肌电触发生物反馈治疗脑梗死患者早期偏瘫的临床疗效评价

doi:10.13481/j.1671-587x.20150130

吉林大学学报(医学版) ›› 2015, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (01): 156-159.doi: 10.13481/j.1671-587x.20150130

肌电触发生物反馈治疗脑梗死患者早期偏瘫的临床疗效评价

熊英琼^1,2,3, 潘婕^2,3, 吴晓牧^2,3, 程绍民⁴

1. 南昌大学医学院, 江西南昌 330006;
2. 江西省人民医院神经内科, 江西南昌 330006;
3. 江西省神经病学研究所, 江西南昌 330006;
4. 江西中医药大学基础医学院中医诊断学教研室, 江西南昌 330004

收稿日期:2014-03-18 发布日期:2015-01-30
通讯作者: 程绍民,副教授,硕士研究生导师(Tel:0791-87118925,E-mail:csm21cn@163.com) E-mail:csm21cn@163.com
作者简介:熊英琼(1976-),女,江西省南昌市人,副主任医师,在读医学博士,主要从事神经病学与中西医结合的基础和临床研究。
基金资助:
江西省科技厅科技支撑计划项目资助课题(20111BBG70017-6);江西省卫生厅科技计划项目资助课题(20113007)

Evaluation on clinical curative effect of myoelectricity triggering biofeedback in treatment of early hemiplegia of cerebral infarction patients

XIONG Yingqiong^1,2,3, PAN Jie^2,3, WU Xiaomu^2,3, CHENG Shaomin⁴

1. Department of Medical College, Nanchang University, Nanchang 330006, China;
2. Department of Neurology, People's Hospital, Jiangxi Province, Nanchang 330006, China;
3. Jiangxi Institute of Neurology, Nanchang 330006, China;
4. Department of Chinese Medical Dignostics, Basic Medical College, Jiangxi University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Nanchang 330004, China

Received:2014-03-18 Published:2015-01-30

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

目的: 探讨肌电触发生物反馈治疗对脑梗死早期偏瘫患者肢体康复的影响,并对其临床疗效进行评价。方法: 653例确诊为急性脑梗死患者按治疗意愿分为对照组(n=257)和治疗组(n=396)。2组患者均同时接受常规药物治疗,其中治疗组又分为神经肌肉电刺激(NMES)治疗(n=275)及肌电触发电刺激反馈(MTB)治疗(n=121)2个亚组,于病情稳定48 h后进行瘫痪肢体生物反馈治疗。所有病例分别于治疗前、治疗后7d及治疗结束后,采用美国国立卫生院卒中量表(NIHSS)和简氏Fugl-Meyer评定量表(FMA)评价患者神经功能缺损程度以及患肢运动功能,采用Barthel指数(BI)评价患者日常生活能力(ADL)。结果: 对照组与治疗组患者治疗前NIHSS、FMA和ADL评分比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。与治疗前比较,治疗组中2亚组患者治疗后各项评分均明显提高(P<0.01);与NMES组比较,MTB组患者各项评分均有提高(P<0.05)。结论: 对急性期脑梗死患者的瘫痪肢体进行早期生物反馈训练康复治疗能促进偏瘫肢体的功能恢复,显著改善患者日常生活能力,其中MTB疗法疗效优于NMES疗法。

关键词: 急性脑梗死, 肌电触发生物反馈, 康复治疗

Abstract:

Objective To observe the effect of myoelectricity triggering biofeedback on the rehabilitation of cerebral infarction patient's early hemiplegia, and to evaluate its clinical curative effcet. Methods 653 patients with acute cerebral infarction were divided into control group(n=257) and therapeutic group(n=396) according to the will of the patients.The patients in two groups accepted conventional therapy at the same time, and the patients in therapeutic group were divided into two subgroups: neural muscle electrical stimulus(NMES)(n=275) and myoelectricity triggering biofeedback(MTB) subgroups(n=121).The neurologic impairment degree and motor function of the patients in two groups were evaluated with NIHSS and FMA 7 d before treatment, 7 d after treatment, and at the end of treatment.At the same time, the activities of daily living(ADL) of the patients were evaluated with BI. Results There were no significant differences in the scores of NIHSS, FMA and ADL of the patients before treatment between two groups(P>0.05).Compared with before treatment, the scores of the patients in therapeutic group were significantly improved(P<0.01).Compared with NMES group, the scores of the patients in MTB group were significantly improved(P<0.05). Conclusion Rehabilitative care of cerebral infarction patient's early hemiplegia with MTB can promote the function of the hemiplegia limbs to resume, and improve patient's activity of daily living.The curative effect of MTB is superior to the NMES.

Key words: acute cerebral infarction, myoelectricity triggering biofeedback, rehabilitation care

中图分类号:

R743.3

熊英琼, 潘婕, 吴晓牧, 程绍民. 肌电触发生物反馈治疗脑梗死患者早期偏瘫的临床疗效评价[J]. 吉林大学学报(医学版), 2015, 41(01): 156-159.

XIONG Yingqiong, PAN Jie, WU Xiaomu, CHENG Shaomin. Evaluation on clinical curative effect of myoelectricity triggering biofeedback in treatment of early hemiplegia of cerebral infarction patients[J]. Journal of Jilin University Medicine Edition, 2015, 41(01): 156-159.

参考文献

[1] 赵英玲,商晓英.早期康复对脑卒中患者日常生活活动能力的影响[J].中国康复理论与实践,2007,13(8):777.

[2] Bolton DA,Cauraugh JH,Hausenblas HA.Electromyogram triggered neuromuscular stimulation and stroke motor recovery of arm/hand functions: a meta-analysis[J].J Neurol Sci,2004,223(2):121-127.

[3] Fields RW.Electromyographically triggered electric muscle stimulation for chronic hemiplegia[J].Arch Phys Med Rehabil,1987,68(7):407-414.

[4] 中华神经科学会.脑血管疾病分类(1995)[J].中华神经科杂志,1996,29(6):376-377.

[5] 刘罡,吴毅,吴军发.脑卒中后大脑可塑性的研究进展[J].中国康复医学杂志,2008,23(1):87-90.

[6] 张通.中国脑卒中康复治疗指南(2011完全版)[J].中国康复理论与实践,2012,18(4):301-318.

[7] 燕铁斌,许云影,李常威.功能性电刺激改善急性脑卒中患者肢体功能的随机对照研究[J].中华医学杂志,2006,86(37):2627-2631.

[8] 侯勇伦,丛芳,桑德春,等.肌电触发神经肌肉刺激对偏瘫患者腕指背伸功能的影响[J].中国康复理论与实践,2010,16(6):568-570.

[9] 江征,蔡素芳,王辉,等.肌电触发电刺激疗法对脑卒中患者手功能的影响[J].中国康复理论与实践,2013,19(1):60-62.

[10] 胡可慧,李阳安,熊高华,等.康复训练联合肌电生物反馈治疗对脑卒中偏瘫患者运动功能的影响[J].中国康复,2013,28(1):37-38.

[11] 李海,许琼瑜,焦睿,等.肌电生物反馈疗法结合综合康复训练对脑卒中恢复期患者下肢运动功能的影响[J].临床医学工程,2012,19(4):532-534.

[12] 王亚辉,郝淑芹,常丽静.肌电生物反馈联合康复训练治疗脑卒中的疗效观察[J].中华物理医学与康复杂志,2013,35(6):471-473.

[13] 崔立军,胡永善.我国脑卒中社区康复治疗模式研究现状[J].中国康复医学杂志,2010,25(2):185-189.

肌电触发生物反馈治疗脑梗死患者早期偏瘫的临床疗效评价

Evaluation on clinical curative effect of myoelectricity triggering biofeedback in treatment of early hemiplegia of cerebral infarction patients

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

赞

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 3

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 0

[1]	张雪晶, 曲福玲, 段晓琴, 刘颜芬, 刘忠良. 复杂性区域疼痛综合征治疗的研究进展[J]. 吉林大学学报(医学版), 2018, 44(05): 1090-1095.
[2]	朱云波, 李佳佳, 马征, 赵亮. 阿替普酶对急性脑梗死大鼠血管内皮细胞中Claudin-1和Claudin-5蛋白表达的影响[J]. 吉林大学学报(医学版), 2017, 43(06): 1137-1141.
[3]	耿玉荣, 柳英杰, 张慧丽, 王宏. 甲状腺功能亢进并发急性脑梗死患者临床特点及其静脉溶栓治疗的预后和安全性评价[J]. 吉林大学学报(医学版), 2017, 43(02): 369-374.