吉林大学学报(地球科学版) ›› 2015, Vol. 45 ›› Issue (3): 683-690.doi: 10.13278/j.cnki.jjuese.201503103

• 地质与资源 • 上一篇    下一篇

松辽盆地北部油页岩资源潜力评价

郑玉龙1,2, 陈春瑞3, 王佰长2, 王占国2, 刘胜英3, 吴相梅3   

  1. 1. 中国地质大学(北京)地球科学与资源学院, 北京 100083;
    2. 大庆油田牡丹江新能源有限责任公司, 黑龙江 牡丹江 157032;
    3. 大庆油田有限责任公司勘探开发研究院, 黑龙江 大庆 163712
  • 收稿日期:2014-08-29 发布日期:2015-05-26
  • 作者简介:郑玉龙(1966),男,高级工程师,博士,主要从事非常规油气地质研究,E-mail:zhengyul@petrochina.com.cn。
  • 基金资助:

    国家科技重大专项项目(2008ZX05055);国家潜在油气资源(油页岩勘探开发利用)产学研用合作创新项目(OSR-01-10)

Resource Potential Evaluation of Oil Shale in North Songliao Basin

Zheng Yulong1,2, Chen Chunrui3, Wang Baichang2, Wang Zhanguo2, Liu Shengying3, Wu Xiangmei3   

  1. 1. School of Earth Sciences and Resources, China University of Geosciences, Beijing 100083, China;
    2. Mudanjiang New Energy Company Ltd., Daqing Oilfield, Mudanjiang 157032, Heilongjiang, China;
    3. Exploration and development Research Institute of Daqing Oilfield Company Ltd., Daqing 163712, Heilongjiang, China
  • Received:2014-08-29 Published:2015-05-26

摘要:

为评价松辽盆地北部油页岩资源潜力,开展了14口地质井的钻探、2 100多口老井的复查和多项油页岩的样品分析测试工作。根据油页岩分析测试资料,结合录井、测井、地震、沉积等研究成果,总结了油页岩主要特征,并用体积丰度法初步估算了埋深小于1 km的油页岩和页岩油潜在资源量。结果表明:松辽盆地北部油页岩主要发育在青山口组一段和嫩江组一、二段沉积时期的湖相沉积中,是盆地两次最大湖泛期的产物;嫩江组和青山口组油页岩平均岩石密度分别为2.20和2.18 t/m3,平均含油率分别为5.55%和5.39%;油页岩有机质类型为Ⅰ型和Ⅱ1型,处于未成熟低成熟阶段,有机质丰度极高,是最好的生油岩。松辽盆地北部油页岩分布广泛、层位稳定、资源潜力巨大,初步估算埋深小于1 km的油页岩潜在资源量为6 008.40×108 t,页岩油潜在资源量为297.50×108 t。油页岩可以成为未来大庆油田常规油气的重要补充或接替资源。

关键词: 松辽盆地, 油页岩, 含油率, 沉积环境, 地球化学, 资源潜力

Abstract:

In order to evaluate the oil shale resource potential in north Songliao basin, 14 geological wells are drilled, more than 2 100 old wells are reviewed and a number of oil shale samples are tested. According to the testing data of the oil shale, combined with the well logging, seismic, deposit, and the other research achievements, the main characteristics of oil shale is summarized, and the potential resources of oil shale and shale oil,buried less than 1 000 m in depth, are preliminarily estimated using the volume abundance method. Oil shales in north Songliao basin are mainly developed in the lacustrine deposit when the first section of Qingshankou Formation, the first and second section of Nenjiang Formation deposited, which are the results of the twice maximum flooding period in the basin. The average density of oil shale in Nenjiang Formation and Qingshankou Formation is 2.20 t/m3 and 2.18 t/m3 respectively, and the average oil yield is 5.39% and 5.55% respectively. The types of organic matter of the oil shale are I and II1 in the developing stage from immaturity to low maturity; and they are excellent hydrocarbon source rocks. Oil shale resources in north Songliao basin are widely distributed, stable in strata, and have a great resource potential. It is estimated that the potential resource of oil shale is 6 008.40×108 t and of shale oil is 297.50×108 t for those are buried less than 1 000 m in depth. The oil shale can be an important supplement or replacement of the conventional oil and gas in Daqing oil field in the near future.

Key words: Songliao basin, oil shale, oil yield, depositional environment, geochemistry, resource potential

中图分类号: 

  • P618.12

[1] 钱家麟,尹亮. 油页岩:石油的补充能源[M]. 北京:中国石化出版社,2008. Qian Jialin, Yin Liang. Oil Shale:Complement Resources of Oil[M]. Beijing: Petroleum Industrial Press, 2008.

[2] 刘招君,董清水,叶松青,等. 中国油页岩资源现状[J]. 吉林大学学报: 地球科学版,2006,36(6):869-876. Liu Zhaojun, Dong Qingshui, Ye Songqing, et al. The Situation of Oil Shale Resources in China[J]. Journal of Jilin University: Earth Science Edition, 2006,36(6):869-876.

[3] 刘招君,杨虎林,董清水,等. 中国油页岩[M]. 北京:石油工业出版社,2009. Liu Zhaojun, Yang Hulin, Dong Qingshui, et al. Oil Shale in China[M]. Beijing: Petroleum Industrial Press, 2009.

[4] 隋军,梁文福,冀宝发. 不断创新开发技术,支撑大庆油田持续稳产[J]. 大庆石油地质与开发,2009,28(5):64-68. Sui Jun, Liang Wenfu, Ji Baofa. Based on Continuous Innovation of Development Technology to Achieve Sustainable Production in Daqing Oilfield[J]. Petroleum Geology and Oilfield Development in Daqing,2009,28(5):64-68.

[5] 冯志强. 技术进步是油气勘探持续发展的不竭动力[J]. 大庆石油地质与开发,2009,28(5):6-12. Feng Zhiqiang. Technical Progress Provides Inexhaustible Power for the Sustainable Development of Hydrocarbon Exploration[J]. Petroleum Geology and Oilfield Development in Daqing,2009,28(5):6-12.

[6] 大庆油田石油地质志编写组.中国石油地质志:卷二:大庆、吉林油田:上册:大庆油田[M]. 北京:石油工业出版社,1993. Writing Group of Daqing Oilfield Petroleum Geology. Petroleum Geology of China:Vol 2:Daqing, Jilin Oil Field:Vol 1:Daqing Oil Field[M]. Beijing: Petroleum Industrial Press, 1993.

[7] 叶得泉,黄清华,张莹,等. 松辽盆地白垩纪介形类生物地层学[M]. 北京:石油工业出版社,2002. Ye Dequan, Huang Qinghua, Zhang Ying, et al. Cretaceous Ostracoda Biostratigraphy in Songliao Basin[M]. Beijing: Petroleum Industrial Press, 2002.

[8] 侯读杰,冯子辉,黄清华. 松辽盆地白垩纪缺氧地质事件的地质地球化学特征[J]. 现代地质,2003,17(3):311-317. Hou Dujie, Feng Zihui, Huang Qinghua. Geological and Geochemical Evidences of Anoxic Event in the Songliao Basin, China[J]. Geoscience,2003,17(3):311-317.

[9] 陈雪凝,陆永潮,吴河勇. 白垩纪大洋沉积转变期间松辽盆地的沉积响应[J]. 天然气勘探与开发,2007,30(3):32-36. Chen Xuening, Lu Yongchao, Wu Heyong. Sedimentary Response of Songliao Basin During Cretaceous Oceanic Depositional Transition[J]. Natural Gas Exploration and Development,2007,30(3):32-36.

[10] 高瑞祺,张莹,崔同翠. 松辽盆地白垩纪石油地层[M]. 北京:石油工业出版社,1994. Gao Ruiqi, Zhang Ying, Cui Tongcui. Cretaceous Oil and Gas Strata of Songliao Basin[M]. Beijing: Petroleum Industrial Press, 1994.

[11] SY/T5735-1995 陆相烃源岩地球化学评价方法[S]. 北京:石油工业出版社,1996. SY/T5735-1995 Continental Source Rock Geochemical Evaluation Method[S]. Beijing: Petroleum Industrial Press, 1996.

[12] 刘振文,王佰长,郑玉龙,等. 黑龙江省柳树河盆地五林勘查区油页岩特征[J]. 大庆石油地质与开发,2010,29(6):34-38. Liu Zhenwen, Wang Baichang, Zheng Yulong, et al. Characteristics of Oil Shale in Wulin Prospecting Area in Liushuhe Basin, Heilongjiang Province[J]. Petroleum Geology and Oilfield Development in Daqing,2010,29(6):34-38.

[1] 张强, 丁清峰, 宋凯, 程龙. 东昆仑洪水河铁矿区狼牙山组千枚岩碎屑锆石U-Pb年龄、Hf同位素及其地质意义[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2018, 48(4): 1085-1104.
[2] 郭春涛, 李如一, 陈树民. 塔里木盆地古城地区鹰山组白云岩稀土元素地球化学特征及成因[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2018, 48(4): 1121-1134.
[3] 日比娅, 孙友宏, 韩婧, 郭明义. 3种无机盐催化热解油页岩[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2018, 48(4): 1043-1049.
[4] 崔亚川, 于介江, 杨万志, 张元厚, 崔策, 于介禄. 东天山觉罗塔格带黄山地区角闪辉长岩岩体的年代学、地球化学特征及岩石成因[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2018, 48(4): 1105-1120.
[5] 赵希林, 姜杨, 邢光福, 于胜尧, 彭银彪, 黄文成, 王存智, 靳国栋. 陈蔡早古生代俯冲增生杂岩对华夏与扬子地块拼合过程的指示意义[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2018, 48(4): 1135-1153.
[6] 方晶, 王福, 方雨婷, 潘隆, 李杨, 胡克, 齐乌云, 王中良. 钻孔岩心黏土混浊水电导率、黄铁矿、pH相关性分析及其在古沉积环境复原的应用:以渤海湾西岸平原DC01孔为例[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2018, 48(4): 1154-1164.
[7] 王朝阳, 孟恩, 李壮, 李艳广, 靳梦琪. 吉东南新太古代晚期片麻岩类的时代、成因及其对早期地壳形成演化的制约[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2018, 48(3): 587-625.
[8] 尹业长, 郝立波, 赵玉岩, 石厚礼, 田午, 张豫华, 陆继龙. 冀东高家店和蛇盘兔花岗岩体:年代学、地球化学及地质意义[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2018, 48(2): 574-586.
[9] 马国庆, 孟庆发, 黄大年. 基于重力异常的松辽盆地构造特征识别[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2018, 48(2): 507-516.
[10] 唐文龙, 孙宏伟, 刘晓阳, 王杰, 左立波, 吴兴源. 中南部非洲镍矿成矿规律及资源潜力分析[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2018, 48(1): 53-69.
[11] 齐天骄, 薛春纪, 许碧霞. 新疆昭苏布合塔铜(金)矿化区花岗质岩石锆石U-Pb年龄、地球化学特征及其成因[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2018, 48(1): 132-144.
[12] 蔡来星, 卢双舫, 肖国林, 王蛟, 吴志强, 郭兴伟, 侯方辉. 论优质源储耦合关系的控藏作用:对比松南致密油与松北致密气成藏条件[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2018, 48(1): 15-28.
[13] 孙凡婷, 刘晨, 邱殿明, 鲁倩, 贺云鹏, 张铭杰. 大兴安岭东坡小奎勒河中基性侵入岩成因及地球动力学意义:锆石U-Pb年代学、元素和Hf同位素地球化学证据[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2018, 48(1): 145-164.
[14] 张超, 崔芳华, 张照录, 耿瑞, 宋明春. 鲁西金岭地区含矿闪长岩体成因:来自锆石U-Pb年代学和地球化学证据[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2017, 47(6): 1732-1745.
[15] 施珂, 张达玉, 丁宁, 王德恩, 陈雪锋. 皖南逍遥岩体的年代学、地球化学特征及其成因分析[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2017, 47(6): 1746-1762.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!