吉林大学学报(地球科学版) ›› 2020, Vol. 50 ›› Issue (3): 757-767.doi: 10.13278/j.cnki.jjuese.20190114

• 地质与资源 • 上一篇    

萍乐坳陷中部GFD1井页岩气富集模式

滕龙, 沈雪华, 方朝刚, 郑红军, 朱应新   

  1. 中国地质调查局南京地质调查中心, 南京 210016
  • 收稿日期:2019-05-29 发布日期:2020-05-29
  • 作者简介:滕龙(1980-),男,高级工程师,主要从事非常规油气勘探科研工作,E-mail:42105150@qq.com
  • 基金资助:
    中国地质调查局项目(DD2016-0180,DD20190083);国家重大科技专项(2016ZX05034-001-003)

Shale Gas Enrichment Model of Well GFD1 in Middle Pingle Depression, Jiangxi Province

Teng Long, Shen Xuehua, Fang Chaogang, Zheng Hongjun, Zhu Yingxin   

  1. Nanjing Center, China Geological Survey, Nanjing 210016, China
  • Received:2019-05-29 Published:2020-05-29
  • Supported by:
    Supported by Project of China Geological Survey (DD2016-0180, DD20190083) and National Science and Technology Major Project (2016ZX05034-001-003)

摘要: 为调查评价萍乐坳陷中部二叠系乐平组页岩气资源潜力,于丰城地区部署了页岩气地质调查井——GFD1井。以GFD1井的资料为基础,对乐平组富有机质页岩有机地球化学、岩石学、含气性等特征进行系统分析。结果表明:丰城地区二叠系层序完整,乐平组富有机质页岩厚度大,有机质类型以Ⅱ2-Ⅲ型为主,有机碳质量分数高,热演化程度已进入高成熟生气阶段;脆性矿物平均质量分数为34.84%,具有后期压裂改造的前提条件;随钻气测录井曲线可见两段明显异常。对岩心进行实时现场解吸,煤层气含气量普遍大于1.00 m3/t,平均达3.54 m3/t;页岩气含气量介于0.10~1.50 m3/t之间,平均为0.54 m3/t;致密砂岩气含气量一般小于0.30 m3/t。GFD1井所处的曲江向斜北翼完整,南翼被一条逆断层挤压,具有较好的封堵性,有利于页岩气保存,形成原地宽缓斜坡型页岩气富集模式。

关键词: 萍乐坳陷, 乐平组, 页岩气, 富集模式

Abstract: In order to investigate the potential of oil and gas resources of Upper Permian Leping Formation in Pingle depression, the well GFD1 was deployed to prospect shale gas, coal bed gas, and tight sandstone gas in Qujiang syncline in Fengcheng area, in central Jiangxi Province. The shale gas enrichment model was studied based on the data of drilling, organic geochemistry, petrological parameter, and gas-bearing characteristics, etc. The type of organic matter is mainly type Ⅱ2-Ⅲ. The total organic carbon (TOC) content in Wangpanli Member and Laoshan Member is sufficient with high-maturity. The average brittle mineral mass percent is 34.84%, which is prone to later fracturing. The high logging of total hydrocarbon indicates that the gas is rich in this syncline. The field desorption shows that the coal bed gas is more than 1.00 m3/t, with an average of 3.54 m3/t, the shale gas content varies between 0.10 and 1.50 m3/t, with an average of 0.54 m3/t, and the tight sandstone gas is lower than 0.30 m3/t. The structure of the north side of Qujiang syncline is normal, while the south side is a reverse fault, which is benefitial for oil and gas sealing.

Key words: Pingle depression, Leping Formation, shale gas, enrichment model

中图分类号: 

  • TE122
[1] 张金川,徐波,聂海宽,等.中国页岩气资源勘探潜力[J].天然气工业,2008,28(6):136-140. Zhang Jinchuan, Xu Bo, Nie Haikuan, et al. Exploration Potential of Shale Gas Resources in China[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2008, 28(6):136-140.
[2] Zou Caineng, Dong Dazhong, Wang Yuman, et al. Shale Gas in China:Characteristics, Challenges and Prospects:II[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2016, 43(2):182-196.
[3] 邓荣敬,徐备,张立勤,等.萍乐坳陷西部上古生界-下三叠统烃源岩评价[J].天然气工业,2005,25(3):23-28. Deng Rongjing, Xu Bei, Zhang Liqin, et al. Assessment of the Hydrocarbon Source Rocks in Upper Paleozoic-Lower Triassic in West Pingle Depression[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2005, 25(3):23-28.
[4] 许德如,王力,王智琳,等.江西萍乐凹陷构造-沉积演化的基本特征及对找煤预测的启示[J].大地构造与成矿学,2011,35(4):513-524. Xu Deru, Wang Li, Wang Zhilin, et al. Tectonic-Sedimentary Characteristics of the Ping (Pingxiang)-Le (Leping) Depression in Jiangxi Province and Its Implications on Coal Mineral Resource Prospecting[J]. Geotectonica et Metallogenia, 2011, 35(4):513-524.
[5] 张国涛,陈孝红,张保民,等.湘中邵阳凹陷二叠系龙潭组页岩含气性特征与气体成因[J].地球科学,2019,44(2):539-550. Zhang Guotao, Chen Xiaohong, Zhang Baomin, et al. Gas Bearing Characteristics and Origin Analysis of Shale Gas in Longtan Formation,Permian,Shaoyang Sag, Central Hunan[J]. Earth Science, 2019, 44(2):539-550.
[6] 梁兴,巫向阳,叶舟,等.南鄱阳盆地含油气保存单元及评价[J].天然气工业,2004,24(10):10-13,26. Liang Xing, Wu Xiangyang, Ye Zhou, et al. Hydrocarbon Bearing Preservation Unit in Marine Facies Source Rocks in South Poyang Superposition Basin and Its Evaluation[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2004, 24(10):10-13, 26.
[7] 吴小力,李荣西,李尚儒,等.下扬子地区海陆过渡相页岩气成藏条件与主控因素:以萍乐坳陷二叠系乐平组为例[J].地质科技情报,2018, 37(1):160-168. Wu Xiaoli, Li Rongxi, Li Shangru, et al. Accumulation Conditions and Main Factors of Marine-Continental Transitional Shale Gas in the Lower Yangtze Area of China:A Case of Permian Leping Formation in the Pingle Depression[J]. Geological Science and Technology Information, 2018, 37(1):160-168.
[8] 郭旭升.南方海相页岩气"二元富集"规律:四川盆地及周缘龙马溪组页岩气勘探实践认识[J].地质学报,2014,88(7):1209-1218. Guo Xusheng. Rules of Two-Factor Enrichiment for Marine Shale Gas in Southern China:Understanding from the Longmaxi Formation Shale Gas in Sichuan Basin and Its Surrounding Area[J]. Acta Geologica Sinica, 2014, 88(7):1209-1218.
[9] 金之钧,胡宗全,高波,等.川东南地区五峰组-龙马溪组页岩气富集与高产控制因素[J].地学前缘,2016,23(1):1-10. Jin Zhijun, Hu Zongquan, Gao Bo, et al. Controlling Factors on the Enrichment and High Productivity of Shale Gas in the Wufeng-Longmaxi Formations,Southeastern Sichuan Basin[J]. Earth Science Frontiers, 2016, 23(1):1-10.
[10] 翟刚毅,包书景,王玉芳,等.古隆起边缘成藏模式与湖北宜昌页岩气重大发现[J].地球学报,2017, 38(4):441-447. Zhai Gangyi, Bao Shujing, Wang Yufang, et al. Reservoir Accumulation Model at the Edge of Palaeohigh and Significant Discovery of Shale Gas in Yichang Area, Hubei Province[J]. Acta Geoscientica Sinica, 2017, 38(4):441-447.
[11] Guo X, Hu D, Li Y, et al. Geological Factors Controlling Shale Gas Enrichment and High Production in Fuling Shale Gas Field[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2017, 44(4):513-523.
[12] 包汉勇,张柏桥,曾联波,等.华南地区海相页岩气差异富集构造模式[J].地球科学,2019,44(3):1-13. Bao Hanyong, Zhang Baiqiao, Zeng Lianbo, et al. Marine Shale Gas Differential Enrichment Structure Models in South China[J]. Earth Science, 2019, 44(3):1-13.
[13] Liang F, Bai W, Zou C, et al. Shale Gas Enrichment Pattern and Exploration Significance of Well Wuxi-2 in Northeast Chongqing, NE Sichuan Basin[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2016, 43(3):386-394.
[14] Wang Y, Xu S, Hao F, et al. Geochemical and Petrographic Characteristics of Wufeng-Longmaxi Shales, Jiaoshiba Area, Southwest China:Implications for Organic Matter Differential Accumulation[J]. Marine and Petroleum Geology, 2019, 102:138-154.
[15] He Z, Hu Z, Nie H, et al. Characterization of Shale Gas Enrichment in the Wufeng Formation-Longmaxi Formation in the Sichuan Basin of China and Evaluation of Its Geological Construction-Transformation Evolution Sequence[J]. Journal of Natural Gas Geoscience, 2017, 2(1):1-10.
[16] Ridley M. The Shale Gas Shock[R]. London:The Global Warming Policy Foundation, 2011:32.
[17] 吉利明,邱军利,张同伟,等.泥页岩主要黏土矿物组分甲烷吸附实验[J].地球科学:中国地质大学学报,2012, 37(5):1043-1050. Ji Liming, Qiu Junli, Zhang Tongwei, et al. Experiments on Methane Adsorption of Common Clay Minerals in Shale[J]. Earth Science:Journal of China University of Geosciences, 2012, 37(5):1043-1050.
[18] Maravelis A, Zelilidis A. Organic Geochemical Characteristics of the Late Eocene-Early Oligocene Submarine Fans and Shelf Deposits on Lemnos Island, NE Greece[J]. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 2010, 71(3/4):160-168.
[19] Delvaux D, Martin H, Leplat P, et al. Geochemical Characterization of Sedimentary Organic Matter by Means of Pyrolysis Kinetic Parameters[J]. Organic Geochemistry, 1990, 16(1/2/3):175-187.
[20] 孟召平,郭彦省,刘尉.页岩气储层有机碳含量与测井参数的关系及预测模型[J].煤炭学报,2015,40(2):247-253. Meng Zhaoping, Guo Yansheng, Liu Wei. Relationship Between Organic Carbon Content of Shale Gas Reservoir and Logging Parameters and Its Prediction Model[J]. Journal of China Coal Society, 2015, 40(2):247-253.
[21] Chen X, Bao S, Hou D, et al. Methods and Key Parameters for Shale Gas Resource Evaluation[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2012, 39(5):605-610.
[22] 王世谦,王书彦,满玲,等.页岩气选区评价方法与关键参数[J].成都理工大学学报(自然科学版),2013, 40(6):609-620. Wang Shiqian, Wang Shuyan, Man Ling, et al. Appraisal Method and Key Parameters for Screening Shale Gas Play[J]. Journal of Chengdu University of Technology (Science & Technology Edition), 2013, 40(6):609-620.
[23] 方朝刚,徐振宇,滕龙,等.江西萍乐坳陷中部赣丰地1井上二叠统乐平组页岩气聚气条件[J].石油实验地质,2019,41(1):83-93. Fang Chaogang, Xu Zhenyu, Teng Long, et al. Shale Gas Accumulation in the Upper Permian Leping Formation:A Case Study of Well Ganfengdi-1 in the Central Pingle Depression, Jiangxi Province[J]. Petroleum Geology & Experiment, 2019, 41(1):83-93.
[24] 姚光华,王晓泉,杜宏宇,等.USBM方法在页岩气含气量测试中的适应性[J].石油学报,2016,37(6):802-806. Yao Guanghua, Wang Xiaoquan, Du Hongyu, et al. Applicability of USBM Method in the Test on Shale Gas Content[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica (Petroleum Processing Section), 2016, 37(6):802-806.
[25] Guo T. Key Geological Issues and Main Controls on Accumulation and Enrichment of Chinese Shale Gas[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2016, 43(3):349-359.
[26] 刘鹏,王伟锋,孟蕾,等.鄂尔多斯盆地上古生界煤层气与致密气联合优选区评价[J].吉林大学学报(地球科学版),2016,46(3):692-701. Liu Peng, Wang Weifeng, Meng Lei, et al. Joint Optimization of Coal-Bed Methane and Tight Gas in the Upper Paleozoic of the Ordos Basin[J]. Journal of Jilin Unviersity (Earth Science Edition), 2016, 46(3):692-701.
[27] 傅雪海,张苗,张庆辉,等.山西省域石炭-二叠纪煤系泥页岩气储层评价指标体系[J].煤炭学报,2018,43(6):1654-1660. Fu Xuehai, Zhang Miao, Zhang Qinghui, et al. Evaluation Index System for the Permo-Carboniferous Mud Shale Reservoirs of Coal Measures in Shanxi Province[J]. Journal of China Coal Society, 2018, 43(6):1654-1660.
[1] 罗腾, 冯晅, 郭智奇, 刘财, 刘喜武. 基于模拟退火粒子群优化算法的裂缝型储层各向异性参数地震反演[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2019, 49(5): 1466-1476.
[2] 王修齐, 滕龙, 郑红军, 方朝刚, 张训华. 下扬子丰城-乐平地区二叠系乐平组页岩气潜力综合评价[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2019, 49(1): 248-260.
[3] 王涛利, 王庆涛, 刘文平, 卢鸿, 刘大永. 页岩残留气定量方法及其地质意义[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2018, 48(6): 1645-1653.
[4] 冯小龙, 敖卫华, 唐玄. 陆相页岩气储层孔隙发育特征及其主控因素分析:以鄂尔多斯盆地长7段为例[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2018, 48(3): 678-692.
[5] 徐宏杰, 胡宝林, 郑建斌, 刘会虎, 张文永, 郑凯歌. 淮南煤田煤系页岩气储集空间特征及其岩相控制作用[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2017, 47(2): 418-430.
[6] 邹友琴, 刘莉, 李宏卿, 颜春, 曾马荪, 兰盈盈. 水文地质条件对页岩气开采控制[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2016, 46(3): 824-830.
[7] 杜治利, 田亚, 刘洪军, 王凤琴, 杜小弟, 袁远, 仝立华. 鄂尔多斯盆地南部延长组长9段页岩气资源潜力评价[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2016, 46(2): 358-367.
[8] 刘福春,程日辉,解启来,胡望水,汤济广,李忠博,杨秀辉,徐浩,周隶华. 松辽盆地梨树断陷页岩气资源潜力评价[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2014, 44(3): 762-773.
[9] 付金华,郭少斌,刘新社,王义刚. 鄂尔多斯盆地上古生界山西组页岩气成藏条件及勘探潜力[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2013, 43(2): 382-389.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!