Journal of Jilin University(Earth Science Edition) ›› 2016, Vol. 46 ›› Issue (5): 1527-1537.doi: 10.13278/j.cnki.jjuese.201605301

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Transient Electromagnetic Method Modeling in Ground-Borehole Model with Overburden Influence

Yang Haiyan1,2, Yue Jianhua3, Xu Zhengyu2, Zhang Hua2, Jiang Zhihai3   

  1. 1. State Key Laboratory Breeding Base of Nuclear Resources and Environment, East China Institute of Technology, Nanchang 330013, China;
    2. Fundamental Science on Radioactive Geology and Exploration Technology Laboratory, East China Institute of Technology, Nanchang 330013, China;
    3. School of Resource and Earth Science, China University of Mining & Technology, Xuzhou 221116, Jiangsu, China
  • Received:2016-01-09 Online:2016-09-26 Published:2016-09-26
  • Supported by:

    Supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (41564001, 41164003, 41264004, 41304113, 41174107) and Natural Science Foundation of Jiangxi Province(20151BAB203045)

PDF (PC)

441

Abstract:

As one of the effective methods used to geological prospecting, three dimensional modeling of ground-borehole transient electromagnetic method can offer help for data processing and interpretation. Based on time domain finite difference algorithm, ground-borehole transient electromagnetic response was simulated under three dimensional geological and overburden model. Ground-borehole transient response characteristics of conductive body and overburden, and influenced factors of overburden were analyzed by using the parameter EA. The results indicate that, ground-borehole transient response curves appear two high and one low extreme value when the conductive body locating below transmitter loop. The two high values occur at the depths of upper and down boundary of the body, while the low value occurs at depth of the center of the body. The curves show one single extreme value when the body locating beside loop, which is similar to overburden. Transient field value of overburden is higher than that of conductive body when the body has a lower resistivity because of skin effect. However, the value of overburden is comparatively lower making its influence can be ignored when the distance between transmitter loop and borehole is far enough. Conductor response is related to the ratio of overburden and body. Overburden effect can be effectively reduced.

Key words: ground-borehole transient electromagnetic method, overburden, modeling, finite difference method, Liao absorbing boundary condition

CLC Number: 

  • P631.3

[1] 蒋邦远. 实用近区磁源瞬变电磁法勘探[M]. 北京:地质出版社, 1998. Jiang Bangyuan. Applied near Zone Magnetic Source Transient Electromagnetic Exploration[M]. Beijing:Geological Publishing House, 1998.

[2] 牛之琏. 时间域电磁法勘探[M]. 长沙:中南大学出版社, 2007. Niu Zhilian. The Theory of Time Domain Electromagnetic Methods[M]. Changsha:Central South University of Technology Press, 2007.

[3] 张杰. 地-井瞬变电磁异常特征分析及矢量交会解释方法[D]. 北京:中国地质大学, 2009. Zhang Jie. Analysis of Anomalous Character and Study Vector Intersection for Down-Hole Transient Electromagnetic Method[D]. Beijing:China University of Geosciences, 2009.

[4] 戴雪平.地-井瞬变电磁法三维响应特征研究[D]. 北京:中国地质大学, 2013. Dai Xueping. Research on Three-Dimensional Response Characteristic of Borehole Transient Electromagnetic Method[D]. Beijing:China University of Geosciences, 2013.

[5] Woods D V. A Model Study of the Crone Borehole Pulse Electromagnetic (PEM) System[Z]. Ontario:Queen's University,, 1975.

[6] Dyck A V, West G F. The Role of Simple Computer Models in Interpretations of Wide-Band, Drill-Hole Electromagnetic Surveys in Mineral Exploration[J]. Geophysics, 1984, 49(7):957-980.

[7] Macnae J, Staltari G. Classification of Sign Changes in Borehole TEM Decays[J]. Exploration Geophysics,1987, 18(3):331-339.

[8] Newman G A, Commer M. New Advances in Three Dimensional Transient Electromagnetic Inversion[J].Geophysical Journal International, 2005, 160(1):5-32.

[9] Buselli G, Lee S K. Modelling of Drill-Hole TEM Response from Multiple Targets Covered by a Conductive Overburden[J]. Exploration Geophysics, 1996, 27(3):141-153.

[10] 孟庆鑫, 潘和平. 地-井瞬变电磁响应特征数值模拟分析[J]. 地球物理学报, 2012, 55(3):1046-1053. Meng Qingxin, Pan Heping. Numerical Simulation Analysis of Surface-Hole TEM Responses[J]. Chinese Journal of Geophysics, 2012, 55(3):1046-1053

[11] 孟庆鑫, 潘和平,牛峥. 大地介质影响下地-井瞬变电磁的正演模拟研究[J]. 中国矿业大学学报, 2014, 43(6):1113-1119. Meng Qingxin, Pan Heping, Niu Zheng. Forward Simulation of Surface-Borehole TEM in Geological Medium Effect[J].Journal of China University of Mining & Technology, 2014, 43(6):1113-1119.

[12] 杨海燕,岳建华.吸收边界条件在全空间瞬变电磁计算中的应用[J].中国矿业大学学报, 2009,38(2):263-268. Yang Haiyan, Yue Jianhua. Application of Absorbing Boundary Condition in Whole-Space Computation of Transient Electromagnetic Response[J]. Journal of China University of Mining & Technology, 2009, 38(2):263-268.

[13] 杨海燕,邓居智,张华,等. 矿井瞬变电磁法全空间视电阻率解释方法研究[J]. 地球物理学报,2010,53(3):651-656. Yang Haiyan, Deng Juzhi, Zhang Hua, et al. Research on Full-Space Apparent Resistivity Interpretation Technique in Mine Transient Electromagnetic Method[J]. Chinese Journal of Geophysics, 2010, 53(3):651-656.

[14] 杨海燕, 岳建华.矿井瞬变电磁法理论与技术研究[M]. 1版. 北京:科学出版社, 2015. Yang Haiyan, Yue Jianhua. The Theory and Technique of Mine Transient Electromagnetic Method[M]. 1st ed. Beijing:Science Press, 2015

[15] 岳建华,杨海燕,胡搏.矿井瞬变电磁法三维时域有限差分数值模拟[J].地球物理学进展,2007, 22(6):1904-1909. Yue Jianhua, Yang Haiyan, Hu Bo.3D Finite Difference Time Domain Numerical Simulation for TEM in Mine[J]. Progress in Geophysics, 2007, 22(6):1904-1909.

[16] 岳建华,杨海燕,邓居智.层状介质中地下瞬变电磁场全空间效应[J].地球物理学进展,2012,27(4):1385-1392. Yue Jianhua, Yang Haiyan, Deng Juzhi. Whole-Space Effect on Underground Transient Electromagnetic Field in Layered Media[J]. Progress in Geophysics,2012,27(4):1385-1392.

[17] 米萨克N纳比吉安.勘查地球物理电磁法:第1卷[M].赵经祥,王艳君,译.北京:地质出版社,1992. Misac N N. Electromagnetic Methods in Applied Geoghysics:Volume I[M]. Translated by Zhao Jingxiang, Wang Yanjun. Beijing:Geological Publishing House, 1992.

[18] 杨海燕,邓居智,汤洪志,等.全空间瞬变电磁法资料解释方法中的平移算法[J].吉林大学学报(地球科学版),2014, 44(3):1012-1017. Yang Haiyan, Deng Juzhi, Tang Hongzhi, et al. Translation Algorithm of Data Interpretation Technique in Full-Space Transient Electromagnetic Method[J]. Journal of Jilin University (Earth Sciences Edition), 2014, 44(3):1012-1017.

[19] 王言章,杨蒙蒙,符磊,等.浅层不均匀体对大定源瞬变电磁响应的影响[J].吉林大学学报(地球科学版),2014,44(2):653-659. Wang Yanzhang, Yang Mengmeng, Fu Lei, et al. Infuence of the Shallow Heterogeneities to the TEM Response of the Large Fixed Loop[J]. Journal of Jilin University (Earth Sciences Edition), 2014, 44(2):653-659.

[20] Oristaglio M L. Diffusion of Electromagnetic Fields into the Earth from a Line Source of Current[J]. Geophysics, 1982, 47(11):1585-1592.

[21] 孙怀风,李貅,李术才,等.考虑关断时间的回线源激发TEM三维时域有限差分正演[J].地球物理学报,2013,56(3):1049-1064. Sun Huaifeng, Li Xiu, Li Shucai, et al.Three-Dimensional FDTD Modeling of TEM Excited by a Loop Source Considering Ramp Time[J]. Chinese Journal of Geophysics, 2013, 56(3):1049-1064.

[22] 闫述,陈明生,傅君眉.瞬变电磁场的直接时域数值分析[J].地球物理学报, 2002, 45(2):275-284. Yan Shu, Chen Mingsheng, Fu Junmei. Direct Time-Domain Numerical Analysis of Transient Electromagnetic Fields[J]. Chinese Journal of Geophysics, 2002, 45(2):275-284.

[23] 谭捍东,余钦范,John Booker,等. 大地电磁法三维交错采样有限差分数值模拟[J].地球物理学报,2003,46(5):705-711. Tan Handong, Yu Qinfan, John B, et al. Magne-totelluric Three-Dimensional Modeling Using the Staggered-Grid Finite Difference Method[J]. Chinese Journal of Geophysics, 2003, 46(5):705-711.

[24] 董浩,魏文博,叶高峰,等.基于有限差分正演的带地形三维大地电磁反演方法[J].地球物理学报,2014,57(3):939-952. Dong Hao, Wei Wenbo, Ye Gaofeng, et al. Study of Three-Dimensional Magnetotelluric Inversion Including Surface Topography Based on Finite-Difference Method[J]. Chinese Journal of Geophysics, 2014, 57(3):939-952.

[25] Greenfield R J, Wu S T. Electromagnetic Wave Propa-gation in Disrupted Coal Seams[J]. Geophysics, 1991, 56(10):1571-1577.
[1] Zheng Guolei, Xu Xinxue, Li Shibin, Yuan Hang, Ma Wei, Ye Qing. Inversion of Gravity Data in Tianjin [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Earth Science Edition), 2018, 48(4): 1221-1230.
[2] Li Jianping, Weng Aihua, Li Shiwen, Li Dajun, Li Sirui, Yang Yue, Tang Yu, Zhang Yanhui. 3-D Forward Method for Geomagnetic Depth Sounding Based on Finite Difference Method in Spherical Coordinate [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Earth Science Edition), 2018, 48(2): 411-419.
[3] Yin Changchun, Lu Yongchao, Liu Yunhe, Zhang Bo, Qi Yanfu, Cai Jing. Multigrid Quasi-Linear Approximation for Three-Dimensional Airborne EM Forward Modeling [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Earth Science Edition), 2018, 48(1): 252-260.
[4] Lin Chengyan, Wang Yang, Yang Shan, Ren Lihua, You Chunmei, Wu Songtao, Wu Yuqi, Zhang Yimin. 3D Modeling of Digital Core Based on X-ray Computed Tomography [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Earth Science Edition), 2018, 48(1): 307-317.
[5] Zhao Yuyan, Li Bing, Lu Jilong, Hao Libo, Zhao Yu, Wang Dongming. Geochemical and Geophysical Information Integration Technology for Geological Mapping at Shallow Overburden Area in Northeast China [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Earth Science Edition), 2018, 48(1): 318-333.
[6] An Zhenfang, Zhang Jin, Zhang Jianzhong. Geometry Optimization Design of Three Dimensional Marine Vertical Cable [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Earth Science Edition), 2018, 48(1): 271-284.
[7] Weng Aihua, Li Sirui, Yang Yue, Li Dajun, Li Jianping, Li Shiwen. Basic Principle, Current Status and Prospect of Magnetometric Resistivity [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Earth Science Edition), 2017, 47(6): 1838-1854.
[8] Zhang Baoyi, Yang Li, Chen Xiaoyang, Deng Hao, Mao Xiancheng. Regional Metallogenic Geo-Bodies 3D Modeling and Mineral Resource Assessment Based on Geologic Map Cut Cross-Sections: A Case Study of Manganese Deposits in Southwestern Guangxi, China [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Earth Science Edition), 2017, 47(3): 933-948.
[9] Dong Weihong, Meng Ying, Wang Yushan, Wu Xiancang, Lü Ying, Zhao Hui. Hydrochemical Characteristics and Formation of the Shallow Groundwater in Fujin,Sanjiang Plain [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Earth Science Edition), 2017, 47(2): 542-553.
[10] Song Zhi, Deng Ronggui, Chen Zeshuo, Feng Wei. Physical Simulation and Early Identification of Dadu River Blocking Due to Moxi River Debris Flow [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Earth Science Edition), 2017, 47(1): 163-170.
[11] Wu Zhichun, Guo Fusheng, Lin Ziyu, Hou Manqing, Luo Jianqun. Technology and Method of Multi-Data Merging in 3D Geological Modeling [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Earth Science Edition), 2016, 46(6): 1895-1913.
[12] Zhang Yuqing, Wang Hui, Fan Ting'en, Song Laiming, Nie Yan, Liang Xu, Chen Fei. Granite Buried Hill Reservoir Characterization and Modeling:Taking Offshore a Oilfield in Bohai Bay as an Example [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Earth Science Edition), 2016, 46(5): 1312-1320.
[13] Zhu Chuanhua, Wang Weifeng, Wang Qingzhen, Li Yukun. Numerical Simulation of Structural Strain for Turbidite Sands Reservoirs of Low Permeability [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Earth Science Edition), 2016, 46(5): 1580-1588.
[14] Sun Jianguo. High-Frequency Asymptotic Scattering Theories and Their Applications in Numerical Modeling and Imaging of Geophysical Fields: An Overview of the Research History and the State-of-the-Art, and Some New Developments [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Earth Science Edition), 2016, 46(4): 1231-1259.
[15] Zou Youqin, Liu Li, Li Hongqing, Yan Chun, Zeng Masun, Lan Yingying. Hydrogeological Conditions Control of Shale Gas Exploration [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Earth Science Edition), 2016, 46(3): 824-830.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!
Copyright © Journal of Jilin University(Earth Science Edition), All Rights Reserved.
Tel: +86-431-88502374；13756165364　E-mail: xuebao1956@jlu.edu.cn
Powered by Beijing Magtech Co. Ltd