吉林大学学报(地球科学版) ›› 2017, Vol. 47 ›› Issue (5): 1572-1581.doi: 10.13278/j.cnki.jjuese.201705305

• 地球探测与信息技术 • 上一篇    下一篇

基于Hyposat和HypoDD的山东地区地震波一维速度模型

崔鑫1,2, 李铂1, 朱元清3, 李亚军1, 穆娟1, 王峰1   

  1. 1. 山东省地震局, 济南 250014;
    2. 中国地震局地球物理研究所, 北京 100081;
    3. 上海市地震局, 上海 200062
  • 收稿日期:2017-02-07 出版日期:2017-09-26 发布日期:2017-09-26
  • 作者简介:崔鑫(1983),男,博士研究生,工程师,主要从事地震定位和时频分析研究,E-mail:xc_0071@163.com
  • 基金资助:
    中国地震局项目（161504）；山东省地震局科研基金项目（JJ1703Y）

One-Dimension Seismic Velocity Model of Shandong Province Based on Hyposat and HypoDD

Cui Xin1,2, Li Bo1, Zhu Yuanqing3, Li Yajun1, Mu Juan1, Wang Feng1   

  1. 1. Earthquake Administration of Shandong Province, Jinan 250014, China;
    2. Institute of Geophysics, CEA, Beijing 100081, China;
    3. Earthquake Administration of Shanghai Province, Shanghai 200062, China
  • Received:2017-02-07 Online:2017-09-26 Published:2017-09-26
  • Supported by:
    Supported by Project of China Earthquake Administration (161504) and Project of Shandong Earthquake Agency of Province(JJ1703Y)

PDF (PC)

641

摘要： 本文收集了2009—2016年山东地区M≥0.1的1 554次地震事件及其走时数据，对该地区地震波一维速度模型进行了研究。首先，使用走时曲线拟合、折合走时曲线分析等方法给出了山东地区地震波一维速度结构模型的初始模型以及参考变化范围；然后，精选55次震相较为丰富的地震事件，用Hyposat方法进行批量重定位，根据残差以及地球物理背景给出P波参考模型，之后对理论波速比加入合理的扰动，对所有P波和S波速度模型组合进行批量地震重定位，根据残差结果极小值获得了最优的P波和S波速度模型；最后，利用多重检验方法对最优模型进行检验，包括天然及非天然地震事件检验、3种定位水平差异检验、4种定位深度差异检验以及乳山和长岛震群的双差定位检验，最终获得了较为可靠的山东地区地震波一维速度模型：vP1=6.13 km/s，vP2=6.88 km/s，vP3=7.93 km/s，H1=22 km，H2=33 km，vS1=3.54 km/s，vS2=3.95 km/s，vS3=4.46 km/s。另外，本文发现，单纯型等非线性算法的定位结果对于速度模型依赖性较低，反之Geiger类型的线性迭代定位方法则较为依赖速度模型。

关键词: 地震, 一维速度模型, 定位, 山东

Abstract: We collected earthquakes with local magnitude above 1.0 and travel time data in Shandong area from the year 2009 to 2016, and calculated one-dimension seismic velocity model. The process mainly included three steps:1)Initial model:to fit the travel time data and analyze the reduced travel time curve, eventually to get the initial model and its span; 2) Best model:to relocate the selected events of all possible models based on Hyposat software, according to the RMS and geophysical background, to get the best model of P phase and the possible model of S phase through adding a reasonable variable to theoretical seismic velocity ratio, then to relocate events of all models according to the RMS, and finally to reveal the best model; 3) Model test:to test the best model by using the test of natural earthquake event, blast event, horizontal epicenter comparison of three location methods, depth comparison of four location methods, HypoDD epicenter comparison of Rushan and Changdao earthquake clusters, and ultimately to get the best model. The one-dimension seismic velocity model in Shandong is:vP1=6.13 km/s, vP2=6.88 km/s, vP3=7.93 km/s, H1=22 km, H2=33 km, vS1=3.54 km/s, vS2=3.95 km/s, vS3=4.46 km/s. Besides, the location accuracy of nonlinear algorithm such as simplex generally is less dependent on the seismic velocity model; whereas the linear iterative positioning method based on the Geiger algorithm is more dependent on the seismic velocity model.

Key words: earthquake, one-dimension seismic velocity model, earthquake location, Shandong

中图分类号: 

  • P631.4
[1] Dziewonski A M, Anderson D L. Preliminary Refe-rence Earth Model[J]. Physics of the Earth & Planetary Interiors, 1981, 25(4):297-356.
[2] 朱介寿, 曹家敏, 蔡学林,等. 东亚及西太平洋边缘海高分辨率面波层析成像[J]. 地球物理学报, 2002, 45(5):646-664. Zhu Jieshou, Cao Jiamin, Cai Xuelin, et al. High Resolution Surface Wave Tomography in East Asia and West Pacific Marginal Seas[J]. Chinese Journal of Geophysics, 2002, 45(5):646-664.
[3] Pan Y, Xia J, Xu Y, et al. Delineating Shallow S-Wave Velocity Structure Using Multiple Ambient-Noise Surface-Wave Methods:An Example from Western Junggar, China[J]. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 2016, 106(2):327-336.
[4] Mohanty D, Singh A, O'Driscoll J, et al. P Wave Velocity Structure Below India and Tibet Incorporating Anisotropic Delay Time Effects[J]. Geochemistry Geophysics Geosystems, 2016, 17(3):725-738.
[5] 薛林福, 李文庆, 张伟,等. 分块区域三维地质建模方法[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2014, 44(6):2051-2058. Xue Linfu, Li Wenqing, Zhang Wei, et al. A Method of Block-Divided 3D Geologic Modeling in Regional Scale[J]. Journal of Jilin University(Earth Science Edition), 2014, 44(6):2051-2058.
[6] 曾融生, 孙为国, 毛桐恩,等. 中国大陆莫霍界面深度图[J]. 地震学报, 1995(3):322-327. Zeng Rongsheng, Sun Weiguo, Mao Tong'en, et al. China Mainland Moho Boundary Depth Map[J]. Acta Seismologica Sinica, 1995(3):322-327.
[7] Watts B. Isostasy andFlexures of Lithosphere[M]. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press, 2001.
[8] Geiger L. Probability Method for the Determination of Earthquake Epicenters from Arrival Time Only[J]. Bull St Louis Univ, 1912, 8:60-71.
[9] Nelson D, John V. Earthquake Locations by 3-D Fi-nite-Difference Travel Times[J]. Bull Seism Soc Am, 1990, 80(2):395-410.
[10] Prugger F, Gendzwill J. Microearthquake Location:A Nonlinear Approach that Makes Use of a Simplex Stepping Procedure[J]. Bull Seism Soc Am, 1988, 78(2):799-815.
[11] Douglas A. Joint Epicenter Determination[J]. Na-ture, 1976, 215:45-48.
[12] Pujol J. Joint Event Location:The JHD Technique and Applications to Data from Local Seismic Networks[C]//Thurber C, Rabinowitz N. Advances in Seismic Event Location.[S. l.]:Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2000:163-204.
[13] Crosson R S. Crustal Structure Modeling of Earth-quake Data:1:Simultaneous Least Squares Estimation of Hypocenter and Velocity Parameters[J]. J Geophys Res, 1976, 81(17):3036-3046.
[14] Aki K, Lee K. Determination of Three-Dimensional Velocity Anomalies Under a Seismic Array Using First P Arrival Times from Local Earthquakes:Part 1:A Homogeneous Initial Model[J]. J Geophys Res, 1976, 81(23):4381-4399.
[15] Aki K, Christoffersson A, Eystein H. Determination of the Three-Dimensional Seismic Structure of the Lithosphere[J]. J Geophys Res, 1977, 82(2):277-296.
[16] 朱元清, 石耀霖, 李平. 一种确定地震深度的新方法[J]. 地震地磁观测与研究, 1990, 11(2):4-12. Zhu Yuanqing, Shi Yaolin, Li Ping. A New Method to Determine Earthquake Depth[J]. Seismological and Geomagnetic Observation and Research, 1990, 11(2):4-12.
[17] Thurber C H. Nonlinear Earthquake Location:Theo-ry and Examples[J]. Bull Seism Soc Am, 1985, 75(3):779-790.
[18] Billing S D, Sambridge M S, Kennet B L N. Errors in Hypocenter Location:Picking, Model, and Magnitude Dependence[J]. Bull Seism Soc Am, 1994, 84(6):1978-1990.
[19] Waldhauser F, Ellsworth W L. A Double-Difference Earthquake Location Algorithm:Method and Application to the Northern Hayward Fault, California[J]. Bull Seism Soc Am, 2000, 90 (6):1353-1368.
[20] 林怀存. 山东地区近震地震波速与地壳结构[J]. 华北地震科学, 1989(3):82-90. Lin Huaicun. Local Seismic Velocity and Crust Model of Shandong Area[J]. North China Earthquake Sciences, 1989(3):82-90.
[21] 李铂, 崔鑫, 叶庆东,等. 山东地区地震波一维速度模型研究[J]. 华北地震科学, 2012(4):1-6. Li Bo, Cui Xin, Ye Qingdong, et al. Seismic One-Dimension Velocity Model Research[J]. North China Earthquake Sciences, 2012(4):1-6.
[22] 黄建平,傅容珊, 许萍,等. 利用重力和地形观测反演中国及临区地壳厚度[J]. 地震学报,2006,28 (3):250-258. Huang Jianping, Fu Rongshan, Xu Ping, et al. Inversion of Gravity and Topography Data for the Crust Thickness of China and Its Adjacency[J]. Acta Seismologica Sinica, 2006,28 (3):250-258.
[23] 孙耀庭, 徐守余, 张世奇,等. 山东昌乐凹陷油页岩地球化学特征及成因探讨[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2015, 45(3):736-742. Sun Yaoting, Xu Shouyu, Zhang Shiqi, et al. Geochemical Characteristics and Genesis of the Oil Shale in Changle Sag of Shandong Province[J]. Journal of Jilin University(Earth Science Edition), 2015, 45(3):736-742.
[24] 王淑萍, 徐守余, 董春梅, 等. 东营凹陷民丰洼陷北带沙四下亚段深层天然气储层成岩作用[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2014, 44(6):1747-1759. Wang Shuping, Xu Shouyu, Dong Chunmei, et al. Diagenesis Characteristics of Deep Natural Gas Reservoirs in Es4x in the North Zone of Minfeng Sag in Dongying Depression[J]. Journal of Jilin University (Earth Science Edition), 2014, 44(6):1747-1759.
[25] 代杰瑞, 喻超, 张杰,等. 山东半岛蓝色经济区土壤有机碳储量及固碳潜力分析[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2014, 44(5):1659-1668. Dai Jierui, Yu Chao, Zhang Jie, et al. Analysis on Soil Organic Carbon Storage and the Potential for Carbon Sequestration in the Blue Economic Zone of Shandong Peninsula[J]. Journal of Jilin University(Earth Science Edition), 2014, 44(5):1659-1668.
[26] 黄超, 余朝华, 张桂林,等. 郯庐断裂中段新生代右行走滑位移[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2013, 43(3):820-832. Huang Chao, Yu Chaohua, Zhang Guilin, et al. Cenozoic Dextral Strike-Slip Displacement of the Middle Tan-Lu Fault Zone[J]. Journal of Jilin University(Earth Science Edition), 2013, 43(3):820-832.
[27] 邱毅, 金星, 蔡辉腾,等. 利用人工地震研究福建地壳一维速度结构[J]. 地震工程与工程振动, 2014,34(增刊1):1071-1076. Qiu Yi, Jin Xing, Cai Huiteng, et al. Fujian Crustal One-Dimension Velocity Model Using Artificial Earthquakes[J]. Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Dynamics, 2014, 34(Sup.1):1071-1076.
[28] 王小娜, 于湘伟, 章文波,等. 龙门山断裂带南段地壳一维P波速度结构[J]. 地震研究, 2015, 38(1):16-24. Wang Xiaona, Yu Xiangwei, Zhang Wenbo, et al. 1D P Wave Velocity in the South Segment of Longmenshan Fault Zone[J]. Journal of Seismological Research, 2015, 38(1):16-24.
[29] 范玉兰, 林纪曾, 胡瑞贺, 等. 华南地区近震走时表的研制[J]. 华南地震, 1990, 10(2):1-16. Fan Yulan, Lin Jizeng, Hu Ruihe, et al. The Development of Travel Time Table for Near Earthquake in South China[J]. South China Seismological Journal, 1990, 10(2):1-16.
[1] 刘一, 刘财, 刘洋, 勾福岩, 李炳秀. 复杂地震波场的自适应流预测插值方法[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2018, 48(4): 1260-1267.
[2] 刘明忱, 孙建国, 韩复兴, 孙章庆, 孙辉, 刘志强. 基于自适应加权广义逆矢量方向滤波估计地震同相轴倾角[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2018, 48(3): 881-889.
[3] 郑确, 刘财, 田有. 辽宁海城及其邻区地震b值空间分布特征[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2018, 48(3): 922-933.
[4] 刘四新, 朱怡诺, 王旭东, 宋二乔, 贺文博. 工程地震折射波解释方法研究进展[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2018, 48(2): 350-363.
[5] 徐泰然, 卢占武, 王海燕, 李洪强, 李文辉. 深地震反射剖面揭示的西藏娘热矿集区上地壳结构[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2018, 48(2): 556-565.
[6] 施有志, 柴建峰, 林树枝, 李秀芳. 地下综合管廊边界条件对地震动力响应影响数值分析[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2018, 48(1): 213-225.
[7] 安振芳, 张进, 张建中. 海洋三维VC观测系统优化设计[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2018, 48(1): 271-284.
[8] 施有志, 林树枝, 车爱兰, 惠祥宇, 冯少孔, 黄钰琳. 基于三维地震映像法的地铁盾构区间孤石勘探及其应用[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2017, 47(6): 1885-1893.
[9] 刘海燕, 刘财, 王典, 刘洋. 基于Facet模型梯度算子一致性的地震数据不连续性识别方法[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2017, 47(4): 1286-1294.
[10] 秦胜伍, 马中骏, 刘绪, 李广杰, 彭帅英, 陈骏骏, 翟健健. 基于简化Newmark模型的长白山天池火山诱发崩塌滑坡危险性评价[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2017, 47(3): 826-838.
[11] 姚振岸, 孙成禹. 含流体薄层时移地震AVA/AVF特征分析[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2017, 47(3): 884-898.
[12] 葛利华, 姜弢, 徐学纯, 贾海青, 杨志超. 辽西葫芦岛东部表层调查方法比对实验[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2017, 47(2): 616-625.
[13] 吴建光, 张平, 吕昊, 曾晓献. 基于震幅叠加的微地震事件定位在地面监测中的应用[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2017, 47(1): 255-264.
[14] 王力, 孙丽伟. 山东省寺庄金矿床成矿流体特征[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2016, 46(6): 1697-1710.
[15] 张兆辉, 刘化清, 苏明军. 基于地层切片的小尺度沉积相定量解释方法[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2016, 46(3): 893-899.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!
版权所有 © 《吉林大学学报(地球科学版)》编辑部
地址：长春市西民主大街938号(130026)　电话：+86-431-88502374；13756165364　E-mail: xuebao1956@jlu.edu.cn
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发