吉林大学学报(地球科学版) ›› 2026, Vol. 56 ›› Issue (1): 101-117.doi: 10.13278/j.cnki.jjuese.20250321

• 北方造山带专栏 • 上一篇    下一篇

古亚洲洋东段的剪刀式闭合历史——来自华北克拉通北缘东段及邻区三叠纪地壳厚度空间变异的制约

王菲1,龙欣雨1,唐杰1,郭鹏2,许文良1, 3   

  1. 1.吉林大学地球科学学院,长春 130061
    2.崂山实验室,山东 青岛 266000
    3.自然资源部东北亚矿产资源评价重点实验室(吉林大学),长春 130061
  • 收稿日期:2025-10-02 出版日期:2026-01-26 发布日期:2026-02-09
  • 通讯作者: 龙欣雨(1995—), 女, 工程师, 主要从事火成岩石学方面的研究, E-mail: longxy@jlu.edu.cn
  • 作者简介:王菲(2002—), 女, 博士研究生, 主要从事火成岩石学方面的研究, E-mail: 2209034381@qq.com
  • 基金资助:
    国家科技重大专项(2024ZD1001104);吉林省自然科学基金项目(20240101055JC)

Scissor-Like Closure Process of the Eastern Paleo-Asian Ocean: Constraints from Spatial Variation of the Triassic Crustal Thicknesses in the Eastern Segment of Northern Margin of North China Craton and Adjacent Regions

Wang Fei1, Long Xinyu1, Tang Jie1, Guo Peng2, Xu Wenliang1, 3   

  1. 1. College of Earth Sciences, Jilin University, Changchun 130061, China
    2. Laoshan Laboratory, Qingdao 266000, Shandong,China
    3. Key Laboratory of Mineral Resources Evaluation in Northeast Asia (Jilin University), Ministry of Natural and Resources, 
    Changchun 130061, China
  • Received:2025-10-02 Online:2026-01-26 Published:2026-02-09
  • Supported by:
    the National Science and Technology Major Project (2024ZD1001104) and the Natural Science Foundation of Jilin Province (20240101055JC)

摘要: 古亚洲洋的构造演化对东亚大陆的形成与演化具有决定性意义,深刻影响了中亚造山带的岩浆活动、地层发育和构造格局。然而,古亚洲洋东段最终闭合的时间一直存在争议。本文利用机器学习估算了华北克拉通北缘东段及邻区三叠纪的地壳厚度,为古亚洲洋的最终闭合方式和时间提供了新的约束。研究表明:早—中三叠世,华北克拉通北缘东段及邻区平均地壳厚度在吉林四平地区达到约66 km的最大值,且产出同时代的埃达克质岩石,向东地壳厚度整体呈现降低的趋势,岩石组合以钙碱性中酸性侵入岩为主,表明该时期古亚洲洋在吉林四平地区发生了闭合,导致地壳增厚,同时造成早三叠世地层的缺失,而东端延边地区的古亚洲洋尚未闭合,地壳厚度接近正常大陆地壳厚;晚三叠世,华北克拉通北缘东段及邻区自西向东地壳逐渐增厚,在吉林延边地区达到66 km的最大厚度,伴生同期埃达克质岩石的产出,而辽西—吉林四平地区地壳厚度较早—中三叠世发生减薄,且发育晚三叠世双峰式火成岩组合,指示晚三叠世古亚洲洋在延边地区最终完成闭合,同时西侧已闭合位置由碰撞挤压环境逐渐转变为碰撞后伸展环境。华北克拉通北缘东段及邻区三叠纪地壳厚度的空间变化,结合区域火成岩的岩石组合特征,进一步印证了古亚洲洋自西向东的剪刀式闭合过程,最终闭合发生在晚三叠世。

关键词: 华北克拉通北缘东段及邻区, 古亚洲洋, 三叠纪, 地壳厚度, 中亚造山带, 机器学习

Abstract: The tectonic evolution of the Paleo-Asian Ocean exerted a decisive control on the formation and evolution of the East Asian continent, profoundly influenced magmatic activity, stratigraphic development, and tectonic frameworks within the Central Asian orogenic belt. However, the final closure timing of its eastern segment remains controversial. This study applies machine learning techniques to reconstruct Triassic crustal thickness variations along the eastern segment of the northern margin of the North China craton and adjacent regions, thereby providing new constraints on the mechanism and timing of the final closure of the Paleo-Asian Ocean. During the Early-Middle Triassic, average crustal thickness reached its maximum of approximately 66 km in the Siping area of Jilin Province, a region concurrent with adakitic magmatism. Crustal thickness generally decreased eastward, where the lithological assemblage is dominated by calc-alkaline intermediate-acidic intrusive rocks. These findings suggest that the Paleo-Asian Ocean underwent closed first in the Siping area of Jilin Province in the Early-Middle Triassic, triggering pronounced crustal thickening. In contrast, the easternmost Yanbian area remained an active tectonic seaway, evidenced by crustal thickness comparable to that of normal continental crust. During the Late Triassic, the eastern segment of the northern margin of the North China craton and adjacent regions exhibited an eastward-increasing crustal thickening trend, reaching a maximum thickness of 66 km in the Yanbian area of Jilin Province, again accompanied by synchronous adakitic rocks. Meanwhile, regions like western Liaoning Province and central Jilin Province, which had thickened earlier, now experienced significant crustal thinning accompanied by the emplacement of Late Triassic bimodal igneous rocks. These observations indicate that final closure of the Paleo-Asian Ocean occurred in the Yanbian area during the Late Triassic, while the previously closed western segments transitioned from a collisional-compressional to a post-collisional extensional environment. The systematic spatial-temporal variations in Triassic crustal thickness, integrated with contemporaneous igneous rock assemblages, further confirm a scissor-like west-to-east diachronous closure model for the eastern segment of the Paleo-Asian Ocean, culminating in the Late Triassic.

Key words: eastern segment of the northern margin of the North China craton and adjacent regions, Paleo-Asian Ocean, Triassic, crustal thickness, Central Asian orogenic belt, machine learning

中图分类号: 

  • P548
[1] 高心如, 梁琛岳, 郑常青, 刘永江, 周建波, 宋志伟, 贾祥鹤, 殷浚哲, 洪雨萱, 谭卓, 张佳琦. 蒙古—鄂霍茨克构造域东段晚中生代演化历史——来自岩浆岩和沉积岩的证据[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2026, 56(1): 36-65.
[2] 谭晓淼, 周建波, 饶莹, 王海燕, 侯贺晟, 李明芮, 高锐. 中亚造山带中南部索伦缝合带岩石圈结构及其对古亚洲洋演化的制约[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2026, 56(1): 209-218.
[3] 李功宇, 周建波, 辛中华, 陈卓, 王红燕, 孙宁辰. 佳木斯-兴凯地块的演化历史及其对古大洋构造体制转换的制约[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2026, 56(1): 17-35.
[4] 辛中华, 周建波, 李功宇, 陈卓, 王红燕, 孙宁辰. 吉黑高压带岩石圈结构——大地电磁测深与深地震反射数据联合约束[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2026, 56(1): 199-208.
[5] 张佳琦, 王志新, 梁琛岳, 郑常青, 刘永江. 吉中地区范家屯组变沉积岩碎屑锆石年代学与Hf同位素示踪——对古亚洲洋东段闭合的约束[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2026, 56(1): 149-172.
[6] 韩杰, 周建波, 姜鹤. 古亚洲洋最终缝合带: 索伦克尔—突泉蛇绿岩带的组成与意义[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2026, 56(1): 89-100.
[7] 韩复兴, 刘水源, 高正辉, 韩江涛, 张涛, 尚浩. 基于机器学习的微动HVSR数据干扰信号压制方法[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2025, 55(6): 2153-2163.
[8] 杨兰, 王运, 邹勇军, 胡宝群, 李满根, 张安, 朱满怀. 基于机器学习的富硒土壤预测模型的构建与比较——以江西省信丰县油山地区为例[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2025, 55(5): 1629-1643.
[9] 曹志民, 张丽, 郑兵, 韩建. 基于SMOTE平衡数据的极端随机树岩性识别[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2025, 55(4): 1372-1386.
[10] 孙铭徽, 李向雨, 刘锦, 张洪祥, 董亚超, 张媛竹卉, 刘芸秀. 华北克拉通辽东半岛晚三叠世林家沟岩体的成因及构造意义[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2025, 55(3): 826-842.
[11] 曹志民, 丁璐, 韩建, 郝乐川, .

基于集成机器学习的测井曲线大尺度差异超分辨 [J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2025, 55(2): 670-685.

[12] 吕华星, 陈兆明, 张振波, 姜大朋, 李克成, 郭伟. 机器学习高分辨融合反演在地层对比中的应用——以珠江口盆地开平凹陷开平A构造带为例[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2025, 55(1): 289-297.
[13] 关子成, 裴福萍, 魏敬洋, 李鹏屹. 吉林敦化地区万宝岩组碎屑锆石U-Pb-Hf同位素组成:对区域构造演化的制约[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2024, 54(4): 1279-1279.
[14] 王新领, 祝新益, 张宏兵, 孙博, 许可欣.

基于随机树嵌入的随钻测井岩性识别方法 [J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2024, 54(2): 701-708.

[15] 王振亮, 赵克强, 杨剑洲, 邓友茂, 付燕刚, 段壮, 林鲁军, 左光明. 内蒙古架子山地区晚石炭世二长花岗岩成因及其地质意义[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2023, 53(3): 984-1000.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!