免共振沉桩过程对地表振动影响的FLAC3D数值模拟

doi:10.13278/j.cnki.jjuese.20200276

吉林大学学报(地球科学版) ›› 2021, Vol. 51 ›› Issue (5): 1514-1522.doi: 10.13278/j.cnki.jjuese.20200276

免共振沉桩过程对地表振动影响的FLAC^3D数值模拟

魏家斌¹, 王卫东^1,2, 吴江斌²

1. 同济大学土木工程学院地下建筑与工程系, 上海 200092;
2. 华东建筑设计研究院有限公司上海地下空间与工程设计研究院, 上海 200011

收稿日期:2020-11-26 出版日期:2021-09-26 发布日期:2021-09-29
作者简介:魏家斌(1992-),男,博士研究生,主要从事免共振沉桩环境影响和承载特性研究,E-mail:jiabin_wei@foxmail.com
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金项目（51978399）；上海市科委重点研发项目（18DZ1205300）；上海市青年科技启明星计划（18QB1400300）；上海市优秀学术/技术带头人计划（18XD1422600）

Numerical Simulation with FLAC^3D on Ground Surface Vibration During Pile Driving Using Resonance-Free Technology

Wei Jiabin¹, Wang Weidong^1,2, Wu Jiangbin²

1. Department of Geotechnical Engineering, College of Civil Engineering, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China;
2. Shanghai Underground Space Engineering Design & Research Institute, East China Architecture Design & Research Institute Co., Ltd., Shanghai 200011, China

Received:2020-11-26 Online:2021-09-26 Published:2021-09-29
Supported by:
Supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51978399), the Key R&D Projects of Shanghai Science and Technology Commission (18DZ1205300), the Shanghai Rising-Star Program (18QB1400300) and the Program of Shanghai Academic/Technology Research Leader (18XD1422600)

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为研究免共振沉桩过程对地表振动影响，采用密度放大法以消除模型桩弹性模量过大对计算效率的影响，在有限差分软件FLAC^3D中建立了相应的连续振动沉桩模型，并和文献中的现场测试结果进行了比较，分析了激振力幅值和振动频率这两个施工参数对地表振动响应的影响。结果表明：密度放大法可有效提高数值模拟的计算效率，模拟沉桩7.0倍桩径（4.9 m）所需计算时间约为12.0 h，数值结果较好地模拟了现场测试中免共振沉桩的地表振动影响；激振力幅值和振动频率均主要对近场（水平距离为5.0倍桩径范围内）的地表振动有明显影响；临界沉桩深度与地表振动影响峰值相对应，该深度随水平距离先增大后趋于稳定；激振力幅值对临界沉桩深度的改变不明显，振动频率对远场临界沉桩深度则有较明显影响。

关键词: 免共振沉桩, 密度放大法, 数值模拟, FLAC^3D, 土体振动测试

Abstract: Aiming to investigate the ground surface vibration during pile driving with resonance-free technology, a continuous vibratory pile driving model was established by using the finite difference program FLAC^3D. The density scaling method was introduced to eliminate the effect of time consuming due to the excessive elastic modulus of the model pile. The numerical results were compared to the field test data in literature, and then the influence of exciting force amplitude and vibrating frequency on ground surface vibration, was investigated. The results show that:The density scaling method can effectively increase the simulation efficiency, in which the calculation time for penetrating simulated 7.0 times pile diameter (4.9 m) is around 12.0 h, and there is an acceptable agreement between the numerical result and the field measurement; Additionally, the ground surface vibrations are influenced by the exciting force amplitude and the vibrating frequency mainly in the near field (horizontal distance less than 5.0 times pile diameter); Corresponding to the peak ground surface vibration, the critical penetration depth increases first with the horizontal distance and then tends to almost a steady value; Compared to the exciting force amplitude, the vibrating frequency can influence the critical penetration depth in the far field.

Key words: resonance-free vibratory pile driving, density scaling method, numerical simulation, FLAC^3D, ground vibration tests

中图分类号:

TU67

魏家斌, 王卫东, 吴江斌. 免共振沉桩过程对地表振动影响的FLAC^3D数值模拟[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2021, 51(5): 1514-1522.

Wei Jiabin, Wang Weidong, Wu Jiangbin. Numerical Simulation with FLAC^3D on Ground Surface Vibration During Pile Driving Using Resonance-Free Technology[J]. Journal of Jilin University(Earth Science Edition), 2021, 51(5): 1514-1522.

参考文献

[1] Rajapakse R. Pile Design and Construction Rules of Thumb[M]. 2nd ed. Amsterdam:Elsevier, 2016:286-290.
[2] 杨春柳. 钢管桩免共振施工对邻近地铁的振动影响试验研究[J]. 建筑施工, 2018, 40(9):1655-1657. Yang Chunliu. Experimental Study on Vibration Effect of Steel Pipe Piles Resonance-Free Construction on Adjacent Metro[J]. Building Construction, 2018, 40(9):1655-1657.
[3] 李操, 张孟喜, 周蓉峰, 等. 免共振沉桩原位试验研究[J]. 长江科学院院报, 2020, 37(9):122-127. Li Cao, Zhang Mengxi, Zhou Rongfeng, et al. In-Situ Test Study on Resonance-Free Pile[J]. Journal of Yangtze River Scientific Research Institute, 2020, 37(9):122-127.
[4] 王卫东, 魏家斌, 吴江斌, 等. 高频免共振法沉桩对周围土体影响的现场测试与分析[J]. 建筑结构学报, 2021, 42(4):131-138. Wang Weidong, Wei Jiabin, Wu Jiangbin, et al. Field Test and Analysis on Surrounding Soil Effects of Pile Driving with High-Frequency and Resonance-Free Technology[J]. Journal of Building Structures, 2021, 42(4):131-138.
[5] 王进怀. 2.7高频液压振动沉拔桩锤[C]//中国土木工程学会土力学及基础工程学术委员会联合年会. 北京:中国土木工程学会, 1998:166-172. Wang Jinhuai. 2.7 High Frequency Hydraulic Vibration Sinking and Pulling Pile Hammer[C]//Joint Annual Meeting of the Soil Mechanics and Basic Engineering Academic Committee of China Civil Engineering Society. Beijing:China Civil Engineering Society, 1998:166-172.
[6] Henke S, Grabe J. Numerical Investigation of Soil Plugging Inside Open-Ended Piles with Respect to the Installation Method[J]. Acta Geotechnica, 2008, 3(3):215-223.
[7] Ekanayake S D, Liyanapathirana D S, Leo C J. Influence Zone Around a Closed-Ended Pile During Vibratory Driving[J]. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 2013, 53:26-36.
[8] 肖勇杰, 陈福全, 林良庆. 灌注桩套管振动贯入引起的地面振动及隔振研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2017, 38(3):705-713. Xiao Yongjie, Chen Fuquan, Lin Liangqing. Study of Ground Vibration and Vibration Isolation Due to Sleeve of Cast-in-Place Piles Installed by Vibratory Driving[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2017, 38(3):705-713.
[9] Chen F Q, Lin Y Q, Dong Y Z, et al. Numerical Investigations of Soil Plugging Effect Inside Large-Diameter, Open-Ended Wind Turbine Monopiles Driven by Vibratory Hammers[J]. Marine Georesources and Geotechnology, 2020, 38(1):83-96.
[10] Daryaei R, Bakroon M, Aubram D, et al. Numerical Evaluation of the Soil Behavior During Pipe-Pile Installation Using Impact and Vibratory Driving in Sand[J]. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 2020, 134:1-15.
[11] Galavi V, Beuth L, Coelho Z, et al. Numerical Simulation of Pile Installation in Saturated Sand Using Material Point Method[J]. Procedia Engineering, 2017, 175:72-79.
[12] 韩钧, 陈福全, 曹琪君. 高频液压振动沉桩的颗粒离散元分析[J]. 福州大学学报(自然科学版), 2011, 39(2):287-292. Han Jun, Chen Fuquan, Cao Qijun. DEM Study on the Installation of a Pile Using the High Frequency Hydraulic Vibratory Hammer[J]. Journal of Fuzhou University (Natural Science Edition), 2011, 39(2):287-292.
[13] Feng Z, Deschamps R J. A Study of the Factors Influencing the Penetration and Capacity of Vibratory Driven Piles[J]. Soils and Foundations, 2000, 40(3):43-54.
[14] 陈福全, 雷金山, 汪金卫. 高频液压振动锤沉桩的打入性状分析[J]. 铁道科学与工程学报, 2009, 6(1):41-47. Chen Fuquan, Lei Jinshan, Wang Jinwei. Penetration Behaviour Due to Vibratory Pile Driving Using the High Frequency Hydraulic Vibratory Hammer[J]. Journal of Railway Science and Engineering, 2009, 6(1):41-47.
[15] Rooz A F H, Hamidi A. A Numerical Model for Continuous Impact Pile Driving Using ALE Adaptive Mesh Method[J]. Soil Dynamic and Earthquake Engineering, 2019, 118:134-143.
[16] Itasca Consulting Group Inc. FLAC^3D-Fast Lagrangian Analysis of Continua in Three-Dimensions, Ver. 6.0, User's Guide Manual[Z]. Minneapolis, 2019.
[17] Kuhlemeyer R L, Lysmer J. Finite Element Method Accuracy for Wave Propagation Problems[J]. Journal of the Soil Mechanics and Foundations Division, 1973, 99(5):421-427.
[18] 陈育民, 徐鼎平. FLAC/FLAC^3D基础与工程实例[M]. 2版. 北京:中国水利水电出版社, 2013:225-234. Chen Yumin, Xu Dingping. FLAC/FLAC^3D Foundation and Engineering Examples[M]. 2nd ed. Beijing:China Water and Power Press, 2013:225-234.
[19] Athanasopolous G A, Pelekis P C. Ground Vibrations from Sheetpile Driving Urban Environment:Measurements, Analysis and Effects on Buildings and Occupants[J]. Soil Dynamic and Earthquake Engineering, 2000, 19:371-387.
[20] 建筑工程容许振动标准:GB 50868-2013[S]. 北京:中国计划出版社, 2013. Standard for Allowable Vibration of Building Engineering:GB 50868-2013[S]. Beijing:China Planning Press, 2013.
[21] Thandavamoorthy T. Piling in Fine and Medium Sand:A Case Study of Ground and Pile Vibration[J]. Soil Dynamic and Earthquake Engineering, 2004, 24(4):295-304.
[22] Khoubani A, Ahmadi M M. Numerical Study of Ground Vibration Due to Impact Pile Driving[J]. Geotechnical Engineering, 2012, 167(1):28-29.
[23] Dassault Systemes Simulia. ABAQUS 2016 Analysis User's Manual, Ver.6.16[Z]. Providence, 2016.

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed

免共振沉桩过程对地表振动影响的FLAC^3D数值模拟

Numerical Simulation with FLAC^3D on Ground Surface Vibration During Pile Driving Using Resonance-Free Technology

PDF (PC)

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 10

[1]	夏英杰, 陈华斌, 陈健, 姚明宇, 杨海. 不同施工参数下深层页岩水力压裂数值模拟[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2026, 56(3): 924-936.
[2]	涂君汕, 陈辉, 邓居智, 陈康, 李焱, 余辉. 水库堤坝对高密度电法的影响及校正技术[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2026, 56(3): 1013-1025.
[3]	束龙仓, 位书静, 澈丽木格, 温中琦, 刘波. 西辽河平原生态输水的地下水响应及不确定性量化[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2026, 56(2): 647-660.
[4]	黄兴国, 翁央央, 韩丽. 基于广义递归卷积的孔隙黏弹地震波正演模拟[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2026, 56(1): 377-385.
[5]	周柳湘, 余思琴, 陈俊华, 刘城, 陈义, 张鑫鑫, . 潜孔锤与冲击钻机联合钻进工艺成孔碎岩过程数值模拟[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2025, 55(5): 1608-1618.
[6]	苑成旺, 张敏, 张少龙, 秦磊, 郭海洋, 墨海滢, 信旸. 长春地铁基坑支护结构变形与地表沉降特征[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2025, 55(3): 879-892.
[7]	于子望, 卢帅屹, 白林, 郑天琪. CO2地质封存岩石力学问题研究进展[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2025, 55(3): 930-942.
[8]	程瑶, 陆丹丹, 赵龙飞. 微波加热油页岩储层的热响应 [J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2025, 55(2): 387-400.
[9]	刁国君, 何昕. 地铁明挖车站下穿越既有建筑物的局部暗扩挖施工关键技术 [J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2025, 55(2): 536-549.
[10]	蔺学旻, 肖红琳. 缝洞型储层声波远探测测井响应模拟及应用——以塔河油田碳酸盐岩缝洞型储层为例[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2025, 55(1): 312-327.
[11]	魏虹羽, 李世超, 王伟安. 地球动力学数值模拟算法的应用现状与展望[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2025, 55(1): 98-124.
[12]	吴泽坤, 何来胜, 白晓宇, 麻栋栋, 牛永昌, 赵广, 桑松魁, 闫楠, 张明义. 层状土中静压桩连续贯入现场试验与数值模拟[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2024, 54(4): 1291-1304.
[13]	庞志超, 肖华, 毛晨飞, 陈国军, 梁琬坤, 高明, 张啸. 准噶尔盆地南缘地区含膏质地层岩性特征及测井识别方法[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2024, 54(4): 1419-1431.
[14]	刘怀湜, 赵雪娇, 刘雨新, 房庭瑞, 张静, 嵇艳鞠. 基于改进粒子群优化的超顺磁效应多参数提取[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2024, 54(3): 993-1002.
[15]	韩长玉, 赵浩汀. 路基填筑短期内热棒高导热性影响 [J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2024, 54(2): 570-580.

免共振沉桩过程对地表振动影响的FLAC3D数值模拟

Numerical Simulation with FLAC3D on Ground Surface Vibration During Pile Driving Using Resonance-Free Technology

PDF (PC)

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 10

免共振沉桩过程对地表振动影响的FLAC^3D数值模拟

Numerical Simulation with FLAC^3D on Ground Surface Vibration During Pile Driving Using Resonance-Free Technology