5]	李猛猛, 刘敬党, 梁天意, 谭亮, 王刚, 朱玺. 基于支持向量机算法的岩浆硫化物矿床硫元素预测模型 [J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2022, 52(3): 866-878.
[6]	张贵山, 邱红信, 温汉捷, 彭仁, 孟乾坤. 攀西红格钒钛磁铁矿矿田富钴硫化物中钴的地球化学特征及其地质意义[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2021, 51(6): 1740-1752.
[7]	董志国, 张连昌, 董飞羽, 张帮禄, 谢月桥, 查斌, 彭自栋, 王长乐. 西昆仑穆呼锰矿床地质特征、控矿因素及成矿模式[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2020, 50(5): 1358-1372.
[8]	李堃, 刘飞, 刘凯, 赵少瑞, 汤朝阳, 段其发. 湘西-黔东地区铅锌矿床找矿模型与定量预测[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2020, 50(3): 825-841.
[9]	陆继龙, 范玉超, 熊玉新, 尹业长, 赵玉岩. 甘肃阳山金矿岩(矿)石中金的化学相态分析[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2019, 49(4): 992-1000.
[10]	殷征欣, 李正元, 沈泽中, 汤民强, 魏巍, 刘强, 谢明芮, 蔡周荣. 西太平洋帕里西维拉海盆不对称性发育特征及其成因[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2019, 49(1): 218-229.
[11]	刘招君, 孙平昌, 柳蓉, 孟庆涛, 胡菲. 敦密断裂带盆地群油页岩特征及成矿差异分析[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2016, 46(4): 1090-1099.
[12]	郝立波，吴超，孙立吉，蒋艳明，赵玉岩，陆继龙，李杰. 吉林红旗岭铜镍硫化物矿床Re-Os同位素特征及其意义[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2014, 44(2): 507-517.
[13]	赵新运，郝立波，陆继龙，赵玉岩，魏俏巧. 红旗岭矿床茶尖矿区铂族元素地球化学特征及其意义[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2013, 43(3): 748-757.
[14]	刘金玉, 郗爱华, 葛玉辉, 孙洪涛, 龚鹏辉. 红旗岭3号含矿岩体地质年龄及其岩石学特征[J]. J4, 2010, 40(2): 321-326.
[15]	李绪俊,郗爱华,陈静. 脉状金矿定位预测的关键--主控矿因素分析[J]. J4, 2008, 38(5): 731-0737.