吉林大学学报(地球科学版) ›› 2018, Vol. 48 ›› Issue (5): 1427-1433.doi: 10.13278/j.cnki.jjuese.20170107

• 地质工程与环境工程 • 上一篇    下一篇

滑坡充气截排水有效性数值模拟

陈永珍1, 吴纲1, 孙红月1, 尚岳全2   

  1. 1. 浙江大学海洋学院, 舟山 316021;
    2. 浙江大学建筑工程学院, 杭州 310058
  • 收稿日期:2018-01-17 出版日期:2018-09-26 发布日期:2018-11-20
  • 通讯作者: 孙红月(1970-),女,教授,博士,主要从事地质灾害防治方面的研究,E-mail:shy@zju.edu.cn E-mail:shy@zju.edu.cn
  • 作者简介:陈永珍(1992-),男,硕士研究生,从事地质灾害防治方面的研究,E-mail:chenyongzhen0712@163.com
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金项目(41372277)

Numerical Simulation of the Efficiency of Intercepting Water with Compressed Air in the Treatment of Landslide

Chen Yongzhen1, Wu Gang1, Sun Hongyue1, Shang Yuequan2   

  1. 1. College of Ocean, Zhejiang University, Zhoushan 316021, Zhejiang, China;
    2. College of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China
  • Received:2018-01-17 Online:2018-09-26 Published:2018-11-20
  • Supported by:
    Supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China(41372277)

摘要: 为验证充气截排水在实际滑坡中能有效控制坡体地下水位和坡体稳定性,本文以小旦滑坡为例,在滑坡变形破坏发展特征分析和形成机制研究的基础上,采用数值模拟方法研究了充气截排水技术应用在此类滑坡治理中应用的有效性。通过二维有限元数值模拟,分析了不同充气压力下坡体稳定性的变化规律。结果表明:在滑坡后缘适当位置进行充气能够形成稳定的非饱和截水帷幕,达到降低潜在滑坡区地下水位的目的;小旦滑坡的最佳充气压力值为125 kPa,在最佳充气压力作用下,小旦滑坡坡脚未开挖状态下稳定性系数由1.144增大到1.209,开挖状态下的稳定性系数由1.106增大到1.139;雨季边坡后缘入渗量增大的情况下,充气截排水对滑坡稳定性的提高作用更为显著。

关键词: 含碎石堆积层滑坡, 最佳充气压力, 充气截排水, 数值模拟, 稳定性

Abstract: In order to verify that the groundwater level and slope stability can be effectively controlled in an actual landslide by intercepting water with compressed air, based on the analysis of the characteristics and the formation mechanism of landslide deformation and failure, taking the Xiaodan landslide as an example, the authors studied the effectiveness of the intercepting water with compressed air applied in the treatment of this kind of landslide. Through a two-dimensional finite element numerical simulation, the variation law of a slope stability under different inflation pressures was analyzed. It is found that by inflating air into the appropriate edge of a landslide, a stable unsaturated water cut curtain can be formed to reduce the groundwater level in the potential slide area. When the inflation pressure is 125 kPa, which is the optimum inflation pressure of Xiaodan landslide, the stability coefficient increases from 1.144 to 1.209 under unexploited condition; while the stability coefficient increases from 1.106 to 1.139 under excavated condition. When the infiltration from the trailing edge increases during the rainy season, the effectiveness of intercepting water with compressed air is more significant for landslide stability.

Key words: gravel-containing deposited soil landslide, optimal inflation pressure, intercepting water with compressed air, numerical simulation, stability

中图分类号: 

  • P642.22
[1] 李烈荣. 中国地质灾害与防治[M]. 北京:地质出版社,2003. Li Lierong. Geological Hazards and Prevention in China[M]. Beijing:Geological Publishing House, 2003.
[2] 孙红月,吴红梅,李焕强,等. 松散堆积土中的隔水层对边坡稳定性的影响[J]. 浙江大学学报(工学版), 2010,44(10):2016-2020. Sun Hongyue, Wu Hongmei, Li Huanqiang, et al. Influence to Slope Stability Caused by Impermeable Layer in Loose Deposited Soil[J]. Journal of Zhejiang University (Engineering Science), 2010, 44(10):2016-2020.
[3] 俞伯汀,孙红月,尚岳全. 含碎石黏性土边坡渗流系统的物理模拟试验[J]. 岩土工程学报,2006,28(6):705-708. Yu Boting, Sun Hongyue, Shang Yuequan. Physical Model Simulation Tests on Seepage System in Debris-Containing Clay Slopes[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2006, 28(6):705-708.
[4] 尚岳全,孙红月,侯利国,等. 管网渗流系统对含碎石黏性土边坡的稳定作用[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报,2005,24(8):1371-1375. Shang Yuequan, Sun Hongyue, Hou Liguo, et al. Study on the Stability of Pebbly-Clay Slopes with Pipe Drainage System[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2005, 24(8):1371-1375.
[5] 尚岳全,周建锋,童文德. 含碎块石土质边坡的稳定性问题[J]. 地质灾害与环境保护,2002,13(1):41-43. Shang Yuequan, Zhou Jianfeng, Tong Wende. The Influence of Pipe Seepage System on the Stability of a Pebbly-Clay Slope[J]. Journal of Geological Hazards and Environment Preservation, 2002, 13(1):41-43.
[6] 杜丽丽,孙红月,尚岳全. 松散堆积土边坡充气排水方法[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版),2013,43(3):877-882. Du Lili, Sun Hongyue, Shang Yuequan. Air-Filled Drainage Method in Loose Accumulation Soil Slope[J]. Journal of Jilin University (Earth Science Edition), 2013, 43(3):877-882.
[7] 杜丽丽,孙红月,尚岳全,等. 滑坡应急治理充气截水方法[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报,2013,32(增刊2):3954-3960. Du Lili, Sun Hongyue, Shang Yuequan, et al. Method of Intercepting Water by Filting Soil with Air in Emergency Treatment Engineering of Landslide[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2013, 32(Sup.2):3954-3960.
[8] 杜丽丽,孙红月,尚岳全,等. 充气截排水滑坡治理数值模拟研究[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报,2014,33(增刊1):2628-2634. Du Lili, Sun Hongyue, Shang Yuequan, et al. Simulation of Numerical Control of Pneumatic Cut-off Method for Landslide[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2014, 33(Sup.1):2628-2634.
[9] 康剑伟,孙红月,刘长殿. 一维土柱高压充气阻渗法的数值模拟[J]. 公路工程,2013,38(3):67-71. Kang Jianwei, Sun Hongyue, Liu Changdian. Numerical Simulation of High-Pressure Infiltration Resistance of One-Dimensional Soil Column[J]. Highway Engineering, 2013, 38(3):67-71.
[10] 钱文见,尚岳全,杜丽丽,等. 充气位置及压力对边坡截排水效果的影响[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版),2016,46(2):536-542. Qian Wenjian, Shang Yuequan, Du Lili, et al. Influences of Inflation Location and Pressure on Draining of Slope[J]. Journal of Jilin University (Earth Science Edition), 2016, 46(2):536-542.
[11] 余文飞,孙红月,尚岳全,等. 坡体充气过程中气水两相流数值模拟[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报,2016(增刊2):3597-3604. Yu Wenfei, Sun Hongyue, Shang Yuequan, et al. Numerical Simulation of Air-Water Two-Phase Flow in Inflatable Slope[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2016(Sup.2):3597-3604.
[12] Collins R E. 流体通过多孔材料的流动[M]. 陈钟祥译. 北京:石油工业出版社,1984:63-65. Collins R E. Flow of Fluids Through Porous Materials[M]. Translated by Chen Zhongxiang. Beijing:Petroleum Industry Press, 1984:63-65.
[13] Geo-Slope International Ltd. Air Flow Modeling with AIR/W 2007[M]. Calgary:Geo-Slope International Ltd Press, 2008:117-120.
[14] Van Genuchten M T. A Closed-Form Equation for Predicting the Hydraulic Conductivity of Unsaturated Soils[J]. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 1980, 44:892-898.
[15] 常士骠,张苏民,项勃,等. 工程地质手册[M]. 四版. 北京:中国建筑工业出版社,2006:536-538. Chang Shibiao, Zhang Sumin, Xiang Bo, et al. Engineering Geology Handbook[M]. 4th ed. Beijing:China Architecture and Building Press, 2006:536-538.
[16] 南京大学水文地质工程地质教研室. 工程地质学[M]. 北京:地质出版社,1982. Staff of Hydrogeology and Engineering Geology of Nanjing University. Engineering Geology[M]. Beijing:Geological Publishing House, 1982.
[17] 贝尔J. 多孔介质流体动力学[M]. 李竞生,陈崇希译. 北京:中国建筑工业出版社,1983:346-450. Bear J. Dynamics of Fluids in Porous Media[M]. Translated by Li Jingsheng, Chen Chongxi. Beijing:China Architecture and Building Press, 1983:346-450.
[1] 夏英杰, 陈华斌, 陈健, 姚明宇, 杨海. 不同施工参数下深层页岩水力压裂数值模拟[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2026, 56(3): 924-936.
[2] 涂君汕, 陈辉, 邓居智, 陈康, 李焱, 余辉. 水库堤坝对高密度电法的影响及校正技术[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2026, 56(3): 1013-1025.
[3] 束龙仓, 位书静, 澈丽木格, 温中琦, 刘波. 西辽河平原生态输水的地下水响应及不确定性量化[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2026, 56(2): 647-660.
[4] 黄兴国, 翁央央, 韩丽. 基于广义递归卷积的孔隙黏弹地震波正演模拟[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2026, 56(1): 377-385.
[5] 周柳湘, 余思琴, 陈俊华, 刘城, 陈义, 张鑫鑫, . 潜孔锤与冲击钻机联合钻进工艺成孔碎岩过程数值模拟[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2025, 55(5): 1608-1618.
[6] 苑成旺, 张敏, 张少龙, 秦磊, 郭海洋, 墨海滢, 信旸. 长春地铁基坑支护结构变形与地表沉降特征[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2025, 55(3): 879-892.
[7] 于子望, 卢帅屹, 白林, 郑天琪. CO2地质封存岩石力学问题研究进展[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2025, 55(3): 930-942.
[8] 程瑶, 陆丹丹, 赵龙飞.

微波加热油页岩储层的热响应 [J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2025, 55(2): 387-400.

[9] 刁国君, 何昕.

地铁明挖车站下穿越既有建筑物的局部暗扩挖施工关键技术 [J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2025, 55(2): 536-549.

[10] 蔺学旻, 肖红琳. 缝洞型储层声波远探测测井响应模拟及应用——以塔河油田碳酸盐岩缝洞型储层为例[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2025, 55(1): 312-327.
[11] 魏虹羽, 李世超, 王伟安. 地球动力学数值模拟算法的应用现状与展望[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2025, 55(1): 98-124.
[12] 吴泽坤, 何来胜, 白晓宇, 麻栋栋, 牛永昌, 赵广, 桑松魁, 闫楠, 张明义. 层状土中静压桩连续贯入现场试验与数值模拟[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2024, 54(4): 1291-1304.
[13] 庞志超, 肖华, 毛晨飞, 陈国军, 梁琬坤, 高明, 张啸. 准噶尔盆地南缘地区含膏质地层岩性特征及测井识别方法[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2024, 54(4): 1419-1431.
[14] 刘怀湜, 赵雪娇, 刘雨新, 房庭瑞, 张静, 嵇艳鞠. 基于改进粒子群优化的超顺磁效应多参数提取[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2024, 54(3): 993-1002.
[15] 韩长玉, 赵浩汀.

路基填筑短期内热棒高导热性影响 [J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2024, 54(2): 570-580.

Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 吴远坤, 刘成林, 于春勇. 松辽盆地双城断陷深层原油成藏模式[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2024, 54(5): 1443 -1456 .
[2] 马荣,石建省,刘继朝. 人工内分泌网络模型在水文地质参数研究中的应用[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2013, 43(3): 914 -921 .
[3] 李宁, 王成文. 东北及邻区晚古生代地层接触关系与佳-蒙地块的形成和演化[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2017, 47(5): 1331 -1340 .
[4] 胡大千,初凤友,姚 杰. 中太平洋YJA海山富钴结壳矿物组成与元素地球化学[J]. J4, 2006, 36(01): 32 -0037 .
[5] 姜 雪, 程日辉,于民凤. 裂谷地层的气候和构造控制:Zscape模型分析与在松辽盆地北安断陷的应用[J]. J4, 2006, 36(01): 54 -0059 .
[6] 李春柏,张新涛,刘 立,任延广,孟 鹏. 布达特群热流体活动及其对火山碎屑岩的改造作用--以海拉尔盆地贝尔凹陷为例[J]. J4, 2006, 36(02): 221 -0226 .
[7] 孟宪纲,薄万举,刘志广,刘勇,畅柳,李朝柱,王子平. 芦山7.0级地震与巴颜喀拉块体中东段的活动性[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2014, 44(5): 1705 -1711 .
[8] 陈欢庆, 梁淑贤, 舒治睿, 邓晓娟, 彭寿昌. 冲积扇砾岩储层构型特征及其对储层开发的控制作用——以准噶尔盆地西北缘某区克下组冲积扇储层为例[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2015, 45(1): 13 -24 .
[9] 贾大成,邢立新, 潘 军, M. J. van Bergen, H. van Roermund. 伊通上地幔剪切带捕虏体中富铝尖晶石的地球化学特征[J]. J4, 2006, 36(04): 497 -502 .
[10] 谢忠雷,杨佰玲,包国章,董德明. 茶园土壤不同形态镍的含量及其影响因素[J]. J4, 2006, 36(04): 599 -604 .