吉林大学学报(地球科学版) ›› 2024, Vol. 54 ›› Issue (6): 2029-2046.doi: 10.13278/j.cnki.jjuese.20240223

• 地质与资源 • 上一篇    下一篇

北部湾盆地涠西南凹陷灰岩潜山储层岩溶识别及发育模式

谢兵1,徐昉昊1,范彩伟2,满勇2,江凡2,徐国盛1,张喜淳1,李安然1   

  1. 1.油气藏地质及开发工程全国重点实验室(成都理工大学),成都610059
    2.中海石油(中国)有限公司湛江分公司,广东湛江524057
  • 出版日期:2024-11-26 发布日期:2024-12-24
  • 通讯作者: 徐昉昊(1988—),男,副教授,主要从事储层地质学、流体地球化学与油气成藏方面的研究,E-mail:xufanghao17@cdut.edu.cn
  • 作者简介:谢兵(2000—),男,硕士研究生,主要从事石油天然气勘探方面的研究,E-mail:1023312771@qq.com
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学青年基金项目(42302186);中海石油(中国)有限公司湛江分公司项目(CCL2023ZJFN0540)

Karst Identification and Development Model of Buried Hill Limestone Reservoir in Weixinan Depression, Beibuwan Basin

Xie Bing1, Xu Fanghao1, Fan Caiwei2, Man Yong2, Jiang Fan2, Xu Guosheng1, #br# Zhang Xichun1, Li Anran1#br#   

  1. 1. National Key Laboratory of Reservoir Geology and Development Engineering (Chengdu University of Technology), Chengdu 
    610059, China
    2. CNOOC China Limited,Zhanjiang Branch, Zhanjiang 524057, Guangdong, China

  • Online:2024-11-26 Published:2024-12-24
  • Supported by:
    Supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (42302186) and the Project of CNOOC China Limited, Zhanjiang Branch (CCL2023ZJFN0540)

摘要: 涠西南凹陷灰岩潜山勘探程度低,剩余资源勘探潜力大,二号断裂带周缘已发现多个潜山油田或含油构造,显示良好的勘探前景。本文综合运用钻井、录井、岩心、薄片、成像测井等资料,对二号断裂带碳酸盐岩储层发育特征、岩溶结构进行了系统研究,并根据构造演化与沉积背景综合分析了X构造岩溶储层的演化发育模式。研究结果表明:二号断裂带X构造古潜山岩性主要为灰岩类、灰质白云岩类,储集空间以溶蚀孔、洞、缝为主,孔隙度在0.01%~35.88%之间变化,但平均值偏低,仅为4.30%;以X-1井为例,X构造表生岩溶储层自上而下划分为表层风化带、垂直渗流带、水平潜流带和深部缓流带,水平潜流带岩溶缝/洞发育最优,为优质储层发育带; X构造裂缝-溶洞型灰岩潜山储层发育程度主要受岩相、古地貌及后期构造运动三者控制。岩相决定了溶蚀作用的发育程度,构造运动使地层抬升产生差异化剥蚀以及形成大量的裂缝,为后期岩溶作用提供了有利的渗流空间。古地貌控制了潜水面的相对位置从而控制岩溶的发育位置,岩溶斜坡高部位受到的岩溶作用最强。综合3个控制因素建立了“岩性筑基-裂缝拓容-岩溶改造”的三元耦合碳酸盐岩缝-洞型储层发育模式。

关键词: 北部湾盆地, 涠西南凹陷, 碳酸盐岩潜山, 储层特征, 岩溶作用, 储层发育模式

Abstract: The exploration degree of buried hill limestone in Weixinan sag is low, and the exploration potential of remaining resources is large. Several buried hill oil fields or oil-bearing structures have been discovered around the No. 2 fault zone, which shows a good exploration prospect. In this paper, the development characteristics and karst structure identification of carbonate reservoir in No. 2 fault zone are systematically studied by using the data of drilling, logging, core, thin section and image logging, and the evolution and development model of karst reservoir in X structure is comprehensively analyzed according to the tectonic evolution and sedimentary background. The results show that the lithology of the buried hill of the X structure in the No. 2 fault zone is mainly limestone and lime dolomite, and the reservoir space is dominated by solution pores, caverns and fractures. The porosity varies from 0.01% to 35.88%, but the average value is only 4.30%. Taking well X-1 as an example, the supergene karst reservoir of X structure is divided into surface weathering zone, vertical seepage zone, horizontal subsurface flow zone and deep slow flow zone from top to bottom. The horizontal subsurface flow zone has the best karst fractures/caverns and is a high-quality reservoir development zone. The development degree of X tectonic fracture-cavern type limestone buried hill reservoir is mainly controlled by lithofacies, paleogeomorphology and late tectonic movement. The lithofacies determined the development degree of dissolution, and the tectonic movement caused differentiated denudation and formed a large number of fractures, which provided favorable percolation space for the later karst process. The paleogeomorphology controlled the relative position of the diving surface and thus controlled the development position of karst, and the high part of the karst slope was subjected to the strongest karst process. Based on three controlling factors, the three-element coupling reservoir development model of “lithology foundation building, fracture capacity expansion and karst reconstruction” is established.

Key words: Beibuwan basin, Weixinan sag, carbonate buried hill, reservoir characteristics, karstification, reservoir development model

中图分类号: 

  • P618.13
[1] 吴健, 张恒荣, 胡向阳, 刘土亮, 张恒. 北部湾盆地稠油储层流体识别问题探讨[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2024, 54(3): 1054-1067.
[2] 刘宗宾, 程奇, 吕坐彬, 房娜, 王双龙.

渤海海域锦州南油田太古宇变质岩潜山储层特征及其发育模式 [J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2022, 52(3): 829-839.

[3] 史江涛, 郝君明, 王小雷. 塔河地区奥陶系鹰山组储层特征及其主控因素[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2022, 52(2): 348-362.
[4] 迟唤昭1, 赵玉婷2, 刘 财3, 王 桐4, 胡 佳4, 杨松杉4. 松辽盆地德惠断陷营城组凝灰岩储层地质特征[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2022, 52(1): 55-.
[5] 陶永富, 李达, 黄长兵, 廖鸿辉, 张华琴, 寻升, 李翀, 吴伟. 乍得南部Bongor盆地下白垩统碎屑岩储层成岩作用及其对物性的影响[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2021, 51(6): 1689-1699.
[6] 叶涛, 王清斌, 黄志, 孙哲, 李飞, 陈安清. 碳酸盐岩层序地层格架对岩溶储层的控制作用——以渤海西南海域下古生界为例[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2021, 51(4): 991-1005.
[7] 郑香伟, 吴健, 何胜林, 胡向阳, 梁玉楠. 基于流动单元的砂砾岩储层渗透率测井精细评价[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2016, 46(1): 286-294.
[8] 康志强, 何师意, 罗允义. 表层岩溶系统水化学成因及植被恢复条件下变化趋势——以广西马山弄拉兰电堂泉为例[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2015, 45(1): 232-239.
[9] 马云, 李三忠, 刘鑫, 赵淑娟, 余珊, 王霄飞, 张丙坤. 华南北部湾盆地的形成机制[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2014, 44(6): 1727-1736.
[10] 蒙启安, 刘立, 曲希玉, 汪成辞, 王小琴. 贝尔凹陷与塔南凹陷下白垩统铜钵庙组-南屯组油气储层特征及孔隙度控制作用[J]. J4, 2010, 40(6): 1232-1240.
[11] 郝琦,刘震,查明,李春霞. 辽河茨榆坨潜山太古界裂缝型储层特征及其控制因素[J]. J4, 2006, 36(03): 384-390.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!