吉林大学学报(地球科学版) ›› 2020, Vol. 50 ›› Issue (3): 929-940.doi: 10.13278/j.cnki.jjuese.20190165

• 地球探测与信息技术 • 上一篇    

松辽盆地大庆长垣四方台组可地浸砂岩铀成矿测井评价

于洋, 王祝文, 宁琴琴, 徐方慧   

  1. 吉林大学地球探测科学与技术学院, 长春 130026
  • 收稿日期:2019-08-17 发布日期:2020-05-29
  • 通讯作者: 王祝文(1961-),男,教授,博士,博士生导师,主要从事地球物理测井、核地球物理、测井新方法新技术研究,E-mail:wangzw@jlu.edu.cn E-mail:wangzw@jlu.edu.cn
  • 作者简介:于洋(1995-),男,硕士研究生,主要从事地球物理测井解释理论和方法研究,E-mail:799497065@qq.com
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金项目(41874135)

Logging Evaluation of In-Situ Leachable Sandstone Uranium Mineralization in Sifangtai Formation of Daqing Placanticline, Songliao Basin

Yu Yang, Wang Zhuwen, Ning Qinqin, Xu Fanghui   

  1. College of GeoExploration Science and Technology, Jilin University, Changchun 130026, China
  • Received:2019-08-17 Published:2020-05-29
  • Supported by:
    Supported by National Nature Science Foundation of China (41874135)

摘要: 为了研究孔隙度、渗透率、泥质等参数与砂岩型铀矿成矿的关系,本文对松辽盆地中央坳陷大庆长垣南部某区块四方台组底部砂岩进行分析。含铀矿砂岩具有高放射性,这使得测井曲线的密度值异常降低,自然伽马值异常升高。通过研究总结出利用升高的自然伽马曲线校正密度曲线的方法,以及利用其他不受放射性影响曲线重构自然伽马曲线的方法。与岩心的对比分析结果证明,校正后的密度曲线与重构后的自然伽马曲线较准确,密度曲线校正与自然伽马曲线重构解决了含铀砂岩利用测井曲线求取孔隙度、渗透率参数不准的问题。在准确求取测井参数的基础上,得到能展现砂体内部非均质性特点的物性空间展布并成图分析,进而得出本地区有利于铀成矿的物性条件:产生铀矿的砂体并不是孔渗性质最好的地方,也不是孔渗性质最差的地方,而是处于由高孔渗向低孔渗过渡的地方。

关键词: 砂岩型铀矿, 四方台组, 曲线校正, 非均质性, 控矿理论, 松辽盆地

Abstract: In order to study the relationship between porosity, permeability and clay content and sandstone-type uranium mineralization, the authors analyzed the sandstone at the bottom of Sifangtai Formation in a block south of Daqing Placanticline in the central depression of Songliao basin. The uranium-bearing ore sandstone has high radioactivity, which makes the density value of the logging curve decrease and the natural gamma value rise abnormally. Through the research, this paper summarizes the method of correcting the density by using the increased natural gamma, and the method of reconstructing natural gamma by using other curves unaffected by radioactivity. Through the comparative analysis with the core, it is proved that the corrected density and the reconstructed natural gamma are more accurate. The problem that the parameters of porosity and permeability of uranium-bearing sandstone are calculated by logging curve is solved by the correction of density and the reconstruction of natural gamma. Based on the accurate calculation of the logging parameters, the spatial distribution and mapping analysis of the physical properties are obtained, which can show the characteristics of heterogeneity in sand body. It is concluded that the sand bodies producing uranium ore are not in the place with the best or the worst porosity and permeability, but in the place with the transition from high porosity and permeability to low porosity and permeability.

Key words: sandstone-type uranium deposit, Sifangtai Formation, curve correction, heterogeneity, ore-controlling theory, Songliao basin

中图分类号: 

  • P631.8
[1] 张森,石蕾,鞠楠,等. "油铀兼探"的找矿思路在松辽盆地的应用:以中央拗陷区南部为例[J]. 地质与资源, 2018, 27(3):257-262. Zhang Sen, Shi Lei, Ju Nan, et al. The "Oil-Uranium Co-Exploration" Idea in Songliao Basin:A Practice in Southern Central Depression[J]. Geology and Resources, 2018, 27(3):257-262.
[2] 周晓林,代迪,苟熠,等. 煤田测井资料在圈定黔北煤系铀矿靶区中的应用[J]. 煤田地质与勘探, 2017, 45(6):159-163. Zhou Xiaolin, Dai Di, Gou Yi, et al. Application of Coalfield Logging Data in Prospecting Target Area of Uranium Deposit in Coal Measures in Northern Guizhou[J]. Coal Geology & Exploration, 2017, 45(6):159-163.
[3] 宋焕霞,赵世煌,赵桂军,等. 大营铀矿勘查中实物地质资料的开发利用:找矿思维的转变与创新[J]. 地质通报, 2016, 35(11):1895-1899. Song Huanxia, Zhao Shihuang, Zhao Guijun, et al. Second-Round Development and Utilization of the Geological Samples in the Prospecting for Daying Uranium Deposit:Change and Innovation of Prospecting Thinking[J]. Geological Bulletin of China, 2016, 35(11):1895-1899.
[4] 俞礽安,司马献章,李建国,等. 鄂尔多斯盆地直罗组地层岩性测井响应特征[J]. 煤田地质与勘探, 2018, 46(6):33-39. Yu Reng'an, Sima Xianzhang, Li Jianguo, et al. Response Characteristics of Lithologic Logging of Zhiluo Formation in Ordos Basin[J]. Coal Geology & Exploration, 2018, 46(6):33-39.
[5] 张超,黄华州,徐德林,等. 基于测井曲线的煤体结构判识[J]. 煤炭科学技术, 2017, 45(9):47-51. Zhang Chao, Huang Huazhou, Xu Delin, et al. Coal Structure Identified Based on Logging Curve[J]. Coal Science and Technology, 2017, 45(9):47-51.
[6] 黄笑. 砂岩型铀矿钻孔测井相特征与铀成矿关系[D]. 南昌:东华理工大学, 2017. Huang Xiao. Study on the Relationship Between Drill Logging Characteristics and Uraniu Mineralization in Sandstone-Type Uranium Deposit[D]. Nanchang:East China University of Technology, 2017.
[7] 康勇. 新疆洪海沟铀矿床西山窑组上段砂体渗透性非均质性对铀成矿的影响[C]//中国核科学技术进展报告(第五卷)编委会. 中国核学会2017年学术年会论文集. 威海:中国核学会, 2017:22-28. Kang Yong. Influence of the Sandbody Heterogeneity on Uranium Mineralization in the Upper Section of Xishanyao Formation of Honghaigou Uranium Deposit Xinjiang[C]//Editorial Board of China Nuclear Science and Technology Progress Report (Volume 5). Proceedings of the 2017 Annual Conference of the Chinese Nuclear Society. Weihai:Chinese Nuclear Society, 2017:22-28.
[8] 李继安. 人工智能神经网络在岩性识别、孔隙度和渗透率预测中的应用:以十红滩铀矿床为例[J]. 西北地质, 2010, 43(2):32-37. Li Ji'an. Application of Artificial Intelligence Neural Networks in Lithology Identification and Porosity and Permeability Prediction[J]. Northwestern Geology, 2010, 43(2):32-37.
[9] 张艳,易超. 基于最优化测井解释计算砂岩型铀矿砂体孔隙度的方法:201811580620.1[P]. 2019-04-05. Zhang Yan, Yi Chao. A Method for Calculating the Porosity of Sandstone-Type Uranium Ore Based on Optimized Log Interpretation:201811580620.1[P]. 2019-04-05.
[10] 黄磊,童亨茂,杨东辉,等. 松辽盆地大庆长垣中浅层断层形成演化的新模式[J]. 地质学报, 2019, 93(3):597-605. Huang Lei, Tong Hengmao, Yang Donghui, et al. A New Model for the Formation and Evolution of Middle-Shallow Faults in the Daqing Placanticline, Songliao Basin[J]. Acta Geologica Sinica, 2019, 93(3):597-605.
[11] 宋广寿,高辉,高静乐,等. 西峰油田长8储层微观孔隙结构非均质性与渗流机理实验[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2009, 39(1):53-59. Song Guangshou, Gao Hui, Gao Jingle, et al. Experimental of Microscopic Pore Structure Heterogeneity and Flow Mechanism of Chang 8 Reservoir in Xifeng Oil Field[J]. Journal of Jilin University (Earth Science Edition), 2009, 39(1):53-59.
[12] 岳崇旺,杨小明,钟晓勤,等.利用测井曲线的洛伦兹系数评价地层的非均质性[J].吉林大学学报(地球科学版),2015,45(5):1539-1546. Yue Chongwang, Yang Xiaoming, Zhong Xiaoqin, et al. Evaluation of Formation Heterogeneity Using Lorentz Coefficient of Logging Curves[J]. Journal of Jilin University (Earth Science Edition), 2015, 45(5):1539-1546.
[13] 焦养泉,陈安平,杨琴,等. 砂体非均质性是铀成矿的关键因素之一:鄂尔多斯盆地东北部铀成矿规律探讨[J]. 铀矿地质, 2005,21(1):8-15. Jiao Yangquan, Chen Anping, Yang Qin, et al. Sand Body Heterogeneity:One of the Key Factors of Uranium Metallogenesis in Ordos Basin[J]. Uranium Geology, 2005, 21(1):8-15.
[14] 焦养泉,陈安平,王敏芳,等. 鄂尔多斯盆地东北部直罗组底部砂体成因分析:砂岩型铀矿床预测的空间定位基础[J]. 沉积学报, 2005, 23(3):371-379. Jiao Yangquan, Chen Anping, Wang Minfang, et al. Genetic Analysis of the Bottom Sandstone of Zhiluo Formation, Northeastern Ordos Basin:Predictive Base of Spatial Orientation of Sandstone-Type Uranium Deposit[J]. Acta Sedimentologica Sinica, 2005, 23(3):371-379.
[15] 焦养泉,吴立群,荣辉,等. 铀储层地质建模:揭示成矿机理和应对"剩余铀"的地质基础[J]. 地球科学, 2018, 43(10):3568-3583. Jiao Yangquan, Wu Liqun, Rong Hui, et al. Geological Modeling of Uranium Reservoir:The Geological Foundation of Revealing the Metallogenic Mechanism and Solving "Remaining Uranium"[J]. Earth Science, 2018, 43(10):3568-3583.
[16] 焦养泉,吴立群,荣辉,等. 铀储层结构与成矿流场研究:揭示东胜砂岩型铀矿床成矿机理的一把钥匙[J]. 地质科技情报, 2012, 31(5):94-104. Jiao Yangquan, Wu Liqun, Rong Hui, et al. Uranium Reservoir Architecture and Ore-Forming Flow Field Study:A Key of Revealing Dongsheng Sandstone-Type Uranium Deposit Mineralization Mechanism[J].Geological Science and Technology Information, 2012, 31(5):94-104.
[17] 戴明建,彭云彪,苗爱生. 纳岭沟铀矿床铀成矿主要控制因素与找矿标志[J]. 矿物学报, 2013, 33(增刊2):201-202. Dai Mingjian, Peng Yunbiao, Miao Aisheng. Main Controlling Factors and Prospecting Indicators of Uranium Metallogenesis in Nalinggou Uranium Deposit[J]. Acta Mineralogica Sinica, 2013, 33(Sup. 2):201-202.
[18] 陈心路,易超,李西得,等. 砂体非均质性特征及其与铀成矿关系探讨:以鄂尔多斯盆地东北部大营地区直罗组为例[J]. 矿床地质, 2014, 33(增刊1):617-618. Chen Xinlu, Yi Chao, Li Xide, et al. Characteristics of Sand Body Heterogeneity and Its Relationship with Uranium Mineralization:A Case Study of Zhiluo Formation in Daying Area, Northeastern Ordos Basin[J]. Mineral Deposits, 2014, 33(Sup. 1):617-618.
[19] 陈奋雄,聂逢君,张成勇,等. 伊犁盆地洪海沟地区西山窑组上段层间氧化带分布特征及其主控因素分析[J]. 地质科技情报, 2016, 35(3):105-111. Chen Fenxiong, Nie Fengjun, Zhang Chengyong, et al. Distribution Characteristics of Interlayer Oxidation Zone and Its Main Controlling Factors of Upper Xishanyao Formation in Honghaigou Area, Yili Basin[J]. Geological Science and Technology Information, 2016, 35(3):105-111.
[20] 谢惠丽,吴立群,焦养泉,等. 鄂尔多斯盆地罕台庙地区铀储层非均质性定量评价指标体系[J]. 地球科学, 2016, 41(2):279-292. Xie Huili, Wu Liqun, Jiao Yangquan, et al. The Quantitative Evaluation Index System for Uranium Reservoir Heterogeneity in Hantaimiao Region, Ordos Basin[J]. Earth Science, 2016, 41(2):279-292.
[21] 汤超,金若时,谷社峰,等. 松辽盆地北部四方台组工业铀矿体的发现及其意义[J]. 地质调查与研究, 2018, 41(1):1-8. Tang Chao, Jin Ruoshi, Gu Shefeng, et al. Discovery and Significance of Industrial Uranium Ore in Sifangtai Formation, North Songliao Basin[J]. Geological Survey and Research, 2018, 41(1):1-8.
[22] 魏佳林,汤超,徐增连,等. 大庆长垣南部四方台组砂岩型铀矿化特征研究[J]. 地质调查与研究, 2018, 41(1):9-17. Wei Jialin, Tang Chao, Xu Zenglian, et al. Research on Sandstone-Hosted Uranium Mineralization of the Sifangtai Formation in Southern Daqing Placanticline[J]. Geological Survey and Research, 2018, 41(1):9-17.
[23] 陈路路,汤超,李建国,等. 松辽盆地大庆长垣南端四方台组含铀砂岩岩石学特征及地质意义[J]. 地质调查与研究, 2018, 41(1):33-39. Chen Lulu, Tang Chao, Li Jianguo, et al. Petrology Characteristics of the Uranium-Bearing Layer of Sifantai Formation in Daqing Placanticline of Songliao Basin and Their Geological Implications[J]. Geological Survey and Research, 2018, 41(1):33-39.
[24] 汤超,魏佳林,肖鹏,等. 松辽盆地北部砂岩型铀矿铀的赋存状态研究[J]. 矿产与地质, 2017, 31(6):1009-1016. Tang Chao, Wei Jialin, Xiao Peng, et al. Research on Uranium Occurrence State of Sandstone-Type Uranium Deposit in the Northern Songliao Basin[J]. Mineral Resources and Geology, 2017, 31(6):1009-1016.
[25] 肖鹏,金若时,汤超,等. 松辽盆地北部大庆长垣南端上白垩统四方台组物源体系分析[J]. 石油实验地质, 2018, 40(4):493-501. Xiao Peng, Jin Ruoshi, Tang Chao, et al. Provenance System of the Late Cretaceous Sifangtai Formation in the South of Daqing Placanticline of the Northern Songliao Basin[J]. Petroleum Geology & Experiment, 2018, 40(4):493-501.
[26] 刘华健,金若时,李建国,等. 松辽盆地北部含铀岩系沉积物源及铀源分析研究进展[J]. 地质调查与研究, 2017, 40(4):281-289. Liu Huajian, Jin Ruoshi, Li Jianguo, et al. Advance in Reseach for Sedimentary and Uranium Source Analysis of the Uranium-Bearing Series in Northern Songliao Basin[J]. Geological Survey and Research, 2017, 40(4):281-289.
[27] 刘华健,金若时,肖鹏,等. 松辽盆地北部古恰地区含铀岩系四方台组粒度特征及其沉积环境指示意义[J]. 地质调查与研究, 2018, 41(1):40-50. Liu Huajian, Jin Ruoshi, Xiao Peng, et al. Grain-Size Characteristics of the Sifangtai Formation of Uranium-Bearing Series in Guqia Area, Northern Songliao Basin and Its Sedimentary Environmental Implications[J]. Geological Survey and Research, 2018, 41(1):40-50.
[28] 肖鹏,汤超,魏佳林,等. 大庆长垣南端四方台组沉积相特征及其与铀富集的关系[J]. 地质调查与研究, 2018, 41(1):18-23. Xiao Peng, Tang Chao, Wei Jialin, et al. Sedimentary Facies of the Sifangtai Formation in the Southern Daqing Placanticline and Its Controls to Uranium Mineralization[J]. Geological Survey and Research, 2018, 41(1):18-23.
[29] 张雷,王英民,李树青,等. 松辽盆地北部四方台组-明水组高精度层序地层特征与有利区带预测[J]. 中南大学学报(自然科学版), 2009, 40(6):1679-1688. Zhang Lei, Wang Yingmin, Li Shuqing, et al. High-Resolution Sequence Stratigraphic Characteristic and Favorable Hydrocarbon Accumulation Prediction of Sifangtai to Mingshui Formation in the North Songliao Basin[J]. Journal of Central South University (Science and Technology), 2009, 40(6):1679-1688.
[30] 程日辉,王国栋,王璞珺,等. 松辽盆地松科1井上白垩统-下古新统明水组沉积序列厘米级精细刻画:岩性·岩相·旋回[J]. 地学前缘, 2011, 18(6):285-328. Cheng Rihui, Wang Guodong, Wang Pujun, et al. Centimeter-Scale Sedimentary Sequence Description of Upper Cretaceous-Lower Paleocene Mingshui Formation:Lithostratigraphy, Facies and Cyclostratigraphy, Based on the Scientific Drilling (SK1) Borehole in the Songliao Basin[J]. Earth Science Frontiers, 2011, 18(6):285-328.
[31] 王国栋,程日辉,王璞珺,等. 松辽盆地松科1井上白垩统四方台组沉积序列厘米级精细刻画:岩性·岩相·旋回[J]. 地学前缘, 2011, 18(6):263-284. Wang Guodong,Cheng Rihui,Wang Pujun,et al. Centimeter-Scale Sedimentary Sequence Description of Upper Cretaceous Sifangtai Formation:Lithostratigraphy, Facies and Cyclostratigraphy, Based on the Scientific Drilling (SK1) Borehole in the Songliao Basin[J]. Earth Science Frontiers, 2011, 18(6):263-284.
[32] 万涛,刘招君,胡菲,等. 松辽盆地北部上白垩统四方台组河流相层序沉积特征[J]. 大庆石油地质与开发, 2018, 37(5):1-7. Wan Tao, Liu Zhaojun, Hu Fei, et al. Sedimentary Characteristics of the Fluvial Sequence of Upper Cretaceous Sifangtai Formation in North Songliao Basin[J]. Petroleum Geology & Oilfield Development in Daqing, 2018, 37(5):1-7.
[33] 舒良树,慕玉福,王伯长. 松辽盆地含油气地层及其构造特征[J]. 地层学杂志, 2003, 27(4):340-347. Shu Liangshu, Mu Yufu, Wang Bochang. The Oil Gas-Bearing Strata and the Structural Features in the Songliao Basin, NE China[J]. Journal of Stratigraphy, 2003, 27(4):340-347.
[34] 高翔,刘志宏,聂志阳,等. 松辽盆地大庆长垣形成时间的厘定及其地质意义[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2017, 47(1):74-83. Gao Xiang, Liu Zhihong, Nie Zhiyang, et al. Determination of Timing and Its Geological Significance of Daqing Placanticline in Songliao Basin[J]. Journal of Jilin University (Earth Science Edition), 2017, 47(1):74-83.
[35] 雍世和,张超谟. 测井数据处理与综合解释[M]. 东营:石油大学出版社,1996. Yong Shihe, Zhang Chaomo. Logging Data Processing and Comprehensive Interpretation[M]. Dongying:University of Petroleum Press, 1996.
[36] 李继安,杨兴,郗昭,等. 砂岩型铀矿勘查中密度曲线的校正及应用:以十红滩铀矿床为例[J]. 铀矿地质, 2015, 31(4):459-466. Li Ji'an, Yang Xing, Xi Zhao, et al. Density Logging Curve Correction and Application in Sandstone Uranium Exploration:A Case Study of Shihongtan Uranium Deposit[J]. Uranium Geology, 2015, 31(4):459-466.
[37] 梁齐端. 鄂尔多斯盆地北部地区矿层密度测井曲线畸变原因分析[J]. 铀矿地质, 2005, 21(2):105-111. Liang Qiduan. Analysis on Genesis of Distortion of Ore Layer Density-Logging Curve at Northern Ordos Basin[J]. Uranium Geology, 2005, 21(2):105-111.
[38] 刘之的,杨双定,刘有霞,等. 南梁油田长4+5储层泥质体积分数计算方法[J]. 西安石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2015, 30(2):25-29. Liu Zhidi, Yang Shuangding, Liu Youxia, et al. Calculation Method of Shale Content of Chang 4+5 Reservoir in Nanliang Oilfield[J]. Journal of Xi'an Shiyou University (Natural Science Edition), 2015, 30(2):25-29.
[39] 莫修文,丁永浩,王宏建. 葡西地区油气储层泥质与黏土含量的计算方法研究[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2006, 36(增刊2):139-142. Mo Xiuwen, Ding Yonghao, Wang Hongjian. Method of Estimating Shale and Clay Volume in Hydrocarbon Reservoirs of Puxi Area[J]. Journal of Jilin University (Earth Science Edition),2006, 36(Sup. 2):139-142.
[40] 司马立强,罗兴,张凤生,等. 基于曲线重构的高伽马地层泥质体积分数计算方法[J]. 测井技术, 2013, 37(3):244-248. Sima Liqiang, Luo Xing, Zhang Fengsheng, et al. On the Method of Clay Content Calculation Based on the Curve Reconstruction of the Formation with High Gamma Value[J]. Well Logging Technology, 2013, 37(3):244-248.
[41] 侯连华,信荃麟,刘泽容. 浊积岩储层泥质体积分数计算方法及其应用[J]. 石油大学学报(自然科学版), 1996, 20(4):16-19. Hou Lianhua, Xin Quanlin, Liu Zerong. Calculation Method of Shale Content and Its Application in the Conglomerate Reservoir[J]. Journal of the University of Petroleum, China, 1996, 20(4):16-19.
[42] 侯连华. 自然电位基线偏移影响因素的实验研究[J]. 石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2001, 25(1):93-95. Hou Lianhua. Influencing Factors of Baseline Shift Amplitude of Spontaneous Potential[J]. Journal of the University of Petroleum, China, 2001, 25(1):93-95.
[1] 张健, 张海华, 陈树旺, 郑月娟, 张德军, 苏飞, 黄欣. 松辽盆地北部上二叠统林西组地球化学特征及地质意义[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2020, 50(2): 518-530.
[2] 郑国栋, 孟庆涛, 刘招君. 松辽盆地北部青一段油页岩地球化学特征及其记录的古湖泊学信息[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2020, 50(2): 392-404.
[3] 苗长盛, 徐文, 刘玉虎, 谢荣祥. 松辽盆地南部火山岩储层特征[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2020, 50(2): 635-643.
[4] 张鹏辉, 张小博, 方慧, 王小江, 刘建勋. 地球物理资料揭示的嫩江—八里罕断裂中段深浅构造特征[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2020, 50(1): 261-272.
[5] 迟唤昭, 董福湘, 薛晓刚, 刘财, 司考. 松辽盆地南部地区营城组典型火山机构地质特征[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2019, 49(6): 1649-1657.
[6] 周翔. 松辽盆地北部营城组火山岩地球化学特征及地质意义[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2019, 49(4): 1001-1014.
[7] 马国庆, 孟庆发, 黄大年. 基于重力异常的松辽盆地构造特征识别[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2018, 48(2): 507-516.
[8] 蔡来星, 卢双舫, 肖国林, 王蛟, 吴志强, 郭兴伟, 侯方辉. 论优质源储耦合关系的控藏作用:对比松南致密油与松北致密气成藏条件[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2018, 48(1): 15-28.
[9] 康学远, 施小清, 史良胜, 吴吉春. 基于集合卡尔曼滤波的多相流模型参数估计——以室内二维砂箱中重质非水相污染物入渗为例[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2017, 47(3): 848-859.
[10] 鲍新华, 张宇, 李野, 吴永东, 马丹, 周广慧. 松辽盆地增强型地热系统开发选区评价[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2017, 47(2): 564-572.
[11] 高翔, 刘志宏, 聂志阳, 姚勇, 贾卧, 王超, 宋健. 松辽盆地大庆长垣形成时间的厘定及其地质意义[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2017, 47(1): 74-83.
[12] 林承焰, 曹铮, 任丽华, 张昌盛, 范瑞峰, 王叶, 邢新亚, 马晓兰. 松辽盆地南部大情字井向斜区葡萄花油层石油富集规律及成藏模式[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2016, 46(6): 1598-1610.
[13] 刘立, 白杭改, 刘娜, 明晓冉, 蒋令旭. 洪水型季节性河流砂岩中碎屑黏土的岩石学特征及其研究意义[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2016, 46(4): 1071-1079.
[14] 刘财, 杨宝俊, 冯晅, 单玄龙, 田有, 刘洋, 鹿琪, 刘才华, 杨冬, 王世煜. 论油气资源的多元勘探[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2016, 46(4): 1208-1220.
[15] 康健, 韦庆海, 周琳, 高研, 张永刚, 高峰. 利用地震台阵观测资料研究大庆地区深部构造[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2016, 46(3): 900-910.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!