J4

• 松辽盆地火山岩储层专刊 • 上一篇    下一篇

营城组一段及下段岩性岩相和储层物性的精细刻画--基于标准剖面营一D1井全取心钻孔资料

吴颜雄1,王璞珺1,曲立才2,闵飞琼1,李喆1,任利军1   

  1. 1.吉林大学 地球科学学院,长春 130061;2.大庆油田 勘探开发研究院,黑龙江 大庆 163712
  • 收稿日期:2007-06-20 修回日期:1900-01-01 出版日期:2007-11-26 发布日期:2007-11-26
  • 通讯作者: 吴颜雄

Detailed Description of Lithology, Lithofacies and Porosity and Permeability of the First and the Lower Member of Yingcheng Formation :Based on the Latest Data of Ying-1D1 Well Cores in Standard Section

WU Yan-xiong1,WANG Pu-jun1,QU Li-cai2,MIN Fei-qiong1,LI Zhe1,REN Li-jun1   

  1. 1.College of Earth Sciences,Jilin University,Changchun 130061,China;2.Daqing Exploration & Development Institute,Daqing,Heilongjiang 163712,China
  • Received:2007-06-20 Revised:1900-01-01 Online:2007-11-26 Published:2007-11-26
  • Contact: WU Yan-xiong

摘要: 营一D1井是2006年为揭示营城组内幕基准剖面而布置的探井。经揭示,营城组一段及下段岩性为:熔岩,包括流纹岩、松脂岩、珍珠岩和玄武岩;火山碎屑熔岩,包括角砾熔岩、凝灰熔岩和熔结凝灰岩;火山碎屑岩,包括火山角砾岩和凝灰岩;沉火山碎屑岩,包括沉凝灰岩和沉火山角砾岩。其岩相主要为喷溢相、爆发相和火山沉积相。物性测试资料显示,该井岩心平均孔隙度为15.17%,平均渗透率为1.51×10-3μm2,孔渗线性相关性较好。根据压汞数据各参数将孔隙结构分为6类。综合评价物性与孔隙结构,将该井段划出4类储层:Ⅰ类为好储层,高-特高孔、特高渗,细、中、粗喉共存,粗喉比例大;Ⅱ类为次好储层,高孔、高渗,细喉为主;Ⅲ类储层为中等储层,中孔、中渗,细喉;Ⅳ类为差储层,中、低孔,低溶,细喉。

关键词: 营城组, 岩性, 岩相, 储层物性, 储层评价

Abstract: Yingyi-D1 well, an exploratory well, was drilled to reveal the insider of standard section of Yingcheng Formation in 2006. Volcanic lavas, pyroclastic lavas, pyroclastic rocks and sedimentary pyroclastic rocks have been found in this well. The volcanic lavas include rhyolite, pitchstone, perlite and basalt. Pyroclastic lavas are consisted of breccia lava, tuff lava and ignimbrite. Pyroclastic rocks are mainly composed of volcanic breccia and tuff. Sedimentary pyroclastic rocks are mainly sedimentary tuff and sedimentary volcanic breccia. They mainly belong to effusive facies, explosive facies and volcanogenic sedimentary facies. The average porosity is 15.17% and the average permeability is 1.51×10-3μm2. The porosity is linearly correlated to permeability. Based on the mercury injection capillary pressure data, the pore structures could be classified into six types. Synthetical evaluation of porosity & permeability and pore structure, the reservoirs were classified into four types. Type I is a perfect reservoir with high to super-high porosity and super-high permeability, coarse throat dominating. Type Ⅱ is good reservoir with high porosity & permeability, fine throat dominating. Type Ⅲ is a medium reservoir with medium porosity, medium permeability and fine throat. Type Ⅳ is a poor reservoir with medium to low porosity, low permeability and fine throat.

Key words: Yingcheng Formation, lithology, lithofacies, porosity & permeability, reservoir assessment

中图分类号: 

  • P588.14
[1] 刘宗利, 王祝文, 刘菁华, 赵淑琴, 欧伟明. 辽河东部凹陷火山岩相测井响应特征及储集意义[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2018, 48(1): 285-297.
[2] 张志, 管志超, 王少军. 结合实测光谱的ASTER TIR数据岩性划分与构造样式分析:以新疆阿克苏蓝片岩为例[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2018, 48(1): 334-342.
[3] 陈欢庆, 穆剑东, 王珏, 邓西里. 扇三角洲沉积储层特征与定量评价——以辽河西部凹陷某试验区于楼油层为例[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2017, 47(1): 14-24.
[4] 贾珍臻, 林承焰, 任丽华, 董春梅, 宫宝. 苏德尔特油田低渗透凝灰质砂岩成岩作用及储层质量差异性演化[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2016, 46(6): 1624-1636.
[5] 姜贵璞. 陆相断陷盆地油气空间互补分布成因及分布范围的确定方法[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2016, 46(6): 1649-1659.
[6] 邱隆伟, 师政, 付大巍, 潘泽浩, 杨生超, 曲长胜. 临南洼陷沙三段孔隙度控制因素分析与定量模型[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2016, 46(5): 1321-1331.
[7] 王冠民, 熊周海, 张婕. 岩性差异对泥页岩可压裂性的影响分析[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2016, 46(4): 1080-1089.
[8] 陈圣波, 于亚凤, 杨金中, 王楠, 梦华. 基于实测光谱指数法的ASTER遥感数据岩性信息提取[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2016, 46(3): 938-944.
[9] 修立君, 邵明礼, 唐华风, 董常春, 高有峰. 松辽盆地白垩系营城组火山岩孔缝单元类型和特征[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2016, 46(1): 11-22.
[10] 陈彬滔, 潘树新, 梁苏娟, 张庆石, 刘彩燕, 王革. 陆相湖盆深水块体搬运体优质储层的主控因素以松辽盆地英台地区青山口组为例[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2015, 45(4): 1002-1010.
[11] 马奔奔, 操应长, 王艳忠, 刘惠民, 高永进. 东营凹陷盐家地区沙四上亚段砂砾岩储层岩相与物性关系[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2015, 45(2): 495-506.
[12] 牟丹, 王祝文, 黄玉龙, 许石, 周大鹏. 基于最小二乘支持向量机测井识别火山岩类型:以辽河盆地中基性火山岩为例[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2015, 45(2): 639-648.
[13] 郭华, 贾伟洁, 王平, 谢汝宽. 航磁梯度数据在磁性地质体边界判断方面的研究[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2015, 45(1): 273-281.
[14] 陈树民,姜传金,刘立,初丽兰,裴明波. 松辽盆地徐家围子断陷火山岩裂缝形成机理[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2014, 44(6): 1816-1826.
[15] 尤丽,张迎朝,李才,张哨楠,招湛杰. 基于沉积成岩-储集相分析确定文昌9区低渗储层“甜点”分布[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2014, 44(5): 1432-1440.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!