川中—川西过渡带,沙溪庙组,致密砂岩,相对优质储层,成因机制,四川盆地 ," /> 川中—川西过渡带,沙溪庙组,致密砂岩,相对优质储层,成因机制,四川盆地 ,"/> <p class="MsoNormal"> 四川盆地川中—川西过渡带中侏罗统沙溪庙组致密砂岩相对优质储层成因机制

吉林大学学报(地球科学版) ›› 2024, Vol. 54 ›› Issue (2): 371-388.doi: 10.13278/j.cnki.jjuese.20220208

• 地质与资源 • 上一篇    下一篇

四川盆地川中—川西过渡带中侏罗统沙溪庙组致密砂岩相对优质储层成因机制

宋林珂1,刘四兵2,曾青高1,周栋2,唐大海1,王锦西1   

  1. 1.中国石油西南油气田公司致密油气勘探开发项目部,成都610059

    2.油气藏地质及开发工程国家重点实验室(成都理工大学),成都610059

  • 出版日期:2024-03-26 发布日期:2024-04-01
  • 基金资助:

    国家自然科学基金项目(41972158)


Genetic Mechanism of Relatively High-Quality Reservoirs of Middle Jurassic Shaximiao Formation Tight Sandstone in  Transition Zone Between  Central and Western Sichuan Basin

Song Linke1, Liu Sibing2, Zeng Qinggao1, Zhou Dong2, Tang Dahai1, Wang Jinxi1   

  1. 1. Tight Oil and Gas Exploration and Development Project Department of PetroChina Southwest Oil and Gas Field Company,

    Chengdu 610059, China

    2. State Key Laboratory of Oil and Gas Reservoir Geology and Exploitation (Chengdu University of Technology), Chengdu

    610059, China

  • Online:2024-03-26 Published:2024-04-01
  • Supported by:
    Suported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (41972158)

摘要:

川中—川西过渡带沙溪庙组天然气勘探潜力巨大,是四川盆地近几年勘探的热点。目前,制约沙溪庙组致密砂岩天然气勘探开发的问题较多,其中,“相对优质储层”的形成机理和综合预测是亟需解决的关键问题之一。针对这一科学问题,本次研究通过系统的物性分析、铸体薄片鉴定、扫描电镜分析以及储层地球化学分析等,开展了研究区沙溪庙组相对优质储层成因机制研究。研究结果表明:沙溪庙组致密砂岩以岩屑长石砂岩和长石岩屑砂岩为主。沙二段砂岩石英平均体积分数为35.27%,长石平均体积分数为35.37%,岩屑平均体积分数为29.36%,沙一段砂岩石英平均体积分数为37.79%,长石平均体积分数为24.01%,岩屑平均体积分数为38.20%,沙一段长石体积分数较高,沙二段岩屑体积分数较高。沙二段以变质岩岩屑为主(占岩屑体积分数的55%),沙一段则以岩浆岩岩屑为主(占岩屑体积分数的43%)。储层孔隙类型以原生孔为主,长石溶蚀孔为辅,沙一段具有相对更高比例的原生孔和裂隙孔。沙二段砂岩中38.00%的样品孔隙度大于12%,25.25%的样品渗透率大于1 ×10-3 μm2,沙一段砂岩仅3.09%的样品孔隙度大于12%,但41.22%的样品渗透率大于1 ×10-3μm2。总体表现为致密背景下发育一定的相对优质储层。其中沙二段储层孔隙度发育较好,而沙一段储层渗透性更佳,说明沙一段储层孔隙结构相对较好。沙溪庙组致密砂岩储层发育受控于岩矿组合-烃源体系-成岩系统。岩矿组合为成岩作用的演化提供物质基础,烃源体系决定溶蚀作用发育的强度,并为砂岩中主要自生矿物的沉淀提供必要的离子来源;成岩系统的开放程度则决定了体系内外离子的带进带出,进而影响了溶蚀作用和相应成岩产物的沉淀。沙二和沙一段砂岩岩矿组合的差异、沉积环境的不同、烃源体系以及成岩系统的开放程度是导致其成岩作用差异的主要原因。综上认为,高能沉积环境、早期保持性成岩作用(孔隙衬垫绿泥石)、多期次和多种类型的溶蚀作用以及局部微裂缝的发育改造,是研究区沙溪庙组相对优质储层发育的主要机制。

关键词: 川中—川西过渡带')">

川中—川西过渡带, 沙溪庙组, 致密砂岩, 相对优质储层, 成因机制, 四川盆地

Abstract: The Shaximiao Formation in the transition zone between the central and western Sichuan basin has great potential for natural gas exploration, which has become a hot spot of exploration in  Sichuan basin in recent years. At present, there are many aspects restricting the exploration and development of tight sandstone natural gas in the Shaximiao Formation. The formation mechanism and synthesized prediction of “relatively high-quality reservoirs” are one of the key issues that need to be resolved urgently. In this paper, a series of analysis methods were performed, including systematic physical property analysis, blue-dye thin section identification, scanning electron microscopy analysis, and reservoir geochemical analysis, to determine the genetic mechanism of relatively high-quality reservoirs in the Shaximiao Formation. The results indicate that the tight Shaximiao sandstones are dominated by lithic feldspar sandstone and feldspar lithic sandstone. The average volume fraction of quartz,feldspar,and rock debris in the Second Member of the Shaximiao Formation (SMSF) are 35.27%,  35.37%, and 29.36% respectively. The average volume fraction of quartz,feldspar,and rock debris in the First Member of the Shaximiao Formation (FMSM) are 37.79%, 24.01%, and 38.20% respectively. The volume fraction of feldspar is relatively high compared to the FMSM,and the volume fraction of rock debris is relatively high compared to the SMSF. In terms of type and content of lithic fragments, sandstones in the SMSF are dominated by metamorphic fragments, accounting for 55% of the whole lithic fragments. By contrast, those in the FMSF are dominated by magmatic fragments, making up to 43% of the whole lithic fragments. In addition, the reservoir pore system is predominately composed of primary pores followed by feldspar dissolution pores, in which the FMSF is characterized by a higher content of those pores than the SMSF. In the SMSF, samples with porosity above 12%  account for 38.00%, but with permeability above 1×10-3μm2 account for 25.25%. Those values in the FMSF are 3.09% and 41.22%, respectively. It is generally reflected that some relatively high-quality reservoirs tend to be developed under a tight background. The fact, that the SMSF reservoir is characterized by better porosity and the FMSF has better permeability, demonstrates that the pore structure of the FMSF reservoir is relatively better. Besides, The tight sandstone reservoir in Shaximiao Formation is controlled by litho-mineral association, hydrocarbon source system and diagenetic system. The litho-mineral association provided a material basis for the diagenetic evolution. The hydrocarbon source system controlled the dissolution intensity, and provided ions for main authigenic minerals precipitation in sandstone. The opening degree of the diagenetic system had an effect on the ions’ in-and-out, and affected the dissolution and precipitation of the diagenetic products. The difference of litho-mineral association, variation of sedimentary environment, hydrocarbon source system and opening degree of diagenetic system in SMSF and FMSF are the main reasons for the differential diagenesis.

Key words: transition zone between the central and western Sichuan basin, Shaximiao Formation, tight sandstone, relatively high-quality reservoirs, genetic mechanism, Sichuan basin

中图分类号: 

  • P618.13
[1] 刘硕, 王飞, 于瑞, 高建星, 师昊, 朱玉双. 致密砂岩储层微观孔喉结构及其分形特征[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2024, 54(1): 96-107.
[2] 余光展, 王健, 吴楠, 徐清海, 刘显凤, 付清萌. 鄂尔多斯盆地志靖—安塞地区延长组7段致密砂岩微观孔隙结构评价#br#[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2024, 54(1): 83-95.
[3] 单玄龙, 邢健, 苏思远, 李昂, 赵振铎, 杨钦, 李雪松, 井翠, 张家浩, 孙越.

川南长宁地区下古生界五峰组—龙马溪组一段页岩岩相与含气性特征 [J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2023, 53(5): 1323-1337.

[4] 贺婷, 周宁, 吴啸宇. 基于深度全连接神经网络的储层有效砂体厚度预测[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2023, 53(4): 1262-1274.
[5] 李彦泽, 商琳, 王群会, 孙彦春, 邢建鹏, 蒋东梁, 陈浩. 断陷盆地强非均质低渗-致密砂岩储层综合分类——以渤海湾盆地南堡凹陷为例[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2022, 52(6): 1830-1843.
[6] 张立亚, 徐 文, 沈艳杰. 松辽盆地南部深层致密砂岩气储层形成机制及成藏主控因素[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2022, 52(5): 1707-1717.
[7] 吴 蒙1, 2, 秦 勇2, 申 建2, 宋党育3, 王晓青3, 张谷春1, 李国璋2, 朱士飞1. 致密砂岩储层束缚水饱和度影响因素:以鄂尔多斯盆地临兴地区为例#br#[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2022, 52(1): 68-.
[8] 张益明, 秦小英, 郭智奇, 牛聪, 王迪, 凌云. 针对致密砂岩气储层复杂孔隙结构的岩石物理模型及其应用[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2021, 51(3): 927-939.
[9] 田兴旺, 罗冰, 孙奕婷, 刘冉, 李亚, 陈延贵, 周春林, 汪华, 李亚丁, 王尉, 王云龙, 杨岱林. 二叠系火山碎屑岩气藏天然气地球化学特征及气源分析——以四川盆地成都—简阳地区永探1井为例[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2021, 51(2): 325-335.
[10] 吴蒙, 秦勇, 王晓青, 李国璋, 朱超, 朱士飞. 中国致密砂岩储层流体可动性及其影响因素[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2021, 51(1): 35-51.
[11] 张大智, 初丽兰, 周翔, 王晓莲, 李鑫. 松辽盆地北部徐家围子断陷沙河子组致密气储层成岩作用与成岩相特征[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2021, 51(1): 22-34.
[12] 陈祥忠, 王斌. 基于岩石物理模型的裂缝型储层AVOA反演方法[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2021, 51(1): 266-276.
[13] 崔景伟, 朱如凯. 致密砂岩层内强钙质胶结物成因机制及其意义——以鄂尔多斯盆地三叠系延长组长7油层组为例[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2020, 50(4): 957-967.
[14] 吴蒙, 朱超, 秦云虎, 秦勇, 申建, 赵恒, 朱士飞. 临兴地区山西组致密砂岩气开采潜力地质评价方法[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2020, 50(4): 991-1002.
[15] 王付勇, 程辉. 鄂尔多斯盆地延长组致密砂岩孔喉结构与油藏物性表征[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2020, 50(3): 721-731.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 程立人,张予杰,张以春. 西藏申扎地区奥陶纪鹦鹉螺化石[J]. J4, 2005, 35(03): 273 -0282 .
[2] 李 秉 成. 陕西富平全新世古气候的初步研究[J]. J4, 2005, 35(03): 291 -0295 .
[3] 和钟铧,杨德明,王天武,郑常青. 冈底斯带巴嘎区二云母花岗岩SHRIMP锆石U-Pb定年[J]. J4, 2005, 35(03): 302 -0307 .
[4] 陈 力,佴 磊,王秀范,李 金. 绥中某电力设备站场区地震危险性分析[J]. J4, 2005, 35(05): 641 -645 .
[5] 纪宏金,孙丰月,陈满,胡大千,时艳香,潘向清. 胶东地区裸露含金构造的地球化学评价[J]. J4, 2005, 35(03): 308 -0312 .
[6] 初凤友,孙国胜,李晓敏,马维林,赵宏樵. 中太平洋海山富钴结壳生长习性及控制因素[J]. J4, 2005, 35(03): 320 -0325 .
[7] 李斌,孟自芳,李相博,卢红选,郑民. 泌阳凹陷下第三系构造特征与沉积体系[J]. J4, 2005, 35(03): 332 -0339 .
[8] 李涛, 吴胜军,蔡述明,薛怀平,YASUNORI Nakayama. 涨渡湖通江前后调蓄能力模拟分析[J]. J4, 2005, 35(03): 351 -0355 .
[9] 旷理雄,郭建华,梅廉夫,童小兰,杨丽. 从油气勘探的角度论博格达山的隆升[J]. J4, 2005, 35(03): 346 -0350 .
[10] 章光新,邓伟,何岩,RAMSIS Salama. 水文响应单元法在盐渍化风险评价中的应用[J]. J4, 2005, 35(03): 356 -0360 .