辽河东部凹陷火山岩相测井响应特征及储集意义

doi:10.13278/j.cnki.jjuese.20160341

吉林大学学报(地球科学版) ›› 2018, Vol. 48 ›› Issue (1): 285-297.doi: 10.13278/j.cnki.jjuese.20160341

辽河东部凹陷火山岩相测井响应特征及储集意义

刘宗利¹, 王祝文¹, 刘菁华¹, 赵淑琴², 欧伟明¹

1. 吉林大学地球探测科学与技术学院, 长春 130026;
2. 中国石油辽河油田公司勘探开发研究院, 辽宁盘锦 124010

收稿日期:2016-11-22 出版日期:2018-01-26 发布日期:2018-01-26
通讯作者: 王祝文(1961),男,教授,博士生导师,主要从事地球物理测井、核地球物理、测井新方法新技术等方面的解释理论和方法的教学与科研工作,E-mail:wangzw@jlu.edu.cn E-mail:wangzw@jlu.edu.cn
作者简介:刘宗利(1990),男,博士,主要从事地球物理测井新方法新技术方面的研究,E-mail:liu_zong_li@163.com
基金资助:
国家重点基础研究发展计划（“973”计划）项目（2012CB822002）

Logging Response Characteristics and Reservoir Significance of Volcanic Rocks in the Eastern Sag of Liaohe Depression

Liu Zongli¹, Wang Zhuwen¹, Liu Jinghua¹, Zhao Shuqin², Ou Weiming¹

1. College of GeoExploration Science and Technology, Jilin University, Changchun 130026, China;
2. Research Institute of Exploration and Development, PetroChina Liaohe Oilfield Company, Panjin 124010, Liaoning, China

Received:2016-11-22 Online:2018-01-26 Published:2018-01-26
Supported by:
Supported by National Key Basic Research and Development Program (973 Program), China (2012CB822002)

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 在郯庐断裂多期构造活动作用下，辽河坳陷东部凹陷发生了多期火山活动，致使中基性火山岩广泛发育，以玄武岩和粗面岩为主，可分为5相14亚相。以常规测井曲线特征为基础，结合电成像的分析，识别出了爆发相（火山碎屑流和热基浪亚相）、溢流相（玻质碎屑岩、板状熔岩流和复合熔岩流亚相）、侵出相（内带、中带和外带亚相）和火山沉积相（含外碎屑和再搬运火山碎屑沉积亚相）10种岩相/亚相：火山碎屑流亚相具"焊接"特征，热基浪亚相具层理特征；玻质碎屑岩亚相具高CNL的特征，板状熔岩流亚相DEN、CNL和AC测井曲线显示微齿平滑的特征，而复合熔岩流亚相测井曲线呈指状叠加的特征；侵出相内带→中带→外带电阻率逐渐减小；含外碎屑和再搬运火山碎屑沉积亚相GR值范围不同，并且再搬运火山碎屑沉积亚相具水平层理特征。火山岩相控制原生储集空间的类型，并作用于后期的次生改造，从而影响储层的物性、储集性和有效性。复合熔岩流亚相储层孔隙发育，物性好，但由于内部纵向上结构不一致，非均质性强，因而储层含油性差。火山碎屑流亚相内部在纵向上岩性及结构相对一致，因而储层物性相对均一、分布集中，为有利的火山岩储层，可以作为东部凹陷进一步勘探开发的有利相带。

关键词: 辽河坳陷, 东部凹陷, 火山岩相, 测井响应, 火山岩储层, 储集空间

Abstract: Because of the Tanlu fault, many tectonic movements occurred in the eastern sag of Liaohe depression, all of which were accompanied by volcanic activities with different intensity. So volcanic rocks are widely developed. The volcanic rocks are dominated by basalt and trachyte, which are divided into 5 lithofacies and 14 sub-facies. Furthermore, based on the analysis of conventional logging curve and electrical image logging, 10 lithofacies/sub-facies are recognized such as explosive facies (pyroclastic flow, surge sub-facies), effusive lava flow facies (hyaloclastite, tabular flow, compound flow sub-facies), extrusive dome facies (inner zone, intermediate zone, and outer zone sub-facies), volcaniclastic facies (resedimented volcaniclastics, epiclast-bearing volcanogenic deposits sub-facies). The pyroclastic flow sub-facies ischaracterized by welding, and pyroclastic surge sub-facies is characterized by various beddings; the hyaloclastite sub-facies has high CNL, the tabular flow sub-facies is with smoothed logging curves of DEN, CNL and AC, and the compound flow sub-facies is with finger-shape logging curves; from inner zone to outer zone, the resistivity decreases; the ranges of GR values of the sub-facies of resedimented volcaniclastics and epiclast-bearing volcanogenic deposits sub-facies are different, and the resedimented volcaniclastic deposits is with horizontal beddings. The volcanic facies control the type of primary reservoir space, and affect the secondary transformation, the physical properties, the storage, and the effectiveness of the reservoir. The reservoir of hyaloclastite sub-facies with pore development has good physical properties; however, because the internal vertical structure is inconsistent and strong heterogeneous, the oil content of the reservoir is poor. The lithology and structure of the pyroclastic flow sub-facies is consistent vertically, the reservoir physical properties are relatively uniformly distributed, which is a favorable facies belt for further exploration and development.

Key words: Liaohe depression, eastern sag, volcanic lithofacies, logging response, volcanic reservoir, reservoir space

中图分类号:

刘宗利, 王祝文, 刘菁华, 赵淑琴, 欧伟明. 辽河东部凹陷火山岩相测井响应特征及储集意义[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2018, 48(1): 285-297.

Liu Zongli, Wang Zhuwen, Liu Jinghua, Zhao Shuqin, Ou Weiming. Logging Response Characteristics and Reservoir Significance of Volcanic Rocks in the Eastern Sag of Liaohe Depression[J]. Journal of Jilin University(Earth Science Edition), 2018, 48(1): 285-297.

参考文献

[1] 王璞珺, 迟元林, 刘万洙,等. 松辽盆地火山岩相:类型、特征和储层意义[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2003, 33(4): 449-456. Wang Pujun, Chi Yuanlin, Liu Wanzhu, et al. Volcanic Facies of Songliao Basin: Classification, Characteristics and Reservoir Significance[J]. Journal of Jilin University(Earth Science Edition), 2003, 33(4): 449-456.
[2] Stewart A L, McPhie J. Facies Architecture and Late Pliocene-Pleistocene Evolution of a Felsic Volcanic Island, Milos, Greece[J]. Bulletin of Volcanology, 2006, 68(7): 703-726.
[3] 冯子辉, 邵红梅, 童英. 松辽盆地庆深气田深层火山岩储层储集性控制因素研究[J]. 地质学报, 2008, 82(6): 760-768. Feng Zihui, Shao Hongmei, Tong Ying. Controlling Factors of Volcanic Gas Veservoir Property in Qingshen Gas Field, Songliao Basin[J]. Acta Geologica Sinica, 2008, 82(6): 760-768.
[4] 高有峰,刘万洙,纪学雁,等. 松辽盆地营城组火山岩成岩作用类型、特征及其对储层物性的影响[J].吉林大学学报(地球科学版),2007, 37(6): 1251-1258. Gao Youfeng, Liu Wanzhu, Ji Xueyan, et al. Diagenesis Types and Features of Volcanic Rocks and Its Impact on Porosity and Permeability in Yingcheng Formation, Songliao Basin[J]. Journal of Jilin University(Earth Science Edition), 2007, 37(6): 1251-1258.
[5] 郭振华, 王璞珺, 印长海,等. 松辽盆地北部火山岩岩相与测井相关系研究[J].吉林大学学报(地球科学版),2006, 36(2):207-214. Guo Zhenhua, Wang Pujun, Yin Changhai, et al. Relationship Between Lithofacies and Logging Facies of the Volcanic Reservoir Rocks in Songliao Basin[J]. Journal of Jilin University(Earth Science Edition), 2006, 36(2):207-214.
[6] 赵澄林,孟卫工,金春爽,等.辽河盆地火山岩与油气[M].北京:石油工业出版社,1999:15-20. Zhao Chenglin,Meng Weigong,Jin Chunshuang,et a1.Volcanic Rocks and Hydrocarbon in Liaohe Basin[M].Beijing:Petroleum Industry Press,1999:15-20.
[7] 孙卉.辽河东部凹陷中新生代火山事件与构造作用[J].中国石油勘探,2005(5):36-41. Sun Hui. Mesozoic-Cenozoic Volcanic Events and Structure Effects in the Eastern Sag in Liaohe Depression[J]. China Petroleum Exploration,2005(5):36-41.
[8] 李思伟,王璞珺,丁秀春,等.辽河东部凹陷走滑构造及其与火山岩分布的关系[J].地质论评,2014,60(3):591-600. Li Siwei, Wang Pujun, Ding Xiuchun, et al. The Relationship of Strike-Slip Belts and Volcanic Rocks Distribution in the Eastern Depression Liaohe Basin[J].Geological Review, 2014, 60(3): 591-600.
[9] 陈全茂,李忠飞.辽河盆地东部凹陷构造及其含油气性分析[M].北京:地质出版社,1998. Chen Quanmao, Li Zhongfei. Structure and Capability Analysis of the Eastern Sag of Liaohe Basin[M]. Beijing: Geological Publishing House,1998.
[10] 蔡国钢.辽河裂谷东部凹陷粗面岩成因机理探讨[J].地球学报,2010,31(2):245-250. Cai Guogang. Genetic Mechanism of Trachyte in the Eastern Depression of Liaohe Rift[J]. Acta Geoscientica Sinica, 2010, 31(2): 245-250.
[11] 于小健,黄玉龙,李军,等.辽河盆地东部凹陷古近系沙三段粗面岩成因及喷发模式[J].中国矿业,2013,22(3):58-65 Yu Xiaojian,Huang Yulong, Li Jun, et al. Lithogenesis and Eruption Model of the Eocene Trachyte in the Eastern Sag of Liaohe Basin[J]. China Mining Magazine, 2013, 22(3): 58-65.
[12] 冯玉辉. 辽河盆地中基性火山岩:从储层刻画到成藏规律[D].长春:吉林大学,2016. Feng Yuhui. Intermediate-Mafic Volcanic Rocks in the Liaohe Basin: Volcanic Reservoirs Characterization and Hydrocarbon Accumulation[D]. Changchun: Jinlin University, 2016.
[13] 黄玉龙,单俊峰,边伟华,等. 辽河坳陷中基性火成岩相分类及储集意义[J].石油勘探与开发,2014,41(6):1-10. Huang Yulong, Shan Junfeng, Bian Weihua, et al. Facies Classification and Reservoir Significance of the Cenozoic Intermediate and Mafic Igneous Rocks in Liaohe Depression, East China[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2014, 41(6):1-10.
[14] 刘宗利,王祝文,刘菁华,等.辽河盆地东部凹陷中基性火成岩测井曲线特征研究[J].石油物探,2015,54(6):787-795. Liu Zongli, Wang Zhuwen, Liu Jinghua, et al. The Logging Characteristics of the Intermediate and Basic Igneous Rock from the Eastern Depression of Liaohe Basin[J]. Geophysical Prospecting for Petroleum, 2015, 54(6):787-795.
[15] 王春燕. 火山岩岩相测井响应机理及识别方法[J]. 大庆石油地质与开发, 2013, 32(3): 135-139. Wang Chunyan. Log Response Mechanism and Identifying Method for Volcanic Facies[J]. Petroleum Geology and Oilfield Development in Daqing, 2013, 32(3): 135-139.
[16] 覃豪.火山岩岩相测井识别机理及方法:以徐家围子断陷深层火山岩为例[J]. 长江大学学报(自然科学版),2016, 13(11):4-10. Qin Hao. Mechanism and Method ot Logging Identification of Volcanic Facies: By Taking the Deep Volcanic Rocks of Xujiaweizi Fault Depression for Example[J]. Journal of Yangtze University (Natural Science Edition), 2016, 13(11):4-10.
[17] 王泽华, 朱筱敏, 孙中春, 等. 测井资料用于盆地中火成岩岩性识别及岩相划分:以准噶尔盆地为例[J]. 地学前缘, 2015, 22(3): 254-268. Wang Zehua, Zhu Xiaomin, Sun Zhongchun, et al. Igneous Lithology Identification and Lithofacies Classification in the Basin Using Logging Data: Taking Junggar Basin as an Example[J]. Earth Science Frontiers, 2015, 22(3):254-268.
[18] 吴颜雄, 王璞珺, 吴艳辉, 等. 火山岩储集空间的构成: 以松辽盆地为例[J]. 天然气工业, 2011, 31(4): 28-33. Wu Yanxiong, Wang Pujun, Wu Yanhui, et al. Components of Volcanic Reservoir Space: A Case Study from the Songliao Basin[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2011, 31(4): 28-33.
[19] 黄玉龙, 王璞珺, 舒萍, 等. 松辽盆地营城组中基性火山岩储层特征及成储机理[J]. 岩石学报, 2010, 26(1): 82-92. Huang Yulong, Wang Pujun, Shu Ping, et al. Characteristics and Formation Mechanism of the Cretaceous Intermediate and Mafic Volcanic Reservoirs in Songliao Basin, NE China[J]. Acta Petrologica Sinica, 2010, 26(1): 82-92.
[20] 罗静兰,林潼,杨知盛,等.松辽盆地升平气田营城组火山岩岩相及其储集性能控制因素分析[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2008, 29(6):748-757. Luo Jinglan, Lin Tong, Yang Zhisheng, et al. Lithofacies and Reservoir Quality Control Factors of Volcanics in the Yingcheng Formation in the Shengping Gas Field in the Songliao Basin[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2008, 29(6): 748-757.
[21] 李喆,王璞珺,纪学雁,等. 松辽盆地东南隆起区营城组火山岩相和储层的空间展布特征[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2007, 37(6): 1224-1231. Li Zhe, Wang Pujun, Ji Xueyan, et al. The Spatial Distribution of Volcanic Facies and Reservoir in Yingcheng Formation of Southeast Uplifted Area of Songliao Basin[J]. Journal of Jilin University(Earth Science Edition), 2007, 37(6): 1224-1231.
[22] 王岩泉, 胡大千, 蔡国刚,等. 辽河盆地东部凹陷火山岩储层特征与主控因素[J]. 石油学报, 2013, 34(5): 896-904. Wang Yanquan, Hu Daqian, Cai Guogang, et al. Characteristics and Controlling Factors of Cenozoic Volcanic Reservoirs in Liaohe Basin, NE China[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2013, 34(5): 896-904.

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed

辽河东部凹陷火山岩相测井响应特征及储集意义

Logging Response Characteristics and Reservoir Significance of Volcanic Rocks in the Eastern Sag of Liaohe Depression

PDF (PC)

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 0

[1]	潘保芝, 刘文斌, 张丽华, 郭宇航, 阿茹罕. 一种提高储层裂缝识别准确度的方法[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2018, 48(1): 298-306.
[2]	李永刚. 松南气田火山岩致密储层分类及有利目标潜力评价[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2017, 47(2): 344-354.
[3]	徐宏杰, 胡宝林, 郑建斌, 刘会虎, 张文永, 郑凯歌. 淮南煤田煤系页岩气储集空间特征及其岩相控制作用[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2017, 47(2): 418-430.
[4]	姜艳娇, 孙建孟, 高建申, 邵维志, 迟秀荣, 柴细元. 低孔渗储层井周油藏侵入模拟及阵列感应电阻率校正方法[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2017, 47(1): 265-278.
[5]	王璞珺, 缴洋洋, 杨凯凯, 张增宝, 边伟华. 准噶尔盆地火山岩分类研究与应用[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2016, 46(4): 1056-1070.
[6]	修立君, 邵明礼, 唐华风, 董常春, 高有峰. 松辽盆地白垩系营城组火山岩孔缝单元类型和特征[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2016, 46(1): 11-22.
[7]	祝鹏, 林承焰, 李智强, 赵文积, 张华莲. 水平井和大斜度井中阵列侧向测井响应数值模拟[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2015, 45(6): 1862-1869.
[8]	何辉, 孔垂显, 蒋庆平, 邓西里, 肖芳伟, 李顺明. 准噶尔盆地西北缘二叠系火山岩储层裂缝发育特征及分布预测—以金龙2井区佳木河组为例[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2015, 45(5): 1278-1288.
[9]	罗胜元, 何生, 金秋月, 杨睿之, 张君立. 渤南洼陷超压系统划分及结构特征[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2015, 45(1): 37-51.
[10]	陈树民，姜传金，刘立，初丽兰，裴明波. 松辽盆地徐家围子断陷火山岩裂缝形成机理[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2014, 44(6): 1816-1826.
[11]	沈艳杰, 程日辉, 赵春满, 黄党委, 于振锋, 杨伟航. 与火山作用有关的岩系测井识别与物源分析--以松南十屋油田营城组为例[J]. J4, 2012, 42(3): 590-599.
[12]	柳成志, 孙玉凯, 于海山, 杨文敏, 雷海艳. 三塘湖盆地石炭系火山岩油气储层特征及碱性成岩作用[J]. J4, 2010, 40(6): 1221-1231.
[13]	王璞珺, 印长海, 朱如凯, 闫林, 边伟华, 黄玉龙, 吴颜雄. 中基性火山作用喷出物类型、特征与成因[J]. J4, 2010, 40(3): 469-481.
[14]	赵飞, 罗静兰, 张有平, 王安生, 刘文峰, 吴宝成, 白雷. 克拉玛依油田六、七、九区石炭系火山岩储集层特征及其控制因素[J]. J4, 2010, 40(1): 48-55.
[15]	闫伟林，范晓敏. 火成岩中网状裂缝双侧向测井响应特征[J]. J4, 2009, 39(1): 158-0162.