Journal of Jilin University(Engineering and Technology Edition) ›› 2024, Vol. 54 ›› Issue (5): 1355-1367.doi: 10.13229/j.cnki.jdxbgxb.20220845

Previous Articles    

Longitudinal seismic mitigation of near⁃fault long⁃span RC soft⁃lighten arch bridge based on viscous damper

Chang-jiang SHAO1,2(),Hao-meng CUI1,Qi-ming QI1,Wei-lin ZHUANG1,2   

  1. 1.School of Civil Engineering，Southwest Jiaotong University，Chengdu 610031，China
    2.National Engineering Research Center of Geological Disaster Prevention Technology in Land Transportation，Southwest Jiaotong University，Chengdu 610031，China
  • Received:2022-07-02 Online:2024-05-01 Published:2024-06-11

RICH HTML

 0   

PDF (PC)

230

Abstract:

To improve the longitudinal seismic performance of long-span soft-lighten arch bridges in high-intensity near-fault regions， the applicability of viscous dampers was discussed for an upper-deck RC arch bridge through the nonlinear time history analysis. The structural system and dynamic characteristics of the novel arch bridge were compared with those of the conventional RC arch bridge. The seismic damage path was explored and the layout schemes of the viscous damper were optimized. The structural response and the mitigation due to dampers were investigated under the near-field and far-field ground motions. The influence of high-order mode was analyzed. The rationality of the mitigation design was investigated based on fragility analysis. The results show that the medium height column is vulnerable to near-field longitudinal and vertical design earthquake， while the arch rib remains elastic. The overall mitigation effect is the best when the dampers are located on the abutments and high columns. The S-shaped distribution of shear force and bending moment envelope of high column with damper is more obvious than the others due to the influence of high-order mode. The structural responses are larger with significant energy dissipation and efficient mitigation under near-field impulse and far-field long-period earthquakes than the other conditions， and the hysteresis loop of the damper would suddenly change under the influence of displacement pulse. The damage probability of mitigation design with excellent application is effectively decreased under four types of near-field and far-field earthquakes. However， the damper should meet the seismic requirements of large force and stroke.

Key words: bridge engineering, soft-lighten long-span arch bridge, near-field and far-field ground motions, seismic mitigation performance, high-order mode, fragility analysis

CLC Number: 

  • U448

Fig. 1

Elevation view and critical sections of the bridge （unit： m）"

Fig. 2

FEM model of the bridge and constitutive model of connecting elements"

Table 1

Constitutive model parameters of connecting elements"

连接单元连接属性
板式橡胶支座剪切刚度k/（kN·m-1）
P2、P7、P8、P15、P16及P21处P5、P6、P17及P18处P3、P4、P19及P20处
367561259198
四氟滑板支座初始刚度k0/（kN·m-1）临界滑动摩擦力Fmax/kN等效刚度keff/（kN·m-1）
675040208
黏滞阻尼器阻尼系数C/（kN·（m·s-1）-α ）速度指数α
500~60000.2~0.8

Table 2

Typical longitudinal vibration modal characteristics"

序号周期/s质量参与系数/%振型特征
13.97060.98主拱纵向弯曲、主梁纵向平动
52.0742.12梁拱反对称竖弯
110.8371.94主跨梁拱反对称竖弯
430.4030.96墩P6、P7、P16、P19纵向弯曲
500.3500.75墩P7、P15纵向弯曲
670.2610.90墩P5、P8纵向弯曲
810.2110.75墩P5、P14纵向弯曲
980.1733.41主跨梁拱反对称竖弯
1020.16111.36主跨梁拱纵向平动
2000.0061.03墩P1及主拱拱肋根部纵向弯曲

Table 3

Parameters of selected ground motions"

地震动断层距/kmPGA/gPGV/（m?s-1）PGD/mPGV/PGA/sPGD/PGV/s
NP5.090.350.760.570.220.76
NF7.290.270.250.090.090.37
FF50.100.120.130.030.110.20
FL36.920.110.120.080.110.66

Fig. 3

Time history and response spectrum curves of ground motions"

Fig.4

Seismic damage evolution of arch bridge"

Fig.5

Longitudinal seismic damage evolution of arch bridge"

Fig.6

Displacements of column tops and bearings"

Fig.7

Internal forces of column bottoms"

Fig.8

Displacements of column tops and bearings"

Table 4

Seismic mitigation ratio of displacement response of bridge column tops and bearings"

地震动墩顶位移减震率/%支座位移减震率/%
P1P5P18P22P1P5P18P22
NP2848481082979883
NF106476-741959745
FF48282-640979336
FL-16971677949867

Fig.9

Shear force and moment responses of column bottoms"

Table 5

Seismic mitigation ratio of shear force and moment response of bridge column bottoms"

地震动墩底剪力减震率/%墩底弯矩减震率/%
P1P5P18P22P1P5P18P22
NP3056452853552
NF12294-5106942-7
FF2047-31-956512-6
FL-410135-263466

Fig.10

Displacement and internal force response envelopes of pier shafts"

Fig.11

Damage state of arch bridge columns"

Fig.12

Total energy of structure"

Fig.13

Hysteretic curves of viscous damper"

Fig.14

Output force and deformation time history curves of viscous damper"

Table 6

Damage indexes of column P18"

损伤状态判断依据曲率/m-1曲率延性比
轻微损伤纵筋首次屈服2.40E-031.000
中等损伤截面等效屈服3.01E-031.256
严重损伤混凝土压应变达到0.0047.75E-033.235
完全破坏截面破坏1.58E-026.573

Fig.15

Acceleration response spectra of ground motions"

Fig.16

Seismic vulnerability curves of column P18"

1 陈宝春,刘君平. 世界拱桥建设与技术发展综述[J]. 交通运输工程学报, 2020, 20(1): 27-41.
Chen Bao-chun, Liu Jun-ping. Review of construction and technology development of arch bridges in the world[J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 2020, 20(1): 27-41.
2 惠迎新,毛明杰,刘海峰,等. 跨断层桥梁结构地震响应影响[J]. 吉林大学学报: 工学版, 2018, 48(6): 1725-1734.
Hui Ying-xin, Mao Ming-jie, Liu Hai-feng, et al. Influence of structural seismic response of bridges crossing active fault[J]. Journal of Jilin University (Engineering and Technology Edition), 2018, 48(6): 1725-1734.
3 云迪,刘贺,张素梅. 中承式钢管混凝土拱桥弹塑性地震时程分析[J]. 吉林大学学报: 工学版, 2014, 44(6): 1633-1638.
Yun Di, Liu He, Zhang Su-mei. Elastic-plastic time-history analysis of half-through CFST arch bridge[J]. Journal of Jilin University (Engineering and Technology Edition), 2014, 44(6): 1633-1638.
4 李小珍,刘鸣,杨得海,等. 大跨度上承式钢桁架拱桥的地震损伤演化模拟[J]. 西南交通大学学报, 2020, 55(6): 1207-1214, 1223.
Li Xiao-zhen, Liu Ming, Yang De-hai, et al. Seismic damage evolution simulation of long-span deck steel truss arch bridge[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2020, 55(6): 1207-1214, 1223.
5 卓卫东,颜全哲,吴梅容,等. 中承式钢管混凝土拱桥地震易损性分析[J]. 铁道学报, 2019, 41(5): 126-132.
Zhuo Wei-dong, Yan Quan-zhe, Wu Mei-rong, et al. Seismic fragility analysis of half-through concrete filled steel tubular arch bridge[J]. Journal of the China Railway Society, 2019, 41(5): 126-132.
6 Alvarez J J, Aparicio A C, Jara J M, et al. Seismic assessment of long-span arch bridge considering the variation in axial forces induced by earthquakes[J]. Engineering Structures, 2012, 34: 69-80.
7 Deng K, Yan G, Yang H,et al. RC arch bridge seismic performance evaluation by sectional N-M interaction and coupling effect of brace beams[J]. Engineering Structures, 2019, 183: 18-29.
8 梁雄,李乾坤,苏成. 某跨海大桥主桥总体方案与减隔震研究[J]. 振动与冲击, 2019, 38(9): 252-259, 284.
Liang Xiong, Li Qian-kun, Su Cheng. Study on the overall scheme and isolation of the main bridge of a sea-crossing bridge[J]. Journal of Vibration and Shock, 2019, 38(9): 252-259, 284.
9 彭益华,何旭辉,敬海泉,等. 半漂浮体系钢管混凝土拱桥黏滞阻尼器减震研究[J]. 铁道科学与工程学报, 2021, 18(6): 1504-1512.
Peng Yi-hua, He Xu-hui, Jing Hai-quan,et al. Study on seismic reduction of viscous dampers in semi-floating CFST arch bridge[J]. Journal of Railway Science and Engineering, 2021, 18(6): 1504-1512.
10 李小珍,刘桢杰,辛莉峰,等. 考虑行波效应的刚架系杆拱桥减隔震分析[J]. 铁道工程学报, 2015, 32(3): 46-51.
Li Xiao-zhen, Liu Zhen-jie, Xin Li-feng,et al. Analysis of seismic isolation for frame tied bridge under the effect of traveling wave[J]. Journal of Railway Engineering Society, 2015, 32(3): 46-51.
11 张永亮,董阳,朱尚清,等. 大跨上承式铁路钢桁拱桥减震性能研究[J]. 铁道工程学报, 2016, 33(1): 75-79.
Zhang Yong-liang, Dong Yang, Zhu Shang-qing,et al. Research on damping performance of the long-span deck type steel truss railway arch bridge[J]. Journal of Railway Engineering Society, 2016, 33(1): 75-79.
12 European Committee for Standardization. 1:2004. Eurocode 8: Design of structures for earthquake resistance-part 1: general rules, seismic actions and rules for buildings [S].
13 徐龙军,胡进军,谢礼立. 特殊长周期地震动的参数特征研究[J]. 地震工程与工程振动, 2008, 28(6): 20-27.
Xu Long-jun, Hu Jin-jun, Xie Li-li. On characteristics of ground motion parameters for special long-period ground motions[J]. Journal of Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration, 2008, 28(6): 20-27.
14 邵长江,漆启明,韦旺,等. 设置黏滞阻尼器的超高墩大跨铁路连续钢桁梁桥纵向减震性能研究[J]. 中国铁道科学, 2021, 42(6): 27-38.
Shao Chang-jiang, Qi Qi-ming, Wei Wang, et al. Study on longitudinal seismic mitigation performance of a long-span railway continuous steel truss girder bridge with ultra-high piers using fluid viscous dampers[J]. China Railway Science, 2021, 42(6): 27-38.
15 陈永祁,耿瑞琦,马良喆. 桥梁用液体粘滞阻尼器的减震设计和类型选择[J]. 土木工程学报, 2007, 40(7): 55-61.
Chen Yong-qi, Geng Rui-qi, Ma Liang-zhe. Design and selection of fluid viscous devices for shock control of bridges[J]. China Civil Engineering Journal, 2007, 40(7): 55-61.
16 Cornell C A, Jalayer F, Hamburger R O,et al. Probabilistic basis for 2000 SAC federal emergency management agency steel moment frame guidelines[J]. Journal of Structural Engineering, 2002, 128(4): 526-533.
17 Earthquake Loss Estimation Methodology Technical Manual, HAZUS 99 (1999) [C]. Developed by the federal emergency management agency Washington, D.C. through agreements with the National Institute of Building Sciences Washington, DC, 1999.
18 漆启明,邵长江,胡晨旭,等. 空心墩地震损伤评估及性能水准量化研究[J]. 土木工程学报, 2020, 53(11): 116-128.
Qi Qi-ming, Shao Chang-jiang, Hu Chen-xu, et al. Study on seismic damage assessment and performance level quantification of hollow pier[J]. China Civil Engineering Journal, 2020, 53(11): 116-128.
[1] Qiu ZHAO,Peng CHEN,Yu-wei ZHAO,Ao YU. Overall mechanical performance of jointless bridges with arch structure behind abutment [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Engineering and Technology Edition), 2024, 54(4): 1016-1027.
[2] Hong ZHANG,Zhi-wei ZHU,Tian-yu HU,Yan-feng GONG,Jian-ting ZHOU. Bridge bolt defect identification method based on improved YOLOv5s [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Engineering and Technology Edition), 2024, 54(3): 749-760.
[3] Zhi-qiang HAN,Gang XIE,Ya-juan ZHUO,Zuo-long LUO,Hua-teng LI. Vibration response of continuous girder bridge based on wheel⁃deck coherent excitation [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Engineering and Technology Edition), 2024, 54(2): 436-444.
[4] Guo-jun YANG,Ya-hui QI,Xiu-ming SHI. Review of bridge crack detection based on digital image technology [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Engineering and Technology Edition), 2024, 54(2): 313-332.
[5] Guo-jin TAN,Ji OU,Yong-ming AI,Run-chao YANG. Bridge crack image segmentation method based on improved DeepLabv3+ model [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Engineering and Technology Edition), 2024, 54(1): 173-179.
[6] Guan-xu LONG,Xiu-shi ZHANG,Gong-feng XIN,Tao WANG,Gan YANG. Bridge weigh-in-motion combined with machine version [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Engineering and Technology Edition), 2024, 54(1): 188-197.
[7] Xing WEI,Ya-jie GAO,Zhi-rui KANG,Yu-chen LIU,Jun-ming ZHAO,Lin XIAO. Numerical simulation of residual stress field of stud girth weld in low temperature environment [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Engineering and Technology Edition), 2024, 54(1): 198-208.
[8] Ran AN,You-zhi WANG. Shear properties of shear stud connectors under combined tension and shear loading [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Engineering and Technology Edition), 2023, 53(9): 2554-2562.
[9] Xin-dai ZUO,Jin-quan ZHANG,Shang-chuan ZHAO. Fatigue stiffness degradation and life prediction method of in⁃service concrete T⁃beams [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Engineering and Technology Edition), 2023, 53(9): 2563-2572.
[10] Zheng-wei GU,Pan ZHANG,Dong-ye LYU,Chun-li WU,Zhong YANG,Guo-jin TAN,Xiao-ming HUANG. Earthquake⁃induced residual displacement analysis of simply supported beam bridge based on numerical simulation [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Engineering and Technology Edition), 2023, 53(6): 1711-1718.
[11] Chun-li WU,Shi-ming HUANG,Kui LI,Zheng-wei GU,Xiao-ming HUANG,Bing-tao ZHANG,Run-chao YANG. Analysis of pier action effect under flood based on numerical simulation and statistical analysis [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Engineering and Technology Edition), 2023, 53(6): 1612-1620.
[12] Guo-jin TAN,Qing-wen KONG,Xin HE,Pan ZHANG,Run-chao YANG,Yang-jun CHAO,Zhong YANG. Bridge scour depth identification based on dynamic characteristics and improved particle swarm optimization algorithm [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Engineering and Technology Edition), 2023, 53(6): 1592-1600.
[13] Hui JIANG,Xin LI,Xiao-yu BAI. Review on development of bridge seismic structural systems： from ductility to resilience [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Engineering and Technology Edition), 2023, 53(6): 1550-1565.
[14] Feng WANG,Shuang-rui LIU,Jia-ying WANG,Jia-ling SONG,Jun WANG,Jiu-peng ZHANG,Xiao-ming HUANG. Size and shape effects of wind drag coefficients for porous structures [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Engineering and Technology Edition), 2023, 53(6): 1677-1685.
[15] Jun WANG,Jia-wu LI,Feng WANG,Jiu-peng ZHANG,Xiao-ming HUANG. Wind speed distribution in simplified U⁃shaped valley and its effect on buffeting response of long⁃span suspension bridge [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Engineering and Technology Edition), 2023, 53(6): 1658-1668.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!
Copyright © Journal of Jilin University(Engineering and Technology Edition), All Rights Reserved.
Tel: +86-431-85095297　Fax: +86-431-85094074　E-mail: xbgxb@jlu.edu.cn
Powered by Beijing Magtech Co. Ltd