J4

• 松辽盆地火山岩储层专刊 • 上一篇    下一篇

松辽盆地营城组火山岩定量储层地质模型及其精细描述

张斌1,王璞珺1,丁日新2,许中杰1   

  1. 1.吉林大学 地球科学学院,长春 130061;2.大庆油田 勘探开发研究院,黑龙江 大庆 163712
  • 收稿日期:2007-06-20 修回日期:1900-01-01 出版日期:2007-11-26 发布日期:2007-11-26
  • 通讯作者: 张斌

Geologic Model Quantification and Characterization for Volcanic Reservoir of the Yingcheng Formation in Songliao Basin

ZHANG Bin1, WANG Pu-jun1, DING Ri-xin2, XU Zhong-jie1   

  1. 1.College of Earth Sciences, Jilin University, Changchun 130061, China;2.Daqing Exploration & Development Institute,Daqing,Heilongjiang 163712,China
  • Received:2007-06-20 Revised:1900-01-01 Online:2007-11-26 Published:2007-11-26
  • Contact: ZHANG Bin

摘要: 储层地质模型指火山岩的岩性岩相和储层物性的空间分布。通过对营城组火山岩剖面的详细研究,结合2口钻井的岩心资料,详细划分对比储层单元,定量刻画火山岩储层。研究区火山岩相呈喷溢相→爆发相→喷溢相+侵出相→火山沉积相→爆发相→火山通道相+喷溢相的序列特征。爆发相、喷溢相规模最大,各亚相侧向延伸在400~4 000 m,单层厚度为2~130 m;火山通道相、侵出相和火山沉积相的规模较小,侧向延伸为110~1 500 m,单层厚度为3~85 m。营下段为Ⅰ类、Ⅲ类储层,营一段为Ⅰ类、Ⅱ类储层夹Ⅳ类储层,营二段为Ⅰ类储层,营三段为互层的Ⅰ类、Ⅱ类、Ⅲ类储层夹薄层Ⅳ类储层。上部亚相、火山颈亚相、内带亚相是最好储层,下部亚相、隐爆角砾岩亚相为较好储层,爆发相为中等储层,中部亚相、火山沉积相为差储层。火山熔岩类物性随埋深增加变化小,火山碎屑岩类物性随埋深增加变化大,低孔、低渗岩石的物性随埋深增加变化小。

关键词: 松辽盆地, 营城组, 火山岩储层, 露头, 岩相模型, 储层模型

Abstract: Here reservoir geologic model refers to the spatial distribution characteristics of lithology, lithofacies and porosity & permeability for reservoir volcanic rocks. Field sections and two drilling wells are studied in detail here, reservoir units are divided and compared, and thus the volcanic reservoirs of the area are finally quantified and characterized. Volcanic facies sequence in the area under study is mainly effusive facies→ explosive facies→ effusive facies & extrusive facies→ volcanic sedimentary facies→ explosive facies→ volcanic conduit facies & effusive facies. Explosive facies and effusive facies are of the largest scales, with lateral ranging of some subfacies from 400 m to 4 000 m and thickness of a single layer ranging from 2 m to 130 m. Volcanic conduit facies, extrusive facies and volcanic sedimentary facies are smaller, lateral range is from 110 m to 1 500 m and thickness of single layer is from 3m to 85 m. According to volcanic reservoir classifying standards, the lower member of the Yingcheng Formation is the first and third grade, the 1st member is the first and second grade, with the fourth grade, the 2nd member is the first grade, and the 3rd member is interbedded by the first, second and third grades with thin layers of the fourth grade. The upper subfacies, volcanic neck subfacies and inner subfacies are the best volcanic reservoirs. The lower subfacies and hydrothermal breccias subfacies are better volcanic reservoirs, the explosive facies is middle, and the middle subfacies and volcanic sedimentary facies are bad volcanic reservoirs. Porosity and permeability of volcanic lavas would be slightly affected by their buried depth, while pyroclastic rocks would be getting worse with increasing buried depth. Volcanic rocks with low porosity and low permeability would be affected little by their buried depth.

Key words: Songliao Basin, Yingcheng Formation, volcanic reservoir, outcrop, lithofacies model, reservoir model

中图分类号: 

  • P618.13
[1] 马国庆, 孟庆发, 黄大年. 基于重力异常的松辽盆地构造特征识别[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2018, 48(2): 507-516.
[2] 潘保芝, 刘文斌, 张丽华, 郭宇航, 阿茹罕. 一种提高储层裂缝识别准确度的方法[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2018, 48(1): 298-306.
[3] 蔡来星, 卢双舫, 肖国林, 王蛟, 吴志强, 郭兴伟, 侯方辉. 论优质源储耦合关系的控藏作用:对比松南致密油与松北致密气成藏条件[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2018, 48(1): 15-28.
[4] 刘宗利, 王祝文, 刘菁华, 赵淑琴, 欧伟明. 辽河东部凹陷火山岩相测井响应特征及储集意义[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2018, 48(1): 285-297.
[5] 鲍新华, 张宇, 李野, 吴永东, 马丹, 周广慧. 松辽盆地增强型地热系统开发选区评价[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2017, 47(2): 564-572.
[6] 李永刚. 松南气田火山岩致密储层分类及有利目标潜力评价[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2017, 47(2): 344-354.
[7] 高翔, 刘志宏, 聂志阳, 姚勇, 贾卧, 王超, 宋健. 松辽盆地大庆长垣形成时间的厘定及其地质意义[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2017, 47(1): 74-83.
[8] 林承焰, 曹铮, 任丽华, 张昌盛, 范瑞峰, 王叶, 邢新亚, 马晓兰. 松辽盆地南部大情字井向斜区葡萄花油层石油富集规律及成藏模式[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2016, 46(6): 1598-1610.
[9] 王璞珺, 缴洋洋, 杨凯凯, 张增宝, 边伟华. 准噶尔盆地火山岩分类研究与应用[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2016, 46(4): 1056-1070.
[10] 刘财, 杨宝俊, 冯晅, 单玄龙, 田有, 刘洋, 鹿琪, 刘才华, 杨冬, 王世煜. 论油气资源的多元勘探[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2016, 46(4): 1208-1220.
[11] 温志良, 姜福平, 钟长林, 姜雪飞, 王果谦, 齐岩. 松辽盆地东南隆起超大型油页岩矿床特征及成因[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2016, 46(3): 681-691.
[12] 康健, 韦庆海, 周琳, 高研, 张永刚, 高峰. 利用地震台阵观测资料研究大庆地区深部构造[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2016, 46(3): 900-910.
[13] 修立君, 邵明礼, 唐华风, 董常春, 高有峰. 松辽盆地白垩系营城组火山岩孔缝单元类型和特征[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2016, 46(1): 11-22.
[14] 何辉, 孔垂显, 蒋庆平, 邓西里, 肖芳伟, 李顺明. 准噶尔盆地西北缘二叠系火山岩储层裂缝发育特征及分布预测—以金龙2井区佳木河组为例[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2015, 45(5): 1278-1288.
[15] 那金, 许天福, 魏铭聪, 冯波, 鲍新华, 姜雪. 增强地热系统热储层-盐水-CO2相互作用[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2015, 45(5): 1493-1501.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!