J4 ›› 2012, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (1): 92-103.

• 地质与资源 • 上一篇    下一篇

陕南铜厂铜矿床成矿物质来源探讨

叶霖1|2|杨玉龙1|2| 高伟1|2|刘铁庚1   

  1. 1.中国科学院地球化学研究所矿床地球化学国家重点实验室|贵阳550002;
    2.中国科学院研究生院|北京100039
  • 收稿日期:2011-05-02 出版日期:2012-01-26 发布日期:2012-01-26
  • 作者简介:叶霖(1970-)|男|副研究员|主要从事矿床地球化学研究|Tel:0851-5895591|E-mail:yelin@vip.gyig.ac.cn
  • 基金资助:

    国家自然科学基金项目(40873038);国家“973”计划项目(2006CB403508)

Source of Ore-Forming Materials of Tongchang Copper Ore Deposit in Southern Shaanxi Province, China

YE Lin1|YANG Yu-long1|2|GAO Wei1|2|LIU Tie-geng1   

  1. 1.State Key Laboratory of Ore Deposit Geochemistry, Institute of Geochemistry, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Guiyang550002, China;
    2.Graduate School of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing100039, China
  • Received:2011-05-02 Online:2012-01-26 Published:2012-01-26

摘要:

陕南铜厂铜矿床是“勉-略-宁”矿集区内最具代表性的铜矿床,通过黄铜矿等单矿物及矿区地质体的微量与稀土元素地球化学对比研究发现:1)黄铜矿以富Ni、Zn和贫Co为特征,与晚元古代郭家沟组细碧岩类似,较闪长岩和钠长岩不同;矿床中存在轻稀土富集和稀土配分模式相对平坦两类黄铜矿,岩体内外接触带黄铁矿Co/Ni值差异表明其成矿物质具多源性;由矿区各地质体成矿元素背景可见,矿床成矿物质来源应以细碧岩为主、闪长岩为辅。2)黄铜矿Eu负异常明显,其δEu值明显低于闪长岩和细碧岩,这与成矿过程中富挥发分流体所形成云英岩化、钠长石化造成的Eu亏损有关,且黄铜矿Y/Ho值与钠长岩较为相似,暗示铜矿化与钠质交代作用关系密切。3)黄铜矿Co、Ni含量一般大于黄铁矿几倍到几十倍,与矽卡岩、斑岩、火山-次火山热液及火山-喷气型铜矿中黄铜矿差异明显,而与铜镍硫化物型矿床中黄铜矿类似,这可能与成矿作用继承了富Ni源区有关。该矿床成矿模式为:海西期,伴随着勉略洋盆闭合俯冲-碰撞形成勉略宁地区韧-脆性逆冲推覆构造、走滑断层,在区域变质流体与天水混合形成富碱和CO2的混合热液作用下,使地层-细碧岩和部分闪长岩中Cu等成矿物质大量析出,形成低温、低盐度成矿热液,沿矿区发育EW向与NE 向两组韧性走滑断裂充填沉淀成矿。

关键词: 勉略宁地区, 铜厂, 铜矿床, 微量元素, 成矿物质来源, 矿床成因

Abstract:

The Tongchang deposit is the most typical copper deposit in Mianxian-Lueyang-Ningqiang (Mian-Lue-Ning) area in southern Shaanxi, China. By studying on trace elements and REEs geochemistry of chalcopyrite (pyrite) as well as geological bodies in the deposit, we can draw some conclusions as followings. Firstly, the chalcopyrite is characterized by enrichment of Ni and Zn, depletion of Co, which is similar to the spilite of Late Proterozoic Guojiagou Formaion, while different from diorite and albite rocks in the mine. There are two kinds of chalcopyrites with different REE patterns, one is enriched in LREE and the other has relatively flat REE pattern. The pyrite grains hosted in internal and external contact zones of the diorite intrusion have different Co/Ni ratios, suggesting multiple sources of ore-forming materials. Analyzing on the background values of those oreforming elements in various geological bodies indicates that ore-forming material is mainly from the spilite and minor from the diorite. Secondly, the chalcopyrite is characterized by obvious negative Eu anomalies and its δEu value is much lower than those of the diorite and spilite. The depletion of Eu is likely related to greisenization and albitization caused by volatile fluids during mineralization. Furthermore, Y/Ho ratios of the chalcopyrite are similar to those of albite rocks, implying the close relationship between copper mineralization and Na replacement. Thirdly, due to the inheritance of the trace elements feature from source of ore-forming mineralizing materials, the Ni and Co content in the chalcopyrite is n-n×10 times than in the pyrite, corresponding to that in Cu-Ni sulfide type deposit and different from that in skarn-type, porphyry-type, volcanic-subvolcanic hydrothermal type as well as VMS Cu deposit. The metallogenic model of Tongchang copper deposit can be listed as following. During the Hercynian period, with the closure, subduction and collision of Mian-Lue ancient oceanic basin, the dutile-brittle thrusting nappe structure and strike-slip fault were formed in Mian-Lue-Ning area. The metasomatism of mixed hydrothermal by regional metamorphic fluid and rainwater, which rich in Na+, K+ and CO2, resulted in the translation of ore-forming materials (e.g. Cu and Ni) from strata of Guojiagou Group and spilite (and diorite) to form the metallogenic hydrothermal fluid. The hydrothermal fluid was characterized by low temperature and salinity, and enriched in ore-forming materials. The Tongchang deposit was resulted from filling and metasomatism of the hydrothermal fluid in the EW-and NE-trending dutile strike-slip faults in this area.

Key words: Mian-Lue-Ning area, Tongchang, copper deposits, trace elements, source of ore-forming materials, ore genesis

中图分类号: 

  • P618.41
[1] 李向文, 张志国, 王可勇, 孙加鹏, 杨吉波, 杨贺. 大兴安岭北段宝兴沟金矿床成矿流体特征及矿床成因[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2018, 48(4): 1071-1084.
[2] 伍登浩, 高顺宝, 郑有业, 田坎, 张永超, 姜军胜, 余泽章, 黄鹏程. 西藏班公湖—怒江成矿带南侧矽卡岩型铜多金属矿床S、Pb同位素组成及成矿物质来源[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2018, 48(1): 70-86.
[3] 叶霖, 刘玉平, 张乾, 鲍谈, 何芳, 王小娟, 王大鹏, 蓝江波. 云南都龙超大型锡锌多金属矿床中闪锌矿微量及稀土元素地球化学特征[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2017, 47(3): 734-750.
[4] 张锦让, 温汉捷, 邹志超. 滇西北兰坪盆地金满脉状铜矿床成矿流体特征及其成矿意义[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2017, 47(3): 706-718.
[5] 郝立波, 赵昕, 赵玉岩. 辽宁白云金矿床稳定同位素地球化学特征及矿床成因[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2017, 47(2): 442-451.
[6] 曹建劲, 李映葵, 刘昶, 袁雪玲. 贵州关岭丙坝铜矿床地气微粒特征[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2017, 47(1): 95-105.
[7] 王力, 孙丽伟. 山东省寺庄金矿床成矿流体特征[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2016, 46(6): 1697-1710.
[8] 王晰, 段明新, 任云生, 侯召硕, 孙德有, 郝宇杰. 内蒙古额尔古纳地区八大关铜钼矿床流体包裹体特征与成矿时代[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2016, 46(5): 1354-1367.
[9] 刘云华, 李真, 莫宣学, 黄玉, 李云涛, 韩一筱. 西天山卡特巴阿苏矽卡岩型-破碎带蚀变岩型金铜矿床地质特征[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2016, 46(5): 1368-1382.
[10] 温志良, 姜福平, 钟长林, 姜雪飞, 王果谦, 齐岩. 松辽盆地东南隆起超大型油页岩矿床特征及成因[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2016, 46(3): 681-691.
[11] 吴海枝, 韩润生, 吴鹏. 楚雄盆地六苴砂岩型铜矿床成矿流体性质及演化[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2016, 46(2): 398-411.
[12] 曾令高, 张均, 孙腾, 李斌, 朱光辉, 贾子超, 方权, 陈庚户. 峨眉山大火成岩省烂纸厂铁矿床地质特征、成因及其找矿勘查启示[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2016, 46(2): 412-424.
[13] 韩润生, 李波, 倪培, 邱文龙, 王旭东, 王天刚. 闪锌矿流体包裹体显微红外测温及其矿床成因意义——以云南会泽超大型富锗银铅锌矿床为例[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2016, 46(1): 91-104.
[14] 王承洋, 王可勇, 周向斌, 李文, 黄广环, 李剑锋, 张雪冰, 于琪. 内蒙古东山湾钨钼多金属矿床成矿流体地球化学特征及成因[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2015, 45(3): 759-771.
[15] 王力,潘忠翠,孙丽伟. 山东莱州新城金矿床流体包裹体[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2014, 44(4): 1166-1176.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!