基于多元回归分析的铬污染地下水风险评价方法

doi:10.13278/j.cnki.jjuese.201606206

吉林大学学报(地球科学版) ›› 2016, Vol. 46 ›› Issue (6): 1823-1829.doi: 10.13278/j.cnki.jjuese.201606206

基于多元回归分析的铬污染地下水风险评价方法

刘海龙¹, 马小龙², 袁欣¹, 穆环玲¹, 冷冰原¹, 洪梅¹

1. 吉林大学地下水资源与环境教育部重点实验室, 长春 130021;
2. 吉林省水文地质调查所, 长春 130103

收稿日期:2016-03-01 出版日期:2016-11-26 发布日期:2016-11-26
通讯作者: 洪梅(1972),女,教授,博士,主要从事污染场地控制与修复方面的研究,E-mail:hongmei@jlu.edu.cn E-mail:hongmei@jlu.edu.cn
作者简介:刘海龙(1989),男,硕士,主要从事污染场地控制与修复方面的研究,E-mail:568043143@qq.com
基金资助:
国家水体污染控制与治理科技重大专项课题（2012ZX07207-007）；中国地质调查局项目（1212011220987）

Risk Assessment Method of Chromium(Ⅵ) Polluting Groundwater Based on Multiple Regression Analysis

Liu Hailong¹, Ma Xiaolong², Yuan Xin¹, Mu Huanling¹, Leng Bingyuan¹, Hong Mei¹

1. Key Lab of Groundwater Resources and Environment of Ministry of Education, Jilin University, Changchun, 130021, China;
2. Hydrogeologic Survey of Jilin Province, Changchun 130103, China

Received:2016-03-01 Online:2016-11-26 Published:2016-11-26
Supported by:
Supported by Major Science and Technology Program for Water Pollution Control and Treatment (2012ZX07207-007) and Geological Survey Projects of China Geological Survey (1212011220987)

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 土-水分配系数（K_d）是表征重金属污染物在土壤包气带中迁移能力的重要参数，受污染物质量浓度、pH值、有机质质量分数、铁铝氧化物质量分数等多种因素影响。本文通过实验研究了分配系数与各种影响因素之间的关系，基于多元回归分析方法得到了分配系数与影响因素的关系方程；并以分配系数、泄漏量、土壤孔隙度、初始含水率为风险因子建立了地下水污染风险评价方法。以某工厂铬废液的泄露为案例，采用构建的方法进行地下水污染风险评价。结果表明：该处地下水被污染的风险等级为中等。地下水污染风险评价方法的建立为重金属污染地下水的监测管理提供了一种有效方法。

关键词: 多元回归分析, 六价铬, 分配系数, 地下水, 风险评价

Abstract: Soil-water distribution coefficient (K_d) is an important parameter to characterize the migration of heavy metal pollutants in the vadose zone,K_dof Cr(Ⅵ) is influenced by the concentration of pollutants, pH value, organic matter content, iron oxide content, aluminum oxide content and other factors.The relationship between K_d and influence factors was investigated by experiment.Based on the multiple regression analysis method,relation equation between the distribution coefficient and various factors was obtained, and the risk assessment method of groundwater pollution was established with the distribution coefficient, leakage, soil porosity, initial water content as risk factors. With the case of chromium waste liquid leakage, pollution risk assessment of groundwater was carried out based on established method. The results show that the risk level of groundwater contamination is moderate. The establishment of groundwater pollution risk assessment method provides a method for management of contaminated groundwater by heavy metal.

Key words: multiple regression analysis, Cr(Ⅵ), distribution coefficient, groundwater, risk assessment

中图分类号:

X523

刘海龙, 马小龙, 袁欣, 穆环玲, 冷冰原, 洪梅. 基于多元回归分析的铬污染地下水风险评价方法[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2016, 46(6): 1823-1829.

Liu Hailong, Ma Xiaolong, Yuan Xin, Mu Huanling, Leng Bingyuan, Hong Mei. Risk Assessment Method of Chromium(Ⅵ) Polluting Groundwater Based on Multiple Regression Analysis[J]. Journal of Jilin University(Earth Science Edition), 2016, 46(6): 1823-1829.

参考文献

[1] 黄顺红. 铬渣堆场铬污染特征及其铬污染土壤微生物修复研究[D]. 长沙: 中南大学, 2009. Huang Shunhong. Characteristics of Chromium Pollution at Chromium-Containing Slag Site and Chromium (Ⅵ) Bioremediation in the Contaminated Soil[D]. Changsha: Central South University,2009.
[2] 李晶晶, 彭恩泽. 综述铬在土壤和植物中的赋存形式及迁移规律[J]. 工业安全与环保, 2005, 31(3): 31-33. Li Jingjing, Peng Enze. Summarization on the Existing Form and Transferring Rules of Chromium in Soil[J]. Industrial Safety and Environmental Protection, 2005, 31(3): 31-33.
[3] 李喜林, 王来贵, 赵奎,等. 铬渣浸溶Cr(Ⅵ)溶解释放规律研究:以锦州堆场铬渣为例[J]. 地球与环境, 2013, 41(5):518-523. Li Xilin, Wang Laigui, Zhao Kui, et al.Research on Cr(Ⅵ) Releasing Mechanism by Chromium Slag Dissolution as Exemplified by the Chromium Slag of Jinzhou Yard[J]. Earth and Environment, 2013, 41(5):518-523.
[4] 张伟红. 地下水污染预警研究[D]. 长春:吉林大学, 2007. Zhang Weihong. Study on the Early Warning of Groundwater Pollution[D]. Changchun: Jilin University, 2007.
[5] Butt T E, Oduyemi K O K. A Holistic Approach to Concentration Assessment of Hazards in the Risk Assessment of Landfill Leachate[J]. Environment International, 2003, 28(7): 597-608.
[6] Nixon W B, Murphy R J, Stessel R I. An Empirical Approach to the Performance Assessment of Solid Waste Landfills[J]. Waste Management &Research, 1997, 15(6): 607-626.
[7] Rahman A. A GIS Based DRASTIC Model for Asse-ssing Groundwater Vulnerability in Shallow Aquifer in Aligarh, India[J]. Applied Geography,2008, 28(1): 32-53.
[8] Al-Adamat R A N, Foster I D L, Baban S M J. Groundwater Vulnerability and Risk Mapping for the Basaltic Aquifer of the Azraq Basin of Jordan Using GIS, Remote Sensing and DRASTIC[J]. Applied Geography, 2003, 23(4): 303-324.
[9] 梁婕, 谢更新, 曾光明, 等. 基于随机-模糊模型的地下水污染风险评价[J]. 湖南大学学报(自然科学版), 2009, 36(6): 54-58. Liang Jie, Xie Gengxin, Zeng Guangming, et al. An Integrated Stochastic-Fuzzy Modeling Approach for the Risk Assessment of Groundwater Pollution[J]. Journal of Hunan University(Natural Sciences), 2009, 36(6): 54-58.
[10] Connell L D, Van den Daele G. A Quantitative App-roach to Aquifer Vulnerability Mapping[J]. Journal of Hydrology, 2003, 276(1): 71-88.
[11] Babiker I S, Mohamed M A A, Hiyama T, et al. A GIS-Based DRASTIC Model for Assessing Aquifer Vulnerability in Kakamigahara Heights, Gifu Prefecture, Central Japan[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2005, 345(1): 127-140.
[12] 周长松, 邹胜章, 李录娟, 等. 岩溶区典型石灰土Cd形态指示意义及风险评价:以桂林毛村为例[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2016, 46(2): 552-562. Zhou Changsong, Zou Shengzhang, Li Lujuan, et al. Implications of Cadmium Forms and Risk Assessment of Calcareous Soil in Karst Area: A Case Study of Maocun in Guilin, China[J]. Journal of Jilin University (Earth Science Edition), 2016, 46(2): 552-562.
[13] Hellerich L A, Nikolaidis N P. Studies of Hexavalent Chromium Attenuation in Redox Variable Soils Obtained from a Sandy to Sub-Wetland Groundwater Environment[J]. Water Research, 2005, 39(13): 2851-2868.
[14] Wittbrodt P R, Palmer C D. Reduction of Cr (Ⅵ) in the Presence of Excess Soil Fulvic Acid[J]. Environmental Science &Technology, 1995, 29(1): 255-263.
[15] Banks M K, Schwab A P, Henderson C. Leaching and Reduction of Chromium in Soil as Affected by Soil Organic Content and Plants[J]. Chemosphere, 2006, 62(2): 255-264.
[16] Bartlett R J. Chromium Cycling in Soils and Water: Links, Gaps, and Methods[J]. Environmental Health Perspectives, 1991, 92: 17.
[17] 宣昊, 滕彦国, 倪师军, 等. 基于地球化学基线的土壤重金属污染潜在生态风险评价[J]. 矿物岩石, 2005, 25(4): 69-72. Xuan Hao, Teng Yanguo, Ni Shijun, et al. Potential Ecological Risk Assessment on Heavy Metal in the Soil of Dexing Area Based on Geochemical Baseline[J]. Journal of Mineralogy and Petrology, 2005, 25(4): 69-72.
[18] 李卓, 吴普特, 冯浩,等. 黏粒质量分数对土壤水分蓄持能力影响的模拟试验[J]. 中国水土保持科学, 2009, 7(5):94-99. Li Zhuo, Wu Pute, Feng Hao, et al. Effects of Soil Clay Content on Soil Water-Holding Capacity by Simulated Experiments[J]. Science of Soil and Water Conservation, 2009, 7(5):94-99.

相关文章 15

[1]	杜新强, 尹呈杉, 方永军, 李孜涵, 郭辉. 基于地下水生态水位埋深阈值的可开采量评价——以三江平原普阳灌区为例[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2026, 56(2): 635-646.
[2]	束龙仓, 位书静, 澈丽木格, 温中琦, 刘波. 西辽河平原生态输水的地下水响应及不确定性量化[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2026, 56(2): 647-660.
[3]	杨婷, 李亚鑫, 刘娜, 林晓君, 曾经文, 王秀娟, 蔡倩怡, 罗子峰, 张苑铃, 容精男, 余伟达, 丘锦荣, 周建利. 沸石作为PRB填充介质修复NH4+污染地下水的效果及原位再生性能[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2026, 56(2): 661-672.
[4]	秦传玉, 尤凯鸿, 李小奇, 张成武, 于丽娟. 地下水常见阴离子影响双重改性纳米零价铁降解硝基苯的机制及效果[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2026, 56(1): 342-351.
[5]	张文静, 涂志鹏, 贾媛媛. 矿区重金属的释放迁移与污染预测研究进展[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2025, 55(6): 2001-2027.
[6]	闫纲丽, 冯屾, 刘睿男, 黄冠星. 地下水背景值评估研究进展[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2025, 55(5): 1655-1670.
[7]	王双, 朱奋, 李亮, 李林坚, 刘娜. 湛江市硇洲岛浅层地下水水化学特征及成因机制[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2025, 55(5): 1680-1690.
[8]	黄树春, 李洪涛, 邓波, 王丹, 张高华. 湖南湘潭河西地区近20年岩溶水化学时空演变及其影响因素 [J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2025, 55(4): 1269-1287.
[9]	王锦博, 贺志毅, 王亚楠, 程诗雨, 刘明柱. 某污染场地土壤与地下水协同修复阈值[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2025, 55(4): 1288-1297.
[10]	王福刚, 管小桐, 何庆成, 程辉, 杨国华, 程中乐, 王耀辉. 考虑边界层流体黏度变化的黏性土低速非达西渗流数学模型[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2025, 55(3): 893-905.
[11]	胡启智, 王秀娟, 丘锦荣, 康迪, 曾经文, 蔡倩怡, 刘人涛, 刘娜. 潮汕地区地下水饮用水源地酸性浅层地下水特征及其成因探讨[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2025, 55(3): 906-918.
[12]	刘波, 李诗浓, 李伟, 王文鹏, 鲁程鹏, 束龙仓. 基于栅格信息量法的区域地面沉降风险评价：以河北省沧州市为例[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2025, 55(3): 919-929.
[13]	张晟瑀, 申文超, 苏小四. 基于随机森林法的区域地下水硝酸盐污染风险评价[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2025, 55(3): 943-956.
[14]	魏四平, 李兵, 赵玉岩, 魏俏巧, 吴景华. L-半胱氨酸提取农田土壤中生物有效态砷 [J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2025, 55(2): 601-611.
[15]	段磊, 曾经文, 赵显林, 丘锦荣, 刘娜, 陶钧实, 周建利. 珠江三角洲典型水产养殖区浅层地下水碘化物分布、来源及健康风险评估[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2024, 54(5): 1657-1674.

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed

基于多元回归分析的铬污染地下水风险评价方法

Risk Assessment Method of Chromium(Ⅵ) Polluting Groundwater Based on Multiple Regression Analysis

PDF (PC)

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 10