Journal of Jilin University(Earth Science Edition) ›› 2024, Vol. 54 ›› Issue (5): 1645-1656.doi: 10.13278/j.cnki.jjuese.20230090

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Proportioning of Similar Materials in Rock Physical Simulation Experiments

Niu Yao1, Su Zhandong1,2, Sun Jinzhong3, Zhang Hao1, Wu Xueli1, Lin Qiqi1, Wang Zhiwen1,

Li Zimeng1, Zhu Huanxin1, Zhang Jianyong1,2, Liang Jinping1,2   

  1. 1. Department of Geological Engineering, Institute of Disaster Prevention, Sanhe 065201, Hebei, China

    2. Hebei Key Laboratory of Earthquake Disaster Prevention and Risk Assessment, Sanhe 065201, Hebei, China

    3. School of Engineering and Technology, China University of Geosciences (Beijing), Beijing 100083, China

  • Online:2024-09-26 Published:2024-10-12
  • Supported by:
    Supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (41807270),the Fundamental Research Fund for the Central Universities (ZY20215113) and the Science and Technology Innovation Program of Postgraduate Students in Institute of Disaster Prevention (ZY20230311)

Abstract:

In order to determine the ratio of similar materials commonly used in physical simulation experiments, four raw materials including river sand, barite powder, gypsum and cement were selected, and orthogonal design was adopted. Bone glue ratio (ratio of river sand mass and  barite powder mass to gypsum mass and cement mass), water-paste ratio (ratio of cement mass to gypsum mass) and barite content (ratio of barite powder mass to aggregate mass), with five levels for each factor, were set to carry out density test and acoustic emission test under uniaxial compression. The sensitivity of different proportions to the physical and mechanical indexes of similar materials and the indexes of damage degree were determined. The experimental results show that the density, compressive strength and elastic modulus of similar materials under the influence of bone glue ratio have the largest range, which are 0.13 g/cm3, 2.60 MPa and 247 MPa, respectively, F-test has the largest value, and the significance is the highest. Poisson’s ratio has the largest range under the influence of barite content, which is 0.09, and has the highest significance. The relative cumulative damage degree (D) had the largest range (0.25) under the influence of bone glue ratio, and the F test value was the most significant. In general, the bone glue ratio controls the density, compressive strength, elastic modulus and D of similar materials.

Key words: physical model test, similar material, orthogonal design, sensitivity, characteristics of injury

CLC Number: 

  • TU45
[1] Yan Baizhong, Xu Wenjie, Li Yuhan, Sun Jian, Bi Pan, Li Yao, Zhang Xu. Optimal Layout of Pumping and Recharging Wells for Groundwater Source Heat Pump and Parameter Sensitivity [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Earth Science Edition), 2023, 53(1): 218-229.
[2] Zhang Yanjun, Yuan Xuebing, Ma Yueqiang, Gao Xuefeng, Gao Yang. Sensitivity of Thermal-Fluid Coupling Parameters  of Granite Double Fractures#br# [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Earth Science Edition), 2022, 52(6): 1971-1981.
[3] Zhang Lihua, Wang Min, Shan Gangyi, Pan Baozhi, Cao Yue. Analysis on Porosity Stress Sensitivity of Volcanic Rocks with Different Lithology and Its Influencing Factors:#br# Taking Volcanic Rocks in Changling Fault Depression as an Example [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Earth Science Edition), 2022, 52(2): 382-389.
[4] WuMeng1, 2, QinYong2, ShenJian2, SongDangyu3, WangXiaoqing3, ZhangGuchun1, LiGuozhang2, ZhuShifei1. Influencing Factors of Irreducible Water Saturation in Tight Sandstone Reservoirs:A Case Study of Linxing Area in Ordos Basin#br# [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Earth Science Edition), 2022, 52(1): 68-.
[5] Wang Yuxia, Zhou Lifa, Jiao Zunsheng, Shang Qinghua, Huang Shengwang. Sensitivity Evaluation of Tight Sandstone Reservoir in Yanchang Formation in Shanbei Area, Ordos Basin [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Earth Science Edition), 2018, 48(4): 981-990.
[6] Yang Jianping, Liu Zhibin, Yu Xiaolin, Tao Zhengwu, Xu Peng, Li Zhiqiang. Mechanism of Permeability Stress Sensitivity Based on Random Pore Network Simulation [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Earth Science Edition), 2017, 47(2): 626-632.
[7] Jiang Qifeng, Rong Mianshui, Peng Yanju. Quantitative Analysis of Dynamic Shear Modulus Ratio's Effect on Response Spectra [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Earth Science Edition), 2015, 45(3): 876-885.
[8] Zheng Fei, Shi Xiaoqing, Wu Jichun, Zhao Liang, Chen Yang. Global Parametric Sensitivity Analysis of Numerical Simulation for CO2 Geological Sequestration in Saline Aquifers: A Case Study of Yancheng Formation in Subei Basin [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Earth Science Edition), 2014, 44(1): 310-318.
[9] Wang Hongde,Gao Youlong,Xue Xingqiao,Jin Xiaohao,Wang Gang. Optimal Placement of Monitoring Points at Typical Landslide [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Earth Science Edition), 2013, 43(3): 858-866.
[10] Luo Jiannan, Lu Wenxi, Kang Zhu, Song Jing,Zhang Yibo. Global Sensitivity for Surfactant Enhanced Aquifer Remediation Process [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Earth Science Edition), 2013, 43(2): 558-0563.
[11] LIU Hai-fei, LIU Jian-xin, GUO Rong-wen, DENG Xiao-kang, RUAN Bai-yao. Efficient Inversion of 3D IP Data for Continuous Model with Complex Geometry [J]. J4, 2011, 41(4): 1212-1218.
[12] YIN Xiong-rui, ZHANG Guang-xin, YANG Fan, XU Bin. Distributed Hydrological Modeling in Semi-Arid Region in Northeast China: A Case Study in the Taoer River Basin [J]. J4, 2011, 41(1): 137-144.
[13] CHEN Xue-lian,WANG Rui-jia. Investigating Depth of Mode Waves in the Borehole Surrounded by Transversely Isotropic Elastic Formation [J]. J4, 2008, 38(3): 502-0507.
[14] TANG Jie, ZHAO Feng-qin, LI Zhao-yang, WANG Chen-ye. Evaluation of Sensitivity to Alkali-saline Land Supported by GIS [J]. J4, 2006, 36(05): 841-746.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!