吉林大学学报(地球科学版) ›› 2025, Vol. 55 ›› Issue (2): 536-549.doi: 10.13278/j.cnki.jjuese.20240192

• 地质工程与环境工程 • 上一篇    下一篇

地铁明挖车站下穿越既有建筑物的局部暗扩挖施工关键技术

刁国君1, 何昕2   

  1. 1.中铁隧道局集团路桥工程有限公司,天津300308

    2.吉林大学交通学院,长春130025

  • 出版日期:2025-03-26 发布日期:2025-05-10
  • 基金资助:

    基金项目:吉林省科技发展计划项目(20240304126SF)


Key Technology of Local Underground and Enlarged Excavation Construction of Subway Open-Cut Station Underpassing Existing Buildings

Diao Guojun 1,He Xin2   

  1. 1. Road and Bridge Engineering Co., Ltd. ,China Railway Tunnel Group Co. ,Ltd. ,Tianjin 300308, China

    2. Transportation College,Jilin University,Changchun 130025,China

  • Online:2025-03-26 Published:2025-05-10
  • Supported by:
    Supported by the Science and Technology Development Project of Jilin Province (20240304126SF)

摘要: 针对成都地铁某明挖车站局部穿越既有建筑物的复杂工程挑战,通过综合对比分析和有限元模拟,采用了局部暗扩挖的施工策略。提出了明暗挖分界点的科学判定方法,并深入探讨了沉降控制、暗挖初期支护和二次衬砌等施工关键技术的多个方面,包括施工前的降水处理、地表注浆加固与数值模拟分析,以及施工中的超前支护、开挖步骤控制和二次衬砌结构施工等。结果表明:相较于传统的明挖法,暗挖扩挖技术能显著降低拆迁难度,工程成本投入减少约1.04亿元,施工周期缩短2个月;施工成功的关键在于精确确定明暗挖分界点,建议该分界点设在结构腋角外侧,距离房屋基础3 m处,同时结合袖阀管地表注浆与管井降水等措施有效控制地表沉降。施工过程中,需根据暗挖隧道跨度及围岩特性灵活选择施工方法,妥善处理初期支护结构节点,确保二次衬砌施工与初期支护结构破除的有效衔接,并高度重视施工监测的应用。

关键词: 地铁, 穿越既有建筑物, 局部暗扩挖, 数值模拟, 暗挖法, 明挖法, 明暗挖分界点, 沉降

Abstract:

Addressing the complex engineering challenges of a excavated metro station in Chengdu that partially traverses existing buildings, this study adopted a localized undercut and expansion excavation strategy through comprehensive comparative analysis and finite element simulation. The research proposed a scientific method for determining the boundary between open and undercut excavation, and delved into various aspects of key construction technologies such as settlement control, primary support for undercut excavation, and secondary lining, including pre-construction dewatering, ground surface grouting reinforcement, and numerical simulation analysis, as well as advanced support during construction, excavation sequence control, and secondary lining structure construction. The research results indicate that, compared to the traditional open-cut method, the undercut and expansion excavation technique can significantly reduce demolition difficulties, It has significantly cut the investment in project costs by approximately 104 million yuan and shortened the construction period by two months. The key to successful construction lies in accurately determining the boundary between open and undercut excavation, which is recommended to be set outside the structural haunch and 3 m away from the building foundation. Meanwhile, combining sleeve valve pipe ground surface grouting with tube well dewatering measures can effectively control ground surface settlement. During construction, it is necessary to flexibly select construction methods based on the span of the undercut tunnel and the characteristics of surrounding rocks, properly handle the nodes of the primary support structure, ensure effective connection between secondary lining construction and the removal of the primary support structure, and attach great importance to the application of construction monitoring.

Key words: subway, crossing existing buildings, local underground excavation with enlargement, numerical simulation, underground excavation method, open cut method, boundary between underground and open excavation, settlement

中图分类号: 

  • TU455
[1] 程瑶, 陆丹丹, 赵龙飞.

微波加热油页岩储层的热响应 [J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2025, 55(2): 387-400.

[2] 魏虹羽, 李世超, 王伟安. 地球动力学数值模拟算法的应用现状与展望[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2025, 55(1): 98-124.
[3] 蔺学旻, 肖红琳. 缝洞型储层声波远探测测井响应模拟及应用——以塔河油田碳酸盐岩缝洞型储层为例[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2025, 55(1): 312-327.
[4] 吴泽坤, 何来胜, 白晓宇, 麻栋栋, 牛永昌, 赵广, 桑松魁, 闫楠, 张明义. 层状土中静压桩连续贯入现场试验与数值模拟[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2024, 54(4): 1291-1304.
[5] 庞志超, 肖华, 毛晨飞, 陈国军, 梁琬坤, 高明, 张啸. 准噶尔盆地南缘地区含膏质地层岩性特征及测井识别方法[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2024, 54(4): 1419-1431.
[6] 刘怀湜, 赵雪娇, 刘雨新, 房庭瑞, 张静, 嵇艳鞠. 基于改进粒子群优化的超顺磁效应多参数提取[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2024, 54(3): 993-1002.
[7] 韩长玉, 赵浩汀.

路基填筑短期内热棒高导热性影响 [J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2024, 54(2): 570-580.

[8] 刘国东, 杜成鸿, 侯杰, 杨梦溪, 陈宇, 谢杨.

基于用高斯分布生成管道的岩溶地下水流数值模拟 [J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2024, 54(2): 592-603.

[9] 刘鑫, 张文, 李根, 刘波. 高位远程崩滑碎屑流-泥石流灾害链的演变过程与影响范围预测:以“4·5”四川洪雅县铁匠湾地质灾害链为例[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2023, 53(6): 1799-1811.
[10] 左鹏飞, 刘财, 郭智奇, 冯晅. 基于近场动力学理论的裂纹模型波场数值模拟及频散特性分析[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2023, 53(4): 1250-1261.
[11] 张志佳, 孙章庆, 王瑞湖, 韩复兴, 陆济璞, 刘亚光, 岑文攀, 高正辉. 复杂地表起伏多重变加密网格有限差分法波动方程数值模拟[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2023, 53(2): 598-.
[12] 赵一行, 詹刚毅, 石钰锋, 简庆华. 土岩复合地层超深圆形基坑内衬墙作用效果及优化[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2023, 53(2): 526-.
[13] 张延军, 袁学兵, 马跃强, 高雪峰, 高阳. 花岗岩双裂隙热-流耦合参数敏感性[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2022, 52(6): 1971-1981.
[14] 沈威, 毛立华, 陈永, 夏志强, 童建波, 方火浪. 地铁引起的土层与建筑物振动响应及其减振研究[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2022, 52(4): 1203-.
[15] 亢佳乐, 卢全中, 占洁伟, 杨天亮, 沈首秀.

隐伏地裂缝破裂扩展物理模型试验边界效应 [J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2022, 52(3): 941-954.

Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 李 秉 成. 陕西富平全新世古气候的初步研究[J]. J4, 2005, 35(03): 291 -0295 .
[2] 陈 力,佴 磊,王秀范,李 金. 绥中某电力设备站场区地震危险性分析[J]. J4, 2005, 35(05): 641 -645 .
[3] 李斌,孟自芳,李相博,卢红选,郑民. 泌阳凹陷下第三系构造特征与沉积体系[J]. J4, 2005, 35(03): 332 -0339 .
[4] 李涛, 吴胜军,蔡述明,薛怀平,YASUNORI Nakayama. 涨渡湖通江前后调蓄能力模拟分析[J]. J4, 2005, 35(03): 351 -0355 .
[5] 王谦,吴志芳, 张汉泉,莫修文. 随机分形在刻划储层非均质特性中的应用[J]. J4, 2005, 35(03): 340 -0345 .
[6] 杨晓平,李仰春,柳 震, 汪 岩,王洪杰. 黑龙江东部鸡西盆地构造层序划分与盆地动力学演化[J]. J4, 2005, 35(05): 616 -621 .
[7] 赵宏光,孙景贵,陈军强,赵俊康,姚凤良,段 展. 延边小西南岔富金斑岩铜矿床的含矿流体起源与演化——H,O,C,S,Pb同位素示踪[J]. J4, 2005, 35(05): 601 -606 .
[8] 梁秀娟, 林学钰, 于 军. 虚拟现实技术在水文地质研究中的应用[J]. J4, 2005, 35(05): 636 -640 .
[9] 殷 文,印兴耀, 张繁昌. 基于并行遗传算法的地震属性优化研究[J]. J4, 2005, 35(05): 672 -676 .
[10] 赵 峰,范海峰,田竹君,王志刚. 吉林省中部不同土地利用类型的土壤侵蚀强度变化分析[J]. J4, 2005, 35(05): 661 -666 .