江苏省成年人代谢综合征流行特征及其不同诊断标准的对比研究

doi:10.13481/j.1671-587x.20150136

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

目的: 了解江苏省成年人代谢综合征(MS)的流行特征,比较5种不同MS诊断标准应用的一致性和差异,探讨适宜成年人预测MS其他组分及危险因素聚集能力相对最好的最佳腰围或体质量指数(BMI)切点。方法: 2010年在江苏省采用多阶段整群随机抽样方法抽取18岁及以上常住居民8 400人,对调查对象进行体检和面对面问卷调查获取健康信息,分别采用2004年中华医学会糖尿病学分会(CDS)、2005年美国胆固醇教育计划成人治疗方案第三次报告(NCEP-ATP Ⅲ)、2005年国际糖尿病联盟(IDF)、2007年中国成人血脂异常防治指南制订联合委员会(JCDCG)和2009年国际联合暂定声明(JIS)标准诊断MS,描述各种标准MS的流行特征。分析不同标准对MS异常组分及危险因素聚集的检出情况,计算不同标准的符合率和Kappa值,比较MS不同诊断标准的一致性和差异。用受试者工作特征曲线(ROC)分析腰围及BMI切点预测MS各异常组分及危险因素聚集情况。结果: 调查对象中CDS、ATPⅢ、IDF、JCDCG和JIS标准诊断的MS粗患病率(标化患病率)分别为18.4%(15.1%)、37.3%(31.0%)、29.5%(24.6%)、22.8%(19.4%)和38.9%(32.7%)。各种标准诊断的MS患病率在不同性别、年龄、文化程度、职业和父母是否患病高血压及糖尿病组中的分布比较差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。采用CDS、ATPⅢ、IDF、JCDCG和JIS标准诊断为MS者中存在3种及3种以上危险因素聚集的比例分别为97.2%、96.7%、97.2%、98.7%和100.0%。ATPⅢ与JIS、ATPⅢ与IDF和IDF与JIS的符合率(Kappa值)分别为95.93%(0.91)、91.91%(0.82)和88.89%(0.76),其他诊断标准的两两符合率为78%~82%,Kappa值为0.40~0.74。腰围切点男/女为85/80 cm时,预测危险因素聚集的灵敏度、特异度和ROC曲线距离分别为88.29%、74.54%、0.28和85.97%、70.07%、0.33。结论: 江苏省成年人MS患病率水平较高。CDS、ATPⅢ、IDF、JCDCG和JIS诊断标准在江苏省成年人群的适用性存在较大差异,ATPⅢ与JIS标准的一致性最好。适宜江苏省成年人群的最佳腰围切点男/女为85/80 cm。

关键词: 代谢综合征, 诊断标准, 患病率, 一致性, 监测

Abstract:

Objective To investigate the epidemiological characteristics of metabolic syndrome(MS)in adults of Jiangsu Province and compare the consistency and difference of the five diagnostic criteria for MS, and to explore the optimum cut-off points of waist circumference or body mass index(BMI)for forecasting other components and risk factors aggregation of MS in adults of Jiangsu Province. Methods A total of 8 400 residents aged 18 and older from Jiangsu Province were selected by multistage cluster randomly sampling method in 2010.Medical examination and face to face questionnaire survey were conducted to collect the health information for respondents.The prevalence and epidemiological characteristics of MS were calculated and described, diagnosed according to five diagnostic criteria, issued by the Chinese Medical Association Diabetes Branch(CDS)in 2004, Adult Treatment Panel Ⅲ of National Cholesterol Education Program(NCEP-ATP Ⅲ)in 2005, International Diabetes Federation(IDF)in 2005, Joint committee for Developing Chinese Guidelines on Prevention and Treatment of Dyslipidemia in Adults(JCDDCG)in 2007 and International Joint Interim Statement(JIS)in 2009, respectively.The distribution of MS components and risk factors aggregation were analyzed, and the agreement rate and Kappa values of different diagnostic criteria were calculated to compare the consistency and difference of the five diagnostic criteria.Receiver operating characteristic(ROC)curve was conducted to forecast other components and risk factors aggregation of MS with cut-off points of waist circumference or BMI. Results The crude prevalence(standardized prevalence rate)of MS in the respondents was respectively 18.4%(15.1%)for CDS criterion, 37.3%(31.0%) for ATPⅢ criterion, 29.5%(24.6%)for IDF criterion, 22.8%(19.4%)for JCDCG criterion and 38.9%(32.7%)for JIS criterion.There were statistically significant differences of the distribution of the prevalence of MS diagnosed by different criteria between different sex, age, education level, occupation, parents in hypertension and diabetes group(P<0.05).The proportions of at least three risk factors among the subjects with MS diagnosed by CDS, ATPⅢ, IDF, JCDCG and JIS criteria were respectively 97.2%, 96.7%, 97.2%, 98.7% and 100%. The agreement rates(Kappa value) were respectively 95.93%(0.91), 91.91%(0.82)and 88.89%(0.76) between ATP Ⅲ and JIS, ATP Ⅲ and IDF, IDF and JIS.The agreement rate and Kappa value of other pairs were among 78%-82% and 0.40-0.74, respectively.The sensitivity, specificity and shortest distance of receiver operating characteristic(ROC)curve for forecasting risk factors aggregation of MS were respectively 88.29%, 74.54%, 0.28 in male and 85.97%, 70.07%, 0.33 in female when waist circumference was 85 cm in male and 80 cm in female. Conclusion The prevalence of MS is higher in the adults of Jiangsu Province.Among the five diagnostic criteria for MS, there is bigger difference in applicability for the adults of Jiangsu and a best consistency between the ATPⅢ and JIS.The optimum cut-off points of waist circumference for the adults in Jiangsu Province are respectively 85 cm for male and 80 cm for female.

Key words: metabolic syndrome, diagnostic criteria, prevalence rate, consistency, surveillance

中图分类号:

R181.38

陶然, 武鸣, 覃玉, 苏健, 张永青, 吕淑荣, 潘晓群, 杨婕, 周金意. 江苏省成年人代谢综合征流行特征及其不同诊断标准的对比研究[J]. 吉林大学学报(医学版), 2015, 41(01): 181-189.

TAO Ran, WU Ming, QIN Yu, SU Jian, ZHANG Yongqing, LYU Shurong, PAN Xiaoqun, YANG Jie, ZHOU Jinyi. Epidemiological characteristics of metabolic syndrome and comparison between its different diagnostic criteria in adults of Jiangsu Province[J]. Journal of Jilin University Medicine Edition, 2015, 41(01): 181-189.

参考文献

[1] 贾伟平.中国人代谢综合征的现状及临床特征 [J].中华内分泌代谢杂志,2006,22(3): 6-8.

[2] Ma X,Zhu S.Metabolic syndrome in the prevention of cardiovascular diseases and diabetes-still a matter of debate? [J].Eur J Clin Nutr,2013,67(5): 518-521.

[3] 单忠艳.代谢综合征患病因素的思考 [J].中华糖尿病杂志,2013,5(12): 716-718.

[4] 中华医学会糖尿病学分会代谢综合征研究协作组,中华医学会糖尿病学分会关于代谢综合征的建议.[J] 中华糖尿病杂志,2004,12(3): 156-160.

[5] Grundy SM,Cleeman JI,Daniels SR,et al.Diagnosis and management of the metabolic syndrome.An American Heart Association/National Heart,Lung,and Blood Institute Scientific Statement [J].Circulation,2005,112(17): 2735-2752.

[6] Alberti KG,Zimmet P,Shaw J.IDF Epidemiology Task Force Consensus Group.The metabolic syndrome: a new worldwide definition [J].Lancet,2005,366(9491): 1059-1062.

[7] 中国成人血脂异常防治指南制订联合委员会.中国成人血脂异常防治指南 [J].中华心血管杂志,2007,35(5): 390-419.

[8] Alberti KG,Eckel RH,Grundy SM,et al.Harmonizing the metabolic syndrome: a joint interim statement of the International Diabetes Federation Task Force on Epidemiology and Prevention;National Heart,Lung,and Blood Institute;American Heart Association;World Heart Federation;International Atherosclerosis Society;and International Association for the Study of Obesity [J].Circulation,2009,120(16): 1640-1645.

[9] 周慧,胡晓抒,郭志荣,等.三种代谢综合征诊断标准在江苏人群中的适用性研究 [J].中华预防医学杂志,2009,343(2): 117-121.

[10] 李莹,李淑环,高孟,等.三种诊断标准下的代谢综合症的适用性比较 [J].中华疾病控制杂志,2012,16(5): 392-395.

[11] 胡浙芳,章荣华,黄李春,等.四种代谢综合征诊断标准在浙江省城市人群中应用情况的比较 [J].中华预防医学杂志,2014,48(6): 507-511.

[12] 刘晶,陈宝鑫,王红梅,等.三种代谢综合征诊断标准在4206例脑卒中高危患者中的比较研究 [J].中华内分泌代谢杂志,2014,30(3): 192-196.

[13] 宋秀玲,莫景富,许燕君,等.广东省成人代谢综合征流行特征及其不同诊断标准的对比研究 [J].中华糖尿病杂志,2013,5(12): 728-733.

[14] World Health Organization.The WHO STEPwise approach to chronic disease risk factor surveillance [R].Geneva,2006: 10.

[15] 江苏省疾病预防控制中心.江苏省慢性病及其危险因素监测报告(2010)[M].南京:南京师范大学出版社,2013: 155-192.

[16] Alberti KG,Zimmet PZ.Definition,diagnosis and classification of diabetes mellitus and its complications.Part 1: diagnosis andclassification of diabetes mellitus provisional report of a WHO consultation [J].Diabet Med,1998,15(7): 539-553.

[17] 李岩,赵冬,王薇,等.中国11省市35~64岁人群应用不同代谢综合征诊断标准的比较 [J].中华流行病学杂志,2007,28(1): 83-86.

[18] 胡晓抒,郭志荣,周慧,等.江苏省35~64岁人群代谢综合征的流行病学调查 [J].中华流行病学杂志,2006,27(9): 751-756.

[19] 吴南楠,李强,陈凯庭,等.黑龙省20~74岁居民代谢综合征流行病学调查 [J].中华内分泌杂志,2010,26(9): 758-761.

[20] 时颖,张普洪,焦淑芳,等.北京市成人代谢综合征流行水平及其危险因素 [J].中华预防医学杂志,2009,43(1): 82-84.

[21] Kashihara H,Lee JS,Kawakubo K,et al.Criteria of waist circumference according to computed tomography- measured visceral fat area and the clustering of cardiovascular risk factors [J].Circ J,2009,73(10): 1881-1886.

[22] 周北凡,武阳丰,李莹,等.中国成人代谢综合征腰围切点研究 [J].中华心血管杂志,2005,33(1): 81-85.