J4

• 纪念专栏 • 上一篇    下一篇

滇西哀牢山构造带:结构与演化

刘俊来1|唐渊1,2|宋志杰1|Tran My Dung1,3|翟云峰1,4|吴文彬1|陈文5   

  1. 1.中国地质大学地质过程与矿产资源国家重点实验室|北京100083;2.成都地质矿产研究所|成都610081;3.越南河内矿业与地质大学|越南 河内100803;4.中国石油吉林油田公司勘探开发研究院, 吉林 松原138001;5.中国地质科学院地质研究所|北京100037
  • 收稿日期:2011-07-10 出版日期:2011-09-26 发布日期:2011-09-26
  • 作者简介:刘俊来(1960-)|男|天津静海人|教授|博士生导师|主要从事构造地质学与区域构造学方面的研究|E-mail:jliu@cugb.edu.cn
  • 基金资助:

    国家“973”计划项目 (2009CB421001);国土资源部公益性行业科研专项经费项目 (200811008,201011027-1);中国地质调查局项目(1212010661311)

The Ailaoshan Belt in Western Yunnan:Tectonic Framework and Tectonic Evolution

LIU Jun-lai1, TANG Yuan1,2, SONG Zhi-jie1, TRAN My Dung1,3, ZHAI Yun-feng1,4, WU Wen-bin1, CHEN Wen5   

  1. 1.State Key Laboratory of Geological Processes and Mineral Resources, China University of Geosciences, Beijing100083, China;
    2.Chengdu Institute of Geology and Mineral Resources, Chengdu610081, China;
    3.Hanoi University of Mining and Geology, Hanoi100803, Vietnam;
    4.Exploration &|Development Research Institute,Jilin Oil Field Company, PetroChina, Songyuan138000, Jilin|China;
    5.Institute of Geology, Chinese Academy of Geological Sciences, Beijing100037, China
  • Received:2011-07-10 Online:2011-09-26 Published:2011-09-26

摘要:

哀牢山构造带是藏东(东南亚)地区的一条重要线性构造,它分隔了扬子-华南地块与印支地块,并保存了多阶段复杂大地构造演化的记录。哀牢山构造带内由东向西依次发育了晚太古代-新元古代深变质岩系、新生代构造-岩浆活动带(剪切带)、金平-沱江晚二叠-早三叠世裂谷带残余和哀牢山早石炭世-早三叠世混杂岩带。具有不同特点的地质单元间被以新生代为主发育的断裂构造所间隔;而不同时期异地就位或混合岩化成因的花岗质岩石在构造带中普遍存在。哀牢山构造带在不同地质历史阶段具有多重大地构造属性,总体上经历了3个重要大地构造演化阶段:前特提斯演化、特提斯演化和新生代陆内演化阶段。前特提斯演化时期,主体部分(尤其是其东部带)具有亲扬子地块的属性,保留了自晚太古代到新元古代地壳演化的记录。一直到早古生代时期,哀牢山构造带的大地构造属性与扬子-华南地区依然具有密切的亲缘关系。自晚古生代-早中生代时期古特提斯洋打开之后,该带与华南-扬子板块之间分化成2个属性不同的构造域,始于早石炭世打开的哀牢山洋与始于早二叠世打开的金平-沱江洋依次消亡。特提斯洋的闭合,一方面形成了古哀牢山造山带,同时使得扬子-华南地块与印支地块回复到一个统一的陆内环境中;印度-欧亚板块之间的交互作用,对这一地区有着深刻的影响,相继形成了早新生代哀牢山造山带、晚渐新世-早中新世造山后区域性伸展与高钾碱性岩浆活动性和晚渐新世-早中新世印支地块的大规模南东向逃逸、哀牢山大型左行走滑剪切作用及伴生的钙碱性岩浆活动性。

关键词: 哀牢山, 特提斯, 印度-欧亚板块碰撞, 走滑剪切带, 大地构造演化, 构造

Abstract:

The Ailaoshan tectonic zone is the most significant lineament in the eastern Tibet (Southeast Asia), which separates the Yangtze-South China and the Indochina blocks. Information on multi-stage complex tectonic evolution is preserved in the rocks in the tectonic zone. Late Archean-Neoproterozoic high grade metamorphic rock series, Cenozoic tectono-magmatic assemblages (shearing deformation structures), Late Permian-Early Triassic Jinping-Song Da rifting rock sequences and Early Carboniferous-Early Triassic Ailaoshan tectonic mélange were well developed from east to west along the Ailaoshan tectonic zone. The various tectonic units of different characteristics are separated by fault structures mainly developed in Cenozoic. Granitic intrusions of various stages which were formed due to allochthonous emplacement or mingmatization are widespread along the tectonic belt.The Ailaoshan tectonic belt has multiple tectonic natures during different geologic history stages. On the whole, it has experienced three important tectonic stages, i.e. Pre-tethys, Tethys, and Cenozoic intracontinental stages. During the Pre-tethys evolution until Early Paleozoic, the major part of the belt (especially along the eastern zone) had affinity to the Yangtze block, and preserved records of Late Archean-Neoproterozoic crustal evolution. Since the Late Paleozoic-Early Mesozoic the tectonic belt became a part of the Tethyan domain with the opening of Paleotethys. The belt was evolved into a tectonic domain with different nature from that of the South China-Yangtze plate. Subsequent closure of the Ailaoshan Ocean in from Early Carboniferous and the Jinping-Song Da Ocean since Early Permian resulted in the formation of the paleo-Ailaoshan orogenic belt. The closure of the Tethyan oceans made Yangtze-South China block and Indochina block to become a unified continent. Interaction between the Indian and the Eurasian plates had a sound influence on the Ailaoshan belt. There are Early Cenozoic (Paleocene to Early Oligocene) orogenic contraction, Late Oligocence-Early Miocene post-orogenic extension and high-potassium alkaline magmatic activity, and Late Oligocence-Early Miocene large-scale southeasternward extrusion of the Indochina block, and large-scale left-lateral strike-slips shearing coeval calc-alkaline magmatic activities.

Key words: Ailaoshan, Tethys, Indian-Eurasian plate collision, strike-slip shear zone, tectonic evolution, tectonic

中图分类号: 

  • P542.4
[1] 牟敦山, 付广, 陈雪晴. 南堡1号构造馆三段断盖配置油气渗漏部位及其控藏作用[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2018, 48(4): 1008-1017.
[2] 宋明春, 李杰, 李世勇, 丁正江, 谭现锋, 张照录, 王世进. 鲁东晚中生代热隆-伸展构造及其动力学背景[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2018, 48(4): 941-964.
[3] 刘明忱, 孙建国, 韩复兴, 孙章庆, 孙辉, 刘志强. 基于自适应加权广义逆矢量方向滤波估计地震同相轴倾角[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2018, 48(3): 881-889.
[4] 姚刚, 董向欣, 李丽丽, 马国庆, 孟令顺. 东海陆架盆地构造划分的高精度重磁解释技术[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2018, 48(2): 517-524.
[5] 李昂, 鞠林波, 张丽艳. 塔里木盆地古城低凸起古-中生界构造演化特征与油气成藏关系[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2018, 48(2): 545-555.
[6] 尹业长, 郝立波, 赵玉岩, 石厚礼, 田午, 张豫华, 陆继龙. 冀东高家店和蛇盘兔花岗岩体:年代学、地球化学及地质意义[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2018, 48(2): 574-586.
[7] 朱晓颖, 杨海, 匡星涛, 彭巍巍, 张洪瑞. 新疆东昆仑-阿尔金地区航磁反映的断裂构造特征[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2018, 48(2): 461-473.
[8] 孟恩, 王朝阳, 刘超辉, 施建荣, 李艳广. 辽东半岛东南部南辽河群变质火山岩的时代、成因及其对区域构造演化的制约[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2017, 47(6): 1589-1619.
[9] 展铭望, 付广, 仇翠莹, 杨在增. 一种新的断裂破坏泥岩盖层程度的综合研究方法[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2017, 47(6): 1687-1694.
[10] 阮大为, 李顺达, 毕亚强, 刘兴宇, 陈旭虎, 王兴源, 王可勇. 内蒙古阿尔哈达铅锌矿床构造控矿规律及深部成矿预测[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2017, 47(6): 1705-1716.
[11] 谭洪旗, 刘玉平. 滇东南猛洞岩群斜长角闪岩成因及其构造意义[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2017, 47(6): 1763-1783.
[12] 王孔伟, 常德龙, 李春波, 胡安龙, 魏东. 再论“滑坡群”——以三峡库区为例[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2017, 47(5): 1491-1501.
[13] 张博为, 付广, 张居和, 胡明, 刘峻桥, 王浩然. 油源断裂转换带裂缝发育及其对油气控制作用——以冀中坳陷文安斜坡议论堡地区沙二段为例[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2017, 47(2): 370-381.
[14] 高翔, 刘志宏, 聂志阳, 姚勇, 贾卧, 王超, 宋健. 松辽盆地大庆长垣形成时间的厘定及其地质意义[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2017, 47(1): 74-83.
[15] 刘敬寿, 戴俊生, 徐珂, 张艺, 丁文龙. 构造裂缝产状演化规律表征方法及其应用[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2017, 47(1): 84-94.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!