Journal of Jilin University(Earth Science Edition) ›› 2026, Vol. 56 ›› Issue (3): 768-787.doi: 10.13278/j.cnki.jjuese.20250218

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Enrichment Mechanism and Enrichment  Model of Shale Oil in Different Source-Reservoir Assemblages of Chang 71-2 Submember in Longdong Area, Ordos Basin

Li Guan1, He Wenxiang1, Wen Zhigang1,2,3, Hu Yong1, Gao Xiaoyang1, Xiao Na4,5   

  1. 1. College of Resources and Environment, Yangtze University, Wuhan 430100, China
    2. Hubei Key Laboratory of Petroleum Geochemistry and Environment(Yangtze University), Wuhan 430100, China
    3. Key Laboratory of Exploration Technologies for Oil and Gas Resources, Ministry of Education(Yangtze University), Wuhan 
    430100, China
    4. College of Petroleum Engineering,Yangtze University,Wuhan 403100, China
    5. Hubei Key Laboratory of Oil and Gas Drilling and Production Engineering (Yangtze University), Wuhan 430100, China 
  • Online:2026-05-26 Published:2026-06-02
  • Supported by:
    Supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (42202177),China National Petroleum Corporation Changqing Oilfield Branch Project (2024-14206) and Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region Natural Science Fund Project(202501A1344)

Abstract: The pronounced heterogeneity of source–reservoir architectures in continental shale systems has not yet been adequately captured by existing classification schemes, which constrains a systematic understanding of shale oil enrichment mechanisms. Although various source–reservoir classification frameworks have been proposed, their applicability to the strongly heterogeneous continental shales of China remains limited, and consequently the controlling role of source–reservoir relationships on shale oil enrichment has not been comprehensively elucidated. This paper takes the interbedded shale oil reservoirs of the Chang 71-2 Submember in Longdong area of the Ordos basin as the research object. Based on the superimposition relationship and thickness of sandstone and mudstone, combined with X-ray diffraction tests, three types of source-reservoir assemblages are classified. Furthermore, relying on high-pressure mercury intrusion tests, nitrogen adsorption tests, ordinary thin sections, casting thin sections, scanning electron microscopy images, and two-dimensional NMR T1-T2 spectra, the differences in shale oil reservoirs, pore structures, and occurrence states are comprehensively explored. The results show that: type Ⅰ source-reservoir assemblage is dominated by mesopores and macropores, with a small amount of micropores, featuring good pore connectivity and uniform pore distribution; It is mainly composed of intergranular pores, with a small number of intragranular dissolution pores developed, and microfractures are well-developed; Movable oil is widely distributed in mesopores and macropores, making it a favorable assemblage for shale oil enrichment. Type Ⅱ source-reservoir assemblage has relatively developed micropores and mesopores; It develops a small number of intergranular pores, a small number of intragranular dissolution pores, and a small number of microfractures; Heavy-component residual oil is widely distributed in micropores, with moderate mobility, resulting in moderate shale oil enrichment capacity. Type Ⅲ source-reservoir assemblage is dominated by micropores; It is mainly composed of clay mineral cementation pores and carbonate cementation pores, with dense pores and poor pore connectivity; Capillary-bound water is widely distributed in the pores, restricting the flow of movable oil and being unfavorable for shale oil enrichment. Felsic minerals significantly promote the occurrence and migration of movable oil in mesopores and macropores, whereas clay minerals favor the retention of oil in adsorbed or residual states; Together, these mineralogical components constitute the primary controlling factors for shale oil enrichment. In contrast, average pore radius, maximum mercury saturation, porosity, permeability, and specific surface area act as secondary controlling factors for shale oil enrichment. 


CLC Number: 

  • P618.12
[1] Chen Zexi, Xu Zhiming, Li Bin, Zhong Li, Peng Jun, Zhang Kun, Wei Xiangfeng, Hao Jingyu. The Characteristics and Evaluation Method of Matrix-Type Shale Sweet Spots: Taking the Middle Jurassic Lianggaoshan Formation of Fuling Area in Sichuan Basin as an Example [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Earth Science Edition), 2026, 56(3): 788-803.
[2] Zhang Wen, Lan Sheng, Ma Wenliang, Wang Jia. Study on the Evolution of Pore Structure Characteristics of Xinjiang Oil Shale During the Heating Progress [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Earth Science Edition), 2023, 53(6): 1689-1705.
[3] . [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Earth Science Edition), 2023, 53(2): 343-.
[4] Gao Jiajun, Meng Qingtao, Zeng Wenren, Li Jinguo, Li Li, Kang Jianan, . Organic Geochemical Characteristics and Depositional Environment Analysis of Eocene Dalianhe Formation Oil Shale in Yilan Basin [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Earth Science Edition), 2023, 53(1): 60-72.
[5] Zhao Yue, Li lei, Si Yunhang, Wang Huimin. Fractal Characteristics and Controlling Factors of Pores in Shallow Shale Gas Reservoirs: A Case Study of Longmaxi Formation in Zhaotong Area, Yunnan Province [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Earth Science Edition), 2022, 52(6): 1813-1829.
[6] Li Chengbo, Ning Chuanqi, Zhong Changlin, Ren Jianchao, Xu Renyu, Yin Shuqin. Discussion on Extent of Exploration Control of Oil Shale Deposits in China [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Earth Science Edition), 2021, 51(1): 13-21.
[7] Hai Lianfu, Wang Lei, Ma Zhijun, Xu Qinghai, Song Yang, Bai Jinhe. Oil Shale Characteristics and Sedimentary Environment of Yan'an Formation in Middle Jurassic in Tanshan Area, Guyuan, Ningxia [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Earth Science Edition), 2020, 50(3): 747-756.
[8] Meng Qingtao, Li Jinguo, Liu Zhaojun, Hu Fei, Xu Chuan. Organic Geochemical Characteristics and Depositional Environment of Oil Shale of Eocene of Paleocene Youganwo Formation in Yangjiao Mining Area of Maoming Basin [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Earth Science Edition), 2020, 50(2): 356-367.
[9] Jia Jianliang, Liu Zhaojun, Meng Qingtao, Sun Pingchang, Xu Jinjun, Liu Rong, Bai Yueyue. Response Mechanism Between Oil Yield and Total Organic Carbon of Non-Marine Oil Shale in China [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Earth Science Edition), 2020, 50(2): 368-377.
[10] Wang Simin, Zang Dongsheng, Wang Xiqiong, Li Jie, Han Song, Li Jianzhong. Oil Shale Features and Sedimentary Environment in Jianchang Basin, Western Liaoning Province [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Earth Science Edition), 2020, 50(2): 326-340.
[11] Song Yu, Liu Zhaojun, Achim Bechtel, Xu Yinbo, Meng Qingtao, Sun Pingchang, Zhu Kai. Controlling Factors of Oil Shale and Coal Oil Yield in Lower Cretaceous Muling Formation in Laoheishan Basin [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Earth Science Edition), 2020, 50(2): 378-391.
[12] Zheng Guodong, Meng Qingtao, Liu Zhaojun. Geochemical Characteristics and Paleolimnological Information of Oil Shale in 1st Member of Qingshankou Formation in Northern Songliao Basin [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Earth Science Edition), 2020, 50(2): 392-404.
[13] Zeng Wenren, Meng Qingtao, Liu Zhaojun, Xu Yinbo, Sun Pingchang, Wang Kebing. Organic Geochemical Characteristics and Paleo-Lake Conditions of Oil Shale of Middle Jurassic Shimengou Formation in Tuanyushan Area of Northern Qaidam Basin [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Earth Science Edition), 2019, 49(5): 1270-1284.
[14] Ma Zhongliang, Wang Qiang, Zheng Lunju, Zhang Caiming. Identification Method & Application of Temperature and Heating Time and Hydrocarbon Conversion Rate of Oil Shale In-Situ Mining [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Earth Science Edition), 2019, 49(2): 394-399.
[15] Abakar Rabiea, Sun Youhong, Han Jing, Guo Mingyi. Catalytic Pyrolysis of Oil Shale in the Presence of Three Kinds of Inorganic Salt [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Earth Science Edition), 2018, 48(4): 1043-1049.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!