吉林大学学报(地球科学版) ›› 2019, Vol. 49 ›› Issue (4): 1121-1128.doi: 10.13278/j.cnki.jjuese.20180045

• 地质工程与环境工程 • 上一篇    下一篇

聚合物改性硫化亚铁在饱和多孔介质中的迁移性能

洪梅, 杨慧萍, 陈韶音   

  1. 地下水资源与环境教育部重点实验室(吉林大学), 长春 130021
  • 收稿日期:2018-03-09 出版日期:2019-07-26 发布日期:2019-07-26
  • 作者简介:洪梅(1972-),女,教授,博士生导师,主要从事污染场地风险评估方面的研究,E-mail:hongmei@jlu.edu.cn
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金项目(41530636);吉林省科技发展计划项目(20150204045SF)

Polymer Modified FeS Migration Performance in Saturated Porous Media

Hong Mei, Yang Huiping, Chen Shaoyin   

  1. Key Lab of Groundwater Resources and Environment(Jilin University), Ministry of Education, Changchun 130021, China
  • Received:2018-03-09 Online:2019-07-26 Published:2019-07-26
  • Supported by:
    Supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (41530636) and Project Agreement for Science &Technology Development, Jilin Province (20150204045SF)

摘要: 本文采用羧甲基纤维素钠(CMC)、瓜尔胶(Guar gum)对硫化亚铁(FeS)进行了改性,以增强FeS的稳定性和迁移性。通过实验考察了3种FeS(CMC-FeS、GG-FeS、Nano-FeS)的沉降性能及其在粗、中、细砂3种介质中的迁移性能,并根据胶体过滤理论计算了3种FeS在中砂中的沉积速率及在不同介质中的最大迁移距离。结果表明:改性后FeS的稳定性较高,抗沉降性能CMC-FeS > GG-FeS >> Nano-FeS;由穿透曲线看出,3种FeS在粗、中、细砂中的穿透能力(即出流质量浓度ρi与注入质量浓度ρ0的比值)均为CMC-FeS > GG-FeS > Nano-FeS。粗砂和中砂中CMC-FeS的穿透能力明显高于GG-FeS,但细砂中二者的穿透能力相近,说明瓜尔胶的剪切稀化特性更利于GG-FeS在细颗粒介质中的迁移;FeS注入质量浓度的增加会导致更多的FeS沉积到介质中,但聚合物改性可以显著降低沉积速率,沉积速率CMC-FeS < GG-FeS < Nano-FeS;改性后CMC-FeS和GG-FeS在中砂的最大迁移距离分别是Nano-FeS的6.4倍和2.6倍,增加GG-FeS注入质量浓度对其最大迁移距离影响较小。

关键词: 硫化亚铁, 多孔介质, 硫化亚铁质量浓度, 迁移

Abstract: Nano-FeS was modified by sodium carboxymethyl cellulose (CMC) and guar gum to improve its performance of stability and migration. The sedimentation properties, migration properties, and deposition rates of three kinds of ferrous sulfide (CMC-FeS, GG-FeS, and Nano-FeS) were studied experimentally. According to the theory of colloid filtration, the maximum migration distances of the three kinds of FeS in different media were calculated. The results showed that the anti-settling property was CMC-FeS > GG-FeS >> Nano-FeS, and the polymer improved the suspending stability of FeS. The penetration curves showed that the penetrating ability (the ratio of outflow concentration ρi to injection concentration ρ0) of the three kinds of FeS in three media was CMC-FeS > GG-FeS > Nano-FeS, and the penetration ability of CMC-FeS was higher than that of GG-FeS in coarse and medium sand, but was similar to that of GG-FeS in fine sand. It shows that the shear thinning property of guar gum is more conducive to the migration of GG-FeS in fine granular media. With the increase of FeS concentration,more FeS will be deposited in the medium, but polymer modification can significantly reduce the deposition rate:GG-FeS

Key words: FeS, porous media, FeS concentration, migration

中图分类号: 

  • X523
[1] Paknikar K M, Nagpal V, Pethkar A V, et al. Degradation of Lindane from Aqueous Solutions Using Iron Sulfide Nanoparticles Stabilized by Biopolymers[J]. Science and Technology of Advanced Materials, 2005, 6(3):370-374.
[2] 王夏琳, 李睿华. 利用FeS去除水中硝基苯的试验研究[J]. 环境科学, 2012, 33(12):4346-4351. Wang Xialin, Li Ruihua. Investigation of Nitrobenzene Removal by Iron Sulfide(FeS)[J]. Chinese Journal of Environmental Science, 2012, 33(12):4346-4351.
[3] 陈凡. 纳米FeS的制备及其在含铬污水处理中的应用研究[D]. 上海:同济大学, 2004. Chen Fan. Preparation of Iron Sulfide Nanoparticls and Study on Removal of Chromium(VI) from Wastewater[D]. Shanghai:Tongji University, 2004.
[4] Wolthers M, Charlet L, Weijden C H V D, et al. Arsenic Mobility in the Ambient Sulfidic Environment:Sorption of Arsenic(V) and Arsenic(Ⅲ) onto Disordered Mackinawite[J]. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, 2005, 69(14):3483-3492.
[5] Zhong Xiong, He Feng, Zhao Dongye, et al. Immobilization of Mercury in Sediment Using Stabilized Iron Sulfide Nanoparticles[J]. Water Research, 2009, 43(20):5171-5179.
[6] Zhao Xiao, Liu Wen, Cai Zhengqing, et al. An Overview of Preparation and Applications of Stabilized Zero-Valent Iron Nanoparticles for Soil and Groundwater Remediation[J]. Water Research, 2016, 100:245-266.
[7] Cushing B L, Kolesnichenko V L, Charles J O. Recent Advances in the Liquid-Phase Syntheses of Inorganic Nanoparticles[J]. Chemical Reviews, 2004, 104(9):3893-3946.
[8] He Feng, Zhao Dongye. Manipulating the Size and Dispersibility of Zerovalent Iron Nanoparticles by Use of Carboxymethyl Cellulose Stabilizers[J]. Environmental Science and Technology, 2007, 41(17):6216-6221.
[9] Mitzel M R, Tufenkji N. Transport of Industrial PVP-Stabilized Silver Nanoparticles in Saturated Quartz Sand Coated with Pseudomonas Aeruginosa PAO1 Biofilm of Variable Age[J]. Environmental Science and Technology, 2014,48(5):2715-2723.
[10] Alberto T, Loon C K, Rajandrea S, et al. Reduced Aggregation and Sedimentation of Zero-Valent Iron Nanoparticles in the Presence of Guar Gum[J]. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, 2008, 3249(1):71-79.
[11] 董军, 徐暖, 刘同喆, 等. 乳化植物油强化土著微生物修复中高浓度Cr(Ⅵ)污染地下水[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2018, 48(1):234-240. Dong Jun, Xu Nuan, Liu Tongzhe, et al. Indigenous Microbial Remediation of Middle-High Concentration Cr(Ⅵ) Contaminated Groundwater Enhanced by Emulsified Vegetable Oil[J]. Journal of Jilin Unviersity(Earth Science Edition), 2018, 48(1):234-240.
[12] He Feng, Zhang Man, Qian Tianwei, et al. Transport of Carboxymethyl Cellulose Stabilized Iron Nanoparticles in Porous Media:Column Experiments and Modeling[J]. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, 2009, 334(1):96-102.
[13] He Feng, Zhao Dongye, Liu Juncheng, et al. Stabilization of Fe-Pd Nanoparticles with Sodium Carboxymethyl Cellulose for Enhanced Transport and Dechlorination of Trichloroethylene in Soil and Groundwater[J]. Industrial and Engineering Chemistry Research, 2007, 46(1):29-34.
[14] Zhong Xiong, He Feng, Zhao Dongye. Immobilization of Mercury in Sediment Using Stabilized Iron Sulfide Nanoparticles[J]. Water Research, 2009, 43(20):5171-5179.
[15] Wang Xianbiao, Liu Jin, Zhao Donglin, et al. Preparation of CMC-Stablized FeS Nanoparticles and Their Enhanced Performance for Cr(VI) Removal[J]. Advanced Materials Research, 2011, 287:96-99.
[16] Chen Juan, Chen Ri, Hong Mei. Influence of pH on Hexavalent Chromium Reduction by Fe(Ⅱ) and Sulfide Compounds[J]. Water Sci Technol, 2015,72(1):22-28.
[17] Gong Yanyan, Liu Yuanyuan, Zhong Xiong, et.al. Immobilization of Mercury in Field Soil and Sediment Using Carboxymethyl Cellulose Stabilized Iron Sulfide Nanoparticles[J]. Nanotechnology, 2012, 23(29):294007-294019.
[18] 刘伟. 瓜尔豆胶稳定纳米铁的制备及其去除水体中六价铬的研究[D]. 天津:南开大学, 2013. Liu Wei. Synthesis of Guar Gum Stabilized Nanoscale Zero-Valent Iron and Application for Cr(Ⅵ)Removal in Water[D]. Tianjin:Nankai University, 2013.
[19] 乐兰. 绿色聚合物改性纳米零价铁及其对六价铬去除[D]. 昆明:昆明理工大学, 2016. Le Lan.Green Polymer Modified Nano Zero Valent Iron for Removal of Chromium (Ⅵ)[D]. Kunming:Kunming University of Science and Technology, 2016.
[20] Alberto T, Rajandrea S. Enhanced Transport of Zerovalent Iron Nanoparticles in Saturated Porous Media by Guar Gum[J]. Journal of Nanoparticle Research, 2009, 11:635-645.
[21] Velimirovic M, Simons Q, Bastiaens L. Guar Gum Coupled Microscale ZVI for in Situ Treatment of CAHs:Continuous-Flow Column Study[J]. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2014, 265:20-29.
[22] Velimirovic M, Tosco T, Uyttebroek M, et al. Field Assessment of Guar Gum Stabilized Microscale Zerovalent Iron Particles for In-Situ Remediation of 1,1,1-Trichloroethane[J]. Journal of Contaminant Hydrology, 2014, 164:88-99.
[23] Gastone F, Tosco T, Sethi R. Guar Gum Solutions for Improved Delivery of Iron Particles in Porous Media:Part 1:Porous Medium Rheology and Guar Gum-Induced Clogging[J]. Journal of Contaminant Hydrology, 2014, 166:23-33.
[24] Kerzschmar R, Barmettler K, Grolimund D, et al. Experimental Determination of Colloid Deposition Rates and Collision Efficiencies in Natural Porous[J]. Water Resource Research, 1997, 33(5):1129-1137.
[25] Leconanet H F, Bottero J Y, Wiesner M R. Laboratory Assessment of the Mobility of Nanomaterials in Porous Media[J]. Environmental Science and Technology, 2004, 38(19):5164-5169.
[26] Rajagopalan R, Tien C. Comment on Correlation Equation for Predicting Single-Collector Efficiency in Physicochemical Filtration in Saturated Porous Media[J]. Environmental Science and Technology, 2005,39(14):5494-5495.
[27] Yao K M, Habibian M T, O'Melia C R. Water and Waste Filtration, Concepts and Applications[J]. Environmental Science Teehnology, 1971, 5(11):1105-1112.
[28] 苏燕. 包气带NAPLs污染的表面活性剂泡沫强化修复实验研究[D]. 吉林:吉林大学, 2015. Su Yan. Study on Enhanced Remediation of NAPLs Contaminated Vadose Zone with Surfactant Foams[D]. Jilin:Jilin University, 2015.
[1] 张文静, 涂志鹏, 贾媛媛. 矿区重金属的释放迁移与污染预测研究进展[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2025, 55(6): 2001-2027.
[2] 周琨超, 王志远, 翟金榜, 张泽, 孟祥熙, 袁名扬.

振动荷载作用下近相变区冰-水相变迁移规律 [J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2025, 55(2): 550-562.

[3] 李洋, 欧丽, 黄琨, 刘鹏, 刘燕红, 李曼曼, 唐金平. 基于同步辐射技术研究锌在废弃稀土矿区土壤中的吸附及垂向迁移特征[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2025, 55(1): 233-244.
[4] 李英钧, 宋泽峰, 杨悦锁, 邓亚男, 任弘宇, 蔡奎, 胡紫如. 石棉尾矿场地土壤污染地球化学特征及其对微生物多样性的影响[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2024, 54(3): 980-992.
[5] 李晓艳, 张青伟, 洪松涛, 袁雨婷, 余金燕, 潘俐傧, 刘莹红. 不同氧化还原条件下铅锌矿尾砂中重金属元素活化迁移规律[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2022, 52(2): 434-441.
[6] 王孔伟, 路永强, 聂进, 滕明明, 王宵亮. 三峡库区仙女山和九畹溪断裂带水库地震变化规律[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2021, 51(2): 624-637.
[7] 朱君, 李婷, 陈超, 谢添, 张艾明. 近海核电厂核素地下水释放通量的模型计算方法[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2021, 51(1): 201-211.
[8] 洪梅, 任璇, 杨慧萍. 稳定型与负载型FeS修复Cr(Ⅵ)污染地下水的可行性[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2020, 50(4): 1182-1188.
[9] 杨悦锁, 朱一丹, 张文卿, 武宇辉, Yu Tong, 张大志. 地下水系统中镍污染和天然胶体共迁移特征[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2020, 50(1): 226-233.
[10] 赵勇胜, 杨元元, 高鹏龙, 康学赫, 王昊颖, 常月华. 多孔介质中热蒸汽的迁移特性及其修复氯苯污染土壤的效果[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2019, 49(5): 1431-1437.
[11] 郝立波, 吴超, 赵新运, 赵玉岩, 陆继龙, 魏俏巧. 治岭头金矿围岩蚀变特征及其意义[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2017, 47(4): 1104-1118.
[12] 陈随海, 韩润生, 申屠良义, 吴鹏, 邱文龙, 文德潇. 滇东北矿集区昭通铅锌矿区蚀变岩分带及元素迁移特征[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2016, 46(3): 711-721.
[13] 李杨, 王清, 王坛华. 冻土水热耦合模型数值求解及结果检验[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2015, 45(1): 207-213.
[14] 魏华玲,周国华,孙彬彬,刘占元,曾道明. 浙江省东部土壤元素地球化学特征及意义[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2013, 43(2): 564-572.
[15] 于子望,张延军,张庆,许天福. TOUGHREACT搭接FLAC3D算法[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2013, 43(1): 199-206.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 尤敏鑫,刘建民. 同位素地球化学在峨眉山大火成岩省研究中的应用现状与进展[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2014, 44(4): 1231 -1243 .
[2] 杨春梅, 李洪奇,陆大卫,张方礼,高 原,邵英超. 不同驱替方式下岩石电阻率与饱和度的关系[J]. J4, 2005, 35(05): 667 -671 .
[3] 祝洪臣,张炯飞,权 恒. 大兴安岭中生代两期成岩成矿作用的元素、同位素特征及其形成环境[J]. J4, 2005, 35(04): 436 -0442 .
[4] 朱建伟, 赵刚, 刘博, 郭巍, 成俊. 油页岩测井识别技术及应用[J]. J4, 2012, 42(2): 289 -295 .
[5] 陈力,梁海安,张文娟,荣帆. 模糊数学方法在城市工程地质环境区划中的应用--以抚顺市城区为例[J]. J4, 2008, 38(5): 837 -0840 .
[6] 高桂梅,苏 克,王文颖,甘树才,刘招君. 吉林省桦甸油页岩中稀土元素和微量元素的研究[J]. J4, 2006, 36(6): 974 -0979 .
[7] 吴孔运,蒋忠诚,叶 晔. 不同植物群落对灰岩试块溶蚀速率的影响[J]. J4, 2007, 37(5): 967 -0971 .
[8] 周彦章,迟宝明,刘中培. 山东夏甸金矿床充水机理构造控制模式[J]. J4, 2008, 38(2): 255 -0260 .
[9] 张渊,刘连登,孙景贵,陈国华,张洪喜,闫复传,杨开春. 胶东西北部黄埠岭金矿床两期次叠加成矿[J]. J4, 2008, 38(1): 21 -0026 .
[10] 鲁程鹏, 束龙仓, 苑利波, 张蓉蓉, 黄币娟, 王彬彬. 基于示踪试验求解岩溶含水层水文地质参数[J]. J4, 2009, 39(4): 717 -721 .