吉林大学学报(地球科学版) ›› 2026, Vol. 56 ›› Issue (3): 768-787.doi: 10.13278/j.cnki.jjuese.20250218

• 地质与资源 • 上一篇    下一篇

鄂尔多斯盆地陇东地区长71-2亚段不同源储组合的页岩油富集机理及富集模式

李冠1, 何文祥1, 文志刚1,2,3, 胡勇1, 高小洋1, 肖娜4,5    

  1. 1.长江大学资源与环境学院,武汉430100
    2.油气地球化学与环境湖北省重点实验室(长江大学),武汉430100
    3.油气资源与勘探技术教育部重点实验室(长江大学),武汉430100
    4.长江大学石油工程学院,武汉 430100
    5.油气钻采工程湖北省重点实验室(长江大学),武汉430100
  • 出版日期:2026-05-26 发布日期:2026-06-02
  • 通讯作者: 胡勇(1980—),男,副教授,博士,主要从事地质建模和人工智能方面的研究,E-mail: 64421847@qq.com
  • 作者简介:李冠(1996—),男,博士研究生,主要从事页岩油勘探开发和石油勘探地质方面的研究,E-mail: m13596956922@163.com
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金项目(42202177);中国石油长庆油田分公司项目(2024-14206);新疆维吾尔自治区自然科学基金项目(202501A1344)

Enrichment Mechanism and Enrichment  Model of Shale Oil in Different Source-Reservoir Assemblages of Chang 71-2 Submember in Longdong Area, Ordos Basin

Li Guan1, He Wenxiang1, Wen Zhigang1,2,3, Hu Yong1, Gao Xiaoyang1, Xiao Na4,5   

  1. 1. College of Resources and Environment, Yangtze University, Wuhan 430100, China
    2. Hubei Key Laboratory of Petroleum Geochemistry and Environment(Yangtze University), Wuhan 430100, China
    3. Key Laboratory of Exploration Technologies for Oil and Gas Resources, Ministry of Education(Yangtze University), Wuhan 
    430100, China
    4. College of Petroleum Engineering,Yangtze University,Wuhan 403100, China
    5. Hubei Key Laboratory of Oil and Gas Drilling and Production Engineering (Yangtze University), Wuhan 430100, China 
  • Online:2026-05-26 Published:2026-06-02
  • Supported by:
    Supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (42202177),China National Petroleum Corporation Changqing Oilfield Branch Project (2024-14206) and Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region Natural Science Fund Project(202501A1344)

摘要: 陆相页岩源储结构的强烈非均质性尚未被现有划分体系充分刻画,制约了对页岩油富集机制的系统认知。尽管已有多种源储结构划分方案,但其适配我国陆相页岩强非均质性的能力有限,使得源储关系对页岩油富集的控制作用尚未得到系统揭示。本文以鄂尔多斯盆地陇东地区长71-2亚段夹层型页岩油为研究对象,根据砂岩、泥岩的叠置关系和厚度,结合X射线衍射测试划分出3类源储组合,并根据高压压汞测试、氮气吸附测试、普通薄片、铸体薄片、扫描电镜图像和二维核磁T1-T2图谱综合探究页岩油储层特征、孔隙结构差异和赋存状态。结果表明:Ⅰ类源储组合为厚层砂岩与厚层泥岩叠置,以介孔和宏孔为主,微孔有少量分布,孔隙连通性好,孔隙分布均匀;粒间孔为主体,发育少量粒内溶孔,微裂缝发育;介、宏孔隙中广泛分布可动油,是页岩油富集的有利组合。Ⅱ类源储组合为薄层砂岩与厚层泥岩叠置,微、介孔较为发育;发育少量粒间孔、粒内溶孔和微裂缝;微孔中广泛分布重组分残余油,可动性一般,页岩油富集能力适中。Ⅲ类源储组合为薄层砂岩与薄层泥岩叠置,以黏土矿物胶结孔和碳酸盐胶结孔为主,孔隙致密,孔隙连通差;孔隙中广泛分布毛细管束缚水,限制了可动油的流动,不利于页岩油富集。长英质矿物显著促进介孔和宏孔的可动油赋存与运移,黏土矿物则促使油以吸附态或残余态赋存,两者为页岩油富集的主控因素。平均孔隙半径、最大汞饱和度、孔隙度、渗透率和比表面积为页岩油富集的次要因素。


关键词: 鄂尔多斯盆地, 长71-2亚段, 源储组合, 储层特征, 页岩油, 富集模式

Abstract: The pronounced heterogeneity of source–reservoir architectures in continental shale systems has not yet been adequately captured by existing classification schemes, which constrains a systematic understanding of shale oil enrichment mechanisms. Although various source–reservoir classification frameworks have been proposed, their applicability to the strongly heterogeneous continental shales of China remains limited, and consequently the controlling role of source–reservoir relationships on shale oil enrichment has not been comprehensively elucidated. This paper takes the interbedded shale oil reservoirs of the Chang 71-2 Submember in Longdong area of the Ordos basin as the research object. Based on the superimposition relationship and thickness of sandstone and mudstone, combined with X-ray diffraction tests, three types of source-reservoir assemblages are classified. Furthermore, relying on high-pressure mercury intrusion tests, nitrogen adsorption tests, ordinary thin sections, casting thin sections, scanning electron microscopy images, and two-dimensional NMR T1-T2 spectra, the differences in shale oil reservoirs, pore structures, and occurrence states are comprehensively explored. The results show that: type Ⅰ source-reservoir assemblage is dominated by mesopores and macropores, with a small amount of micropores, featuring good pore connectivity and uniform pore distribution; It is mainly composed of intergranular pores, with a small number of intragranular dissolution pores developed, and microfractures are well-developed; Movable oil is widely distributed in mesopores and macropores, making it a favorable assemblage for shale oil enrichment. Type Ⅱ source-reservoir assemblage has relatively developed micropores and mesopores; It develops a small number of intergranular pores, a small number of intragranular dissolution pores, and a small number of microfractures; Heavy-component residual oil is widely distributed in micropores, with moderate mobility, resulting in moderate shale oil enrichment capacity. Type Ⅲ source-reservoir assemblage is dominated by micropores; It is mainly composed of clay mineral cementation pores and carbonate cementation pores, with dense pores and poor pore connectivity; Capillary-bound water is widely distributed in the pores, restricting the flow of movable oil and being unfavorable for shale oil enrichment. Felsic minerals significantly promote the occurrence and migration of movable oil in mesopores and macropores, whereas clay minerals favor the retention of oil in adsorbed or residual states; Together, these mineralogical components constitute the primary controlling factors for shale oil enrichment. In contrast, average pore radius, maximum mercury saturation, porosity, permeability, and specific surface area act as secondary controlling factors for shale oil enrichment. 


中图分类号: 

  • P618.12
[1] 陈泽熙, 徐志明, 李斌, 钟笠, 彭军, 张昆, 魏祥峰, 郝景宇. 基质型页岩甜点特征及评价方法:以四川盆地涪陵地区中侏罗统凉高山组陆相页岩为例[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2026, 56(3): 788-803.
[2] 杨烁, 丁毅, 杜发述, 祖贺川, 张君毅, 刘强, 张祺, 苏涛. 二连盆地阿南凹陷腾格尔组构造-岩性油气藏形成条件及富集模式[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2026, 56(3): 754-767.
[3] 王健, 张媛瑗, 吴楠, 徐清海, 崔子岳, 刘显凤, 付清萌. 鄂尔多斯盆地志靖—安塞地区长7段夹层型页岩油储层特征及分类评价[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2026, 56(2): 453-468.
[4] 刘涛, 刘宗堡, 张可佳, 张岩, 张瑞雪, 刘晓文, 徐翠云.

基于深度学习的致密砂岩储层薄片图像生成与识别方法 [J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2026, 56(2): 724-738.

[5] 刘静怡, 陈守民, 申战勇, 王筱晔, 董宪鹏, 张雯, 朱玉双, .

致密储层微观孔隙结构特征及其对渗流特征的影响——以鄂尔多斯盆地姬塬地区长6储层为例 [J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2025, 55(5): 1434-1444.

[6] 张可佳, 廖明月, 刘涛, 赵玉武, 刘宗堡, 田枫, 张岩, 贺友志.

基于改进BlendMask的页岩扫描电镜图像矿物鉴定方法 [J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2025, 55(4): 1387-1400.

[7] 肖正录, 李勇, 路俊刚, 秦春雨, 刘章昊, 周翔, 蒋奇君, 周易鑫. 四川盆地侏罗系大安寨段页岩油富集条件及有利勘探目标[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2025, 55(4): 1039-1050.
[8] 王安, 胡明毅, 高家俊, 杨亮, 邢济麟. 松南长岭凹陷青山口组一段泥页岩元素地球化学特征及古环境意义[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2024, 54(6): 2075-2088.
[9] 谢兵, 徐昉昊, 范彩伟, 满勇, 江凡, 徐国盛, 张喜淳, 李安然. 北部湾盆地涠西南凹陷灰岩潜山储层岩溶识别及发育模式[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2024, 54(6): 2029-2046.
[10] 于正军, 张军华, 周昊, 任瑞军, 陈永芮, 杨玉龙. 准噶尔盆地东南缘页岩油储层脆性预测与评价[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2024, 54(5): 1711-1723.
[11] 蔡潇, 夏威, 马晓东, 臧素华, 丁安徐, 刘玉霞, 花彩霞, 朱一川, 李辉. 苏北盆地溱潼凹陷古近系阜宁组页岩油储集空间特征及其影响因素[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2024, 54(5): 1482-1493.
[12] 惠瑞瑞, 刘妍, 张志升, 张治东, 李斌, 郭爱华. 鄂尔多斯盆地安塞地区延长组长9段原油地球化学特征与油源对比[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2024, 54(5): 1468-1481.
[13] 李晓光, 倪智勇, 宋到福, 张旋, 韩子敬, 张威, 安川. 杭锦旗地区二叠系储层油气成藏期次及流体势特征[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2024, 54(4): 1110-1123.
[14] 李勇霖, 倪智勇, 李晓光, 韩子敬, 张威, 安川. 鄂尔多斯盆地杭锦旗地区断控气藏差异[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2024, 54(3): 773-783.
[15] 冯若琦, 刘正伟, 孟越, 蒋丽婷, 韩作为, 刘林玉.

烃源岩有机碳测井预测模型优选及应用——以鄂尔多斯盆地安塞地区延长组长9为例 [J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2024, 54(2): 688--700.

Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!