吉林大学学报(地球科学版) ›› 2022, Vol. 52 ›› Issue (1): 171-.

• 地质工程与环境工程 • 上一篇    下一篇

基于鲁棒性原理的碎石桩置换率优化

  

  1. 浙江大学海洋学院,浙江舟山316000
  • 收稿日期:2021-08-04 出版日期:2022-01-27 发布日期:2022-03-02
  • 通讯作者: 李晴芳(1997—), 女, 硕士研究生, 主要从事软土地基处理等方面的研究, Email: poppyqing19@163.com
  • 基金资助:
    国家重点研发计划项目(2016YFC1401202);自然资源部浙江地质灾害野外观测研究站开放基金(ZJDZGCZ2021)

Optimization of Area Replacement Ratio of Stone Column Based on Robustness Principle

  1. Ocean College, Zhejiang University, Zhoushan 316000, Zhejiang,China
  • Received:2021-08-04 Online:2022-01-27 Published:2022-03-02
  • Supported by:
    Supported by the National Key R & D Program of China (2016YFC1401202) and the Open Fund of Observation & Research Station of Geohazards in Zhejiang, Ministry of Natural Resources, China (ZJDZGCZ2021)

摘要: 碎石桩是处理软土地基的常用方法之一,置换率作为碎石桩设计中的关键参数,其值取决于软土力学参数和工后沉降量限值等要素。考虑实际工程中软土力学参数的不确定性,以及综合衡量工后沉降量和工程造价,确定最优置换率。本文首先基于岩土工程鲁棒性设计原理,将桩体压缩模量和土体压缩模量视为具有不确定性的参数即噪声因素,利用MonteCarlo模拟方法生成噪声因素的数值,并基于单向分层总和法计算工后沉降量标准差作为鲁棒性指标,从鲁棒性、安全性和经济性3个方面优化碎石桩置换率;然后提出了碎石桩鲁棒性设计流程并通过工程案例说明其应用方法,基于此例讨论了沉降量限值、压缩模量变异系数和参数分布模式对优化结果的影响规律。结果表明:通过本文计算流程的最优置换率值为 29%;沉降量限值的提高需要投入更多的工程造价;土体压缩模量相较于碎石桩对最终优化结果的影响幅度更大;相较于对数正态分布,采用正态分布模拟噪声因素参数分布时计算的结果不确定性更高。

关键词: 压缩模量, 碎石桩, 复合地基, 优化设计, 置换率, 鲁棒性

Abstract:  Determination of the specific area replacement ratio is crucial in construction, considering the uncertainty of mechanical parameters of soft soil itself and the balance between postconstruction settlement satisfaction and cost. Based on the robust geotechnical design principle, the pile and soil constrained modulus is regarded as noise factors with uncertainty, and by using the MonteCarlo simulation method the value of several possible noise factors is determined; Further, the standard deviation of postconstruction settlement is calculated by the oneway layerwise summation method as the measure of robustness; Finally, the area replacement ratio of gravel pile could be optimized with considering safety, cost and robustness simultaneously. In this study, a robust design framework of stone column was proposed and its application was illustrated through an engineering example. Based on this example, the influence rules of settlement limit, coefficient of variation of compression modulus, and parameter distribution mode on the optimization were discussed. The results show that the optimal replacement rate is 29%; The improvement of settlement limit increases the engineering cost; The compressive modulus of soil has a greater influence on the final optimization than that of gravel pile; When using normal instead of lognormal distribution to simulate the noise factor distribution, the results of this calculation are more uncertain.

Key words: constrained modulus, stone column, composite foundation, optimization design, area replacement ratio, robustness

中图分类号: 

  • P59
[1] 王常明, 鲁鋆, 马栋和. 土石围堰中混凝土防渗墙设计方案的数值优化[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2020, 50(3): 857-865.
[2] 吴有平, 张可能, 刘杰, 何杰. 侧向约束下柔性桩复合地基沉降特性[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2017, 47(3): 818-825.
[3] 余楚, 张翼龙, 孟瑞芳, 曹文庚. 河套平原浅层地下水动态监测网优化设计[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2015, 45(4): 1173-1179.
[4] 石少敏. 动力法计算振冲碎石桩桩体压缩模量[J]. J4, 2011, 41(1): 172-176.
[5] 李智强, 范宜仁, 邓少贵, 季秀峰, 李虎. 基于改进差分进化算法的阵列侧向测井反演[J]. J4, 2010, 40(5): 1199-1204.
[6] 吴旭君,范黎明,殷其雷. 新建城区大面积填土地基基础方案分析[J]. J4, 2008, 38(2): 290-0292.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 纪宏金,孙丰月,陈满,胡大千,时艳香,潘向清. 胶东地区裸露含金构造的地球化学评价[J]. J4, 2005, 35(03): 308 -0312 .
[2] 初凤友,孙国胜,李晓敏,马维林,赵宏樵. 中太平洋海山富钴结壳生长习性及控制因素[J]. J4, 2005, 35(03): 320 -0325 .
[3] 章光新,邓伟,何岩,RAMSIS Salama. 水文响应单元法在盐渍化风险评价中的应用[J]. J4, 2005, 35(03): 356 -0360 .
[4] 肖长来,张力春,方 樟,贾 涛. 洮儿河扇形地地表水与地下水资源的转化关系[J]. J4, 2006, 36(02): 234 -0239 .
[5] 张 辉,李桐林,董瑞霞. 基于电偶源的体积分方程法三维电磁反演[J]. J4, 2006, 36(02): 284 -0288 .
[6] 张凡芹,王伟锋,王建伟,孙粉锦,刘锐娥. 苏里格庙地区凝灰质溶蚀作用及其对煤成气储层的影响[J]. J4, 2006, 36(03): 365 -369 .
[7] 霍秋立,汪振英,李敏,付丽,冯大晨. 海拉尔盆地贝尔凹陷油源及油气运移研究[J]. J4, 2006, 36(03): 377 -383 .
[8] 姜晓轶,周云轩. 从空间到时间——时空数据模型研究[J]. J4, 2006, 36(03): 480 -485 .
[9] 高志前,樊太亮,李 岩,刘武宏,陈玉林. 塔里木盆地寒武-奥陶纪海平面升降变化规律研究[J]. J4, 2006, 36(04): 549 -556 .
[10] 赵 峰,范海峰,田竹君,王志刚. 吉林省中部不同土地利用类型的土壤侵蚀强度变化分析[J]. J4, 2005, 35(05): 661 -666 .