基于中期旋回洪泛面的河流相地层等时划分

doi:10.13278/j.cnki.jjuese.20170193

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 在高分辨率层序地层学理论的指导下，以中期旋回的洪泛面为基准，根据不同时期河道砂体顶面的高程差异划分地层单元，可以实现河流相地层的等时划分与对比。以渤海Q油田北区明化镇组下段N₂m²油组为例，基于砂体发育频率和高程差异构建了一套河流相地层等时划分方法：首先对地震相、测井相、砂岩发育特征等进行综合分析，识别后期河道的下切位置，"回填"被侵蚀破坏的部分，恢复中期旋回末期的原始洪泛泥岩界面，将其作为等时地层划分的基准；然后根据砂体发育的频率特征以及砂体顶面与中期旋回洪泛面的高程关系，构建等时界面识别曲线，刻画泥岩的集中发育位置，识别短期或超短期旋回的等时界面，实现地层的等时划分。实例分析表明，该方法能够有效识别不同地层单元之间的界面位置，将N₂m²油组划分为6个等时单元，不同时期河道的沉积特征符合中期基准面上升半旋回内的河道沉积演化规律。

关键词: 河流相地层, 等时界面, 高程差, 等时划分

Abstract: This paper focuses on the study of fluvial facies isochronous stratigraphic division based on a medium cycle flood surface. Under the guidance of the high resolution sequence stratigraphy theory, based on the flood surface of a middle period cycle, the stratigraphic division of river facies were divided and contrasted according to the elevation difference on the top of channel sand bodies in different periods. Taking the N₂m² oil group in the lower section of the Minghuazhen Formation in the north part of the Bohai Q oilfield as an example, the authors established a set of methods for fluvial facies isochronous stratigraphic division based on the sand body development frequency and elevation difference. According to the comprehensive analysis of seismic facies, logging facies,and sandstone development characteristics, the downcut position of the later channel was identified. As a basis of isochronous stratigraphic division, the original flooding mudstone interface at the end of the medium-term cycle was restored after backfilling the part that had been eroded. According to the frequency characteristics of sand body development, and elevation relationship between a sand body top surface and a medium cycle flood surface, the equal time interface recognition curves were constructed. These curves are used to characterize the concentrated development positon of mudstone and to identify the isochronous interfaces of short or ultra short cycles. Based on the above work, the isochronous stratigraphic division is realized. A case analysis shows that this method can idendify the interface positions between different stratigraphic elements effectively in dividing the N₂m² oil group into six isochronous units, and the sedimentary characteristics of river courses in six periods conform to the sedimentary evolution pattern of the middle term base level rising semi-cycle.

Key words: fluvial facies, isochronous interface, elevation difference, isochronous division

中图分类号:

TE122

范廷恩, 王海峰, 张晶玉, 汤婧, 高玉飞, 于斌. 基于中期旋回洪泛面的河流相地层等时划分[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2018, 48(5): 1316-1329.

Fan Ting'en, Wang Haifeng, Zhang Jingyu, Tang Jing, Gao Yufei, Yu Bin. Isochronous Stratigraphic Division of Fluvial Facies Based on Mid Term Cycle Flood Surface[J]. Journal of Jilin University(Earth Science Edition), 2018, 48(5): 1316-1329.

参考文献

[1] 于兴河. 油田开发中后期储层面临的问题与基于沉积成因的地质表征方法[J]. 地学前缘,2012,19(2):1-14. Yu Xinghe. Existing Problems and Sedimentogenesis-Based Methods of Reservoir Characterization During the Middle and Later Periods of Oilfield Development[J]. Earth Science Frontiers, 2012, 19(2):1-14.
[2] 胡光明,王军,纪友亮,等. 河流相层序地层模式与地层等时对比[J]. 沉积学报,2010,28(4):745-751. Hu Guangming, Wang Jun, Ji Youliang, et al. Fluvial Sequence Stratigraphy Mode and Isochronous Strata Correlation[J]. Acta Sedimentologica Sinica, 2010, 28(4):745-751.
[3] 曾祥平. 储集层构型研究在油田精细开发中的应用[J]. 石油勘探与开发,2010,37(4):483-489. Zeng Xiangping. Application of Reservoir Structure Research in the Fine Exploitation of Oilfields[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2010, 37(4):483-489.
[4] 马世忠,孙雨,范广娟,等. 地下曲流河单砂体内部博夹层建筑结构研究方法[J]. 沉积学报,2008,26(4):632-639. Ma Shizhong, Sun Yu, Fan Guangjuan, et al.The Method for Studying Thin Interbed Architecture of Burial Meandering Channel Sandbody[J]. Acta Sedimentologica Sinica, 2008, 26(4):632-639.
[5] 刘海,林承焰,张宪国,等. 孔店油田馆陶组辫状河储层构型研究及剩余油分布规律[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版),2018,48(3):665-677. Liu Hai, Lin Chengyan, Zhang Xianguo, et al.Reservoir Architecture and Remaining Oil Distribution in Braided River of Guantao Formation, Kongdian Oilfield[J]. Journal of Jilin University (Earth Science Edition), 2018, 48(3):665-677.
[6] 赵翰卿,付志国,吕晓光,等. 大型河流-三角洲沉积储层精细描述方法[J]. 石油学报,2000,21(4):109-113. Zhao Hanqing, Fu Zhiguo, Lü Xiaoguang, et al. Methods for Detailed Description of Lager Fluvial-Delta Depositional Reservoir[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2000, 21(4):109-113.
[7] 刘波,赵翰卿,于会宇. 储集层的两种精细对比方法讨论[J]. 石油勘探与开发,2001,28(6):94-96. Liu Bo, Zhao Hanqing, Yu Huiyu. Discussionon the Two Methods of Detailed Researvoir Correlation[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2001, 28(6):94-96.
[8] 刘波. 基准面旋回与沉积旋回的对比方法探讨[J]. 沉积学报,2002,20(1):112-117. Liu Bo. Discussionon the Correlation Methods of Base-Level Cycles and Sedimentary Cycle Sequence[J]. Acta Sedimentologica Sinica, 2002, 20(1):112-117.
[9] 邓宏文. 美国层序地层研究中的新学派:高分辨率层序地层学[J]. 石油与天然气地质,1995,16(2):89-97. Deng Hongwen. A New School of Thought in Sequence Stratigrapyic Studies in US:High-Resolution Sequence Stratigraphy[J]. Oil and Gas Geology, 1995, 16(2):89-97.
[10] 邓宏文,王洪亮,李熙喆. 层序地层基准面的识别、对比技术及应用[J]. 石油与天然气地质,1996,17(3):177-184. Deng Hongwen, Wang Hongliang, Li Xizhe. Identification and Correlation Techniques of Sequence Stratigraphic Base-Levels and Their Application[J]. Oil and Gas Geology, 1996, 17(3):177-184.
[11] 邓宏文,王洪亮,李小孟. 高分辨率层序地层对比在河流相中的应用[J]. 石油与天然气地质,1997,18(2):90-95. Deng Hongwen, Wang Hongliang, Li Xiaomeng. Application of High-Resolution Sequence Stratigraphic Correlation to Fluvial Facies[J]. Oil and Gas Geology, 1997, 18(2):90-95.
[12] 郑荣才,吴朝荣,叶茂才. 浅谈陆相盆地高分辨率层序地层研究思路[J]. 成都理工学院学报,2000,27(3):241-244. Zheng Rongcai, Wu Chaorong, Ye Maocai. Research Thinking of High-Resolution Sequence Stratigraphy About a Terrigenous Basin[J]. Journal of Chengdu University of Technology, 2000, 27(3):241-244.
[13] 龙国清,韩大匡,田昌炳,等. 油藏开发阶段河流相基准面旋回划分与储层细分对比方法探讨[J]. 现代地质,2009,23(5):963-967. Long Guoqing, Han Dakuang, Tian Changbing, et al. The Base Level Cycle Subdivision and Correlation of Fluvial Facies in the Phase of Reservoir Development[J]. Geoscience, 2009, 23(5):963-967.
[14] 袁新涛,沈平平,李薇,等. 油藏开发阶段陆相地层高分辨率层序精细对比探讨[J]. 西安石油大学学报(自然科学版),2007,22(1):25-28. Yuan Xintao, Shen Pingping, Li Wei, et al. High-Resolution Sequence Correlation of Continental Strata in the Phase of Reservoir Development[J]. Journal of Xi'an Shiyou University (Natural Science Edition) 2007, 22(1):25-28.
[15] 张运波,赵宗举,袁圣强,等. 频谱分析法在识别米兰科维奇旋回及高频层序中的应用:以塔里木盆地塔中-巴楚地区下奥陶统鹰山组为例[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版),2011,41(2):400-410. Zhang Yunbo, Zhao Zongju, Yuan Shengqiang, et al. Application of Spectral Analysis to Identify Milankovitch Cycles and High-Frequency Sequences:Take the Lower Ordovician Yingshan Formation of Mid-Tarim Basin as an Example[J]. Journal of Jilin University (Earth Science Edition), 2011, 41(2):400-410.
[16] 郑荣才,柯光明,文华国,等. 高分辨率层序分析在河流相砂体等时对比中的应用[J]. 成都理工大学学报(自然科学版),2004,31(6):641-647. Zheng Rongcai, Ke Guangming, Wen Huaguo, et al. Isochronic Correlation of Fluvial Sandbodies by High-Resolution Sequence Technique[J]. Journal of Chengdu University of Technology(Science and Technology Edition), 2004, 31(6):641-647.
[17] 郑荣才,尹世民,彭军. 基准面旋回结构与叠加样式的沉积动力学分析[J]. 沉积学报,2000,18(3):369-375. Zheng Rongcai, Peng Shimin, Peng Jun. Sedimentary Dynamic Analysis of Sequence Structure and Stacking Pattern of Base-Level Cycle[J]. Acta Sedimentologica Sinica, 2000, 18(3):369-375.
[18] Wright V P, Marriott S B. The Sequence Stratigra-phy of Fluvial Deposition Systems:The Role of Floodplain Sediment Storage[J]. Sedimentary Geology, 1993, 92(Sup. 3/4):289-290.
[19] 胡光义,陈飞,范廷恩,等. 渤海海域S油田新近系明化镇组河流相复合砂体叠置样式分析[J]. 沉积学报,2014,32(3):586-592. Huang Guangyi, Chen Fei, Fan Ting'en, et al. Analysis of Fluvial Facies Compound Sandbody Architecture of the Neogene Minghuazhen Formation of S Oilfield in the Bohai Bay[J]. Acta Sedimentologica Sinica, 2014, 32(3):586-592.
[20] 陈飞,胡光义,范廷恩,等. 渤海海域W油田新近系明化镇组河流相砂体结构特征[J]. 地学前缘,2015,22(2):207-213. Chen Fei, Hu Guangyi, Fan Ting'en, et al. Sandbody Architecture and Sequence Stratigraphy of Fluvial Facies, Neogene Minghuzhen Formation, W Oilfield, Bohai Bay[J]. Earth Science Frontiers, 2015, 22(2):207-213.
[21] 赖维成,徐长贵,于水,等. 渤海海域地质-地球物理储层预测技术及其应用[J]. 中国海上油气,2006,18(4):217-222. Lai Weicheng, Xu Changgui, Yu Shui, et al. Ageological-Geophysical Technique to Predict Reservoir and Its Application in Bohai Sea[J]. China Offshore Oil and Gas, 2006, 18(4):217-222.

相关文章 15

[1]	胡欣蕾, 吕延防, 孙永河, 孙同文. 泥岩盖层内断层垂向封闭能力综合定量评价:以南堡凹陷5号构造东二段泥岩盖层为例[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2018, 48(3): 705-718.
[2]	都鹏燕, 高岗, 魏涛, 赵乐义, 杨军, 李涛, 王建国. 雅布赖盆地萨尔台凹陷侏罗系新河组有效烃源岩研究[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2018, 48(1): 29-38.
[3]	林承焰, 王杨, 杨山, 任丽华, 由春梅, 吴松涛, 吴玉其, 张依旻. 基于CT的数字岩心三维建模[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2018, 48(1): 307-317.
[4]	杨德相, 付广, 孙同文, 李熹微, 姜海燕, 刘滨莹. 油源断裂优势通道输导油气能力综合评价方法及其应用[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2017, 47(6): 1678-1686.
[5]	牛子铖, 柳广第, 国殿斌, 王朋, 张家舲, 赵其磊. 查干凹陷中央构造带不同断阶带原油成熟度特征差异及其成因分析[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2017, 47(4): 1047-1059.
[6]	田敏, 董春梅, 林承焰, 柴小颖, 王丽娟. 柴达木盆地涩北二号生物气田砂体产能分类评价[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2017, 47(4): 1060-1069.
[7]	朱兆群, 林承焰, 张宪国, 李志鹏, 谢晶晶, 魏肃东, 程平. 断陷湖盆早期浅水三角洲沉积——以高邮凹陷永安地区戴一段为例[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2017, 47(3): 659-673.
[8]	徐宏杰, 胡宝林, 郑建斌, 刘会虎, 张文永, 郑凯歌. 淮南煤田煤系页岩气储集空间特征及其岩相控制作用[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2017, 47(2): 418-430.
[9]	兰凯, 刘香峰. 钻柱恶性振动识别与抑制技术研究进展[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2017, 47(1): 203-214.
[10]	林承焰, 曹铮, 任丽华, 张昌盛, 范瑞峰, 王叶, 邢新亚, 马晓兰. 松辽盆地南部大情字井向斜区葡萄花油层石油富集规律及成藏模式[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2016, 46(6): 1598-1610.
[11]	马中振, 谢寅符, 张志伟, 周玉冰, 阳孝法, 王丹丹. 前陆盆地斜坡带勘探丛式平台优选评价——以厄瓜多尔奥连特盆地TW区块为例[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2016, 46(6): 1884-1894.
[12]	张雨晴, 王晖, 范廷恩, 宋来明, 聂妍, 梁旭, 陈飞. 花岗岩潜山储层裂缝建模表征方法——以渤海花岗岩潜山A油田为例[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2016, 46(5): 1312-1320.
[13]	邱隆伟, 师政, 付大巍, 潘泽浩, 杨生超, 曲长胜. 临南洼陷沙三段孔隙度控制因素分析与定量模型[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2016, 46(5): 1321-1331.
[14]	金博, 黄先雄, 常广发，张胜斌,付海波,李铁柱. 滨里海盆地Д南石炭系碳酸盐岩储层类型及分布特征[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2014, 44(6): 2042-2050.
[15]	吴红烛，黄志龙，杨柏松，柳波，闫玉魁，桑廷义，文川江. 马朗凹陷低熟页岩油地球化学特征及成烃机理[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2014, 44(1): 56-66.

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed