吉林大学学报(地球科学版) ›› 2021, Vol. 51 ›› Issue (6): 1801-1810.doi: 10.13278/j.cnki.jjuese.20200054

• 地质工程与环境工程 • 上一篇    下一篇

水力联系系数法定量评价含水层之间水力联系

李超峰1,2   

  1. 1. 中煤科工集团西安研究院有限公司, 西安 710077;
    2. 陕西省煤矿水害防治技术重点实验室, 西安 710077
  • 收稿日期:2020-03-05 出版日期:2021-11-26 发布日期:2021-11-24
  • 作者简介:李超峰(1983-),男,副研究员,博士,主要从事水文地质及矿井水害防治技术方面的研究,E-mail:lichaofeng007@163.com
  • 基金资助:
    国家重点研发计划项目(2016YFC0501104)

Hydraulic Connection Coefficient and Quantitative Evaluation of Hydraulic Connection Between Aquifers

Li Chaofeng1,2   

  1. 1. Xi'an Research Institute, China Coal Technology and Engineering Group Corp, Xi'an 710077, China;
    2. Shaanxi Key Laboratory of Coal Mine Hazard Prevention and Control Technology, Xi'an 710077, China
  • Received:2020-03-05 Online:2021-11-26 Published:2021-11-24
  • Supported by:
    Supported by National Key R&D Program of China (2016YFC0501104)

摘要: 为了定量研究与评价含水层之间地下水水力联系程度,首次提出了水力联系系数C(hydraulic connection coefficient)的概念。将水力联系系数C定义为观测孔目的含水层水位降深与该观测孔位置抽水含水层水位降深的比值。通过水力联系系数,可定量评价某含水层水平上同层之间和垂向上不同含水层之间的水力联系程度。依据鄂尔多斯盆地白垩系洛河组各含水层段的水力联系系数C值,将含水层之间水力联系分为5个等级。其中,0.000 0 ≤ C<0.062 5,0.062 5 ≤ C<0.125 0,0.125 0 ≤ C<0.250 0,0.250 0 ≤ C<0.500 0,C ≥ 0.500 0,分别代表水力联系等级为极弱、弱、中等、强、极强。以高家堡井田钻孔抽(放)水试验数据为例,采用水力联系系数和观测孔水位响应时间两个指标定量评价了区内巨厚层状非均质洛河组含水层内部水力联系。结果表明:洛河组中上段水平同层之间的水力联系系数分别为0.373 0、0.413 8,观测孔水位响应时间较短(约为5 min),水力联系强;洛河组下段水平同层之间水力联系系数分别为0.440 1、0.491 1,观测孔水位响应时间较短(为9~20 min),水力联系强;洛河组中上段与下段垂向水力联系系数分别为0.000 2、0.007 2、0.089 7,观测孔水位响应时间较长(大于60 min),水力联系极弱至弱。

关键词: 洛河组含水层, 垂向层状非均质含水层, 水力联系系数, 抽(放)水试验, 地下水

Abstract: In order to quantitatively evaluate the degree of groundwater hydraulic connection between aquifers, the concept of "hydraulic connection coefficient" C is first proposed. Based on the drawdown of groundwater level in full penetrating wells during the steady-state pumping test when the groundwater level is stable, the hydraulic connection coefficient C is defined as the ratio of the drawdown of groundwater level of the target aquifer to the drawdown of groundwater level of the pumping/dewatering aquifer in the observation borehole. The hydraulic connection coefficient can be used to quantitatively evaluate the degree of hydraulic connection between two points in different directions and different distances on the aquifer plan, and also between different aquifers in the vertical direction. According to the hydraulic connection coefficient C value of the aquifers in Luohe Formation in Ordos basin, the degree of groundwater hydraulic connection between the aquifers is divided into five grades:Among them, 0.000 0 ≤ C<0.062 5, the hydraulic connection is very weak; 0.062 5 ≤ C<0.125 0, the hydraulic connection is weak; 0.125 0 ≤ C<0.250 0, the hydraulic connection is medium; 0.250 0 ≤ C<0.500 0, the hydraulic connection is strong; C ≥ 0.500 0, the hydraulic connection is very strong. Taking the data of pumping test and dewatering test in Gaojiabu mine field as an example, the hydraulic connection coefficient and the response time of groundwater level in the observation borehole beginning to fall are used to quantitatively evaluate the internal groundwater hydraulic connection of the thick and layered Luohe Formation. Among them, when the hydraulic connection coefficient of the middle-upper layers in Luohe Formation is 0.373 0 and 0.413 8 respectively, and the response time of groundwater level in the observation borehole beginning to fall is very short (about 5 min), the groundwater hydraulic connection is strong; The hydraulic connection coefficient of the lower layers in Luohe Formation is 0.440 1 and 0.491 1, respectively, and the response time of groundwater level in observation borehole beginning to fall is short (9-20 min), the groundwater hydraulic connection is strong; When the hydraulic connection coefficient between the middle-upper and lower layers in Luohe Formation is 0.000 2, 0.007 2 and 0.089 7, respectively, and the response time of groundwater level in the observation borehole is longer (more than 60 min), the groundwater hydraulic connection is weak or very weak.

Key words: Luohe Formation aquifer, vertical layered aquifers, hydraulic connection coefficient, pumping (or dewatering) test, groundwater

中图分类号: 

  • P641
[1] Bear J. Hydraulics of Groundwater[M]. New York:Dover Publications,INC,1979.
[2] 陈崇希,林敏,成建梅.地下水动力学[M].5版.北京:地质出版社,2011. Chen Chongxi,Lin Min,Cheng Jianmei. Hydraulics of Groundwater[M]. 5th ed. Beijing:Geological Publishing House,2011.
[3] 郭东屏,宋焱勋,钱会,等.地下水动力学[M].西安:陕西科学技术出版社,1994. Guo Dongping,Song Yanxun,Qian Hui, et al. Hydraulics of Groundwater[M]. Xi'an:Shaanxi Science and Technology Press,1994.
[4] Bear J.多孔介质流体动力学[M].李竞生,陈崇希,译.北京:中国建筑工业出版社,1983. Bear J. Dynamics of Fluids in Porous Media[M]. Translated by Li Jingsheng,Chen Chongxi. Beijing:China Architecture & Building Press,1983.
[5] 王明明,解伟,安永会,等.封隔注浆分层成井技术在水文地质勘查中的应用研究[J].水文地质工程地质,2019,46(1):50-55. Wang Mingming,Xie Wei,An Yonghui,et al. Application of the Technology of Injecting Cement for the Stratified Well Completion to Hydrogeological Exploration[J]. Hydrogeology & Engineering Geology,2019,46(1):50-55.
[6] 邵红旗,曹祖宝,李建文,等.一种放水试验分析方法及其应用[J].水文地质工程地质,2014,41(2):7-12,43. Shao Hongqi,Cao Zubao,Li Jianwen,et al. A Method of Analysis of Dewatering Test and Application[J]. Hydrogeology & Engineering Geology,2014,41(2):7-12,43.
[7] 张海涛,许光泉.基于Visual Basic 6.0的含水层水文地质参数求取软件的开发及应用[J].煤田地质与勘探,2018,46(2):105-110. Zhang Haitao,Xu Guangquan. The Development and Application of Aquifer Hydrogeological Parameter Calculation Software Based on Visual Basic 6.0[J]. Coal Geology & Exploration,2018,46(2):105-110.
[8] 方刚,梁向阳,黄浩,等.巴拉素井田煤层富水机理与注浆堵水技术[J].煤炭学报,2019,44(8):2470-2483. Fang Gang,Liang Xiangyang,Huang Hao,et al. Water-Rich Mechanism of Coal Seam and Grouting and Blocking Water Technology in Balasu Mine Field[J].Journal of China Coal Society,2019,44(8):2470-2483.
[9] 徐智敏,高尚,孙亚军,等.西部典型侏罗系富煤区含水介质条件与水动力学特征[J].煤炭学报,2017,42(2):444-451. Xu Zhimin,Gao Shang,Sun Yajun,et al. A Study of Conditions of Water Bearing Media and Water Dynamics in Typical Jurassic Coal Rich Regions in Western China[J]. Journal of China Coal Society,2017,42(2):444-451.
[10] 李超峰,虎维岳,刘英锋.洛河组含水层垂向差异性研究及保水采煤意义[J].煤炭学报,2019,44(3):848-857. Li Chaofeng,Hu Weiyue,Liu Yingfeng. Vertical Hydrogeological Characteristics of Luohe Aquifer and Its Significance of Water-Preserved Coal Mining[J]. Journal of China Coal Society,2019,44(3):848-857.
[11] 李超峰.彬长矿区巨厚洛河组垂向差异性研究[J].煤炭技术,2018,37(4):131-133. Li Chaofeng. Vertical Differences of Thick Luohe Formation in Binchang Mining Area[J]. Coal Technology,2018,37(4):131-133.
[12] 刘英锋,郭小铭.导水裂缝带部分波及顶板含水层条件下涌水量预测[J].煤田地质与勘探,2016,44(5):97-101,107. Liu Yingfeng,Guo Xiaoming. Prediction of Water Inflow in Roof Aquifer Affected by Water-Flowing Fracture Zone[J]. Coal Geology & Exploration,2016,44(5):97-101,107.
[13] 周建军.崔木煤矿顶板涌突水类型及其判别研究[J].煤矿安全,2019,50(4):205-207,212. Zhou Jianjun. Study on Roof Water Inrush Type and Its Discrimination in Cuimu Coal Mine[J]. Safety in Coal Mines,2019,50(4):205-207,212.
[14] 国家煤矿安全监察局. 煤矿防治水细则[M]. 北京:煤炭工业出版社,2018. The National Coal Mine Safety Administration of China. Handbook of Mine Water Hazard Prevention and Control[M]. Beijing:China Coal Industry Publishing House,2018.
[15] 李超峰.采煤工作面顶板巨厚层状含水层涌水量预测研究[D].北京:煤炭科学研究总院,2019. Li Chaofeng. Prediction Theory and Method of Water Inflow from Roof Thick Layered Aquifer of Coal Mining Face[D]. Beijing:China Coal Research Institute, 2019.
[16] 李云峰,冯建国,王玮,等.鄂尔多斯盆地白垩系含水层系统分析[J].西北地质,2004,37(1):90-96. Li Yunfeng,Feng Jianguo,Wang Wei,et al. The Groundwater System Analysis of Cretaceous System of Ordos Basin[J]. Northwestern Geology,2004,37(1):90-96.
[17] 方刚,刘柏根.基于巴拉素井田多孔抽水试验的含水层特征及水力联系研究[J].水文,2019,39(3):36-40,67. Fang Gang,Liu Baigen. Research on Aquifers Characteristics and Hydraulic Connection Based on Multiple Drilling Pumping Tests in Balasu Well Field[J]. Journal of China Hydrology,2019,39(3):36-40,67.
[18] 彭涛,龙良良,刘凯祥,等.基于煤层顶板抽水试验的含水层水力联系研究[J].矿业安全与环保,2019,46(3):66-69,73. Peng Tao,Long Liangliang,Liu Kaixiang,et al. Study on Aquifer Hydraulic Connection Based on Pumping Test of Coal Seam Roof[J]. Mining Safety & Environmental Protection,2019,46(3):66-69,73.
[19] 穆鹏飞.示踪试验在煤层顶底板充水含水层水力联系探查中的应用[J].中国煤炭,2019,45(5):55-58. Mu Pengfei. Application of Tracer Test in Hydraulic Connection Exploration of Water-Filled Aquifer in Roof and Floor of Coal Seam[J]. China Coal,2019,45(5):55-58.
[20] 姬中奎,薛小渊,杨志斌,等.神府煤田张家峁煤矿烧变岩与水库水力联系研究[J].中国煤炭地质,2019,31(4):57-61. Ji Zhongkui, Xue Xiaoyuan, Yang Zhibin, et al. Study on Hydraulic Connection Between Burnt Rock and Reservoir in Zhangjiamao Coalmine, Shenfu Coalfield[J]. Coal Geology of China,2019,31(4):57-61.
[21] 郑刚,曹剑然,程雪松,等.考虑承压含水层间越流的地下水回灌现场试验研究[J].岩土工程学报,2019,41(9):1609-1618. Zheng Gang,Cao Jianran,Cheng Xuesong,et al. Field Tests on Groundwater Recharge Considering Leakage Between Semiconfined Aquifers[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering,2019,41(9):1609-1618.
[22] 许蓬,王明.环境同位素技术在判定矿井含水层间水力联系的应用[J].煤炭科学技术,2018,46(增刊1):227-230. Xu Peng,Wang Ming. Application of Environmental Isotopes Technology in Determining Hydraulic Connection Between Mine Aquifer[J]. Coal Science and Technology,2018,46(Sup.1):227-230.
[23] 蒋瑞,张志才,陈喜,等.西南喀斯特峰丛- 洼地水力联系特征分析[J].地球与环境,2018,46(2):121-128. Jiang Rui,Zhang Zhicai,Chen Xi,et al. Hydrologic Connectivity in Peak-Cluster Depression of Karst Area in Southwestern China[J]. Earth and Environment,2018,46(2):121-128.
[24] 苏小四,高睿敏,袁文真,等.基于环境同位素技术的河水补给研究:以沈阳黄家傍河水源地为例[J].吉林大学学报(地球科学版),2019,49(3):762-772. Su Xiaosi,Gao Ruimin,Yuan Wenzhen,et al. Research on River Recharge Based on Environmental Isotope Technology:A Case Study of Huangjia Riverside Well Field in Shenyang City[J]. Journal of Jilin University(Earth Science Edition),2019,49(3):762-772.
[25] 束龙仓,王明昭,张惠潼,等.咸淡水界面位置确定的综合方法(TEcG)及其应用[J].吉林大学学报(地球科学版),2019,49(6):1706-1713. Shu Longcang,Wang Mingzhao,Zhang Huitong,et al. Comprehensive Method (TEcG) of Determination of the Location of Freshwater and Saltwater Interface and Its Application[J]. Journal of Jilin University(Earth Science Edition),2019,49(6):1706-1713.
[26] 地质矿产部水文地质工程技术方法研究队.水文地质手册[M].北京:地质出版社,1978. Research Team of Hydrogeological & Engineering Technology Methods, Ministry of Geology and Mineral Resources, China. Handbook of Hydrogeology[M]. Beijing:Geological Publishing House,1978.
[1] 杜新强, 尹呈杉, 方永军, 李孜涵, 郭辉. 基于地下水生态水位埋深阈值的可开采量评价——以三江平原普阳灌区为例[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2026, 56(2): 635-646.
[2] 束龙仓, 位书静, 澈丽木格, 温中琦, 刘波. 西辽河平原生态输水的地下水响应及不确定性量化[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2026, 56(2): 647-660.
[3] 杨婷, 李亚鑫, 刘娜, 林晓君, 曾经文, 王秀娟, 蔡倩怡, 罗子峰, 张苑铃, 容精男, 余伟达, 丘锦荣, 周建利. 沸石作为PRB填充介质修复NH4+污染地下水的效果及原位再生性能[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2026, 56(2): 661-672.
[4] 秦传玉, 尤凯鸿, 李小奇, 张成武, 于丽娟. 地下水常见阴离子影响双重改性纳米零价铁降解硝基苯的机制及效果[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2026, 56(1): 342-351.
[5] 张文静, 涂志鹏, 贾媛媛. 矿区重金属的释放迁移与污染预测研究进展[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2025, 55(6): 2001-2027.
[6] 闫纲丽, 冯屾, 刘睿男, 黄冠星. 地下水背景值评估研究进展[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2025, 55(5): 1655-1670.
[7] 王双, 朱奋, 李亮, 李林坚, 刘娜. 湛江市硇洲岛浅层地下水水化学特征及成因机制[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2025, 55(5): 1680-1690.
[8] 黄树春, 李洪涛, 邓波, 王丹, 张高华.

湖南湘潭河西地区近20年岩溶水化学时空演变及其影响因素 [J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2025, 55(4): 1269-1287.

[9] 王锦博, 贺志毅, 王亚楠, 程诗雨, 刘明柱. 某污染场地土壤与地下水协同修复阈值[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2025, 55(4): 1288-1297.
[10] 王福刚, 管小桐, 何庆成, 程辉, 杨国华, 程中乐, 王耀辉. 考虑边界层流体黏度变化的黏性土低速非达西渗流数学模型[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2025, 55(3): 893-905.
[11] 胡启智, 王秀娟, 丘锦荣, 康迪, 曾经文, 蔡倩怡, 刘人涛, 刘娜. 潮汕地区地下水饮用水源地酸性浅层地下水特征及其成因探讨[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2025, 55(3): 906-918.
[12] 张晟瑀, 申文超, 苏小四. 基于随机森林法的区域地下水硝酸盐污染风险评价[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2025, 55(3): 943-956.
[13] 段磊, 曾经文, 赵显林, 丘锦荣, 刘娜, 陶钧实, 周建利. 珠江三角洲典型水产养殖区浅层地下水碘化物分布、来源及健康风险评估[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2024, 54(5): 1657-1674.
[14] 韩红闪, 朱琳, 郭高轩, 李炳华, 卢灿. 新水情背景下北京平原朝阳—通州沉降区地面沉降特征及其影响[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2024, 54(4): 1326-1338.
[15] 束龙仓, 张彤豪, 澈丽木格, 刘圣昱, 刘波. 降水和地下水开采对通辽市科尔沁区潜水位的影响[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2024, 54(3): 954-966.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 刘建峰,迟效国,周燕,王铁夫,金巍,周建波,董春艳,黎广荣. 小兴安岭东北部金林岩体全岩-角闪石Rb-Sr年龄[J]. J4, 2005, 35(06): 690 -0693 .
[2] 黄冠星, 孙继朝, 张英, 刘景涛, 张玉玺, 荆继红. 珠江三角洲污灌区地下水重金属含量及其相互关系[J]. J4, 2011, 41(1): 228 -234 .
[3] 肖长来,梁秀娟,崔建铭,兰盈盈,张君,李书兰,梁瑞奇,郑策. 确定含水层参数的全程曲线拟合法[J]. J4, 2005, 35(06): 751 -0755 .
[4] 郭振华,王璞珺,印长海,黄玉龙. 松辽盆地北部火山岩岩相与测井相关系研究[J]. J4, 2006, 36(02): 207 -0214 .
[5] 孙永河,付晓飞,吕延防,付广,阎冬. 地震泵抽吸作用与油气运聚成藏物理模拟[J]. J4, 2007, 37(1): 98 -0104 .
[6] 谢忠雷,陈卓,孙文田,尹波. 不同茶园茶叶氟含量及土壤氟的形态分布[J]. J4, 2008, 38(2): 293 -0298 .
[7] 贾军涛,王璞珺,邵 锐,程日辉,张 斌,侯景涛,李金龙,边伟华. 松辽盆地东南缘营城组地层序列的划分与区域对比[J]. J4, 2007, 37(6): 1110 -1123 .
[8] 康立明,任战利. 多参数定量研究流动单元的方法--以鄂尔多斯盆地W93井区为例[J]. J4, 2008, 38(5): 749 -0756 .
[9] 薛永超, 程林松. 白豹油田长8油藏成岩储集相[J]. J4, 2011, 41(2): 365 -371 .
[10] 姜纪沂, 张宇东, 谷洪彪, 左兰丽. 基于灰色关联熵的地下水环境演化模式判别模型研究[J]. J4, 2009, 39(6): 1111 -1116 .