吉林大学学报(地球科学版) ›› 2016, Vol. 46 ›› Issue (2): 358-367.doi: 10.13278/j.cnki.jjuese.201602105

• 地质与资源 • 上一篇    下一篇

鄂尔多斯盆地南部延长组长9段页岩气资源潜力评价

杜治利1,2, 田亚2, 刘洪军3, 王凤琴3, 杜小弟2, 袁远2, 仝立华2   

  1. 1. 中国石油大学(北京)地球科学学院, 北京 102249;
    2. 中国地质调查局油气资源调查中心, 北京 100029;
    3. 西安石油大学地球科学与工程学院, 西安 710065
  • 收稿日期:2015-08-09 发布日期:2016-03-26
  • 作者简介:杜治利(1979-),男,高级工程师,博士,主要从事油气资源选区研究工作,E-mail:du.zhili@qq.com
  • 基金资助:

    国土资源部全国油气资源战略选区调查与评价项目(1211302108023)

Shale Gas Resource Potential Evaluation of Chang 9 Member, Fm. Yanchang in South Ordos Basin

Du Zhili1,2, Tian Ya2, Liu Hongjun3, Wang Fengqin3, Du Xiaodi2, Yuan Yuan2, Tong Lihua2   

  1. 1. College of Geosciences, China University of Petroleum, Beijing 102249, China;
    2. Oil & Gas Survey, China Geological Survey, Beijing 100029, China;
    3. College of Earth Sciences and Engineering, Xi'an Shiyou University, Xi'an 710065, China
  • Received:2015-08-09 Published:2016-03-26
  • Supported by:

    Support by the Project of National Oil and Gas Resources Survey and Strategic Selections,Ministry of Land and Resources (1211302108023)

摘要:

鄂尔多斯盆地南部延长组长9段为长7段之外另一套富含页岩气层段,然而其资源潜力长期未被重视。通过黄探1井的钻探在长9段发现了高含气量的页岩层段,初步证实了其资源潜力。本文利用黄探1井钻探成果并结合大量邻区钻井资料,对鄂尔多斯盆地南部长9段泥页岩发育特点、有机质丰度、有机质类型、热演化成熟度、岩矿特征、储层物性及含气性等方面开展研究,对其页岩气资源潜力进行了评价。总体认为:长9段沉积时期半深湖-深湖相发育,为油页岩形成提供了良好的沉积条件;长9段总有机碳(TOC)平均质量分数3.98%,有机质丰度高,以偏腐殖Ⅱ2型混合有机质为主,处于高成熟演化阶段;页岩储层孔隙度与渗透率均较低,成岩矿物以石英和长石体积分数较高。鄂尔多斯盆地东南部延长组长9段页岩气平均含气量高达2.92 m3/t,是鄂尔多斯盆地下一步页岩气勘探开发的有利方向。

关键词: 页岩气, 资源潜力, 延长组, 长9段, 鄂尔多斯盆地南部

Abstract:

Besides Chang 7 Member, Chang 9 Member is the other important shale gas horizon however its resource potential is unknown. The shale layer with high gas content was found in Chang 9 Member of Well Huangtan-1, whose resource potential is preliminarily confirmed.Based on the drilling results of the well Huangtan-1, and combined with the data of adjacent wells, the development feature, organic matter abundance, organic type, thermal maturity, mineral and petrophysic characteristics, and gas content of shale, the shale gas potential of the study area is preliminarily analyzed. The deep and semi-deep lacustrine facies are deposited during Chang 9 Member deposition period. The total organic content (TOC) of Chang 9 Member is as high as 3.98%, with humic Ⅱ2 organic type, at the high-mature gas-prone stage. The mineral composition is mainly quartz and feldspar. The average gas content is 2.92 m3/t, which shows the great gas generation potential of Chang 9 Member in south Ordos basin.

Key words: shale gas, potential evaluation, Yanchang Formation, Chang 9 Member, south Ordos basin

中图分类号: 

  • P618.12

[1] 何自新. 鄂尔多斯盆地演化与油气[M]. 北京:石油工业出版社, 2003. He Zixin. Evolution and Petroleum of Ordos Basin[M]. Beijing:Petroleum Industry Press, 2003.

[2] 杨俊杰. 鄂尔多斯盆地构造演化与油气分布规律[M]. 北京:石油工业出版社, 2002. Yang Junjie. Structural Evolution and Hydrocarbon Distribution in Ordos Basin[M]. Beijing:Petroleum Industry Press, 2002.

[3] 倪新锋, 陈洪德, 韦东晓. 鄂尔多斯盆地三叠系延长组层序地层格架与油气勘探[J]. 中国地质, 2007, 34(1):73-80. Ni Xinfeng, Cheng Hongde, Wei Dongxiao. Sequence Stratigraphic Framework of the Triassic Tanchang Formation in Ordos Basin and Petroleum Exploratiom[J]. Geology in China, 2007, 34(1):73-80.

[4] 白云来, 马龙, 吴武军, 等. 鄂尔多斯盆地油页岩的主要地质特征及资源潜力[J]. 中国地质,2009,36(5):1123-1137. Bai Yunlai, Ma Long, Wu Wujun, et al. Geological Characteristics and Resource Potential of Oil Shale in Ordos Basin[J]. Geology in China, 2009, 36(5):1123-1137.

[5] 徐士林, 包书景. 鄂尔多斯盆地三叠系延长组页岩气形成条件及有利发育区预测[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2009, 20(3):460-465. Xu Shilin, Bao Shujing. Preliminary Analysis of Shale Gas Resource Potential and Favorable Areas in Ordos Basin[J]. Natural Gas Geoscience, 2009, 20(3):460-465.

[6] 邹才能, 董大忠, 王社教, 等. 中国页岩气形成机理、地质特征及资源潜力[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2010, 37(6):641-653. Zou Caineng, Dong Dazhong, Wang Shejiao, et al. Geological Characteristics Formation Mechanism and Resource Potential of Shale Gas in China[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2010,37(6):641-653.

[7] 雷宇, 王凤琴, 刘洪军, 等. 鄂尔多斯盆地中生界页岩气成藏地质条件[J]. 油气田开发, 2011, 29(6):49-54. Lei Yu, Wang Fengqin, Liu Hongjun, et al. Geological Conditions for Shale Gas Accumulation in Ordos Basin Mesozoic[J]. Oil Gas Field Development, 2011, 29(6):49-54.

[8] 刘岩, 周文, 邓虎成.鄂尔多斯盆地上三叠统延长组含气页岩地质特征及资源评价[J].天然气工业,2013, 33(3):19-23. Liu Yan, Zhou Wen, Deng Hucheng. Geological Characteristics of Gas-Bearing Shales in the Yanchang Formation and Its Resource Assessment in the Ordos Basin[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2013, 33(3):19-23.

[9] 黄第藩, 李晋超, 张大江. 干酪根的类型及其分类参数的有效性、局限性和相关性[J]. 沉积学报, 1984, 2(3):18-35. Huang Difan, Li Jinchao, Zhang Dajiang. Kerogen Types and Study on Effectiveness, Limitation and Interrelation of Their Identification Parameters[J]. Acta Sedimentologica Sinica, 1984, 2(3):18-35.

[10] 王铁冠,钟宁宁,熊波, 等. 源岩生烃潜力的有机岩石学评价方法[J]. 石油学报, 1994, 15(4):9-16. Wang Tieguan, Zhong Ningning, Xiong Bo, et al. Organic Petrologic Methodology for Evaluation of Hydrocarbon Generation Potential in Source Rocks[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica,1994,15(4):9-16.

[11] 霍秋立, 曾花森, 付丽, 等. ΔlgR测井源岩评价方法的改进及其在松辽盆地的应用[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2011, 41(2):586-591. Huo Qiuli, Zeng Huasen, Fu Li, et al. The Advance of ΔlgR Method and Its Application in Songliao Basin[J]. Journal of Jilin University(Earth Science Edition), 2011, 41(2):586-591.

[12] 杨涛涛, 范国章, 吕福亮, 等. 烃源岩测井响应特征及识别评价方法[J].天然气地球科学,2013, 24(2):414-422. Yang Taotao, Fan Guozhang, Lü Fuliang, et al. The Logging Features and Identification Methods of Source Rock[J]. Natural Gas Geoscience, 2013,24(2):414-422.

[13] Montgomery S L, Jarvie D M, Bowker K A, et al. Mississippian Barnett Shale, Fort Worth Basin, North-Central Texas:Gas-Shale Play With Multi-Trillion Cubic Foot Potential[J]. AAPG Bulletin, 2005, 89(2):155-175.

[14] Pollastro R M, Jarvie D M, Hill R J, et al. Geologic Framework of the Mississippian Barnett Shale, Barnett-Paleozoic Total Petroleum System, Bend Arch-Fort Worth Basin, Texas[J]. AAPG Bulletin, 2007, 91(4):405-436.

[15] 蒋裕强, 董大忠, 漆麟, 等. 页岩气储层的基本特征及其评价[J].天然气工业, 2010, 30(10):7-12. Jiang Yuqiang, Dong Dazhong, Qi Lin. et al. Basic Feature and Evaluation of Shale Gas Reservoirs[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2010, 30(10):7-12.

[16] 周进高, 姚根顺, 邓红婴, 等. 鄂尔多斯盆地延长组长9油层组勘探潜力分析[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2008, 35(3):289-293. Zhou Jingao, Yao Genshun, Deng Hongying, et al. Exploration Potential of Chang 9 Member, Yanchang Formation, Ordos Basin[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2008, 35(3):289-293.

[1] 王玉霞, 周立发, 焦尊生, 尚庆华, 黄生旺. 鄂尔多斯盆地陕北地区延长组致密砂岩储层敏感性评价[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2018, 48(4): 981-990.
[2] 冯小龙, 敖卫华, 唐玄. 陆相页岩气储层孔隙发育特征及其主控因素分析:以鄂尔多斯盆地长7段为例[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2018, 48(3): 678-692.
[3] 唐文龙, 孙宏伟, 刘晓阳, 王杰, 左立波, 吴兴源. 中南部非洲镍矿成矿规律及资源潜力分析[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2018, 48(1): 53-69.
[4] 徐宏杰, 胡宝林, 郑建斌, 刘会虎, 张文永, 郑凯歌. 淮南煤田煤系页岩气储集空间特征及其岩相控制作用[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2017, 47(2): 418-430.
[5] 邹友琴, 刘莉, 李宏卿, 颜春, 曾马荪, 兰盈盈. 水文地质条件对页岩气开采控制[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2016, 46(3): 824-830.
[6] 张延军, 余海, 李建明, 于子望, 张佳宁. 深部水热型地热潜力区的GIS预测模型——以土耳其西安纳托利亚地区为例[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2016, 46(3): 855-864.
[7] 谭聪, 于炳松, 阮壮, 刘策, 朱玺, 谢灏辰, 罗忠. 鄂尔多斯盆地西南部延长组高分辨率层序地层划分[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2016, 46(2): 336-347.
[8] 姚泾利, 赵彦德, 邓秀芹, 郭正权, 罗安湘, 楚美娟. 鄂尔多斯盆地延长组致密油成藏控制因素[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2015, 45(4): 983-992.
[9] 马锋, 张光亚, 王红军, 刘祚冬, 蒋凌志, 谢寅福, 李飞, 琚亮. 全球重油与油砂资源潜力、分布与勘探方向[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2015, 45(4): 1042-1051.
[10] 郑玉龙, 陈春瑞, 王佰长, 王占国, 刘胜英, 吴相梅. 松辽盆地北部油页岩资源潜力评价[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2015, 45(3): 683-690.
[11] 刘福春,程日辉,解启来,胡望水,汤济广,李忠博,杨秀辉,徐浩,周隶华. 松辽盆地梨树断陷页岩气资源潜力评价[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2014, 44(3): 762-773.
[12] 黄传冠,刘春根,丁少辉,江俊杰,雷良城. 含矿地质体体积法在江西德兴地区铜矿资源潜力评价中的应用[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2013, 43(4): 1143-1150.
[13] 叶天竺. 矿床模型综合地质信息预测技术方法理论框架[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2013, 43(4): 1053-1072.
[14] 牛翠祎,韩先菊,卿敏. 中国金矿矿产预测评价模型及资源潜力分析[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2013, 43(4): 1210-1222.
[15] 王登红,陈毓川,徐志刚,盛继福,朱明玉,刘喜方,张长青,王成辉,王永磊. 矿产预测类型及其在矿产资源潜力评价中的运用[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2013, 43(4): 1092-1099.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!