吉林大学学报(地球科学版) ›› 2016, Vol. 46 ›› Issue (5): 1332-1341.doi: 10.13278/j.cnki.jjuese.201605106

• 地质与资源 • 上一篇    下一篇

基于AFM表征的页岩孔隙特征及其与解析气量关系

白永强1,2, 刘美2, 杨春梅2, 姜振学1   

  1. 1. 中国石油大学(北京) 非常规天然气研究院, 北京 102249;
    2. 东北石油大学电子科学学院/黑龙江省高校校企共建测试计量技术及仪器仪表工程研发中心, 黑龙江 大庆 163318
  • 收稿日期:2015-12-12 出版日期:2016-09-26 发布日期:2016-09-26
  • 作者简介:白永强(1974-),男,在站博士后,主要从事介观表征研究,E-mail:yqbai2012@163.com
  • 基金资助:

    国家自然科学基金项目(51274068,41472112);中国博士后基金项目(2014M560163);教育部提高油气采收率重点实验室基金(2014)

AFM Based Pore Characterization of Shales and Its Relation to the Analytical Gas

Bai Yongqiang1,2, Liu Mei2, Yang Chunmei2, Jiang Zhenxue1   

  1. 1. Unconventional Gas Research Institute, China University of Petroleum, Beijing 102249, China;
    2. College of Electronic Science, Northeast Petroleum University/The University-Enterprise R & D Center of Measuring and Testing Technology & Instrument and Meter Engineering in Heilongjiang Province, Daqing 163318, Heilongjiang, China
  • Received:2015-12-12 Online:2016-09-26 Published:2016-09-26
  • Supported by:

    Supported by National natural Science Foundation of China (51274068,41472112); Chinese Postdoctoral Science Foundation (2014M560163) and Key Laboratory of Enhance Oil and Gas Recovery of Educational Ministry Foundation (2014)

摘要:

页岩储层的孔隙结构影响着页岩气的储集特性。为了较为真实地反映样品表面孔隙三维结构,著者选用原子力显微镜研究页岩微-纳米孔隙特征。以重庆市涪陵地区焦页1井(JY1)和渝参4井(YC4)典型样品为研究对象,用原子力显微镜表征岩样的微观结构,获取岩样的三维形貌图,分析岩样的孔隙分布特征和储集空间特征,构建代表岩样孔隙特征的参数。分别比较相同井号不同井段之间的特征参数差异和不同井号之间的特征参数差异,从而定量描述岩样的形貌特征。结合样品提取现场解析气量数据,建立JY1、YC4样品的解析气量与特征参数之间的关系。结果表明:JY1样品的储集空间密集,孔隙占的空间相对多,其微观结构更有利于气体的吸附和储集;结合两口井取心现场解析页岩气量分析发现,JY1、YC4样品的空间起伏度FDI与现场解析气量均呈现正相关关系。

关键词: 页岩, 孔隙结构, 解析气量, 原子力显微镜, 特征参数

Abstract:

The pore structure of shale reservoirs has a very significant impact on shale gas reservoir. An atomic force microscope (AFM) has unique advantage in characterization of micro-nanoscale structure, and can reflect three-dimensional structure of the surface of a sample. For the study of the relationship between micro-nanometer pore characterization of shales and the amount of field analytical gas extracted from core, we choose typical samples of Jiaoye 1 well (JY1) and Yucan 4 well (YC4) from Fuling of Chongqing as research objects. We get the micro-structure characterization of the rock samples by atomic force microscope, by obtaining three-dimensional topographies of the samples, and by analyzing the features of pore distribution and reservoir space of the samples. We then build parameters that represent internal characteristics of rock samples. Having compared the differences of the characteristic parameters from different well sections in the same well, and the differences of characteristic parameters from different wells respectively, we describe the morphology features of the rock samples quantitatively. Combined with the data of field analytical gas, we build the relationship between the amount of field analytical gas and characteristic parameters of JY1 and YC4 samples, respectively. The results show that relative to the YC4 samples, JY1 samples show more intensive reservoir spacesis, and higher porosity, and more beneficial to the storage of gas. The results also show that there is a positive correlation between the fluctuation degree of interspace and the amount of the field analytical gas of JY1 and YC4 samples. Our results may have significance for the quantitative evaluation of the relation between exploitable volume and the micro-pore structure of shale gas.

Key words: shale, structure of the pores, analytical gas, atomic force microscope, characteristic parameters

中图分类号: 

  • TE132.3

[1] 董大忠,邹才能,杨桦,等.中国页岩气勘探开发进展与发展前景[J].石油学报,2012,33(1):107-114. Dong Dazhong, Zou Caineng, Yang Hua, et al. Progress and Prospects of Shale Gas Exploration and Development in China[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinic, 2012, 33(1):107-114.

[2] 邹才能,董大忠,王社教,等.中国页岩气形成机理、地质特征及资源潜力[J].石油勘探与开发,2010,37(6):641-653. Zou Caineng, Dong Dazhong, Wang Shejiao, et al. Geological Characteristics, Formation Mechanism and Resource Potential of Shale Gas in China[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2010, 37(6):641-653.

[3] 董大忠,邹才能,李建忠,等.页岩气资源潜力与勘探开发前景[J].地质通报,2011,30(2):324-336. Dong Dazhong, Zou Caineng, Li Jianzhong, et al. Resource Potential, Exploration and Development Prospect of Shale Gas in the Whole World[J]. Geological Bulletin of China, 2011, 30(2):324-336.

[4] 李新景,胡素云,程克明.北美裂缝性页岩气勘探开发的启示[J].石油勘探与开发,2007,34(4):392-400. Li Xinjing, Hu Suyun, Cheng Keming. Suggestions from the Development of Fractured Shale Gas in North America[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2007, 34(4):392-400.

[5] 张金川,边瑞康,荆铁亚,等.页岩气理论研究的基础意义[J].地质通报,2011,30(2):318-323. Zhang Jinchuan, Bian Ruikang, Jing Tieya, et al. Fundamental Significance of Gas Shale Theoretical Research[J]. Geological Bulletin of China, 2011, 30(2):318-323.

[6] 张志英,杨盛波.页岩气吸附解吸规律研究[J].实验力学,2012,27(4):492-497. Zhang Zhiying, Yang Shengbo. On the Adsorption and Desorption Trend of Shale Gas[J]. Journal of Experimental Mechanics, 2012, 27(4):492-497.

[7] Ambrose R J,Hartman R C,Diaz-Campos M,et al.New Pore-Scale Considerations for Shale Gas in Place Calculations[J]. SPE 131772,2010:1-17.

[8] 陈尚斌,朱炎铭,王红岩,等.川南龙马溪组页岩气储层纳米孔隙结构特征及其成藏意义[J].煤炭学报,2012,37(3):438-444. Chen Shangbin, Zhu Yanming, Wang Hongyan, et al. Structure Characteristics and Accumulation Significance of Nanopores in Longmaxi Shale Gas Reservoir in the Southern Sichuan Basin[J]. Journal of China Coal Society, 2012, 37(3):438-444.

[9] 张雪芬,陆现彩,张林晔,等.页岩气的赋存形式研究及其石油地质意义[J].地球科学进展,2010,25(6):597-603. Zhang Xuefen, Lu Xiancai, Zhan Linye, et al. Occurrences of Shale Gas and Their Petroleum Geological Significance[J]. Advances in Earth Sciences, 2010, 25(6):597-603.

[10] 赵佩,李贤庆,田兴旺,等.川南地区龙马溪组页岩气储层微孔隙结构特征[J].天然气地球科学,2014,25(6):947-956. Zhao Pei, Li Xianqing, Tian Xingwang, et al. Study on Micropore Structure Characteristics of Longmaxi Formation Shale Gas Reservoirs in the Southern Sichuan Basin[J]. Natural Gas Geoscience, 2014, 25(6):947-956.

[11] 胡爱军,潘一山,唐巨鹏,等.型煤的甲烷吸附以及NMR试验研究[J].洁净煤技术,2007,13(3):37-40. Hu Aijun, Pan Yishan, Tang Jupeng, et al. Experiment Research of Adsorption and NMR on the Noulding Coal[J]. Clean Coal Technology, 2007, 13(3):37-40.

[12] Raut U, Famá M, Teolis B D, et al. Characterization of Porosity in Vapor-Deposite Damorphous Solid Water from Methane Adsorption[J]. The Journal of Chemical Physics, 2007, 127:1-6.

[13] 钟玲文,张慧,员争荣,等.煤的比表面积、孔体积及其对煤吸附能力的影响[J].煤田地质与勘探,2002,30(3):26-28. Zhong Lingwen, Zhang Hui, Yuan Zhengrong, et al. Influence of Specific Pore Area and Pore Volume of Coal on Adsorption Capacity[J]. Coal Geology & Exploration, 2002, 30(3):26-28.

[14] 许满贯,马正恒,陈甲,等.煤对甲烷吸附性能影响因素的实验研究[J].矿业工程研究,2009,24(2):51-54. Xu Manguan, Ma Zhengheng, Chen Jia, et al. Experimental Study on Influencing Factors of Adsorption Properties of Methane on Coal[J]. Mineral Engineering Research, 2009, 24(2):51-54.

[15] Loucks R G. Revisiting the Importance Secondary Disso-lution Pores in Tertiary Sandstones Along the Texas Gulf Coast[J]. Gulf Coast Association of Geological Societies Transactions, 2005, 55:447-455.

[16] Yao Suping, Jiao Kun, Zhang Ke, et al. An Atomic Force Microscopy Study of Coal Nanopore Structure[J]. Chinese Science Bulletin, 2011, 56(25):2706-2712.

[17] 蒋裕强,陈林,蒋婵,等.致密储层孔隙结构表征技术及发展趋势[J].地质科技情报,2014,33(3):63-70. Jiang Yuqiang, Chen lin, Jiang Chan, et al. Characterization Techniques and Trends of the Pore Structure of Tight Reservoirs[J]. Geological Science and Technology Information, 2014, 33(3):63-70.

[18] 田华,张水昌,柳少波,等.压汞法和气体吸附法研究富有机质页岩孔隙特征[J].石油学报,2012,33(3):419-427. Tian Hua, Zhang Shuichang, Liu Shaobo, et al. Determination of Organic-Rich Shale Pore Features by Mercury Injection and Gas Adsorption Methods[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinic, 2012, 33(3):419-427.

[19] 邹才能,杨智,陶士振,等.纳米油气与源储共生型油气聚集[J].石油勘探与开发,2012,39(1):13-26. Zou Caineng, Yang Zhi, Tao Shizhen, et al. Nano-Hydrocarbon and the Accumulation in Coexisting Source and Reservoir[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2012, 39(1):13-26.

[20] 杨华,李士祥,刘显阳.鄂尔多斯盆地致密油、页岩油特征及资源潜力[J].石油学报,2013,34(1):1-11. Yang Hua, Li Shixiang, Liu Xianyang. Characteristics and Resource Prospects of Tight Oil and Shale Oil in Ordos Basin[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinic, 2013, 34(1):1-11.

[21] 梁超,姜在兴,杨镱婷,等.四川盆地五峰组-龙马溪组页岩岩相及储集空间特征[J].石油勘探与开发,2012,39(6):691-698. Liang Chao, Jiang Zaixing, Yang Yiting, et al. Characteristics of Shale Lithofacies and Reservoir Space of the Wufeng-Longmaxi Formation, Sichuan Basin[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2012, 39(6):691-698.

[22] Atul K V,Bodhisatwa H,Suresh K S,et al.Methane Sorption Dynamics and Hydrocarbon Generation of Shale Samples from West Bokaro and Raniganj Basins[J].Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering, 2014, 21:1138-1147.

[1] 李冠, 何文祥, 文志刚, 胡勇, 高小洋, 肖娜. 鄂尔多斯盆地陇东地区长71-2亚段不同源储组合的页岩油富集机理及富集模式[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2026, 56(3): 768-787.
[2] 陈泽熙, 徐志明, 李斌, 钟笠, 彭军, 张昆, 魏祥峰, 郝景宇. 基质型页岩甜点特征及评价方法:以四川盆地涪陵地区中侏罗统凉高山组陆相页岩为例[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2026, 56(3): 788-803.
[3] 夏英杰, 陈华斌, 陈健, 姚明宇, 杨海. 不同施工参数下深层页岩水力压裂数值模拟[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2026, 56(3): 924-936.
[4] 张恩威, 孟庆涛, 唐佰强, 胡菲, 党微.  基于机器学习的TOC测井预测方法:以松辽盆地南部青山口组一段为例[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2026, 56(3): 1062-1075.
[5] 王健, 张媛瑗, 吴楠, 徐清海, 崔子岳, 刘显凤, 付清萌. 鄂尔多斯盆地志靖—安塞地区长7段夹层型页岩油储层特征及分类评价[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2026, 56(2): 453-468.
[6] 肖正录, 李勇, 路俊刚, 秦春雨, 刘章昊, 周翔, 蒋奇君, 周易鑫. 四川盆地侏罗系大安寨段页岩油富集条件及有利勘探目标[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2025, 55(4): 1039-1050.
[7] 王梓麟, 时婧玥, 杨英, 徐栋, 曾泉树, 张益畅. 深层煤岩孔隙结构表征及压裂缝导流能力影响因素[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2025, 55(4): 1061-1076.
[8] 路研, 刘宗宾, 廖新武, 李超, 王亚. 低渗透砂岩油藏水驱渗流特征[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2025, 55(4): 1077-1090.
[9] 杨立红, 刘莹, 罗弋卜, 曾皓, 苏建政, 李迎超. 油页岩原位开采中高温腐蚀下的选材[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2025, 55(4): 1091-1102.
[10] 张可佳, 廖明月, 刘涛, 赵玉武, 刘宗堡, 田枫, 张岩, 贺友志.

基于改进BlendMask的页岩扫描电镜图像矿物鉴定方法 [J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2025, 55(4): 1387-1400.

[11] 程瑶, 陆丹丹, 赵龙飞.

微波加热油页岩储层的热响应 [J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2025, 55(2): 387-400.

[12] 高波, 潘哲君, 刘连杰, 李玲玲, 洪淑新, 潘会芳, 张波. 松辽盆地徐家围子断陷沙河子组砂砾岩储层有效性综合评价[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2025, 55(1): 31-45.
[13] 王亚, 刘宗宾, 马奎前, 路研, 刘超. 基于LDA协同SSOM算法的低渗透砂岩孔隙结构评价[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2025, 55(1): 298-311.
[14] 王安, 胡明毅, 高家俊, 杨亮, 邢济麟. 松南长岭凹陷青山口组一段泥页岩元素地球化学特征及古环境意义[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2024, 54(6): 2075-2088.
[15] 蔡潇, 夏威, 马晓东, 臧素华, 丁安徐, 刘玉霞, 花彩霞, 朱一川, 李辉. 苏北盆地溱潼凹陷古近系阜宁组页岩油储集空间特征及其影响因素[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2024, 54(5): 1482-1493.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 张世广, 柳成志, 卢双舫, 张雁, 吴高平, 刘秋宏. 高分辨率层序地层学在河、湖、三角洲复合沉积体系的应用--以朝阳沟油田扶余油层开发区块为例[J]. J4, 2009, 39(3): 361 -368 .
[2] 李碧乐,沈鑫,陈广俊,杨延乾,李永胜. 青海东昆仑阿斯哈金矿Ⅰ号脉成矿流体地球化学特征和矿床成因[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2012, 42(6): 1676 -1687 .
[3] 杨晓平,李仰春,柳 震, 汪 岩,王洪杰. 黑龙江东部鸡西盆地构造层序划分与盆地动力学演化[J]. J4, 2005, 35(05): 616 -621 .
[4] 李发文, 冯平, 张超. 天津北三河地区垂向耦合产流模型及应用[J]. J4, 2011, 41(2): 459 -464 .
[5] 王立军,刘国才,黄继国,李跃迁,丛颖,沈照理,赵晓波. 接触氧化技术在公园景观水体功能恢复中的运用试验研究[J]. J4, 2006, 36(03): 458 -461 .
[6] 雷如雄,吴昌志,屈迅,顾连兴,陈刚,吾尔娜,孙洪涛,刘国宁. 中天山天湖东铁钼矿含矿片麻状花岗岩年代学、地球化学和锆石Hf同位素-对于中天山早古生代构造演化的启示[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2014, 44(5): 1540 -1552 .
[7] 初凤友,胡大千,姚杰. 中太平洋YJB海山富钴结核矿物组成与元素地球化学[J]. J4, 2007, 37(1): 8 -0014 .
[8] 周燕,郑培玺,王铁夫,张延洁. 招平断裂带上盘金矿床氢氧同位素地质特征[J]. J4, 2007, 37(4): 668 -0671 .
[9] 唐华风,王璞珺,姜传金,刘杰,张庆晨,冯有良. 松辽盆地火山岩相地震特征及其与控陷断裂的关系[J]. J4, 2007, 37(1): 73 -0078 .
[10] 范晓敏,李舟波. 裂缝性碳酸盐岩储层声波时差曲线的波动和增幅分析[J]. J4, 2007, 37(1): 168 -0173 .