J4 ›› 2011, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (4): 746-749.

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Comparison of diagnosis value between 18F-FDG PET/CT and MRI in breast cancer

ZHAO Ji-hong1,DING Jun2,XU Song-bai3|WANG Xian-rong2,FU Wei-guang2   

  1. 1. Department of Radiology,Tumor Hospital,Jilin Province,Changchun 130012,China|2. Department of Radiology,China-Japan Union Hospital,Jilin University,Changchun 130033,China;3. Department of Neurosurgery,First Hospital,Jilin University,Changchun 130021,China
  • Received:2011-04-06 Online:2011-07-28 Published:2011-07-28

Abstract:

Abstract:Objective  To compare the effects between 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose(18F-FDG)PET-CT and MRI  in diagnosis of breast cancer.Methods 29 patients with suspicious masses in breast were selected,18F-FDG PET/CT and MRI scanning were performed and their pathological results were gotten within 10 d.The sensitivities,specificities and accuracies of PET/CT and MRI in detecting breast cancer were calculated by using surgery or biopsy results as diagnostic golden standard.Results 20 malignant and 9 benign breast lesions of the 29 patients were proven histologically after surgery or biopsy.The sensitivity,specificity and accuracy value obtained by MRI were 85.0%,66.7% and 79.3% respectively,and they  were 90.0%,88.9% and 89.6% for PET/CT.The accuracy of PET/CT was a little higher than that of MRI,but there was no significant difference between them (χ2=1.17,P>0.05). PET/CT found 3 patients with left infraclavicular lymph node metastasis and bone metastasis. Conclusion There is no significant difference between PET/CT and MRI in detecting breast cancer. But PET/CT is superior to MRI in evaluating distant metastasis and accurate staging to guide therapy.

Key words: breast neoplasms;positron emission computed tomography;magnetic resonance imaging

CLC Number: 

  • R737.9